‘Seed + expand’: a general methodology for detecting publication oeuvres of individual researchers

Scientometrics

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 1403-1417

  Reijnhoudt, Linda ^a   Costas, Rodrigo ^b   Noyons, Ed ^b   Börner, Katy ^a,c   Scharnhorst, Andrea ^a  

^a Data Archiving and Networked Services   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Author disambiguation; Publication oeuvre; Scalable methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894615112     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1256-0     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baars, C., Dijk, E., Hogenaar, A., & van Meel, M. (2008). Creating an academic information domain: A Dutch example. In A. Bosnjak & M. Stempfhuber (Eds.), Get the Good Current Research Information System (CRIS) Going: Ensuring Quality of Service for the User in the European Research Area. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems, Maribor, Slovenia, June 05–07 (pp. 77–87). http://depot.knaw.nl/5628/.
2. Börner, K., Ding, Y., Conlon, M., & Corson-Rikert, J. (2012). VIVO: A semantic approach to scholarly networking and discovery. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
3. Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2005). Bibliometric indicators at the micro-level: Some results in the area of natural resources at the Spanish CSIC. Research Evaluation,14(2), 110–120.
4. Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2008). Development of a thematic filter for the bibliometric delimitation on interdisciplinary area: The case of Marine Science. Revista Española de Documentación Científica.,31(2), 261–272.
5. Costas, R., van Bochove, C. (2012). On the relationship between author collaboration and impact of scientific publications. In Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators.
6. Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Bordons, M. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,61(8), 1564–1581.
7. D’Angelo, C. A., Guiffrida, C., & Abramo, G. (2011). A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(2), 257–269.
8. Foley, M. J., & Kochalk, D. L. (2010). Open researcher and contributor identification (ORCID). In Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284314850.
9. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,102(46), 16569–16572.
10. Lariviere, V. (2010). A bibliometric analysis of Quebec’s PhD students’contribution to the advancement of knowledge. PhD Thesis. McGill University, Montreal.
11. Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics,68(3), 519–533.
12. Moed, H. F., Aisati, M., & Plume, A. (2012). Studying scientific migration in Scopus. Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/2Fs11192-012-0783-9.
13. Reijnhoudt, L., Stamper, M. J., Börner, K., Baars, C., & Scharnhorst, A. (2012). NARCIS: Network of Experts and Knowledge Organizations in the Netherlands. Poster Presented at the Third Annual VIVO Conference, August 22–24, 2012, Florida, USA. http://vivoweb.org/conference2012, http://cns.iu.edu/docs/research/2012_NARCIS.pdf.
14. Scharnhorst, A., Börner, K., & Van den Besselaar, P. (Eds.). (2012). Models of science dynamics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23068-4.
15. Scharnhorst, A., & Garfield, E. (2011). Tracing scientific influence. Dynamics of Socio-Economic Systems,2(11), 1–31.
16. Scopus. (2009). Frequently asked questions—author identifier.http://www.info.sciverse.com/documents/files/scopus-training/resourcelibrary/pdf/FAQ_Author_Identifier_09.pdf
17. Sladek, R., Tieman, J., Fazekas, B. S., Abernethy, A. P., & Currow, D. C. (2006). Development of a subject search filter to find information relevant to palliative care in the general medical literature. Journal of the Medical Library Association.,94(4), 394–401.
18. Smalheiser, N. R., & Torvik, V. I. (2009). Author name disambiguation. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology.,43, 287–313.
19. Sonnenwald, D. H. (2005). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology,41(1), 643–681.
20. Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2007). Modelling of bibliometric approaches and importance of output verification in research performance assessment. Research Evaluation,16(2), 93–105.
21. Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. A. N. F. (2011). An impact indicator for researchers. Scientometrics,89(2), 607–629.
22. Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,63(12), 2378–2392.
23. White, Howard D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,52(2), 87–108.
24. Wouters, P., & Costas, R. (2012). Users, narcissism and control—tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. In M. Van Berchum & K. Russell (Eds.), SURFfoundation (p. 50). http://www.surffoundation.nl/en/publicaties/Pages/Users_narcissism_control.aspx.
25. Zuccala, A., Costas, R., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2010). Evaluating research departments using individual level bibliometrics. Eleventh International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. CWTS-Leiden University, Leiden.