Bibliometric indicators at the micro-level: Some results in the area of natural resources at the Spanish CSIC

Research Evaluation

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 110-120

  Costas, Rodrigo ^a   Bordons, Maria ^a  

^a Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28844468399     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154405781776238     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. M Bordons, F Morillo, M T Fernandez and I Gomez (2003), 'One step further in the production of bibliometric indicators at the micro-level: differences by gender and professional category of scientists', Scientometrics, 57(2), pages 159-173.
2. N Carayol and M Matt (2004), 'Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university', Research Policy, 33(8), pages 1081-1102.
3. B Cronin (2001), 'Hyperauthorship: a postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?', Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), pages 558-569.
4. M Davis and C S Wilson (2001), 'Elite researchers in ophthalmology: aspects of publishing strategies, collaboration and multi-disciplinarity1, Scientometrics, 52(3), pages 395-410.
5. J S Dietz, I Chompalov, B Bozeman, E O'Neil Lane and J Park (2000), 'Using the curriculum vitae to study the career paths of scientists and engineers: and exploratory assessment', Scientometrics, 49(3), pages 419-442.
6. M T Fernandez, A Cabrero, M A Zulueta and I Gómez (1993), 'Constructing a relational database for bibliometric analysis', Scientometrics, 3(1), pages 55-62.
7. A K Formann (1992), 'Academia personnel selection: description and prognosis of the decisions made by the committee for the selection and candidates for a full professorship', Scientometrics, 25(3), pages 401-414.
8. M Gatto, G D Leo and G Paris (1999), ll 'Chi e' della ricerca ambientalle in Italia: valutazione statistica della produzione scientifica italiana net settore ambientale (Fondazione Lombardia per I'Ambiente, Milan), http://www.flanet.org/download/publications/marinogatto.pdf. last accessed 7 January 2005.
9. M Gaughan and B Bozeman (2002), 'Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research grants with research center funding', Research Evaluation, 11(1), pages 17-26.
10. B Godin, F Trempe-Bertrand, J P Robitaille and G Cote (2002), Bibliometric Profile of Environmental Science in Canada: 1980-1998 (Observatoire des sciences et des technologies, Quebec). http://www.ost.qc.ca/OSTE/pdf/ rapports/2002/Env_Can_105_EN.pdf. last accessed 7 January 2005.
11. S Hemlin and M Gustafsson (1996), 'Research production in the arts and humanities: a questionnaire study of factors influencing research performance', Scientometrics, 37(3), pages 417-432.
12. J C Huber (2001), 'A new method for analyzing scientific productivity', Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(13), pages 1089-1099.
13. E Jimenez, F D Moya and E Delgado (2003), The evolution of research activity in Spain: the impact of the National Commission for the Evaluation of Research Activity (CNEAI)', Research Policy, 32(1), pages 123-142.
14. M M S Karki (1990), 'Environmental science research in India: an analysis of publications', Scientometrics, 18(5-6), pages 363-373.
15. J S Katz and J Plevin (1998), 'Environmental science in the UK: a bibliometric study', Research Evaluation, 7(1), pages 39-52.
16. L Liang, J Liu and R Rousseau (2004), 'Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: a case study of three major Chinese universities', Scientometrics, 61(1), pages 3-18.
17. A J Lotka (1926), 'The frequency distribution of scientific productivity', Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 16, pages 317-323.
18. R K Merton (1968), 'The Matthew effect in science', Science, 159, pages 56-63.
19. H F Moed (2000), 'Bibliometric indicators reflect publication and management strategies', Scientometrics, 47(2), pages 323-346.
20. A J Nederhof and A F J van Raan (1987), 'Peer review and bibliometric indicators of scientific performance: a comparison of cum laude doctorates with ordinary doctorates in physics', Scientometrics, 11(5-6), pages 333-350.
21. C Nicolini, S Vakula, M Italo Balla and E Gandini (1995), 'Can the assignment of university chairs be automated?', Scientometrics, 32(2), pages 93-107.
22. J R Ferez Alvarez-Ossorio, M J Martin Sempere, M T Fernandez, M Vazquez, C Galban, L Plaza, I Aguillo, C Ronda, A Cabrero, S Hernando and I Gomez (1997), 'Analisis de la producción científica española en ecología y medio ambiente, 1989-1993', Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 20(4), pages 363-375.
23. K Prpic (1996), 'Characteristics and determinants of eminents scientists' productivity', Scientometrics, 36(1), pages 185-206.
24. K Prpic (2000), 'The publication productivity of young scientists: an empirical study', Scientometrics, 49(3), pages 453-490.
25. D Rennie, V Yank and L Emanuel (1997), 'When authorship fails: a proposal to make contributors accountable', Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(7), pages 579-585.
26. J Rey and M J Martin (1999), The role of domestic journals in geographically-oriented disciplines: the case of Spanish journals on earth sciences', Scientometrics, 45(2), pages 203-216.
27. C Y K So (1998), 'Citation ranking versus expert judgment in evaluating communication scholars: effects of research specialty size and individual prominence', Scientometrics, 41(3), pages 325-333.
28. G Sonnert (1995), 'What makes a good scientist?: determinants of peer evaluation among biologists', Social Studies of Science, 25, pages 35-55.
29. T W Steele and J C Stier (2000), The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: a forestry case study', Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(5), pages 476-484.
30. P M Trenchard (1992), 'Hierarchical bibliometry: a new objective measure of individual scientific performance to replace publication counts and to complement citation measures', Journal of Information Science, (18), pages 69-75.
31. F J Trueba and H Guerrero (2004), 'A robust formula to credit authors for their publications', Scientometrics, 60(2), pages 181-204.
32. L Turner and J Mairesse (2004), 'Individual productivity differences in public research: how important are non individual determinants? An econometric study of French physicists' publications and citations (1986-997)', in Workshop: The Empirical Economic Analysis of the Academic Sphere (Louis Pasteur University, Strasbourg), http://courmot2.u-strasbg.fr/EEAAS/turner_mairesse.pdf. last accessed 12 January 2005.
33. A F J van Raan (1996), 'Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises', Scientometrics, 36(3), pages 397-420.
34. P Vinkler (1995), 'Some aspects of the evaluation of scientific and related performances of individuals', Scientometrics, 32(2), pages 109-116.