Constructivism as a theoretical foundation for the use of technology in social studies?

Theory and Research in Social Education

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 72-104

  Doolittle, Peter E ^a   Hicks, David ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844463619     PISSN: 00933104     EISSN: 21631654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2003.10473216     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Ackerman, P., Kyllonen, P., & Roberts, R. (1999). Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinants. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Alleman, J. & Brophy, J. (1998) Assessment in a social constructivist classroom. Social Education, 62, 32-34.
3. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1995). Applications and misapplications of cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Retrieved June 29, 2002, from http://act.psy.cmu.edu/personal/ja/misapplied.html
4. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11.
5. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1998). Radical constructivism and cognitive psychology. In D. Ravitch, (Ed.), Brookings papers on educational policy: 1998(pp. 227-255). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.
6. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Education psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
7. Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problem of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
8. Barr, R. D., Barth, J. L., & Shermis, S. S. (1978). Defining the social studies. Palm Springs, CA: ETC Publications.
9. Baxter, M. G., Ferrell, R. H., & Wiltz, J. E. (1964). The teaching of American history in high schools. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
10. Becker, H. (1999). Internet use by teacher. Retrieved from the Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations Web site: http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/findings/Internet-Use/startpage.htm
11. Becker, H., Ravitz, J.L., & Wong, Y. (1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers and software. Retrieved from the Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations Web site: http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/findings/ComputerUse/html/startpage.htm
12. Berger, P, & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social constructions of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
13. Berson, M. J. (1996). Effectiveness of computer technology in social studies: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 486-499.
14. Berson, M. J., Berson, I., & Ralston, M. (1999). Threshing out the myths and facts of Internet safety: A response to separating wheat from chaff. Social Education, 63(3) 160-161.
15. Berson, M. J., Cruz, B. C., Duplass, J. A., & Johnston, J.H. (2001) Social studies and the Internet Upper Saddle River, NJ. Merrill.
16. st century (pp. 209-229). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
17. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
18. Braun, J. A. & Risinger, C. F. (1999). Surfing social studies: The Internet book. Washington D.C.: National Council for Social Studies.
19. Breivik, P. (1998). Student learning in the information age. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
20. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
21. Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill
22. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.
23. Cobb, P, & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspective in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31, 175-190.
24. Code, L. (1993). Taking subjectivity into account. In L. Alcoff and E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 15-48). New York: Routledge.
25. Cogan, J. J., Grossman, D., & Lei, M. (2000). Citizenship: The democratic imagination in a global context. Social Education, 64 (1), 48-52.
26. Crocco, M. S. (2001). Leveraging constructivist learning in the social studies classroom. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(3), 386-394. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss3/currentissues/socialstudies/article2. htm
27. Cuban, L. (2001) Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Dewey, J. (1896-1972). The reflex arc concept in psychology. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The early works (Vol. 5. pp. 96-109). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
29. Diem, R. (1999, September/October). Editor’s notes. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 2(1), 2.
30. Doolittle, P. E. (2001). The need to leverage theory in the development of guidelines for using technology in social studies teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(1), 501-516. Retrieved from http://www. citejournal.org/vol1/iss4/currentissues/socialstudies/article2.htm
31. Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (p. 170-198). New York: Macmillan.
32. Ehman, L. H., & Glenn, A. D. (1991). Interactive technology in the social studies. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 513-522). New York: Macmillan.
33. Engle, S. (1960) Decision-making: The heart of the social studies. Social Education, 24, 306.
34. Ernest, P. (1995). The one and the many. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 459-486). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Fleury, S. (1997). Misconstruing constructivism and state regulation of teaching (unlearning what we know about educational reforms). Theory and Research in Social Education, 25(3), 349-353.
36. Fontana, L. A. (1997). Online learning communities. Implications for the social studies. In P. Martorella (Ed.), Interactive technologies and the social studies (pp. 1-26). New York; State University of New York Press.
37. Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.). (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspective, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Freiwald, W. D. (1997). Computer use in elementary social studies. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 418 024)
39. Garrison, J. (1998). Toward a pragmatic social constructivism. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (Eds.), Constructivism and education (pp. 43-60). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.
40. Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Gergen, K. J. (1995). Social construction and the educational process. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale, Constructivism in education (pp. 17-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43. Harrington, H. L. (1993). The essence of technology and the education of teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 5-15.
44. Hendry, G. D. (1996). Constructivism and educational practice. Australian Journal of Education, 40(1), 19-45.
45. Hertzberg, H. W. (1981). Social studies reform 1880-1980. Boulder, CO: Social Science Education Consortium.
46. Hicks, D., Tlou, J., Lee, J., Parry, L., & Doolittle, P. (2002) Global connections: Using the Internet to support citizenship education. International Journal of Social Education, 17(1), 93-102
47. Hooper, S., & Hokanson, B. (2000) The changing face of knowledge. Social Education, 64(1), 28-31.
48. Hope, W. C. (1996). It’s time to transform social studies teaching. The Social Studies, 87(4), 149-151.
49. Howe, K., & Berv, J. (2000). Constructing constructivism: Epistemological and pedagogical. In. D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 19-40). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Hunt, M. (2000). Teaching historical significance. In J. Arthur and R. Phillips (Eds.), Issues in history teaching (pp. 39-53). London: Routledge.
51. th century: From scientific objectivity to the postmodern challenge. London: Wesleyan University Press.
52. James, W. (1958). Talks with teachers. New York: Norton. (Originally published in 1899)
53. Jonassen, D. H, Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
54. Kleg, M. (1997). Technology and the darkside: Hate online. In P. Martorella (Ed.), Interactive technologies and the social studies (pp. 71-90). New York: State University of New York Press.
55. Kluwe, R. H. (1982). Cognitive knowledge and executive control: Metacognition, In D. R. Griffin (Ed.), Animal mind-human mind (pp. 201-224). New York: SpringerVerlag.
56. Lorsbach, A. W., & Basolo, F. (1999). Problem-based learning. In J. A. Braun and C. F. Risinger (Eds.), Surfing social studies: The Internet book (pp. 121-128). Washington D.C; National Council for Social Studies.
57. Martorella, P. (Ed.). (1997) Interactive technologies and the social studies. New York: State University of New York Press.
58. Martorella, P. (1998) Technology and the social studies or which way to the sleeping giant? Theory and Research in Social Education, 25, 511-514.
59. Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learners as information processors: Legacies and limitations of educational psychology’s second metaphor. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 151-161.
60. McCarty L. P., & Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Seductive illusions: Von Glasersfeld and Gergen on epistemology and education. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 41-85). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
61. Means, B., & Olsen, K. (1994) The link between technology and authentic learning. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 15-19.
62. Milman, N., & Heinecke, W. (2000). Innovative integration of technology in an undergraduate history course. Theory and Research in Social Education, 28(4), 546-565.
63. Molebash, P. (2002). Constructivism meets technology integration: The CUFA technology guidelines in an elementary social studies methods course. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30(3), 429-455.
64. Moshman, D. (1982). Exogenous, endogenous, and dialectical constructivism. Developmental Review, 2, 371-384.
65. Naisbitt, J. (1982). Megatrends. New York: Warner Books.
66. National Council for the Social Studies. (1994) Expectations for excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, D.C.: National Council for Social Studies.
67. National School Board Foundation. (2002). Are we there yet? Research and guidelines on schools' use of the Internet. Retrieved from the National School Board Web site: http://www.nsbf.org/thereyet/fulltext.htm
68. November, A. (1998). The web-teaching Zack to think. Retrieved from http://www.anovember.com/articles/zack.html
69. Oliver, K. (2000). Methods for developing constructivist learning on the web. Education Technology, 40, 5-18.
70. Packer, M. J., & Boicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35(4), 227-241.
71. Peck, K. & Dorricott, D. (1994). Why use technology? Educational Leadership, 51(7) 1114.
72. Pepper, S.C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
73. Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5-12.
74. Phillips, D. C. (Ed). (2000). Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
75. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent. New York: Viking Press.
76. Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibrium of cognitive structures. New York: Viking.
77. Prawat, R. S. (1996). Constructivisms, modern and postmodern. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 215-225.
78. Prawat, R. S., & Floden, R. E. (1994). Philosophical perspectives on constructivist views of learning. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 37-48.
79. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In W. Damon, D. Kuhn, & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (pp. 679-744). New York: Wiley.
80. Ross, E. W. (1997). The struggle for the social studies curriculum. In E. W. Ross (Ed.), The social studies curriculum: Purposes, problems, and possibilities (pp. 3-20). New York: State University of New York Press.
81. Russell, T. L. (1999). No significant difference phenomenon. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
82. Sahakian, W. S., & Sahakian, M. L., (1966). Ideas of the great philosophers. New York: Barnes & Noble.
83. Saxe, D. W. (1988). Candy selling and math learning. Educational Researcher, 17(6), 1421.
84. Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (1999). Student engagement with social issues in a multimedia-supported learning environment. Theory and Research in Social Education, 27(4), 472-504
85. Scheurman, G. (1998) From behaviorist to constructivist teaching. Social Education, (62)1, 6-9.
86. Scheurman, G. & Newmann, F. (1998). Authentic intellectual work in social studies: Putting performance before pedagogy. Social Education, (62)1, 23-25.
87. Schug, M. C., Western, R. D., & Enochs, L. G. (1997). Why do social studies teachers use textbooks? The answer may lay in economic theory. Social Education, 61(2), 97-101.
88. Scott, T. J. & O’Sullivan, M. (2000). The Internet and information literacy: Taking the first step toward technology education in the social studies. The Social Studies, May/June, 121-125.
89. Shaver, J. P., Davis, O. L., & Helburn, S. W. (1980).An interpretive report on the status of precollege social studies education based on three NSF-funded studies in What are the needs in precollege science, mathematics, and social studies education. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
90. Shiveley, J., & Van Fossen, P. (1999). Critical thinking and the Internet: Opportunities for the social studies classroom. The Social Studies, Jan/Feb, 42-46.
91. Spencer, J. M., & Barth, J. L. (1992). The deconstruction of history in the public school classroom. Social Education, 56(1), 13-14.
92. Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. (Eds.). (1995). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
93. Theisen, R. (2000). President’s address. Social studies education: A challenge, a choice, and commitment. Social Education, 64(1), 6-8, 63-64.
94. th Annual Meeting of the National Council for the Social Studies, Orlando, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED438205)
95. von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The Invented Reality (pp. 17-40). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.