Relevance vector machine and support vector machine classifier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1322-1329

  Bowd, Christopher ^a   Medeiros, Felipe A ^a   Zhang, Zuohua ^b   Zangwill, Linda M ^a   Hao, Jiucang ^b,c   Lee, Te Won ^b,c   Sejnowski, Terrence J ^b,c   Weinreb, Robert N ^a   Goldbaum, Michael H ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^c SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

^d VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYZER; BAYES THEOREM; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; POLARIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RELEVANCE VECTOR MACHINE; RETINA NERVE CELL; SCANNING LASER POLARIMETRY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; THICKNESS; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL FIELD; ALGORITHM; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; LASER; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBER; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; AREA UNDER CURVE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; LASERS; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 18244383805     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1122     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bagga H, Greenfield DS. Quantitative assessment of structural damage in eyes with localized visual field abnormalities. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:797-805.
2. Bagga H, Greenfield DS, Feuer W, Knighton RW. Scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation and optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:521-529.
3. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Association between scanning laser polarimetry measurements using variable corneal polarization compensation and visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:961-966.
4. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Mohammadi K, Weinreb RN. Comparison of scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation and retinal nerve fiber layer photography for detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:698-704.
5. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and Stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:827-837.
6. Reus NJ, Lemij HG. The relationship between standard automated perimetry and GDx VCC measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:840-845.
7. Weinreb RN. Evaluating the retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma with scanning laser polarimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1403-1406.
8. Weinreb RN, Bowd C, Zangwill LM. Glaucoma detection using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal polarization compensation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:218-224.
9. Garway-Heath DF, Greaney MJ, Caprioli J. Correction for the erroneous compensation of anterior segment birefringence with the scanning laser polarimeter for glaucoma diagnosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1465-1474.
10. Vapnik V. Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Wiley; 1998.
11. Vapnik V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2000.
12. Bowd C, Chan K, Zangwill LM, et al. Comparing neural networks and linear discriminant functions for glaucoma detection using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:3444-3454.
13. Goldbaum MH, Sample PA, Chan K, et al. Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:162-169.
14. Bishop CM, Tipping ME. Variational relevance vector machines. In: Boutilier C, Goldszmidt M, eds. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Microsoft Research; 2000:45-63.
15. Tipping ME. Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. J Mach Learn Res. 2001;1:211-244.
16. Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1993.
17. Weinreb RJM, Dreher AW, Coleman A, Quigley H, Shaw B, Reiter K. Histopathologic validation of Fourier-ellipsometry measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:557-560.
18. Bagga H, Greenfield DS. Retinal nerve fiber layer assessment using scanning laser polarimetry. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2004;44:29-42.
19. Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Optic nerve imaging: recent advances. In: Grehn F, Stamper R, eds. Glaucoma. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2004:63-91.
20. Greenfield DS, Knighton RW, Huang XR. Effect of corneal polarization axis on assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by scanning laser polarimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:715-722.
21. Weinreb RN, Bowd C, Greenfield DS, Zangwill LM. Measurement of the magnitude and axis of corneal polarization with scanning laser polarimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:901-906.
22. Zhou Q, Weinreb RN. Individualized compensation of anterior segment birefringence during scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2221-2228.
23. Sample PA, Goldbaum MH, Chan K, et al. Using machine learning classifiers to identify glaucomatous change earlier in standard visual fields. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2660-2665.
24. Zangwill LM, Chan K, Bowd C, et al. Heidelberg retina tomograph measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3144-3151.
25. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA, et al. Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy classifiers and stereophotograph evaluation for prediction of visual field abnormalities in glaucoma-suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2255-2262.
26. Strauss DJ, Delb W, Plinkert PK. Objective detection of the central auditory processing disorder: a new machine learning approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51:1147-1155.
27. Shoeb A, Edwards H, Connolly J, Bourgeois B, Treves T, Guttag J. Patient-specific seizure onset detection. Epilepsy Behav. 2004;5:483-498.
28. Campanini R, Dongiovanni D, Iampieri E, et al. A novel featureless approach to mass detection in digital mammograms based on support vector machines. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:961-975.
29. Piliouras N, Kalatzis I, Dimitropoulos N, Cavouras D. Development of the cubic least squares mapping linear-kernel support vector machine classifier for improving the characterization of breast lesions on ultrasound. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2004;28:247-255.
30. Bishop CM, Tipping ME. Bayesian regression and classification. In: Suykens J, Horvath G, Basu S, Micchelli C, Vandewalle J, eds. Advances in Learning Theory: Methods, Models and Applications (NATO Science Series. Series III, Computer and Systems Sciences. Vol. 190). Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2003:267-285.
31. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-845.
32. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Berry CC, et al. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1993-2003.
33. Medeiros FA, Susanna R Jr. Comparison of algorithms for detection of localised nerve fibre layer defects using scanning laser polarimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:413-419.
34. Colen TP, Lemij HG. Prevalence of split nerve fiber layer bundles in healthy eyes imaged with scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:151-156.
35. Tannenbaum DP, Hoffman D, Lemij HG, Garway-Heath DF, Greenfield DS, Caprioli J. Variable corneal compensation improves discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes with the scanning laser polarimeter. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:259-264.
36. Brigatti L, Hoffman D, Caprioli J. Neural networks to identify glaucoma with structural and functional measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;121:511-521.
37. Uchida H, Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2393-2401.
38. Hothorn T, Lausen B. Bagging tree classifiers for laser scanning images: a data- and simulation-based strategy. Artif Intell Med. 2003;27:65-79.
39. Mardin CY, Hothorn T, Peters A, Junemann AG, Nguyen NX, Lausen B. New glaucoma classification method based on standard Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters by bagging classification trees. J Glaucoma. 2003;12:340-346.