Expectancy-value and cognitive process outcomes in mathematics learning: a structural equation analysis

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 325-340

  Phan, Huy P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

academic achievement; deep learning; reflective thinking; self efficacy; student learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896549475     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2013.832161     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
3. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
4. Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
5. Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
6. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y.P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(3), 133-149. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433
7. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
8. Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
9. Britner, S.L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485-499. doi: 10.1002/tea.20131
10. Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. DeBacker, T.K., & Nelson, R.M. (1999). Variations on an expectancy-value model of motivation in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 71-94. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1998.0984
12. Dewey, J. (1909/1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: DC Health.
13. Diseth, Å. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 191-195. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.003
14. Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck's model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 43-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007
15. Eccles, J.S., Adler, T.F., Futterman, R., Goff, S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece, J.L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J.T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freemen.
16. Entwistle, N.J. (1990). Student learning and classroom environment. In N. Jones & N. Frederickson (Eds.), Refocusing educational psychology (pp. 8-30). New York: Falmer.
17. Fenollar, P., Román, S., & Cuestas, P.J. (2007). University students' academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(Pt 4), 873-891. doi: 10.1348/000709907X189118
18. Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059
19. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
20. Greene, B.A., & Miller, R.B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 181-192. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0015
21. Grushka, K., McLeod, J.H., & Reynolds, R. (2005). Reflecting upon reflection: Theory and practice in one Australian university teacher education program. Reflective Practice, 6(2), 239-246. doi: 10.1080/14623940500106187
22. Harackiewicz, J.M., Barron, K.E., Carter, S.M., Letho, A.T., & Elliot, A.J. (1997). Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classrooms: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1284-1295. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1284
23. Justicia, F., Carmen Pichardo, M., Cano, F., Berbén, A.B.G., & de la Fuente, J. (2008). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F): Exploratory and confirmator factor analyses. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 41(3), 355-372. doi: 10.1007/BF03173004
24. Kember, D., Leung, D., Jones, A., Loke, A.Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., et al. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381-389. doi: 10.1080/713611442
25. Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
26. Lent, R.W., Lopez, F.G., & Bieschke, K.J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(4), 424-430. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.38.4.424
27. Lent, R.W., Lopez, F.G., Brown, S.D., & Gore, P.A. (1996). Latent structure of the sources of mathematics self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 292-308. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1996.0045
28. Leung, D.Y.P., & Kember, D. (2003). The relationship between approaches to learning and reflection upon practice. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 61-71. doi: 10.1080/01443410303221
29. Liem, A.D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 486-512. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
30. Loehlin, J.C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path and structural equation analysis (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Lopez, F.G., & Lent, R. (1992). Sources of mathematics self-efficacy in high school students. Career Development Quarterly, 41(1), 3-12. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.1992.tb00350.x
32. Marsh, H.W., & Yeung, A.S. (1997). Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 41-54. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.41
33. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I - Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4-11. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
34. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578. doi: 10.3102/00346543066004543
35. Pajares, F., Johnson, J., & Usher, E.L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 104-120.
36. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Open University Press.
37. Pedro, J. (2005). Reflection in teacher education: Exploring pre-service teachers' meanings of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 6(1), 49-66. doi: 10.1080/1462394042000326860
38. Phan, H.P. (2007). An examination of reflective thinking, learning approaches, and self-efficacy beliefs at the University of the South Pacific: A path analysis. Educational Psychology, 27(6), 789-806. doi: 10.1080/01443410701349809
39. Phan, H.P. (2009a). Exploring students' reflective thinking practice, deep processing strategies, effort, and achievement goal orientations. Educational Psychology, 29(3), 297-313. doi: 10.1080/01443410902877988
40. Phan, H.P. (2009b). Relations between goals, self-efficacy, critical thinking and deep processing strategies: A path analysis. Educational Psychology, 29(7), 777-799. doi: 10.1080/01443410903289423
41. Phan, H.P. (2010). Students' academic performance and various cognitive processes of learning: An integrative framework and empirical analysis. Educational Psychology, 30(3), 297-322. doi: 10.1080/01443410903573297
42. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Centre for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
43. Rogosa, D. (1979). Causal models in longitudinal research: Rationale, formulation and interpretation. In J.R. Nesselroade & P.B. Balles (Eds.), Longitudinal research in the study of behaviour and development (pp. 263-302). New York: Academic Press.
44. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45. Schunk, D.H. (1987). Peer models and children's behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 149-174. doi: 10.3102/00346543057002149
46. Schunk, D.H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 207-231. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
47. Schunk, D.H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In J.E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation and adjustment: Theory, research and application (pp. 283-301). New York: Plenum Press.
48. Schunk, D.H., & Hanson, A.R. (1985). Peer models: Influence on children's self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 313-322. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.77.3.313
49. Schunk, D.H., & Hanson, A.R. (1989a). Influence of peer-model attributes on children's beliefs and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 431-434. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.431
50. Schunk, D.H., & Hanson, A.R. (1989b). Self-modeling and children's cognitive skill learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 155-163. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.155
51. Seifert, T.L., & O'Keefe, B.A. (2001). The relationship of work avoidance and learning goals to perceived competence, externality and meaning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(Pt 1), 81-92. doi: 10.1348/000709901158406
52. Senko, C., & Miles, K.M. (2008). Pursuing their own learning agenda: How mastery-oriented students jeopardize their class performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 561-583. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.12.001
53. Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you'll know what you learn! British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(Pt 3), 343-360. doi: 10.1348/0007099041552314
54. Sins, P.H.M., van Joolingen, W.R., Savelsbergh, E.R., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2008). Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between students' achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 58-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.004
55. Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173-180. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
56. Vispoel, W.P. (1995). Self-concept in the arts: An extension of the Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 134-153. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.134
57. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49-78. doi: 10.1007/BF02209024
58. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015