Genetics and evolution of function-valued traits: understanding environmentally responsive phenotypes

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 637-647

  Stinchcombe, John R ^a   Beder, J ^b   Carter, P A ^b   Gilchrist, G W ^b   Gervini, D ^b   Gomulkiewicz, R ^b   Hallgrimsson, B ^b   Heckman, N ^b   Houle, D ^b   Kingsolver, J G ^b   Marquez, E ^b   Marron, J ^b   Meyer, K ^b   Mio, W ^b   Schmitt, J ^b   Yao, F ^b   Kirkpatrick, Mark ^c   Beder, Jay ^b   Carter, Patrick A ^b   Gilchrist, George W ^b   Gervini, Daniel ^b   Gomulkiewicz, Richard ^b   Heckman, Nancy ^b   Kingsolver, Joel G ^b   Marquez, Eladio ^b   Marron, J Stephen ^b   Meyer, Karin ^b   Mio, Washington ^b   Schmitt, Johanna ^b   Yao, Fang ^b   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b University of Texas ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FUTURE PROSPECT; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GROWTH RATE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MORPHOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84867219508     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.002     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Mousseau T.A., Roff D.A. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 1987, 59:181-197.
2. Houle D. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 1992, 130:195-204.
3. Hansen T., et al. Heritability is not evolvability. Evol. Biol. 2011, 38:258-277.
4. Roff D.A. The evolution of genetic correlations: an analysis of patterns. Evolution 1996, 50:1392-1403.
5. Conner J.K., et al. Rapid independent trait evolution despite a strong pleiotropic genetic correlation. Am. Nat. 2011, 178:429-441.
6. Fry J.D. The mixed-model analysis of variance applied to quantitative genetics: biological meaning of the parameters. Evolution 1992, 46:540-550.
7. Agrawal A.F., Stinchcombe J.R. How much do genetic covariances alter the rate of adaptation?. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 276:1183-1191.
8. Gomulkiewicz R., Houle D. Demographic and genetic constraints on evolution. Am. Nat. 2009, 174:E218-E229.
9. Ragland G.J., Carter P.A. Genetic covariance structure of growth in the salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum. Heredity 2004, 92:569-578.
10. Griswold C.K., et al. Hypothesis testing in comparative and experimental studies of function-valued traits. Evolution 2008, 62:1229-1242.
11. Kirkpatrick M., Heckman N. A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite-dimensional characters. J. Math. Biol. 1989, 27:429-450.
12. Kirkpatrick M., et al. Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. Genetics 1990, 124:979-993.
13. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, Longman Group. D.S. Falconer, T.F.C. Mackay (Eds.).
14. Beder J.H., Gomulkiewicz R. Computing the selection gradient and evolutionary response of an infinite-dimensional trait. J. Math. Biol. 1998, 36:99-319.
15. Life History Evolution 2002, Sinauer Associates. D.A. Roff (Ed.).
16. Kingsolver J.G., Gomulkiewicz R. Environmental variation and selection on performance curves. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2003, 43:470-477.
17. Kingsolver J.G., et al. Relating environmental variation to selection on reaction norms: an experimental test. Am. Nat. 2007, 169:163-174.
18. Flowering Plants: Evolution Above the Species Level 1974, Harvard University Press. G.L. Stebbins (Ed.).
19. Schluter D. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 1996, 50:1766-1774.
20. Kirkpatrick M., Meyer K. Direct estimation of genetic principal components: simplified analysis of complex phenotypes. Genetics 2004, 168:2295-2306.
21. Meyer K., Kirkpatrick M. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of genetic principal components and smoothed covariance matrices. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2005, 37:1-30.
22. Kirkpatrick M., Lofsvold D. Measuring selection and constraint in the evolution of growth. Evolution 1992, 46:954-971.
23. Kirkpatrick M. Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions. Genetica 2009, 136:271-284.
24. Hine E., Blows M.W. Determining the effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix. Genetics 2006, 173:1135-1144.
25. Simonsen A.K., Stinchcombe J.R. Quantifying evolutionary genetic constraints in the Ivyleaf morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 171:972-986.
26. Houle D. Numbering the hairs on our heads: the shared challenge and promise of phenomics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:1793-1799.
27. Schaeffer L.R., et al. Experience with a test-day model. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:1135-1144.
28. Schaeffer L.R., Jamrozik J. Random regression models: a longitudinal perspective. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2008, 125:145-146.
29. Meyer K. Scope for a random regression model in genetic evaluation of beef cattle for growth. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2004, 86:69-83.
30. Stinchcombe J.R., et al. Across-environment genetic correlations and the frequency of selective environments shape the evolutionary dynamics of growth rate in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 2010, 64:2887-2903.
31. Gibert P., et al. Describing the evolution of reaction norm shape: body pigmentation in Drosophila. Evolution 1998, 52:1501-1506.
32. Roux F., et al. Impact of initial pathogen density on resistance and tolerance in a polymorphic disease resistance gene system in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2010, 185:283-291.
33. Pilson D. The evolution of plant response to herbivory: simultaneously considering resistance and tolerance in Brassica rapa. Evol. Ecol. 2000, 14:457-489.
34. Hakes A.S., Cronin J.T. Resistance and tolerance to herbivory in Solidago altissima (Asteraceae): genetic variability, costs, and selection for multiple traits. Am. J. Bot. 2011, 98:1446-1455.
35. O'Hara R.B., et al. Bayesian approaches in evolutionary quantitative genetics. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:949-957.
36. Memmott J., et al. The effect of propagule size on the invasion of an alien insect. J. Anim. Ecol. 2005, 74:50-62.
37. SAS System for Mixed Models 1996, SAS Institute. R.C. Littell (Ed.).
38. Meyer K. WOMBAT: a tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2007, 8:815-821.
39. ASReml User Guide Release 3.0 2009, VSN International. A.R. Gilmour (Ed.).
40. Hadfield J.D. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Soft. 2010, 33:1-22.
41. Mixed Models: Theory and Applications 2004, John Wiley & Sons. E. Demidenko (Ed.).
42. Rice J.A., Wu C.O. Non parametric mixed effects models for unequally sampled noisy curves. Biometrics 2001, 57:253-259.
43. Pletcher S.D., Geyer C.J. The genetic analysis of age-dependent traits: modeling the character process. Genetics 1999, 153:825-835.
44. Meyer K. Random regression analyses using B-splines to model growth of Australian Angus cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2005, 37:473-500.
45. Misztal I. Properties of random regression models using linear splines. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2006, 123:74-80.
46. Ritchie M.G. The shape of female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93:14628-14631.
47. Ritchie M.G., et al. Variation, but no covariance, in female preference functions and male song in a natural population of Drosophila montana. Anim. Behav. 2005, 70:849-854.
48. Fowler-Finn K.D., Rodríguez R.L. Experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment. Evolution 2012, 66:459-468.
49. McGuigan K., et al. Genetic analysis of female preference functions as function-valued traits. Am. Nat. 2008, 172:194-202.
50. Robinson M.R., et al. The impact of environmental heterogeneity on genetic architecture in a wild population of Soay sheep. Genetics 2009, 181:1639-1648.
51. Service P.M., Rose M.R. Genetic covariation among life-history components: the effect of novel environments. Evolution 1985, 39:943-945.
52. van Noordwijk A.J., de Jong G. Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am. Nat. 1986, 128:137-142.
53. Wilson A.J., et al. Environmental coupling of selection and heritability limits evolution. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e216.
54. The Phytometer Method in Ecology: the Plant and Community as Instruments 1924, The Carnegie Institution of Washington. F.E. Clements, G.W. Goldsmith (Eds.).
55. Huber H., et al. Frequency and microenvironmental pattern of selection on plastic shade-avoidance traits in a natural population of Impatiens capensis. Am. Nat. 2004, 163:548-563.
56. Kelley J.L., et al. Soft and hard selection on plant defence traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2005, 7:287-302.
57. Applied Functional Data Analysis, Methods and Case Studies 2002, Springer. J.O. Ramsay, B.W. Silverman (Eds.).
58. Functional Data Analysis 2005, Springer. J.O. Ramsay, B.W. Silverman (Eds.).
59. Functional Data Analysis with R and MATLAB 2009, Springer. J. Ramsay (Ed.).
60. Drown D.M., et al. Invasive genotypes are opportunistic specialists not general purpose genotypes. Evol. Appl. 2011, 4:132-143.
61. Husby A., et al. Speeding up microevolution: the effects of increasing temperature on selection and genetic variance in a wild bird population. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1000585.
62. Simon J., et al. Prior mating experience modulates the dispersal of Drosophila in males more than in females. Behav. Genet. 2011, 41:754-767.
63. Rodríguez-Muñoz R., et al. Natural and sexual selection in a wild insect population. Science 2010, 328:1269-1272.
64. Rockman M.V. Reverse engineering the genotype-phenotype map with natural genetic variation. Nature 2008, 456:738-744.
65. Lande R., Arnold S.J. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 1983, 37:1210-1226.
66. Houle D., et al. Phenomics: the next challenge. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:855-866.
67. Izem R., Kingsolver J.G. Variation in continuous reaction norms: quantifying directions of biological interest. Am. Nat. 2005, 166:277-289.
68. Bjorklund M. Phenotypic variation of growth trajectories in finches. Evolution 1993, 47:1506-1514.
69. Bjorklund M. Variation in growth in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus). J. Evol. Biol. 1997, 10:139-155.
70. Brommer J.E., et al. Exploring the genetics of aging in a wild passerine bird. Am. Nat. 2007, 170:643-650.
71. Morgan T.J., et al. Ontogenies in mice selected for high voluntary wheel-running activity. I. Mean ontogenies. Evolution 2003, 57:646-657.
72. Nussey D.H., et al. Testing for genetic trade-offs between early- and late-life reproduction in a wild red deer population. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2008, 275:745-750.
73. Pettay J.E., et al. Age-specific genetic and maternal effects in fecundity of preindustrial Finnish women. Evolution 2008, 62:2297-2304.
74. Pletcher S.D., et al. Genome-wide transcript profiles in aging and calorically restricted Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:712-723.
75. Wilson A.J., et al. Ontogenetic patterns in heritable variation for body size: using random regression models in a wild ungulate population. Am. Nat. 2005, 166:E177-E192.
76. Wilson A.J., et al. Quantitative genetics of growth and cryptic evolution of body size in an island population. Evol. Ecol. 2007, 21:337-356.
77. Wilson A.J., et al. Evidence for a genetic basis of aging in two wild vertebrate populations. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:2136-2142.
78. Delcourt M., et al. Quantitative genetics of female mate preferences in an ancestral and a novel environment. Evolution 2010, 64:2758-2766.
79. Rundle H.D., et al. The diversification of mate preferences by natural and sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:1608-1615.
80. McGuigan K. Condition dependence varies with mating success in male Drosophila bunnanda. J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:1813-1825.
81. Sgrò C.M., Blows M.W. The genetic covariance among clinal environments after adaptation to an environmental gradient in Drosophila serrata. Genetics 2004, 167:1281-1291.
82. McGuigan K., et al. Quantitative genetic variation in static allometry in the threespine stickleback. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2010, 50:1067-1080.
83. Brommer J.E., et al. Exploring plasticity in the wild: laying date-temperature reaction norms in the common gull Larus canus. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2008, 275:687-693.
84. Gilchrist G.W. A quantitative genetic analysis of thermal sensitivity in the locomotor performance curve of Aphidius ervi. Evolution 1996, 50:1560-1572.
85. Husby A., et al. Contrasting patterns of phenotypic plasticity in reproductive traits in two great tit (Parus major) populations. Evolution 2010, 64:2221-2237.
86. Kingsolver J.G., et al. Variation, selection and evolution of function-valued traits. Genetica 2001, 112:87-104.
87. Kingsolver J.G., et al. Quantitative genetics of continuous reaction norms: thermal sensitivity of caterpillar growth rates. Evolution 2004, 58:1521-1529.
88. Knies J.L., et al. The genetic basis of thermal reaction norm evolution in lab and natural phage populations. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e201.
89. Knies J.L., et al. Hotter is better and broader: thermal sensitivity of fitness in a population of bacteriophages. Am. Nat. 2009, 173:419-430.
90. Latimer C.A., et al. Quantitative genetic variation for thermal performance curves within and among natural populations of Drosophila serrata. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24:965-975.
91. Lõhmus M., et al. Effects of temperature and growth hormone on individual growth trajectories of wild-type and transgenic coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch. J. Fish Biol. 2010, 76:641-654.
92. Nussey D.H., et al. Selection on heritable phenotypic plasticity in a wild bird population. Science 2005, 310:304-306.
93. The Functional Phylogenies Group Phylogenetic inference for function-valued traits: speech sound evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:160-166.
94. Evolution in Changing Environments 1968, Princeton University Press. R. Levins (Ed.).
95. Young N.M., et al. Quantitative analyses link modulation of sonic hedgehog signaling to continuous variation in facial growth and shape. Development 2010, 137:3405-3409.
96. Martin J.G.A., et al. Measuring individual differences in reaction norms in field and experimental studies: a power analysis of random regression models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2011, 2:362-374.
97. Yao F., et al. Functional data analysis for sparse longitudinal data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2005, 100:577-590.
98. Kingsolver J.G. Variation in growth and instar number in field and laboratory Manduca sexta. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2007, 274:977-981.
99. Wang H., Marron J.S. Object oriented data analysis: sets of trees. Ann. Stat. 2007, 35:1849-1873.