Burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening programme: Randomised controlled trial

Gut

Volumn 61, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1552-1559

  De Wijkerslooth, Thomas R ^a   De Haan, Margriet C ^a   Stoop, Esther M ^b   Bossuyt, Patrick M ^a   Thomeer, Maarten ^b   Essink Bot, Marie Louise ^a   Van Leerdam, Monique E ^b   Fockens, Paul ^a   Kuipers, Ernst J ^b   Stoker, Jaap ^a   Dekker, Evelien ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCAGON; MEGLUMINE IOXITALAMATE PLUS SODIUM IOXITALAMATE; MOVIPREP; SCOPOLAMINE BUTYL BROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLON LAVAGE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DEFECATION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

AGED; ANXIETY; CATHARTICS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; THERAPEUTIC IRRIGATION;

EID: 84866937863     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301308     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol 2007;18:581-92. (Pubitemid 46359643)
2. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977-81. (Pubitemid 24015040)
3. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 375:1624-33.
4. Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E, et al. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:1541-9. (Pubitemid 351813919)
5. de Haan MC, van Gelder RE, Graser A, et al. Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1747-63.
6. von Wagner C, Halligan S, Atkin WS, et al. Choosing between CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnostic context: a qualitative study of influences on patient preferences. Health Expect 2009;12:18-26.
7. Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, et al . Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:578-85. (Pubitemid 36348528)
8. Jensch S, Bipat S, Peringa J, et al. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation. Eur Radiol 2010;20:146-56.
9. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 2003;227:378-84. (Pubitemid 36514750)
10. de Wijkerslooth TR, de Haan MC, Stoop EM, et al. Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2010;10:47.
11. TENALEA ID Project. ALEA Randomisation Software (Version 2.2) [Computer Software]. Amsterdam: Netherlands Cancer Institute, 2006. http://tenalea.net
12. Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek. 2011. http://www.cbs.nl
13. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:873-85.
14. Nagengast FM, Kaandorp CJ. [Revised CBO guideline 'follow-up after polypectomy']. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001;145:2022-5.
15. Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Gouw CI, et al. CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy in two iodine-based preparation schemes. Eur Radiol 2010;20:367-76.
16. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2004;127:1300-11. (Pubitemid 39457756)
17. Burling D. CT colonography standards. Clin Radiol 2010;65:474-80.
18. Denters MJ, Deutekom M, Fockens P, et al. Implementation of population screening for colorectal cancer by repeated fecal occult blood test in the Netherlands. BMC Gastroenterol 2009;9:28.
19. van Gelder RE, Birnie E, Florie J, et al. CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study. Radiology 2004;233:328-37. (Pubitemid 39423788)
20. Deutekom M, Terra MP, Dijkgraaf MG, et al. Patients' perception of tests in the assessment of faecal incontinence. Br J Radiol 2006;79:94-100. (Pubitemid 43337850)
21. Hol L, de Jonge V, van Leerdam ME, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: comparison of perceived test burden of guaiac-based faecal occult blood test, faecal immunochemical test and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:2059-66.
22. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 1932;140:1-55.
23. Ko HH, Zhang H, Telford JJ, et al. Factors influencing patient satisfaction when undergoing endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69:883-91; quiz 891. e1.
24. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003;41:582-92.
25. Multicentre Australian Colorectal-neoplasia Screening (MACS) Group. A comparison of colorectal neoplasia screening tests: a multicentre community-based study of the impact of consumer choice. Med J Aust 2006;184:546-50.
26. Jung HS, Park DK, Kim MJ, et al. A comparison of patient acceptance and preferences between CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Korean J Intern Med 2009;24:43-7.
27. Renaut AJ, Raniga S, Frizelle FA, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and acceptability of phospo-soda buffered saline (Fleet) with sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate (Picoprep) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Colorectal Dis 2008;10:503-5. (Pubitemid 351682179)
28. Buccicardi D, Grosso M, Caviglia I, et al. CT colonography: patient tolerance of laxative free fecal tagging regimen versus traditional cathartic cleansing. Abdom Imaging 2010;36:532-7.
29. Bretthauer M, Thiis-Evensen E, Huppertz-Hauss G, et al. NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy. Gut 2002;50:604-7. (Pubitemid 34407484)
30. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1570-95. (Pubitemid 351615355)