Speed-dependent reference joint trajectory generation for robotic gait support

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1447-1458

  Koopman, B ^a   van Asseldonk, E H F ^a   Van der Kooij, H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Kinematics; Prediction methods; Reference joint trajectories; Regression analysis; Robotic gait support; Walking speed

Indexed keywords

ANGULAR VELOCITY; JOINTS (ANATOMY); KINEMATICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPEED; TRAJECTORIES;

CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; GAIT KINEMATICS; GAIT REHABILITATION; JOINT TRAJECTORIES; PREDICTION METHODS; RECONSTRUCTED TRAJECTORY; REFERENCE TRAJECTORIES; WALKING-SPEED;

ROBOTICS;

ABDUCTION; ADDUCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; FEMALE; GAIT; HIP; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; KINEMATICS; KNEE FUNCTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; WALKING SPEED;

KINEMATICS; PREDICTION METHODS; REFERENCE JOINT TRAJECTORIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROBOTIC GAIT SUPPORT; WALKING-SPEED;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BODY HEIGHT; FEMALE; FOOT; GAIT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84896484512     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.037     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alton F., Baldey L., Caplan S., Morrissey M.C. A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. Clin. Biomech. 1998, 13:434-440.
2. Aoyagi D., Ichinose W.E., Harkema S.J., Reinkensmeyer D.J., Bobrow J.E. A robot and control algorithm that can synchronously assist in naturalistic motion during body-weight-supported gait training following neurologic injury. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2007, 15:387-400.
3. Banala S.K., Kim S.H., Agrawal S.K., Scholz J.P. Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX). IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2009, 17:2-8.
4. Beaman C.B., Peterson C.L., Neptune R.R., Kautz S.A. Differences in self-selected and fastest-comfortable walking in post-stroke hemiparetic persons. Gait Posture 2010, 31:311-316.
5. Colombo G., Joerg M., Schreier R., Dietz V. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2000, 37:693-700.
6. Crowinshield R.D., Brand R.A., Johnston R.C. The effects of walking velocity and age on hip kinematics and kinetics. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1978, 140-144.
7. Delval A., Salleron J., Bourriez J.L., Bleuse S., Moreau C., Krystkowiak P., Defebvre L., Devos P., Duhamel A. Kinematic angular parameters in PD: reliability of joint angle curves and comparison with healthy subjects. Gait Posture 2008, 28:495-501.
8. Diaz I., Gil J.J., Sanchez E. Lower-limb robotic rehabilitation: literature review and challenges. J. Rob. 2011, 2011:1-11.
9. Dollar A.M., Herr H. Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: challenges and state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom. 2008, 24:144-158.
10. Draper N.R., Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis 1998, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ.
11. Emken J.L., Harkema S.J., Beres-Jones J.A., Ferreira C.K., Reinkensmeyer D.J. Feasibility of manual teach-and-replay and continuous impedance shaping for robotic locomotor training following spinal cord injury. IEEE Trans. Bio-med. Eng. 2008, 55:322-334.
12. Emken J.L., Wynne J.H., Harkema S.J., Reinkensmeyer D.J. A robotic device for manipulating human stepping. IEEE Trans. Rob. 2006, 22:185.
13. Ferris D.P., Sawicki G.S., Domingo A. Powered lower limb orthoses for gait rehabilitation. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 2005, 11:34-49.
14. Geisser S. Predictive Inference 1993, Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
15. Goldie P.A., Matyas T.A., Evans O.M. Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1996, 77:1074-1082.
16. Hanlon M., Anderson R. Prediction methods to account for the effect of gait speed on lower limb angular kinematics. Gait Posture 2006, 24:280-287.
17. Kerrigan D.C., Todd M.K., Della Croce U. Gender differences in joint biomechanics during walking: normative study in young adults. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil 1998, 77:2-7.
18. Kerrigan D.C., Todd M.K., Della Croce U., Lipsitz L.A., Collins J.J. Biomechanical gait alterations independent of speed in the healthy elderly: evidence for specific limiting impairments. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1998, 79:317-322.
19. Kettelkamp D.B., Johnson R.J., Smidt G.L., Chao E.Y., Walker M. An electrogoniometric study of knee motion in normal gait. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1970, 52:775-790.
20. Kirtley C., Whittle M.W., Jefferson R.J. Influence of walking speed on gait parameters. J. Biomed. Eng. 1985, 7:282-288.
21. Koopman B., Grootenboer H.J., de Jongh H.J. An inverse dynamics model for the analysis, reconstruction and prediction of bipedal walking. J. Biomech. 1995, 28:1369-1376.
22. Lee S.J., Hidler J. Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals. J. Appl. Physiol. 2008, 104:747-755.
23. Lelas J.L., Merriman G.J., Riley P.O., Kerrigan D.C. Predicting peak kinematic and kinetic parameters from gait speed. Gait Posture 2003, 17:106-112.
24. Matsas A., Taylor N., McBurney H. Knee joint kinematics from familiarised treadmill walking can be generalised to overground walking in young unimpaired subjects. Gait Posture 2000, 11:46-53.
25. Molloy M., Salazar-Torres J., Kerr C., McDowell B.C., Cosgrove A.P. The effects of industry standard averaging and filtering techniques in kinematic gait analysis. Gait Posture 2008, 28:559-562.
26. Murray M.P., Drought A.B., Kory R.C. Walking patterns of normal men. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1964, 46:335-360.
27. Oberg T., Karsznia A., Oberg K. Joint angle parameters in gait-reference data for normal subjects, 10-79 years of age. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 1994, 31:199-213.
28. Parvataneni K., Ploeg L., Olney S.J., Brouwer B. Kinematic, kinetic and metabolic parameters of treadmill versus overground walking in healthy older adults. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 2009, 24:95-100.
29. Pennycott A., Wyss D., Vallery H., Klamroth-Marganska V., Riener R. Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2012, 9:65.
30. Pepin A., Norman K.E., Barbeau H. Treadmill walking in incomplete spinal-cord-injured subjects: 1. Adaptation to changes in speed. Spinal Cord 2003, 41:257-270.
31. Riener R., Lunenburger L., Jezernik S., Anderschitz M., Colombo G., Dietz V. Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2005, 13:380-394.
32. Riley P.O., Paolini G., Della Croce U., Paylo K.W., Kerrigan D.C. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait Posture 2007, 26:17-24.
33. Sadeghi H., Mathieu P.A., Sadeghi S., Labelle H. Continuous curve registration as an intertrial gait variability reduction technique. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2003, 11:24-30.
34. Schwartz M.H., Rozumalski A., Trost J.P. The effect of walking speed on the gait of typically developing children. J. Biomech. 2008, 41:1639-1650.
35. Sekiya N., Nagasaki H. Reproducibility of the walking patterns of normal young adults: test-retest reliability of the walk ratio (step-length/step-rate). Gait Posture 1998, 7:225-227.
36. Silder A., Heiderscheit B., Thelen D.G. Active and passive contributions to joint kinetics during walking in older adults. J. Biomech. 2008, 41:1520-1527.
37. Stansfield B.W., Hillman S.J., Hazlewood M.E., Robb J.E. Regression analysis of gait parameters with speed in normal children walking at self-selected speeds. Gait Posture 2006, 23:288-294.
38. Stauffer Y., Allemand Y., Bouri M., Fournier J., Clavel R., Metrailler P., Brodard R., Reynard F. The WalkTrainer-a new generation of walking reeducation device combining orthoses and muscle stimulation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2009, 17:38-45.
39. Stone M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 1974, 36:111-147.
40. Stoquart G., Detrembleur C., Lejeune T. Effect of speed on kinematic, kinetic, electromyographic and energetic reference values during treadmill walking. Neurophysiol. Clin. 2008, 38:105-116.
41. Strathy G.M., Chao E.Y., Laughman R.K. Changes in knee function associated with treadmill ambulation. J. Biomech. 1983, 16:517-522.
42. Street J.O., Carroll R.J., Ruppert D. A note on computing robust regression estimates via iteratively reweighted least squares. Am. Stat. 1988, 42:152-154.
43. Vallery H., van Asseldonk E.H., Buss M., van der Kooij H. Reference trajectory generation for rehabilitation robots: complementary limb motion estimation. IEEE Trans. Neural. Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2009, 17:23-30.
44. van Asseldonk E.H., Veneman J.F., Ekkelenkamp R., Buurke J.H., van der Helm F.C., van der Kooij H. The effects on kinematics and muscle activity of walking in a robotic gait trainer during zero-force control. IEEE Trans. Neural. Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2008, 16:360-370.
45. Van Hedel H.J., Tomatis L., Muller R. Modulation of leg muscle activity and gait kinematics by walking speed and bodyweight unloading. Gait Posture 2006, 24:35-45.
46. van Hedel H.J.A., Dietz V., Curt A. Assessment of walking speed and distance in subjects with an incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil. Neural. Repair 2007, 21:295-301.
47. Wass E., Taylor N.F., Matsas A. Familiarisation to treadmill walking in unimpaired older people. Gait Posture 2005, 21:72-79.
48. Witte U.S., Carlsson J.Y. Self-selected walking speed in patients with hemiparesis after stroke. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 1997, 29:161-165.
49. Yano H., Kasai K., Saitou H., Iwata H. Development of a gait rehabilitation system using a locomotion interface. J. Visual Comp. Anim. 2003, 14:243-252.
50. Zeni J.A., Richards J.G., Higginson J.S. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. Gait Posture 2008, 27:710-714.