Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 32, Issue SUPPL.1, 2014, Pages

  Zmistowski, Benjamin ^a   Valle, Craig Della ^a   Bauer, Thomas W ^a   Malizos, Konstantinos N ^a   Alavi, Abbas ^a   Bedair, Hani ^a   Booth, Robert E ^a   Choong, Peter ^a   Deirmengian, Carl ^a   Ehrlich, Garth D ^a   Gambir, Anil ^a   Huang, Ronald ^a   Kissin, Yair ^a   Kobayashi, Hideo ^a   Kobayashi, Naomi ^a   Krenn, Veit ^a   Lorenzo, Drago ^a   Marston, S B ^a   Meermans, Geert ^a   Perez, Javier ^a   Ploegmakers, J J ^a   Rosenberg, Aaron ^a   Simpfendorfer, C ^a   Thomas, Peter ^a   Tohtz, Stephan ^a   Villafuerte, Jorge A ^a   Wahl, Peter ^a   Wagenaar, Frank Christiaan ^a   Witzo, Eivind ^a   more..

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

C REACTIVE PROTEIN;

ARTHROPATHY; COMORBIDITY; ERYTHROCYTE SEDIMENTATION RATE; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; NEUTROPHIL; NONHUMAN; NOTE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYNOVIAL FLUID; ALGORITHM; ARTHRITIS, INFECTIOUS; ARTHROPLASTY; BLOOD; BLOOD EXAMINATION; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CYTOLOGY; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METABOLISM; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS;

ALGORITHMS; ARTHRITIS, INFECTIOUS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; CHRONIC DISEASE; HEMATOLOGIC TESTS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; SPECIMEN HANDLING; SYNOVIAL FLUID;

EID: 84895805589     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22553     Document Type: Note

References (108)

1. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, et al. 2011. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2992-2994.
2. Berbari E, Mabry T, Tsaras G, et al. 2010. Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2102-2109.
3. Cipriano CA, Brown NM, Michael AM, et al. 2012. Serum and synovial fluid analysis for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic infection in patients with inflammatory arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:594-600.
4. Ghanem E, Antoci V Jr., Pulido L, et al. 2009. The use of receiver operating characteristics analysis in determining erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels in diagnosing periprosthetic infection prior to revision total hip arthroplasty. Int J Infect Dis 13:e444-e449.
5. Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, et al. 2007. Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1409-1416.
6. Olshaker JS, Jerrard DA. 1997. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate. J Emerg Med 15:869-874.
7. Schinsky MF, Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, et al. 2008. Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1869-1875.
8. Bedair H, Ting N, Jacovides C, et al. 2011. The Mark Coventry Award: diagnosis of early postoperative TKA infection using synovial fluid analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:34-40.
9. Dinneen A, Guyot A, Clements J, et al. 2013. Synovial fluid white cell and differential count in the diagnosis or exclusion of prosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J 95-B:554-557.
10. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Odum SM, et al. 2003. The value of white blood cell counts before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18:1038-1043.
11. Trampuz A, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, et al. 2004. Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. Am J Med 117:556-562.
12. Zmistowski B, Restrepo C, Huang R, et al. 2012. Periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis: a complete understanding of white blood cell count and differential. J Arthroplasty 27:1589-1593.
13. Tsaras G, Maduka-Ezeh A, Inwards CY, et al. 2012. Utility of intraoperative frozen section histopathology in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1700-1711.
14. Fehring TK, McAlister JA Jr. 1994. Frozen histologic section as a guide to sepsis in revision joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:229-237.
15. Ko PS, Ip D, Chow KP, et al. 2005. The role of intraoperative frozen section in decision making in revision hip and knee arthroplasties in a local community hospital. J Arthroplasty 20:189-195.
16. Lonner JH, Desai P, Dicesare PE, et al. 1996. The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1553-1558.
17. Morawietz L, Tiddens O, Mueller M, et al. 2009. Twentythree neutrophil granulocytes in 10 high-power fields is the best histopathological threshold to differentiate between aseptic and septic endoprosthesis loosening. Histopathology 54:847-853.
18. Nunez LV, Buttaro MA, Morandi A, et al. 2007. Frozen sections of samples taken intraoperatively for diagnosis of infection in revision hip surgery. Acta Orthop 78:226-230.
19. Stroh DA, Johnson AJ, Naziri Q, et al. 2012. How do frozen and permanent histopathologic diagnoses compare for staged revision after periprosthetic hip infections? J Arthroplasty 27:1663-1668 e1661.
20. Krenn V, Morawietz L, Kienapfel H, et al. 2013. Revised consensus classification. Histopathological classification of diseases associated with joint endoprostheses. Z Rheumatol 72:383-392.
21. Parvizi J, Jacovides C, Antoci V, et al. 2012. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: the utility of a simple yet unappreciated enzyme. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2242-2248.
22. Wetters NG, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, et al. 2012. Leukocyte esterase reagent strips for the rapid diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 27:8-11.
23. Aggarwal VK, Tischler E, Ghanem E, et al. 2013. Leukocyte esterase from synovial fluid aspirate: a technical note. J Arthroplasty 28:193-195.
24. Atkins BL, Athanasou N, Deeks JJ, et al. 1998. Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. J Clin Microbiol 36:2932-2939.
25. Mikkelsen DB, Pedersen C, Hojbjerg T, et al. 2006. Culture of multiple peroperative biopsies and diagnosis of infected knee arthroplasties. APMIS 114:449-452.
26. Muller M, Morawietz L, Hasart O, et al. 2008. Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection following total hip arthroplasty-evaluation of the diagnostic values of pre-And intraoperative parameters and the associated strategy to preoperatively select patients with a high probability of joint infection. J Orthop Surg Res 3:31.
27. Ghanem E, Ketonis C, Restrepo C, et al. 2009. Periprosthetic infection: where do we stand with regard to Gram stain? Acta Orthop 80:37-40.
28. Johnson AJ, Zywiel MG, Stroh DA, et al. 2010. Should gram stains have a role in diagnosing hip arthroplasty infections? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2387-2391.
29. Morgan PM, Sharkey P, Ghanem E, et al. 2009. The value of intraoperative Gram stain in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2124-2129.
30. Oethinger M, Warner DK, Schindler SA, et al. 2011. Diagnosing periprosthetic infection: false-positive intraoperative Gram stains. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:954-960.
31. Spangehl MJ, Masterson E, Masri BA, et al. 1999. The role of intraoperative gram stain in the diagnosis of infection during revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:952-956.
32. Zywiel MG, Stroh DA, Johnson AJ, et al. 2011. Gram stains have limited application in the diagnosis of infected total knee arthroplasty. Int J Infect Dis 15:e702-e705.
33. Deirmengian GK, Zmistowski B, Jacovides C, et al. 2011. Leukocytosis is common after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:3031-3036.
34. Toossi N, Adeli B, Rasouli MR, et al. 2012. Serum white blood cell count and differential do not have a role in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 27:51-54. e51.
35. Engh CA Jr., Ho H, Engh CA. 2009. Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: does early clinical outcome justify the chance of an adverse local tissue reaction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:406-412.
36. Mikhael MM, Hanssen AD, Sierra RJ. 2009. Failure of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty mimicking hip infection. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:443-446.
37. Molvik H, Hanna SA, de Roeck NJ. 2010. Failed metal-onmetal total hip arthroplasty presenting as painful groin mass with associated weight loss and night sweats. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39:E46-E49.
38. Diaz-Ledezma C, Lichstein PM, Dolan JH, et al. What is the best strategy to diagnose hip/knee periprosthetic joint infections in Medicare patients seen in the ambulatory setting?. CORR. Publication Pending.
39. Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW, et al. 2010. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18:760-770.
40. Fink B, Gebhard A, Fuerst M, et al. 2013. High diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in periprosthetic joint infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:956-964.
41. Fink B, Makowiak C, Fuerst M, et al. 2008. The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:874-878.
42. Fuerst M, Fink B, Ruther W. 2005. The value of preoperative knee aspiration and arthroscopic biopsy in revision total knee arthroplasty. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:36-41.
43. Malhotra R, Morgan DA. 2004. Role of core biopsy in diagnosing infection before revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:78-87.
44. Meermans G, Haddad FS. 2010. Is there a role for tissue biopsy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1410-1417.
45. Sadiq S, Wootton JR, Morris CA, et al. 2005. Application of core biopsy in revision arthroplasty for deep infection. J Arthroplasty 20:196-201.
46. Williams JL, Norman P, Stockley I. 2004. The value of hip aspiration versus tissue biopsy in diagnosing infection before exchange hip arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 19:582-586.
47. Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Duffy MC, et al. 1998. Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 27:1247-1254.
48. Bozic KJ, Lau E, Kurtz S, et al. 2012. Patient-related risk factors for postoperative mortality and periprosthetic joint infection in medicare patients undergoing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:130-137.
49. Bozic KJ, Lau E, Kurtz S, et al. 2012. Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection and postoperative mortality following total hip arthroplasty in Medicare patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:794-800.
50. Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, et al. 2008. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1710-1715.
51. Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ, et al. 2007. Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:90-93.
52. Ghanem E, Parvizi J, Burnett RS, et al. Cell count and differential of aspirated fluid in the diagnosis of infection at the site of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008. 90:1637-1643.
53. Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Sharkey P, et al. 2008. Diagnosis of infected total knee: findings of a multicenter database. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2628-2633.
54. Parvizi J, Jacovides C, Zmistowski B, et al. 2011. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection: is there a consensus? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:3022-3030.
55. Schumacher HR Jr., Sieck MS, Rothfuss S, et al. 1986. Reproducibility of synovial fluid analyses. A study among four laboratories. Arthritis Rheum 29:770-774.
56. Wyles CC, Larson DR, Houdek MT, et al. 2013. Utility of synovial fluid aspirations in failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28:818-823.
57. Society of Unicondylar Research and Continuing Education. 2012. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27: 46-50.
58. Bottner F, Wegner A, Winkelmann W, et al. 2007. Interleukin-6, procalcitonin and TNF-Alpha: markers of peri-prosthetic infection following total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:94-99.
59. Ghanem E, Houssock C, Pulido L, et al. 2008. Determining "true" leukocytosis in bloody joint aspiration. J Arthroplasty 23:182-187.
60. Butler-Wu SM, Burns EM, Pottinger PS, et al. 2011. Optimization of periprosthetic culture for diagnosis of Propionibacterium acnes prosthetic joint infection. J Clin Microbiol 49:2490-2495.
61. Larsen LH, Lange J, Xu Y, et al. 2012. Optimizing culture methods for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a summary of modifications and improvements reported since 1995. J Med Microbiol 61:309-316.
62. Neut D, van Horn JR, van Kooten TG, et al. 2003. Detection of biomaterial-Associated infections in orthopaedic joint implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 413:261-268.
63. Schafer P, Fink B, Sandow D, et al. 2008. Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy. Clin Infect Dis 47:1403-1409.
64. Barrack RL, Aggarwal A, Burnett RS, et al. 2007. The fate of the unexpected positive intraoperative cultures after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:94-99.
65. Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, et al. 2005. Prosthetic joint infection diagnosed postoperatively by intraoperative culture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 439:38-42.
66. Azzam K, Parvizi J, Jungkind D, et al. 2009. Microbiological, clinical, and surgical features of fungal prosthetic joint infections: a multi-institutional experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:142-149.
67. Hwang BH, Yoon JY, Nam CH, et al. 2012. Fungal periprosthetic joint infection after primary total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:656-659.
68. Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Cockerill FR III. 2006. Fungi, mycobacteria, zoonotic and other organisms in prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 451:64-72.
69. Tokarski AT, O'Neil J, Deirmengian CA, et al. 2013. The Routine use of atypical cultures in presumed aseptic revisions is unnecessary. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3171-3177.
70. Kamme C, Lindberg L. 1981. Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in deep infections after total hip arthroplasty: differential diagnosis between infectious and non-infectious loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 154:201-207.
71. Zappe B, Graf S, Ochsner PE, et al. 2008. Propionibacterium spp. in prosthetic joint infections: a diagnostic challenge. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:1039-1046.
72. Jacovides CL, Kreft R, Adeli B, et al. 2012. Successful identification of pathogens by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based electron spray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS) in culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:2247-2254.
73. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Hanssen AD, et al. 2006. Sonication of explanted prosthetic components in bags for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is associated with risk of contamination. J Clin Microbiol 44:628-631.
74. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, et al. 2007. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med 357:654-663.
75. Aggarwal VK, Higuera C, Deirmengian G, et al. 2013. Swab cultures are not as effective as tissue cultures for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3196-3203.
76. Font-Vizcarra L, Garcia S, Martinez-Pastor JC, et al. 2010. Blood culture flasks for culturing synovial fluid in prosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2238-2243.
77. Burnett RS, Aggarwal A, Givens SA, et al. 2010. Prophylactic antibiotics do not affect cultures in the treatment of an infected TKA: a prospective trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:127-134.
78. Tetreault MW, Wetters NG, Aggarwal V, et al. 2013. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: should prophylactic antibiotics be withheld before revision surgery to obtain appropriate cultures? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:52-56.
79. Achermann Y, Vogt M, Leunig M, et al. 2010. Improved diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection by multiplex PCR of sonication fluid from removed implants. J Clin Microbiol 48:1208-1214.
80. Bjerkan G, Witso E, Bergh K. 2009. Sonication is superior to scraping for retrieval of bacteria in biofilm on titanium and steel surfaces in vitro. Acta Orthop 80:245-250.
81. Kobayashi H, Oethinger M, Tuohy MJ, et al. 2009. Improving clinical significance of PCR: use of propidium monoazide to distinguish viable from dead Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Orthop Res 27:1243-1247.
82. Monsen T, Lovgren E, Widerstrom M, et al. 2009. In vitro effect of ultrasound on bacteria and suggested protocol for sonication and diagnosis of prosthetic infections. J Clin Microbiol 47:2496-2501.
83. Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Cofield RH, et al. 2009. Microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection by use of implant sonication. J Clin Microbiol 47:1878-1884.
84. Clarke MT, Roberts CP, Lee PT, et al. 2004. Polymerase chain reaction can detect bacterial DNA in aseptically loose total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 427:132-137.
85. Esteban J, Alonso-Rodriguez N, del-Prado G, et al. 2012. PCR-hybridization after sonication improves diagnosis of implant-related infection. Acta Orthop 83:299-304.
86. Gallo J, Kolar M, Dendis M, et al. 2008. Culture and PCR analysis of joint fluid in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. New Microbiol 31:97-104.
87. Gomez E, Cazanave C, Cunningham SA, et al. 2012. Prosthetic joint infection diagnosis using broad-range PCR of biofilms dislodged from knee and hip arthroplasty surfaces using sonication. J Clin Microbiol 50:3501-3508.
88. Mariani BD, Martin DS, Levine MJ, et al. 1996. The Coventry Award. Polymerase chain reaction detection of bacterial infection in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:11-22.
89. Panousis K, Grigoris P, Butcher I, et al. 2005. Poor predictive value of broad-range PCR for the detection of arthroplasty infection in 92 cases. Acta Orthop 76:341-346.
90. Rak M, Barlic-Maganja D, Kavcic M, et al. 2013. Comparison of molecular and culture method in diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. FEMS Microbiol Lett 343:42-48.
91. Rasouli MR, Harandi AA, Adeli B, et al. 2012. Revision total knee arthroplasty: infection should be ruled out in all cases. J Arthroplasty 27:1239-1243. e1231-e1232.
92. Tunney MM, Patrick S, Curran MD, et al. 1999. Detection of prosthetic hip infection at revision arthroplasty by immunofluorescence microscopy and PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 37:3281-3290.
93. Portillo ME, Salvado M, Sorli L, et al. 2012. Multiplex PCR of sonication fluid accurately differentiates between prosthetic joint infection and aseptic failure. J Infect 65:541-548.
94. Kobayashi N, Inaba Y, Choe H, et al. 2009. Simultaneous intraoperative detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus and pan-bacterial infection during revision surgery: use of simple DNA release by ultrasonication and real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2896-2902.
95. Tigges S, Stiles RG, Roberson JR. 1994. Appearance of septic hip prostheses on plain radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:377-380.
96. Love C, Tomas MB, Marwin SE, et al. 2001. Role of nuclear medicine in diagnosis of the infected joint replacement. Radiographics 21:1229-1238.
97. Cyteval C, Hamm V, Sarrabere MP, et al. 2002. Painful infection at the site of hip prosthesis: CT imaging. Radiology 224:477-483.
98. Chryssikos T, Parvizi J, Ghanem E, et al. 2008. FDG-PET imaging can diagnose periprosthetic infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1338-1342.
99. Delank KS, Schmidt M, Michael JW, et al. 2006. The implications of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of endopros-thetic loosening and infection in hip and knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, blinded study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:20.
100. Glithero PR, Grigoris P, Harding LK, et al. 1993. White cell scans and infected joint replacements. Failure to detect chronic infection. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:371-374.
101. Graute V, Feist M, Lehner S, et al. 2010. Detection of lowgrade prosthetic joint infections using 99mTc-Antigranulocyte SPECT/CT: initial clinical results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1751-1759.
102. Love C, Marwin SE, Tomas MB, et al. 2004. Diagnosing infection in the failed joint replacement: a comparison of coincidence detection 18F-FDG and 111In-labeled leukocyte/99mTc-sulfur colloid marrow imaging. J Nucl Med 45:1864-1871.
103. Magnuson JE, Brown ML, Hauser MF, et al. 1988. In-111-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy in suspected orthopedic prosthesis infection: comparison with other imaging modalities. Radiology 168:235-239.
104. Nagoya S, Kaya M, Sasaki M, et al. 2008. Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection at the hip using triple-phase bone scintigraphy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:140-144.
105. Savarino L, Baldini N, Tarabusi C, et al. 2004. Diagnosis of infection after total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 70:139-145.
106. Scher DM, Pak K, Lonner JH, et al. 2000. The predictive value of indium-111 leukocyte scans in the diagnosis of infected total hip, knee, or resection arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 15:295-300.
107. Segura AB, Munoz A, Brulles YR, et al. 2004. What is the role of bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of infected joint prostheses? Nucl Med Commun 25:527-532.
108. Sousa R, Massada M, Pereira A, et al. 2011. Diagnostic accuracy of combined 99mTc-sulesomab and 99mTcnanocolloid bone marrow imaging in detecting prosthetic joint infection. Nucl Med Commun 32:834-839.