Development and evaluation of a field-based high-throughput phenotyping platform

Functional Plant Biology

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 68-79

  Andrade Sanchez, Pedro ^a   Gore, Michael A ^b,c   Heun, John T ^a   Thorp, Kelly R ^b   Carmo Silva, A Elizabete ^b,d   French, Andrew N ^b   Salvucci, Michael E ^b   White, Jeffrey W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^d ROTHAMSTED RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cotton; Genetics; Gossypium barbadense; Phenomics; Proximal sensing

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; COTTON; CULTIVAR; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; GENETICS; GROWING SEASON; MEASUREMENT METHOD; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PHENOTYPE; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

EID: 84890460571     PISSN: 14454408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/FP13126     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) 'Crop evapotranspiration - guide-lines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56.' (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome)
2. Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological 26, 211-252.
3. Brown PW (1989) 'Accessing the Arizona Meteorological Network (AZMET) by vomputer. Extension report no. 8733.' (University of Arizona: Tucson)
4. 2 availability and inactivation of Rubisco limit photosynthesis in cotton plants under heat and drought stress in the field. Environmental and Experimental Botany 83, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j. envexpbot.2012.04.001
5. Comar A, Burger P, de Solan B, Baret F, Daumard F, Hanocq JF (2012) A semi-automatic system for high throughput phenotyping wheat cultivars in-field conditions: description and first results. Functional Plant Biology 39, 914-924. doi:10.1071/FP12065
6. Furbank RT, Tester M (2011) Phenomics - technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends in Plant Science 16, 635-644. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.09.005
7. Fussell J, Rundquist D, Harrington JA (1986) On defining remote sensing. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 52, 1507-1511.
8. Göttsche F-M, Olesen FS (2001) Modelling of diurnal cycles of brightness temperature extracted from METEOSAT data. Remote Sensing of Environment 76, 337-348. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00214-5
9. Holland JB, Nyquist WE, Cervantes-Martínez CT (2003) Estimating and interpreting heritability for plant breeding: an update. Plant Breeding Reviews 22, 9-112.
10. Houle D, Govindaraju DR, Omholt S (2010) Phenomics: the next challenge. Nature Reviews. Genetics 11, 855-866. doi:10.1038/nrg2897
11. Hunt R (1979) Plant growth analysis: the rationale behind the use of the fitted mathematical function. Annals of Botany 43, 245-249.
12. Kimes D (1981) Remote sensing of temperature profiles in vegetation canopies using multiple view angles and inversion techniques. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing GE-19, 85-90. doi:10.1109/TGRS.1981.350357
13. Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter J, Li W (2004) 'Applied linear statistical models.' 4th edn. (McGraw-Hill: Boston)
14. Lan Y, Zhang H, Lacey R, Hoffman W, Wu W (2009) Development of an integration sensor and instrumentation system for measuring crop conditions. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal 11, 1-16.
15. McCarthy C, Hancock N, Raine S (2010) Apparatus and infield evaluations of a prototype machine vision system for cotton plant internode length measurement. Journal of Cotton Science 14, 221-232.
16. Milton EJ (1987) Principles of field spectroscopy. International Journal of Remote Sensing 8, 1807-1827. doi:10.1080/01431168708954818
17. Montes JM, Melchinger AE, Reif JC (2007) Novel throughput phenotyping platforms in plant genetic studies. Trends in Plant Science 12, 433-436. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2007.08.006
18. Piepho H-P, Möhring J (2007) Computing heritability and selection response from unbalanced plant breeding trials. Genetics 177, 1881-1888. doi:10.1534/genetics.107.074229
19. Qi J, Pinter P, Clarke TR, Kimball BA, Moran MS (1997) Diagnostic assessments of plant condition using multiangular remote sensing measurements and BRDF models. Journal of Remote Sensing 1, 25-29.
20. Ruixiu S, Wilkerson JB, Wilhelm LR, Tompkins FD (1989) A microcomputer-based morphometer for bush-type plants. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 4, 43-58. doi:10.1016/0168-1699(89) 90013-6
21. Rundquist D, Perk R, Leavitt B, Keydan G, Gitelson A (2004) Collecting spectral data over cropland vegetation using machine-positioning versus hand-positioning of the sensor. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 43, 173-178. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2003.11.002
22. Scotford IM, MillerPCH(2004) Estimating tiller density and leaf area index of winter wheat using spectral reflectance and ultrasonic sensing techniques. Biosystems Engineering 89, 395-408. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng. 2004.08.019
23. White JW, ConleyMM(2013) Aflexible, low-cost cart for proximal sensing. Crop Science 53, 1646-1649. doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.01.0054
24. White JW, Andrade-Sanchez P, Gore MA, Bronson KF, Coffelt TA, Conley MM, Feldmann KA, French AN, Heun JT, Hunsaker DJ, Jenks MA, Kimball BA, Roth RL, Strand RJ, Thorp KR, Wall GW, Wang G (2012) Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research. Field Crops Research 133, 101-112. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.04. 003
25. WuWR,LiWM,Tang DZ,Lu HR, WorlandAJ (1999) Time-related mapping of quantitative trait loci underlying tiller number in rice. Genetics 151, 297-303.