Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: Does early clinical outcome justify the chance of an adverse local tissue reaction?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 468, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 406-412

  Engh Jr , Charles A ^a   Ho, Henry ^a   Engh, Charles A ^a  

^a ANDERSON ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BONE ATROPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; JOINT EFFUSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MECHANICAL STRESS; METAL ON METAL BEARING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; REOPERATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; DISLOCATION; FEMALE; FOREIGN BODY REACTION; HIP; HYPERSENSITIVITY; INSTRUMENTATION; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOLYSIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

METAL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; DISLOCATIONS; FEMALE; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; HYPERSENSITIVITY; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOLYSIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 76249101202     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1063-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. HC Amstutz PE Beaulé FJ Dorey MJ Le Duff PA Campbell TA Gruen 2004 Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 86 28 39 14711942
2. KJ Bozic SM Kurtz E Lau K Ong V Chiu TP Vail HE Rubash DJ Berry 2009 The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 1614 1620 10.2106/JBJS.H.01220 19571083
3. KJ Bozic SM Kurtz E Lau K Ong TP Vail DJ Berry 2009 The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 128 133 10.2106/JBJS.H.00155 19122087
4. P Campbell A Shimmin L Walter M Solomon 2008 Metal sensitivity as a cause of groin pain in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing J. Arthroplasty 23 1080 1085 10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.024 18534479
5. J Daniel PB Pynsent DJ McMinn 2004 Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 86 177 184 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.14600 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7ltlaisg%3D%3D 15046429 (Pubitemid 38386853)
6. AP Davies HG Willert PA Campbell ID Learmonth CP Case 2005 An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87 18 27 10.2106/JBJS.C.00949 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FgvVymuw%3D%3D 15634811 (Pubitemid 40094135)
7. CP Delaunay 2004 Metal-on-metal bearings in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty J. Arthroplasty 19 8 Suppl 3 35 40 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.002 15578550 (Pubitemid 39575825)
8. LD Dorr Z Wan DB Longjohn B Dubois R Murken 2000 Total hip arthroplasty with use of the Metasul metal-on-metal articulation, Four to seven-year results J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 82 789 798 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czhsFKgsg%3D%3D 10859098
9. D Dowson C Hardaker M Flett GH Isaac 2004 A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part II: design J. Arthroplasty 19 8 Suppl 3 124 130 15578566 (Pubitemid 39575841)
10. CA Engh P Massin KE Suthers 1990 Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 257 107 128 2199114
11. N Hallab K Merritt JJ Jacobs 2001 Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 83 428 436 10.1302/0301-620X.83B3. 9674 11263649 (Pubitemid 32221575)
12. MH Huo NF Gilbert 2005 What's new in hip arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87 2133 2146 10.2106/JBJS.E.00474 16140830 (Pubitemid 41279146)
13. JJ Jacobs NJ Hallab 2006 Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal-on-metal bearings: A local effect of metal hypersensitivity? J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 88 1171 1172 10.2106/JBJS.F.00453 16757747 (Pubitemid 43837108)
14. SS Jameson DJ Langton S Natu TV Nargol 2008 The influence of age and sex on early clinical results after hip resurfacing: an independent center analysis J. Arthroplasty 23 6 Suppl 1 50 55 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.019 18555643
15. P Korovessis G Petsinis M Repanti T Repantis 2006 Metallosis after contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Five to nine-year follow-up J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 88 1183 1191 10.2106/JBJS.D.02916 1:STN:280: DC%2BD28zktlOhsg%3D%3D 16757749 (Pubitemid 43837110)
16. WT Long LD Dorr V Gendelman 2004 An American experience with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties: a 7-year follow-up study J. Arthroplasty 19 8 Suppl 3 29 34 15578549
17. SJ MacDonald 2004 Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: the concerns Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 429 86 93 10.1097/01.blo.0000150309.48474.8b 15577471 (Pubitemid 39579197)
18. H Migaud A Jobin C Chantelot F Giraud P Laffargue A Duquennoy 2004 Cementless metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in patients less than 50 years of age: comparison with a matched control group using ceramic-on-polyethylene after a minimum 5-year follow-up J. Arthroplasty 19 8 Suppl 3 23 28 15578548
19. MM Mikhael AD Hanssen RJ Sierra 2009 Failure of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty mimicking hip infection. A report of two cases J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 91 443 446 10.2106/JBJS.H.00603 19181991
20. I Milosev R Trebse S Kovac A Cör V Pisot 2006 Survivorship and retrieval analysis of Sikomet metal-on-metal total hip replacements at a mean of seven years J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 88 1173 1182 10.2106/JBJS.E.00604 16757748 (Pubitemid 43837109)
21. YS Park YW Moon SJ Lim JM Yang G Ahn YL Choi 2005 Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87 1515 1521 10.2106/JBJS.D.02641 15995119 (Pubitemid 40917752)
22. CB Rieker R Schön P Köttig 2004 Development and validation of a second-generation metal-on-metal bearing: laboratory studies and analysis of retrievals J. Arthroplasty 19 8 Suppl 3 5 11 15578545
23. RB Treacy CW McBryde PB Pynsent 2005 Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 87 167 170 10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15030 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7gs1elsg%3D%3D 15736736 (Pubitemid 40282567)
24. HG Willert GH Buchhorn A Fayyazi R Flury M Windler G Köster CH Lohmann 2005 Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87 28 36 10.2106/JBJS.A.02039pp 15637030 (Pubitemid 40094136)
25. B Zicat CA Engh E Gokcen 1995 Patterns of osteolysis around total hip components inserted with and without cement J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 77 432 439 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7pslKqtA%3D%3D 7890792