Molecular mechanics and dynamics: Numerical tools to sample the configuration space

Frontiers in Bioscience - Landmark

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 578-604

  Masetti, Matteo ^a   Rocchia, Walter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Atomistic simulation; Configurational space; Force fields; Molecular dynamics; Molecular mechanics; Polarizable force fields; Review

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; REVIEW;

ALGORITHMS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION;

EID: 84895477380     PISSN: 27686701     EISSN: 27686698     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2741/4229     Document Type: Review

References (129)

1. W. F. van Gunsteren, D. Bakowies, R. Baron, I. Chandrasekhar, M. Christen, X. Daura, P. Gee, D. P. Geerke, A. Glättli, P. H. Hünenberger, M. A. Kastenholz, C. Oostenbrink, M. Schenk, D. Trzesniak, N. F. A. van der Vegt and H. B. Yu: Biomolecular Modeling: Goals, Problems, Perspectives. Angew Chem Int Ed, 45(25), 4064-4092 (2006)
2. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller and E. Teller: Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines. J Chem Phys, 21(6), 1087-1092 (1953)
3. B. J. Alder and T. E. Wainwright: Phase Transition for a Hard Sphere System. J Chem Phys, 27(5), 1208-1209 (1957)
4. B. J. Alder and T. E. Wainwright: Studies in Molecular Dynamics. I. General Method. J Chem Phys, 31(2), 459-466 (1959)
5. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley. Computer Simulation of Liquids. Oxford University Press, New York (1987)
6. D. Frenkel and B. Smit. Understanding Molecular Simulation. Academic Press (1996)
7. L. Verlet: Computer "Experiments" on Classical Fluids. I. Thermodynamical Properties of Lennard-Jones Molecules. Phys Rev, 159(1), 98-103 (1967)
8. R. W. Hockney. Potential calculation and some applications. In: Methods in Computational Physics: Advances in Research and Applications. Elsevier (1970)
9. W. C. Swope, H. C. Andersen, P. H. Berens and K. R. Wilson: A computer simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physical clusters of molecules: Application to small water clusters. J Chem Phys, 76(1), 637-649 (1982)
10. W. B. Streett, D. J. Tildesley and G. Saville: Multiple time-step methods in molecular dynamics. Mol Phys, 35(3), 639-648 (1978)
11. G. J. Martyna, M. E. Tuckerman, D. J. Tobias and M. L. Klein: Explicit reversible integrators for extended systems dynamics. Mol Phys, 87(5), 1117-1157 (1996)
12. J.-P. Ryckaert, G. Ciccotti and H. J. C. Berendsen: Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys, 23(3), 327-341 (1977)
13. H. C. Andersen: Rattle: A "velocity" version of the shake algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations. J Comput Phys, 52(1), 24-34 (1983)
14. P. J. Steinbach and B. R. Brooks: New sphericalcutoff methods for long-range forces in macromolecular simulation J Comput Chem, 15, 667-683 (1994)
15. L. Greengard and V. Rokhlin: A fast algorithm for particle simulations. J Comput Phys, 73, 325-348 (1987)
16. K. E. Schmidt and M. A. Lee: Implementing the fast multipole method in three dimensions. J Stat Phys, 63, 1223-1235 (1991)
17. S. W. De Leeuw, J. W. Perram and E. R. Smith: Simulation of electrostatic systems in periodic boundary conditions. I. Lattice sums and dielectric constants. Proc R Soc London, Ser A, 373, 27-56 (1980)
18. S. W. De Leeuw, J. W. Perram and E. R. Smith: Simulation of electrostatic systems in periodic boundary conditions. II. Equivalence of boundary conditions. Proc R Soc London, Ser A, 373, 56-66 (1980)
19. S. W. De Leeuw, J. W. Perram and E. R. Smith: Simulation of electrostatic systems in periodic boundary conditions. III. Further theory and applications. Proc R Soc London, Ser A, 388, 177-193 (1983)
20. J.-P. Hansen: Molecular-dynamics simulations of Coulomb systems in two and three dimensions. In: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Statistical Mechanics Systems. Ed G. C. a. W. G. Hoover. North Holland, Amsterdam (1986)
21. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky and W. T. Vetterling. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)
22. R. W. Hockney and J. W. Eastwood. Computer Simulations Using Particles. McGraw Hill, New York (1981)
23. T. Darden, D. York and L. Pedersen: Particle mesh Ewald: An N log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys, 98, 10089-10092 (1993)
24. M. Deserno and C. Holm: How to mesh up Ewald sums. I. A theoretical and numerical comparison of various particle mesh routines. J Chem Phys, 109, 7678-7693 (1998)
25. G. Brancato, N. Rega and V. Barone: Reliable molecular simulations of solute-solvent systems with a minimum number of solvent shells. J Chem Phys, 124, 214505-214513 (2006)
26. W. Im, S. Berneche and B. Roux: Generalized solvent boundary potential for computer simulations. J Chem Phys, 114(7), 2924-2937 (2001)
27. P. H. Hünenberger: Thermostat algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations. Adv Polymer Sci, 173, 105-149 (2005)
28. L. V. Woodcock: Isothermal molecular dynamics calculations for liquid salts. Chem Phys Lett, 10(3), 257-261 (1971)
29. H. J. C. Berendsen, J. P. M. Postma, W. F. v. Gunsteren, A. DiNola and J. R. Haak: Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys, 81(8), 3684-3690 (1984)
30. H. C. Andersen: Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature. J Chem Phys, 72(4), 2384-2393 (1980)
31. S. Nosé: A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Mol Phys, 52, 255-268 (1984)
32. S. Nosé: A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J Chem Phys, 81(1), 511-519 (1984)
33. W. G. Hoover: Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys Rev A: At Mol Opt Phys, 31(3), 1695-1697 (1985)
34. G. J. Martyna, M. L. Klein and M. Tuckerman: Nosé-Hoover chains: The canonical ensemble via continuous dynamics. J Chem Phys, 97(4), 2635-2643 (1992)
35. T. Schneider and E. Stoll: Molecular-dynamics study of a three-dimensional one-component model for distortive phase transitions. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter, 17(3), 1302-1322 (1978)
36. S. C. Harvey, R. K. Z. Tan and T. E. Cheatham: The flying ice cube: Velocity rescaling in molecular dynamics leads to violation of energy equipartition. J Comput Chem, 19(7), 726-740 (1998)
37. M. Parrinello and A. Rahman: Crystal Structure and Pair Potentials: A Molecular-Dynamics Study. Phys Rev Lett, 45(14), 1196-1199 (1980)
38. M. Parrinello and A. Rahman: Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. J Appl Phys, 52(12), 7182-7190 (1981)
39. J. D. van der Waals: On the continuity of the gas and liquid state. PhD Thesis, Leiden (The Netherlands) (1873)
40. P. Geerlings, F. De Proft and W. Langenaeker: Conceptual Density Functional Theory. Chem Rev, 103, 1793-1873 (2003)
41. W. D. Cornell, P. Cieplak, C. I. Bayly, I. R. Gould, K. M. Merz, D. M. Ferguson, D. C. Spellmeyer, T. Fox, J. W. Caldwell and P. A. Kollman. J Am Chem Soc, 117, 5179 (1995)
42. A. D. MacKerell, D. Bashford, M. Bellott, R. L. Dunbrack, J. D. Evanseck, M. J. Field, S. Fischer, J. Gao, H. Guo, S. Ha, D. Joseph-McCarthy, L. Kuchnir, K. Kuczera, F. T. K. Lau, C. Mattos, S. Michnick, T. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, B. Prodhom, W. E. Reiher, B. Roux, M. Schlenkrich, J. C. Smith, R. Stote, J. Straub, M. Watanabe, J. Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, D. Yin and M. Karplus: All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins. J Phys Chem B, 102(18), 3586-3616 (1998)
43. W. L. Jorgensen, D. S. Maxwell and J. Tirado-Rives: Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids. J Am Chem Soc, 118(45), 11225-11236 (1996)
44. X. Daura, A. E. Mark and W. F. V. Gunsteren: Parametrization of aliphatic CHn united atoms of GROMOS96 force field. J Comput Chem, 19(5), 535-547 (1998)
45. N. L. Allinger: Conformational analysis. 130. MM2. A hydrocarbon force field utilizing V1 and V2 torsional terms. J Am Chem Soc, 99(25), 8127-8134 (1977)
46. N. L. Allinger, Y. H. Yuh and J. H. Lii: Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. 1. J Am Chem Soc, 111(23), 8551-8566 (1989)
47. J. H. Lii and N. L. Allinger: Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. 2. Vibrational frequencies and thermodynamics. J Am Chem Soc, 111(23), 8566-8575 (1989)
48. J. H. Lii and N. L. Allinger: Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. 3. The van der Waals' potentials and crystal data for aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons. J Am Chem Soc, 111(23), 8576-8582 (1989)
49. T. A. Halgren: Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94. J Comput Chem, 17(5-6), 490-519 (1996)
50. T. A. Halgren: Merck molecular force field. II. MMFF94 van der Waals and electrostatic parameters for intermolecular interactions. J Comput Chem, 17(5-6), 520-552 (1996)
51. T. A. Halgren: Merck molecular force field. III. Molecular geometries and vibrational frequencies for MMFF94. J Comput Chem, 17(5-6), 553-586 (1996)
52. S. Mayo, B. Olafson and W. Goddard: DREIDING: a generic force field for molecular simulations. J Phys Chem, 94(26), 8897-8909 (1990)
53. A. C. T. van Duin, S. Dasgupta, F. Lorant and W. A. Goddard: ReaxFF: A Reactive Force Field for Hydrocarbons. J Phys Chem A, 105(41), 9396-9409 (2001)
54. F. Jensen and P.-O. Norrby: Transition states from empirical force fields. Theor Chem Acc, 109(1), 1-7 (2003)
55. S. J. Weiner, P. A. Kollman, D. A. Case, U. C. Singh, C. Ghio, G. Alagona, S. Profeta and P. Weiner: A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins. J Am Chem Soc, 106(3), 765-784 (1984)
56. B. R. Brooks, R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan and M. Karplus: CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem, 4(2), 187-217 (1983)
57. W. L. Jorgensen and C. J. Swenson: Optimized intermolecular potential functions for amides and peptides. Structure and properties of liquid amides. J Am Chem Soc, 107(3), 569-578 (1985)
58. W. L. Jorgensen and J. Tirado-Rives: The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc, 110(6), 1657-1666 (1988)
59. S. J. Weiner, P. A. Kollman, D. T. Nguyen and D. A. Case: An all atom force field for simulations of proteins and nucleic acids. J Comput Chem, 7(2), 230-252 (1986)
60. E. Neria, S. Fischer and M. Karplus: Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems. J Chem Phys, 105(5), 1902-1921 (1996)
61. L. Monticelli, S. K. Kandasamy, X. Periole, R. G. Larson, D. P. Tieleman and S.-J. Marrink: The MARTINI Coarse-Grained Force Field: Extension to Proteins. J Chem Theory Comput, 4(5), 819-834 (2008)
62. V. Tozzini: Coarse-grained models for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 15(2), 144-150 (2005)
63. J. W. Ponder, D. A. Case and D. Valerie. Force Fields for Protein Simulations. In: Advances in Protein Chemistry. Academic Press (2003)
64. P. M. Morse: Diatomic Molecules According to the Wave Mechanics. II. Vibrational Levels. Phys Rev, 34(1), 57-64 (1929)
65. V. Pophristic and L. Goodman: Hyperconjugation not steric repulsion leads to the staggered structure of ethane. Nature, 411(6837), 565-568 (2001)
66. A. D. Mackerell, M. Feig and C. L. Brooks: Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem, 25(11), 1400-1415 (2004)
67. A. Rahman and F. H. Stillinger: Molecular Dynamics Study of Liquid Water. J Chem Phys, 55(7), 3336-3359 (1971)
68. W. L. Jorgensen: Quantum and statistical mechanical studies of liquids. 10. Transferable intermolecular potential functions for water, alcohols, and ethers. Application to liquid water. J Am Chem Soc, 103(2), 335-340 (1981)
69. J. Gasteiger and M. Marsili: Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity - a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron, 36(22), 3219-3228 (1980)
70. T. A. Halgren and R. B. Nachbar: Merck molecular force field. IV. conformational energies and geometries for MMFF94. J Comput Chem, 17(5-6), 587-615 (1996)
71. R. S. Mulliken: Electronic Population Analysis on LCAO-MO Molecular Wave Functions. I. J Chem Phys, 23(10), 1833-1840 (1955)
72. R. F. W. Bader: Atoms in molecules. Acc Chem Res, 18(1), 9-15 (1985)
73. U. Dinur and A. T. Hagler: Geometry-dependent atomic charges: Methodology and application to alkanes, aldehydes, ketones, and amides. J Comput Chem, 16(2), 154-170 (1995)
74. C. I. Bayly, P. Cieplak, W. Cornell and P. A. Kollman: A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J Phys Chem, 97(40), 10269-10280 (1993)
75. W. D. Cornell, P. Cieplak, C. I. Bayly and P. A. Kollmann: Application of RESP charges to calculate conformational energies, hydrogen bond energies, and free energies of solvation. J Am Chem Soc, 115(21), 9620-9631 (1993)
76. P. Cieplak, W. D. Cornell, C. Bayly and P. A. Kollman: Application of the multimolecule and multiconformational RESP methodology to biopolymers: Charge derivation for DNA, RNA, and proteins. J Comput Chem, 16(11), 1357-1377 (1995)
77. J. W. Ponder, C. Wu, P. Ren, V. S. Pande, J. D. Chodera, M. J. Schnieders, I. Haque, D. L. Mobley, D. S. Lambrecht, R. A. DiStasio, M. Head-Gordon, G. N. I. Clark, M. E. Johnson and T. Head-Gordon: Current Status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field. J Phys Chem B, 114(8), 2549-2564 (2010)
78. K. Lindorff-Larsen, S. Piana, K. Palmo, P. Maragakis, J. L. Klepeis, R. O. Dror and D. E. Shaw: Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform, 78(8), 1950-1958 (2010)
79. G. A. Kaminski, R. A. Friesner, J. Tirado-Rives and W. L. Jorgensen: Evaluation and Reparametrization of the OPLS-AA Force Field for Proteins via Comparison with Accurate Quantum Chemical Calculations on Peptides J Phys Chem B, 105(28), 6474-6487 (2001)
80. J. Wang, P. Cieplak and P. A. Kollman: How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? J Comput Chem, 21(12), 1049-1074 (2000)
81. V. Hornak, R. Abel, A. Okur, B. Strockbine, A. Roitberg and C. Simmerling: Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform, 65(3), 712-725 (2006)
82. Y. Duan, C. Wu, S. Chowdhury, M. C. Lee, G. Xiong, W. Zhang, R. Yang, P. Cieplak, R. Luo, T. Lee, J. Caldwell, J. Wang and P. Kollman: A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J Comput Chem, 24(16), 1999-2012 (2003)
83. O. Guvench and A. D. MacKerell. Comparison of Protein Force Fields for Molecular Dynamics Simulations. In: Molecular Modeling of Proteins. Humana Press (2008)
84. N. Foloppe, A. D. MacKerell and Jr.: All-atom empirical force field for nucleic acids: I. Parameter optimization based on small molecule and condensed phase macromolecular target data. J Comput Chem, 21(2), 86-104 (2000)
85. A. D. MacKerell and N. K. Banavali: All-atom empirical force field for nucleic acids: II. Application to molecular dynamics simulations of DNA and RNA in solution. J Comput Chem, 21(2), 105-120 (2000)
86. A. R. van Buuren, S. J. Marrink and H. J. C. Berendsen: A molecular dynamics study of the decane/water interface. J Phys Chem, 97(36), 9206-9212 (1993)
87. L. D. Schuler, X. Daura and W. F. van Gunsteren: An improved GROMOS96 force field for aliphatic hydrocarbons in the condensed phase. J Comput Chem, 22(11), 1205-1218 (2001)
88. J. B. Klauda, R. M. Venable, J. A. Freites, J. W. O'Connor, D. J. Tobias, C. Mondragon-Ramirez, I. Vorobyov, A. D. MacKerell and R. W. Pastor: Update of the CHARMM All-Atom Additive Force Field for Lipids: Validation on Six Lipid Types. J Phys Chem B, 114(23), 7830-7843 (2010)
89. A. A. Skjevik, B. D. Madej, R. C. Walker and K. Teigen: LIPID11: A Modular Framework for Lipid Simulations Using Amber. J Phys Chem B, 116(36), 11124-11136 (2012)
90. C. Dickson, L. Rosso, R. Betz, R. Walker and I. Gould: GAFFlipid: a General Amber Force Field for the accurate molecular dynamics simulation of phospholipid. Soft Matter, 8(37), 9617-9627 (2012)
91. M. L. P. Price, D. Ostrovsky and W. L. Jorgensen: Gas-phase and liquid-state properties of esters, nitriles, and nitro compounds with the OPLS-AA force field. J Comput Chem, 22(13), 1340-1352 (2001)
92. J. Wang, R. M. Wolf, J. W. Caldwell, P. A. Kollman and D. A. Case: Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem, 25(9), 1157-1174 (2004)
93. K. Vanommeslaeghe, E. Hatcher, C. Acharya, S. Kundu, S. Zhong, J. Shim, E. Darian, O. Guvench, P. Lopes, I. Vorobyov and A. D. Mackerell: CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. J Comput Chem, 31(4), 671-690 (2010)
94. S. Giordano and W. Rocchia: Shape-dependent effects of dielectrically nonlinear inclusions in heterogeneous media. J Appl Phys, 98(10), 104101-104110 (2005)
95. S. Giordano and W. Rocchia: Predicting the dielectric nonlinearity of anisotropic composite materials via tensorial analysis. J Phys: Condens Matter, 18, 10585-10599 (2006)
96. P. Ren and J. W. Ponder: Consistent treatment of inter- and intramolecular polarization in molecular mechanics calculations. J Comput Chem, 23(16), 1497-1506 (2002)
97. P. Ren, C. Wu and J. W. Ponder: Polarizable Atomic Multipole-Based Molecular Mechanics for Organic Molecules. J Chem Theory Comput, 7(10), 3143-3161 (2011)
98. J. D. Jackson: Classical Electrodynamics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1998)
99. M. Gilson and B. Honig: Calculation of the total electrostatic energy of a macromolecular system: solvation energies, binding energies, and conformational analysis. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform, 4, 7-18 (1988)
100. B. Honig and A. Nicholls: Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science, 268, 1144-1149 (1995)
101. W. Rocchia, E. Alexov and B. Honig: Extending the Applicability of the Nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann Equation: Multiple Dielectric Constants and Multivalent Ions. J Phys Chem B, 105(28), 6507-6514 (2001)
102. A. Onufriev. Continuum Electrostatics Solvent Modeling with the Generalized Born Model. In: Modeling Solvent Environments. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA (2010)
103. A. Onufriev, D. A. Case and D. Bashford: Effective Born radii in the generalized Born approximation: the importance of being perfect. J Comput Chem, 23(14), 1297-1304 (2002)
104. W. C. Still, A. Tempczyk, R. C. Hawley and T. Hendrickson: Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc, 112(16), 6127-6129 (1990)
105. C. N. Schutz and A. Warshel: What are the dielectric " constants" of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform, 44(4), 400-417 (2001)
106. L. Wang, Z. Zhang, W. Rocchia and E. Alexov: Using DelPhi capabilities to mimic protein's conformational reorganization with amino acid specific dielectric constants. Commun Comput Phys, 13, 13-30 (2013)
107. T.-H. Tan and R. Luo: Continuum treatment of electronic polarization effect. J Chem Phys, 126(9), 094103-094108 (2007)
108. T.-H. Tan, C. Tan and R. Luo: Continuum polarizable force field within the Poisson-Boltzmann framework. J Phys Chem, 112(25), 7675-7688 (2008)
109. B. Thole: Molecular polarizabilities calculated with a modified dipole interaction. Chem Phys, 59(3), 341-350 (1981)
110. P. Cieplak, J. Caldwell and P. Kollman: Molecular mechanical models for organic and biological systems going beyond the atom centered two body additive approximation: aqueous solution free energies of methanol and N-methyl acetamide, nucleic acid base, and amide hydrogen bonding and chloroform/water partition coefficients of the nucleic acid bases. J Comput Chem, 22(10), 1048-1057 (2001)
111. Z.-X. Wang, W. Zhang, C. Wu, H. Lei, P. Cieplak and Y. Duan: Strike a balance: Optimization of backbone torsion parameters of AMBER polarizable force field for simulations of proteins and peptides. J Comput Chem, 27(6), 781-790 (2006)
112. R. W. Dixon and P. A. Kollman: Advancing beyond the atom-centered model in additive and nonadditive molecular mechanics. J Comput Chem, 18(13), 1632-1646 (1997)
113. G. A. Kaminski, H. A. Stern, B. J. Berne, R. A. Friesner, Y. X. Cao, R. B. Murphy, R. Zhou and T. A. Halgren: Development of a polarizable force field for proteins via ab initio quantum chemistry: First generation model and gas phase tests. J Comput Chem, 23(16), 1515-1531 (2002)
114. G. A. Kaminski, H. A. Stern, B. J. Berne and R. A. Friesner: Development of an Accurate and Robust Polarizable Molecular Mechanics Force Field from ab Initio Quantum Chemistry. J Phys Chem A, 108(4), 621-627 (2003)
115. J. R. Maple, Y. Cao, W. Damm, T. A. Halgren, G. A. Kaminski, L. Y. Zhang and R. A. Friesner: A Polarizable Force Field and Continuum Solvation Methodology for Modeling of Protein-Ligand Interactions. J Chem Theory Comput, 1(4), 694-715 (2005)
116. W. Xie, J. Pu, A. D. MacKerell and J. Gao: Development of a Polarizable Intermolecular Potential Function (PIPF) for Liquid Amides and Alkanes. J Chem Theory Comput, 3(6), 1878-1889 (2007)
117. S. W. Rick and S. J. Stuart: Potentials and Algorithms for Incorporating Polarizability in Computer Simulations. Reviews in Computational Chemistry, 18, 89-146 (2002)
118. P. Cieplak, F.-Y. Dupradeau, Y. Duan and J. Wang: Polarization effects in molecular mechanical force fields. J Phys: Condens Matter, 21(33), 333102 (2009)
119. G. Lamoureux, J. A. D. MacKerell and B. Roux: A simple polarizable model of water based on classical Drude oscillators. J Chem Phys, 119(10), 5185-5197 (2003)
120. V. M. Anisimov, G. Lamoureux, I. V. Vorobyov, N. Huang, B. t. Roux and A. D. MacKerell: Determination of Electrostatic Parameters for a Polarizable Force Field Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator. J Chem Theory Comput, 1(1), 153-168 (2004)
121. A. Rappe and W. Goddard: Charge equilibration for molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem, 95(8), 3358-3363 (1991)
122. A. K. Rappe, C. J. Casewit, K. S. Colwell, W. A. Goddard and W. M. Skiff: UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc, 114(25), 10024-10035 (1992)
123. J. L. Banks, G. A. Kaminski, R. Zhou, D. T. Mainz, B. J. Berne and R. A. Friesner: Parametrizing a polarizable force field from ab initio data. I. The fluctuating point charge model. J Chem Phys, 110(2), 741-754 (1999)
124. S. Patel and C. L. Brooks: CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: I parameterization and application to bulk organic liquid simulations. J Comput Chem, 25(1), 1-16 (2004)
125. S. Patel, A. D. Mackerell and C. L. Brooks: CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: II Protein/solvent properties from molecular dynamics simulations using a nonadditive electrostatic model. J Comput Chem, 25(12), 1504-1514 (2004)
126. R. P. Iczkowski and J. L. Margrave: Electronegativity. J Am Chem Soc, 83(17), 3547-3551 (1961)
127. R. S. Mulliken: A New Electroaffinity Scale; Together with Data on Valence States and on Valence Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities. J Chem Phys, 2(11), 782-793 (1934)
128. R. G. Parr and R. G. Pearson: Absolute hardness: companion parameter to absolute electronegativity. J Am Chem Soc, 105(26), 7512-7516 (1983)
129. R. G. Parr, R. A. Donnelly, M. Levy and W. E. Palke: Electronegativity: The density functional viewpoint. J Chem Phys, 68(8), 3801-3807 (1978)