Temperate trees and shrubs as global invaders: The relationship between invasiveness and native distribution depends on biological traits

Biological Invasions

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 577-589

  Pyšek, Petr ^a,b,c   Jarošík, Vojtěch ^a,b   Pergl, Jan ^a   Moravcová, Lenka ^a   Chytrý, Milan ^d   Kühn, Ingolf ^e  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^d MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^e HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Central Europe; Dispersal; Distribution; Invasiveness; Native range; Pollination; Reproduction; Shrubs; Source area approach; Tree invasions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895169153     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-013-0600-2     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Barton AM, Brewster LB, Cox AN, Prentiss NK (2004) Non-indigenous woody invasive plants in a rural New England town. Biol Invasions 6: 205-211.
2. Bellingham PJ, Duncan RP, Lee GW, Buxton RP (2004) Seedling growth rate and survival do not predict invasiveness in naturalized woody plants in New Zealand. Oikos 106: 308-316.
3. Blackburn TM, Duncan RP (2001) Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414: 195-197.
4. Bucharová A, van Kleunen M (2009) Introduction history and species characteristics partly explain naturalization success of North American woody species in Europe. J Ecol 97: 230-238.
5. Carl G, Kühn I (2007) Analyzing spatial autocorrelation in species distributions using Gaussian and Logit models. Ecol Model 207: 159-170.
6. Carmen JG, Brotherson JD (1982) Comparison of sites infested and not infested with saltcedar (Tamarix pentandra) and Russian olive (Eleagnus angustifolia). Weed Sci 30: 360-364.
7. Castro-Díez P, Godoy O, Saldana A, Richardson DM (2011) Predicting invasiveness of Australian acacias on the basis of their native climatic affinities, life history traits and human use. Divers Distrib 17: 934-945.
8. Chytrý M (2012) Vegetation of the Czech Republic: diversity, ecology, history and dynamics. Preslia 84: 427-504.
9. Crawley MJ (2002) Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, Chichester.
10. DAISIE (2009) Handbook of alien species in Europe. Springer, Berlin.
11. Danihelka J, Chrtek J Jr, Kaplan Z (2012) Checklist of vascular plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 84: 647-811.
12. Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang K-Y, Zeger SL (2002) Analysis of longitudinal data. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Durka W, Michalski SG (2012) DaPhne: a dated phylogeny of a large European flora for phylogenetically informed ecological analyses. Ecology 93: 2297.
14. Ellenberg H (1988) Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge.
15. Freckleton RP, Cooper N, Jetz W (2011) Comparative methods as a statistical fix: the dangers of ignoring an evolutionary model. Am Nat 178: E10-E17.
16. Gallagher RV, Leishman MR, Miller JT, Hui C, Richardson DM, Suda J, Trávníček P (2011) Invasiveness in introduced Australian acacias: the role of species traits and genome size. Divers Distrib 17: 884-897.
17. Gibson M, Richardson DM, Marchante E, Marchante H, Rodger JG, Stone GN, Byrne M, Fuentes-Ramírez A, George N, Harris C, Johnson SD, Le Roux JJ, Miller JT, Murphy DJ, Pauw A, Prescott MN, Wandrag EM, Wilson JRU (2011) Reproductive biology of Australian Acacia species: important mediator of invasiveness? Divers Distrib 17: 911-933.
18. Godoy O, Richardson DM, Valladares F, Castro-Díez P (2009) Flowering phenology of invasive alien plant species compared with native species in three Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Ann Bot 103: 485-494.
19. Goodwin BJ, McAllister AJ, Fahrig J (1999) Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Conserv Biol 13: 422-426.
20. Grime JP, Hodgson JG (1987) Botanical contributions to contemporary ecological theory. New Phytol 106(Suppl): 283-295.
21. Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M, Rost TL (2002) Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. Am Nat 159: 396-419.
22. Hamilton MA, Murray BR, Cadotte MW, Hose GC, Baker AC, Harris CJ, Licari D (2005) Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales. Ecol Lett 8: 1066-1074.
23. Hanspach J, Kühn I, Pyšek P, Boos E, Klotz S (2008) Correlates of naturalization and occupancy of introduced ornamentals in Germany. Perspect Plant Ecol Evolut Syst 10: 241-250.
24. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
25. Henderson L (1998) Invasive woody alien plants of the southern and south-western Cape region. Bothalia 28: 91-112.
26. Herron PM, Martine CT, Latimer AM, Leicht-Young SA (2007) Invasive plants and their ecological strategies: prediction and explanation of woody plant invasions in New England. Divers Distrib 13: 633-644.
27. Higgins SI, Richardson DM (1998) Pine invasions in the southern hemisphere: modelling interactions between organism, environment and disturbance. Plant Ecol 135: 79-93.
28. Hui C, Richardson DM, Robertson MP, Wilson JRU, Yates CJ (2011) Macroecology meets invasion ecology: linking native distribution of Australian acacias to invasiveness. Divers Distrib 17: 872-883.
29. Klotz S, Kühn I, Durka W (2002) BIOLFLOR: Eine Datenbank mit biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen zur Flora von Deutschland. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 38: 1-334.
30. Křivánek M, Pyšek P (2006) Predicting invasions by woody species in a temperate zone: a test of three risk assessment schemes in the Czech Republic (Central Europe). Divers Distrib 12: 319-327.
31. Křivánek M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2006) Planting history and propagule pressure as predictors of invasions by woody species in a temperate region. Conserv Biol 20: 1487-1498.
32. Kubát K, Hrouda L, Chrtek Jr, Kaplan Z, Kirschner J, Štěpánek J (eds) (2002) Klíč ke květeně České republiky [Key to the Flora of the Czech Republic]. Academia, Praha.
33. Kueffer C, Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2013) Integrative invasion science: model systems, multi-site studies, focused meta-analysis, and invasion syndromes. New Phytol 200: 615-633.
34. Kühn I, Dormann CF (2012) Less than eight (and a half) misconceptions of spatial analysis. J Biogeogr 39: 995-998.
35. Kühn I, Brandenburg M, Klotz S (2004) Why do alien plant species that reproduce in natural habitats occur more frequently? Divers Distrib 10: 417-425.
36. Küster EC, Kühn I, Bruelheide H, Klotz S (2008) Trait interactions help explain plant invasion success in the German flora. J Ecol 96: 860-868.
37. Liang K, Zeger S (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73: 13-22.
38. Mack RN (2000) Cultivation fosters plant naturalization by reducing environmental stochasticity. Biol Invasions 2: 111-122.
39. Mulvaney M (2001) The effect of introduction pressure on the naturalisation of ornamental woody plants in south eastern Australia. In: Groves RH, Panetta FD, Virtue JG (eds) Weed risk assessment. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 186-193.
40. Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models, 4th edn. Irwin, Illinois.
41. Paradis E (2012) Analysis of phylogenetics and evolution with R, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.
42. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289-290.
43. Prinzing A, Durka W, Klotz S, Brandl R (2002) Which species become aliens? Evol Ecol Res 4: 385-405.
44. Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2005) Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants. In: Inderjit (ed) Invasive plants: ecological and agricultural aspects. Birkhäuser Verlag-AG, Basel, pp 77-96.
45. Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2007) Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: Where do we stand? In: Nentwig W (ed) Biological invasions. Springer, Berlin, pp 97-125.
46. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, Webster G, Williamson M, Kirschner J (2004a) Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53: 131-143.
47. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Williamson M (2004b) Predicting and explaining plant invasions through analysis of source area floras: some critical considerations. Divers Distrib 10: 179-187.
48. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J, Jarošík V, Sixtová Z, Weber E (2008) Geographical and taxonomical biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 237-244.
49. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Randall R, Chytrý M, Kühn I, Tichý L, Danihelka J, Chrtek J Jr, Sádlo J (2009a) The global invasion success of Central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and specie traits. Divers Distrib 15: 891-903.
50. Pyšek P, Křivánek M, Jarošík V (2009b) Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species. Ecology 90: 2734-2744.
51. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J (2011) Alien plants introduced by different pathways differ in invasion success: unintentional introductions as a threat to natural areas. PLoS ONE 6: e24890.
52. Pyšek P, Chytrý M, Pergl J, Sádlo J, Wild J (2012a) Plant invasions in the Czech Republic: current state, introduction dynamics, invasive species and invaded habitats. Preslia 84: 576-630.
53. Pyšek P, Danihelka J, Sádlo J, Chrtek J Jr, Chytrý M, Jarošík V, Kaplan Z, Krahulec F, Moravcová L, Pergl J, Štajerová K, Tichý L (2012b) Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (2nd edition): checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns. Preslia 84: 155-255.
54. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Hejda M, Schaffner U, Vilà M (2012c) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species' traits and environment. Glob Change Biol 18: 1725-1737.
55. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
56. R DevelopmentCore Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria.
57. Randall RP (2002) A global compendium of weeds. R. G. and F. J. Richardson, Melbourne.
58. Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv Biol 11: 193-203.
59. Rejmánek M (1996) A theory of seed plant invasiveness: the first sketch. Biol Conserv 78: 171-181.
60. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77: 1655-1661.
61. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (2013) Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species-2013 update of the global database. Divers Distrib 19: 1093-1094.
62. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Higgins SI, Pitcairn MJ, Grotkopp E (2005) Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. In: Mooney HA, Mack RM, McNeely JA, Neville L, Schei P, Waage J (eds) Invasive alien species: searching for solutions. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 104-161.
63. Richardson DM (1998) Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conserv Biol 12: 18-26.
64. Richardson DM (2006) Pinus: a model group for unlocking the secrets of alien plant invasions? Preslia 78: 375-388.
65. Richardson DM, Bond WJ (1991) Determinants of plant distribution: evidence from pine invasions. Am Nat 137: 639-668.
66. Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2006) Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progr Phys Geogr 30: 409-431.
67. Richardson DM, Rejmánek M (2004) Conifers as invasive aliens: a global survey and predictive framework. Divers Distrib 10: 321-331.
68. Richardson DM, Rejmánek M (2011) Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species-a global review. Divers Distrib 17: 788-809.
69. Richardson DM, Macdonald IA, Forsyth GC (1989) Reduction in plant species richness under stands of alien trees and shrubs in fynbos biome. S Afr For J 149: 1-8.
70. Richardson DM, Williams PA, Hobbs RJ (1994) Pine invasions in the Southern Hemisphere: determinants of spread and invadability. J Biogeogr 21: 511-527.
71. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6: 93-107.
72. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Carlton JT (2011) A compendium of essential concepts and terminology in biological invasions. In: Richardson DM (ed) Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of Charles Elton. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 409-420.
73. Rouget M, Richardson DM (2003) Inferring process from pattern in plant invasions: a semimechanistic model incorporating propagule pressure and environmental factors. Am Nat 162: 713-724.
74. Sádlo J, Chytrý M, Pyšek P (2007) Regional species pools of vascular plants in habitats of the Czech Republic. Preslia 79: 303-321.
75. Schönfelder P (1999) Mapping the flora of Germany. Acta Bot Fenn 162: 43-53.
76. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York.
77. Sol D, Vilà M, Kühn I (2008) The comparative analysis of historical alien introductions. Biol Invasions 10: 1119-1129.
78. Stohlgren TJ, Pyšek P, Kartesz J, Nishino M, Pauchard A, Winter M, Pino J, Richardson DM, Wilson JRU, Murray BR, Phillips ML, Ming-yang L, Celesti-Grapow L, Font X (2011) Widespread plant species: natives versus aliens in our changing world. Biol Invasions 13: 1931-1944.
79. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Midgley GF, Hughes GO, Rouget M (2005) Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob Change Biol 11: 2234-2250.
80. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Rouget M, Procheş S, Wilson JRU (2006) Interactions between environment, species traits and human uses describe patterns of plant invasions. Ecology 87: 1755-1769.
81. van Kleunen M, Johnson SD, Fischer M (2007) Predicting naturalization of southern African Iridaceae in other regions. J Appl Ecol 44: 594-603.
82. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Schlaepfer D, Jeschke JM, Fischer M (2010) Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecol Lett 13: 947-958.
83. Vitousek PM, Walker LR (1989) Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawaii: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecol Monogr 59: 247-265.
84. Westoby M, Leishman MR, Lord JM (1995) On misinterpreting the 'phylogenetic correction'. J Ecol 83: 531-534.
85. Widrlechner MP (2001) The role of environmental analogs in identifying potentially invasive woody plants in Iowa. J Iowa Acad Sci 108: 158-165.
86. Wilson JRU, Richardson DM, Rouget M, Procheş S, Amis MA, Henderson L, Thuiller W (2007) Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions. Divers Distrib 13: 11-22.
87. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology. Springer, New York.