The effects of industry standard averaging and filtering techniques in kinematic gait analysis

Gait and Posture

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 559-562

  Molloy, M ^a   Salazar Torres, J ^b   Kerr, C ^b,c   McDowell, B C ^b   Cosgrove, A P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b MUSGRAVE PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Averaging methods; Kinematics; Non impaired gait

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AVERAGING; CHILD; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE;

EID: 52049119024     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Winter D.A. The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological (1991), University of Waterloo Press, Ontario, Canada p. 9
2. Personal communication with VICON.
3. Woltring H.J. A FORTRAN package for generalized, cross-validatory spline smoothing and differentiation. Adv Eng Softw UK 8 2 (1986) 104-113
4. Davis R.B., Ounpuu S., Tyburski D., and Gage J.R. A gait analysis collection and reduction technique. Hum Movement Sci 10 (1991) 575-587
5. Baker R., Finney L., and Orr J. A new approach to determine the hip rotation profile from clinical gait analysis data. Hum Movement Sci 18 (1999) 655-667
6. Baker R. Pelvic angles: a mathematically rigorous definition which is consistent with a conventional clinical understanding of the terms. Gait Posture 13 (2001) 1-6
7. Gorton G., Herbert D., and Goode B. Assessment of the kinematic variability between twelve shriners motion analysis laboratories. Gait Posture 13 (2001) 247
8. Schwartz M., Trost J., and Wervey R. Measurement and management of errors in quantitative gait data. Gait Posture 20 (2004) 196