Cell adhesion mechanisms on laterally mobile polymer films

Biomaterials

Volumn 35, Issue 17, 2014, Pages 4827-4834

  Kourouklis, Andreas P ^a   Lerum, Ronald V ^b   Bermudez, Harry ^b  

^a University of Massachusetts   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Bilayers; Block copolymers; Focal adhesions; Lateral mobility; Self assembly

Indexed keywords

BIOMIMETICS; BLOCK COPOLYMERS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; DYNAMICS; FIBROBLASTS; LIGANDS; POLYMER FILMS; SELF ASSEMBLY;

3T3 FIBROBLASTS; ADHESION MECHANISMS; AMPHIPHILIC BLOCK COPOLYMERS; BI-LAYER; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; FOCAL ADHESIONS; LATERAL MOBILITY; TIME-DEPENDENT PROPERTIES;

SUBSTRATES;

ARGINYLGLYCYLASPARTIC ACID; COPOLYMER; POLYMER;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL SPREADING; FIBROBLAST; FILM; FOCAL ADHESION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

BILAYERS; BLOCK COPOLYMERS; FOCAL ADHESIONS; LATERAL MOBILITY; SELF-ASSEMBLY;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; FIBROBLASTS; FOCAL ADHESIONS; INTEGRINS; MICE; NIH 3T3 CELLS; OLIGOPEPTIDES; POLYMERS;

EID: 84896489759     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.052     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Stevens M.M., George J.H. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 2005, 310:1135-1138.
2. Lutolf M.P., Hubbell J.A. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol 2005, 23:47-55.
3. Christian Frantz K.M.S., Weaver V.M. The extracellular matrix at a glance. JCell Sci 2010, 24:4195-4200.
4. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Tare R., Andar A., Riehle M.O., Herzyk P., et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007, 6:997-1003.
5. Nelson C.M., Vanduijn M.M., Inman J.L., Fletcher D.A., Bissell M.J. Tissue geometry determines sites of mammary branching morphogenesis in organotypic cultures. Science 2006, 314:298-300.
6. Engler A., Bacakova L., Newman C., Hategan A., Griffin M., Discher D. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J 2004, 86:617-628.
7. Yeung T., Georges P., Flanagan L., Marg B., Ortiz M., Funaki M., et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil Cytoskelet 2005, 60:24-34.
8. Solon J., Levental I., Sengupta K., Georges P.C., Janmey P.A. Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys J 2007, 93:4453-4461.
9. Ghosh K., Pan Z., Guan E., Ge S., Liu Y., Nakamura T., et al. Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties. Biomaterials 2007, 28:671-679.
10. Lo C.M., Wang H.B., Dembo M., Wang Y.L. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J 2000, 79:144-152.
11. Cukierman E., Pankov R., Stevens D.R., Yamada K.M. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001, 294:1708-1712.
12. Levental K.R., Yu H., Kass L., Lakins J.N., Egeblad M., Erler J.T., et al. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell 2009, 139:891-906.
13. Jiang F.X., Yurke B., Schloss R.S., Firestein B.L., Langrana N.A. The relationship between fibroblast growth and the dynamic stiffnesses of a DNA crosslinked hydrogel. Biomaterials 2010, 31:1199-1212.
14. Daley W.P., Peters S.B., Larsen M. Extracellular matrix dynamics in development and regenerative medicine. JCell Sci 2008, 121:255-264.
15. Antia M., Baneyx G., Kubow K.E., Vogel V. Fibronectin in aging extracellular matrix fibrils is progressively unfolded by cells and elicits an enhanced rigidity response. Faraday Discuss 2008, 139:229-249. discussion 309-25, 419-20.
16. Halstenberg S., Panitch A., Rizzi S., Hall H., Hubbell J.A. Biologically engineered protein-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels: a cell adhesive and plasmin-degradable biosynthetic material for tissue repair. Biomacromolecules 2002, 3:710-723.
17. Holland T.A., Tabata Y., Mikos A.G. Invitro release of transforming growth factor-beta 1 from gelatin microparticles encapsulated in biodegradable, injectable oligo(poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) hydrogels. JControl Release 2003, 91:299-313.
18. Rizzi S.C., Hubbell J.A. Recombinant protein-co-peg networks as cell-adhesive and proteolytically degradable hydrogel matrixes. Part I: development and physicochemical characteristics. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6:1226-1238.
19. Kloxin A.M., Kasko A.M., Salinas C.N., Anseth K.S. Photodegradable hydrogels fordynamic tuning of physical and chemical properties. Science 2009, 324:59-63.
20. Garcia A.S., Dellatore S.M., Messersmith P.B., Miller W.M. Effects of supported lipid monolayer fluidity on the adhesion of hematopoietic progenitor cell lines to fibronectin-derived peptide ligands for alpha 5 beta 1 and alpha 4 beta 1 integrins. Langmuir 2009, 25:2994-3002.
21. McBeath R., Pirone D.M., Nelson C.M., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004, 6:483-495.
22. Chen C., Mrksich M., Huang S., Whitesides G., Ingber D. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997, 276:1425-1428.
23. Ananthanarayanan B., Little L., Schaffer D.V., Healy K.E., Tirrell M. Neural stem cell adhesion and proliferation on phospholipid bilayers functionalized with RGD peptides. Biomaterials 2010, 31:8706-8715.
24. Salaita K., Nair P.M., Petit R.S., Neve R.M., Das D., Gray J.W., et al. Restriction of receptor movement alters cellular response: physical force sensing by EphA2. Science 2010, 327:1380-1385.
25. Perez T., Nelson W., Boxer S., Kam L. E-cadherin tethered to micropatterned supported lipid bilayers as a model for cell adhesion. Langmuir 2005, 21:11963-11968.
26. Ch Yu, Law J.B.K., Suryana M., Low H.Y., Sheetz M.P. Early integrin binding to Arg-Gly-Asp peptide activates actin polymerization and contractile movement that stimulates outward translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:20585-20590.
27. Arnold M., Schwieder M., Blü mmel J., Cavalcanti-Adam E.A., Ló pez-Garcia M., Kessler H., et al. Cell interactions with hierarchically structured nano-patterned adhesive surfaces. Soft Matter 2009, 5:72-77.
28. Huang J., Grater S.V., Corbellinl F., Rinck S., Bock E., Kemkemer R., et al. Impact of order and disorder in RGD nanopatterns on cell adhesion. Nano Lett 2009, 9:1111-1116.
29. Discher D., Eisenberg A. Polymer vesicles. Science 2002, 297:967-973.
30. Discher D.E., Janmey P., Wang Y.L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005, 310:1139-1143.
31. Bermudez H., Brannan A., Hammer D., Bates F., Discher D. Molecular weight dependence of polymersome membrane structure, elasticity, and stability. Macromolecules 2002, 35:8203-8208.
32. Lee J., Bermudez H., Discher B., Sheehan M., Won Y., Bates F., et al. Preparation, stability, and invitro performance of vesicles made with diblock copolymers. Biotechnol Bioeng 2001, 73:135-145.
33. Maheshwari G., Brown G., Lauffenburger D., Wells A., Griffith L. Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering. JCell Sci 2000, 113:1677-1686.
34. Kuhlman W., Taniguchi I., Griffith L.G., Mayes A.M. Interplay between PEO tether length and ligand spacing governs cell spreading on RGD-modified PMMA-g-PEO comb copolymers. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:3206-3213.
35. Almeida P.F., Vaz W.L., Thompson T.E. Lateral diffusion in the liquid phases of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine/cholesterol lipid bilayers: a free volume analysis. Biochemistry 1992, 31:6739-6747.
36. Babayco C.B., Turgut S., Smith A.M., Sanii B., Land D., Parikh A.N. Acomparison of lateral diffusion in supported lipid monolayers and bilayers. Soft Matter 2010, 6:5877-5881.
37. Lerum R.V., Bermudez H. Controlled interfacial assembly and transfer of brushlike copolymer films. Chemphyschem 2010, 11:665-669.
38. Hamersky M., Tirrell M., Lodge T. Self-diffusion of a polystyrene-polyisoprene block copolymer. JPolym Sci B 1996, 34:2899-2909.
39. Phair R.D., Gorski S.A., Misteli T. Measurement of dynamic protein binding to chromatin invivo, using photobleaching microscopy. Methods Enzymol 2004, 375:393-414.
40. Soumpasis D.M. Theoretical-analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery experiments. Biophys J 1983, 41:95-97.
41. Dumbauld D.W., Shin H., Gallant N.D., Michael K.E., Radhakrishna H., Garcia A.J. Contractility modulates cell adhesion strengthening through focal adhesion kinase and assembly of vinculin-containing focal adhesions. JCell Physiol 2010, 223:746-756.
42. Shoemaker D.P., Garland C.W., Nibler J.W. Experiments in physical chemistry 1996, McGraw-Hill, New York. 6th ed.
43. Axelrod D., Koppel D.E., Schlessinger J., Elson E., Webb W.W. Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys J 1976, 16:1055-1069.
44. Houseman B., Mrksich M. The microenvironment of immobilized Arg-Gly-Asp peptides is an important determinant of cell adhesion. Biomaterials 2001, 22:943-955.
45. Biesalski M.A., Knaebel A., Tu R., Tirrell M. Cell adhesion on a polymerized peptide-amphiphile monolayer. Biomaterials 2006, 27:1259-1269.
46. Hersel U., Dahmen C., Kessler H. RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. Biomaterials 2003, 24:4385-4415.
47. Chollet C., Chanseau C., Remy M., Guignandon A., Bareille R., Labrugère C., et al. The effect of RGD density on osteoblast and endothelial cell behavior on RGD-grafted polyethylene terephthalate surfaces. Biomaterials 2009, 30:711-720.
48. Massia S., Hubbell J. An RGD spacing of 440nm is sufficient for integrin alpha-v- beta-3-mediated fibroblast spreading and 140nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation. JCell Biol 1991, 114:1089-1100.
49. Arnold M., Cavalcanti-Adam E., Glass R., Blummel J., Eck W., Kantlehner M., et al. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. Chemphyschem 2004, 5:383-388.
50. Gallant N.D., Michael K.E., García A.J. Cell adhesion strengthening: contributions of adhesive area, integrin binding, and focal adhesion assembly. Mol Biol Cell 2005, 16:4329-4340.
51. Elineni K.K., Gallant N.D. Regulation of cell adhesion strength by peripheral focal adhesion distribution. Biophys J 2011, 101:2903-2911.
52. Baxter L.C., Frauchiger V., Textor M., ap Gwynn I., Richards R.G. Fibroblast and osteoblast adhesion and morphology on calcium phosphate surfaces. Eur Cell Mater 2002, 4:1-17.
53. Balaban N.Q., Schwarz U.S., Riveline D., Goichberg P., Tzur G., Sabanay I., et al. Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat Cell Biol 2001, 3:466-472.
54. Giannone G., Dubin-Thaler B.J., Rossier O., Cai Y., Chaga O., Jiang G., et al. Lamellipodial actin mechanically links myosin activity with adhesion-site formation. Cell 2007, 128:561-575.
55. Kernochan L.E., Tran B.N., Tangkijvanich P., Melton A.C., Tam S.P., Yee H.F. Endothelin-1 stimulates human colonic myofibroblast contraction and migration. Gut 2002, 50:65-70.
56. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
57. Lee J., Santore M., Bates F., Discher D. From membranes to melts, rouse to reptation: diffusion in polymersome versus lipid bilayers. Macromolecules 2002, 35:323-326.
58. Rossier O., Octeau V., Sibarita J.B., Leduc C., Tessier B., Nair D., et al. Integrins 1 and 3 exhibit distinct dynamic nanoscale organizations inside focal adhesions. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14:1057-1067.
59. Dustin M.L., Ferguson L.M., Chan P.Y., Springer T.A., Golan D.E. Visualization of CD2 interaction with LFA-3 and determination of the two-dimensional dissociation constant for adhesion receptors in a contact area. JCell Biol 1996, 132:465-474.