Ecological and genetic determinants of Pepino Mosaic Virus emergence

Journal of Virology

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 3359-3368

  Moreno Pérez, Manuel G ^a   Pagán, Israel ^a   Aragón Caballero, Liliana ^b   Cáceres, Fátima ^c   Fraile, Aurora ^a   García Arenal, Fernando ^a  

^a ETSI MontesTechnical University of Madrid   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AGRARIA LA MOLINA   (Peru)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE SAN AGUSTÍN DE AREQUIPA   (Peru)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTIVATED SPECIES; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HOST RANGE; MOSAIC VIRUS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PEPINO MOSAIC VIRUS; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PLANT PATHOGEN INTERACTION; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOMATO; VIRAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; VIRUS CELL INTERACTION; VIRUS CHARACTERIZATION; VIRUS EMERGENCE; VIRUS STRAIN; VIRUS TRANSMISSION; WILD PLANT;

BASE SEQUENCE; CAPSID PROTEINS; ECOLOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PERU; PHYLOGENY; PLANT DISEASES; POTEXVIRUS;

EID: 84894573078     PISSN: 0022538X     EISSN: 10985514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02980-13     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Woolhouse MEJ, Dye C. 2001. Population biology of emerging and re-emerging pathogens. Preface. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 356:981-982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2001.0899.
2. Anderson PK, Cunningham AA, Patel NG, Morales FJ, Epstein PR, Daszak P. 2004. Emerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 535-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.021.
3. Jones RAC. 2009. Plant virus emergence and evolution: origins, new encounter scenarios, factors driving emergence, effects of changing world conditions, and prospects for control. Virus Res. 141:113-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2008.07.028.
4. Elena SF, Bedhomme S, Carrasco P, Cuevas JM, de la Iglesia F, Lafforgue G, Lalic J, Prosper A, Tromas N, Zwart MP. 2011. The evolutionary genetics of emerging plant RNA viruses. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 24:287-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-09-10-0214.
5. Cooper I, Jones RAC. 2006. Wild plants and viruses: under-investigated ecosystems. Adv. Virus Res. 67:1-47. http://dx.doi.org/org/10.1016/S0065-3527(06)67001-2.
6. Gómez P, Sempere RN, Aranda MA. 2012. Pepino mosaic virus and Tomato torrado virus: emerging viruses affecting tomato crops in the Mediterranean basin. Adv. Virus Res. 84:505-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394314-9.00014-2.
7. Hanssen IM, Thomma BPHJ. 2010. Pepino mosaic virus: a successful pathogen that rapidly evolved from emerging to endemic in tomato crops. Mol. Plant Pathol. 11:179-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00600.x.
8. Aguilar JM, Hernández-Gallardo DM, Cenis JL, Lacasa A, Aranda MA. 2002. Complete sequence of the Pepino mosaic virus RNA genome. Arch. Virol. 147:2009-2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00705-002-0848-9.
9. Mumford RA, Metcalfe EJ. 2001. The partial sequencing of the genomic RNA of a UK isolate of Pepino mosaic virus and the comparison of the coat protein sequence with other isolates from Europe and Peru. Arch. Virol. 146:2455-2460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007050170015.
10. Pagán I, Córdoba-Selles MC, Martínez-Priego L, Fraile A, Malpica JM, Jordá C, García-Arenal F. 2006. Genetic structure of the population of Pepino mosaic virus infecting tomato crops in Spain. Phytopathology 96: 274-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-96-0274.
11. Hanssen IM, Mumford R, Blystad DR, Cortez I, Hasiów-Jaroszewska B, Hristova D, Pagán I, Pereira AM, Peters J, Pospieszny H, Ravnikar M, Stijger I, Tomassoli L, Varveri C, van der Vlugt R, Nielsen S. 2010. Seed transmission of Pepino mosaic virus in tomato. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 126: 145-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9528-x.
12. Córdoba-Sellés MC, García-Rández A, Alfaro-Fernández A, Jordá C. 2007. Seed transmission of Pepino mosaic virus and efficacy of tomato seed disinfection treatments. Plant Dis. 91:1250-1254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-91-10-1250.
13. Jones RAC, Koenig R, Lesemann DE. 1980. Pepino mosaic virus, a new potexvirus from pepino (Solanum muricatum). Ann. Appl. Biol. 94:61-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1980.tb03896.x.
14. van del Vlugt RAA, Stijger CCMM, Verhoeven JThJ Lesemann DE. 2000. First report of Pepino mosaic virus on tomato. Plant Dis. 84:103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.1.103E.
15. Cotillon A-C, Girard M, Ducouret S. 2002. Complete nucleotide sequence of the genomic RNA of a French isolate of Pepino mosaic virus (PepMV). Arch. Virol. 147:2231-2238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00705-002-0873-8.
16. French CJ, Bouthillier M, Bernardy M, Ferguson G, Sabourin M, Johnson RC, Masters C, Godkin S, Mumford R. 2001. First report of Pepino mosaic virus in Canada and the United States. Plant Dis. 85:1121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.10.1121C.
17. Ling K-S. 2007. Molecular characterization of two Pepino mosaic virus variants from imported tomato seed reveals high levels of sequence identity between Chilean and US isolates. Virus Genes 34:1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11262-006-0003-x.
18. Maroon-Lango CJ, Guaragna MA, Jordan RL, Hammond J, Bandla M, Marquardt SK. 2005. Two unique isolates of Pepino mosaic virus from a limited source of pooled tomato tissue are distinct from a third (European-like) US isolate. Arch. Virol. 150:1187-1201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00705-005-0495-z.
19. López C, Soler S, Nuez F. 2005. Comparison of the complete sequences of three different isolates of Pepino mosaic virus: size variability of TGBp3 protein between tomato and L. peruvianum isolates. Arch. Virol. 150:619-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00705-004-0438-0.
20. Hanssen IM, Paeleman A, Wittemans L, Goen K, Lievens B, Bragard C, Vanachter ACRC, Thomma BPHJ. 2008. Genetic characterization of Pepino mosaic virus isolates from Belgian greenhouse tomatoes reveals genetic recombination. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 121:131-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10658-007-9255-0.
21. Gómez P, Sempere RN, Elena SF, Aranda MA. 2009. Mixed infections of Pepino mosaic virus strains modulate the evolutionary dynamics of this emergent virus. J. Virol. 83:12378-12387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01486-09.
22. Hasiow-Jaroszevska B, Kuzniar A, Peters SA, Leunissen JAM, Pospieszny H. 2010. Evidence for RNA recombination between distinct isolates of Pepino mosaic virus. Acta Biochim. Pol. 57:385-388.
23. Alfaro-Fernández A, Cebrián MC, Córdoba-Selles C, Herrera-Vasquez JA, Jordá C. 2008. First report of the US1 strain of Pepino mosaic virus in tomato in the Canary Islands, Spain. Plant Dis. 92:1590-1591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-92-11-1590B.
24. French CJ, Dubeau C, Bunckle A, Ferguson G, Haesevoets R, Bouthillier M, Bernardy MG. 2008. Overview of Pepino mosaic virus research. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 30:373-374.
25. Ling K-S, Wintermantel WM, Bledsoe M. 2008. Genetic composition of Pepino mosaic virus population in North American greenhouse tomatoes. Plant Dis. 92:1683-1688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-92-12-1683.
26. Ling K-S, Li RG, Bledsoe M. 2013. Pepino mosaic virus genotype shift in North America and development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification for rapid genotype identification. Virol. J. 10:117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-10-117.
27. Koenig R, Lesemann DE, Jones RAC. 1989. Pepino mosaic virus. AAB descriptions of plant viruses, no. 350. AAB, Warwick, United Kingdom.
28. Soler S, Prohens J, Díez MJ, Nuez F. 2002. Natural occurrence of Pepino mosaic virus in Lycopersicon species in central and southern Peru. J. Phytopathol. 150:49-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0434.2002.00712.x.
29. Hasiów-Jaroszewska B, Paeleman A, Ortega-Parra N, Borodynko N, Minicka J, Czerwoniec A, Thomma BP, Hanssen IM. 2013. Ratio of mutated versus wild-type coat protein sequences in Pepino mosaic virus determines the nature and severity of yellowing symptoms on tomato plants. Mol. Plant Pathol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12059.
30. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340.
31. Rambaut A. 1996. Se-Al: sequence alignment editor. http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/.
32. Tamura K, Peterson P, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731-2739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121.
33. Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:1253-1256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msn083.
34. Posada D. 1998. Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNAsequences: empirical data. Bioinformatics 14:817-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817.
35. Martin DP, Lemey P, Lott M, Moulton V, Posada D, Lefeuvre P. 2010. RDP3: a flexible and fast computer program for analyzing recombination. Bioinformatics 26:2462-2463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq467.
36. Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52:696-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10635150390235520.
37. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-214.
38. Hasiow-Jaroszewska B, Borodynko N, Pospieszny H. 2009. Infectious RNA transcripts derived from cloned cDNA of a Pepino mosaic virus isolate. Arch. Virol. 154:853-856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00705-009-0368-y.
39. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY.
40. Canto T, Aranda MA, Fereres A. 2009. Climate change effects on physiology and population processes of hosts and vectors that influence the spread of hemipteran-borne plant viruses. Glob. Change Biol. 15:1884-1894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01820.x.
41. Garrett KA, Forbes GA, Savary S, Skelsey P, Sparks AH, Valdivia C, van Bruggen AHC, Willocquet L, Djurle A, Duveiller Eckersten H, Pande S, Vera Cruz C, Yuen J. 2011. Complexity in climate-change impacts: an analytical framework for effects mediated by plant disease. Plant Pathol. 60:15-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02409.x.
42. Margosian ML, Garrett KA, Hutchinson JMS, With KA. 2009. Connectivity of the American agricultural landscape: assessing the national risk of crop pest and disease spread. Bioscience 59:141-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.2.7.
43. Woolhouse MEJ, Haydon DT, Antia R. 2005. Emerging pathogens: the epidemiology and evolution of species jumps. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:238-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.009.
44. Elena SF, Agudelo-Romero P, Lalic J. 2009. The evolution of viruses in multi-host fitness landscapes. Open Virol. J. 3:1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874357900903010001.
45. Holmes EC. 2009. The evolutionary genetics of emerging viruses. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40:353-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120248.
46. ISST. 2003. Chilean Seed Industry report. http://www.seedconsortium.org/PUC.
47. Ferreyra R. 1983. Los tipos de vegetación de la costa peruana. An. Jard. Bot. Madr. 40:241-256.
48. Pickersgill B. 2007. Domestication of plants in the Americas: insights from mendelian and molecular genetics. Ann. Bot. 100:925-940. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm193.
49. Arunyawat U, Stephan W, Staedler T. 2007. Using multilocus sequence data to assess population structure, natural selection, and linkage disequilibrium in wild tomatoes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:2310-2322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm162.
50. Lalic J, Cuevas JM, Elena SF. 2011. Effect of host species on the distribution of mutational fitness effects for an RNA virus. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002378.
51. Elena SF, Sanjuán R. 2003. Climb every mountain? Science 302:2074-2075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1093165.
52. Agudelo-Romero P, Carbonell P, Pérez-Amador MA, Elena SF. 2008. Virus adaptation by manipulation of host's gene expression. PLoS One 3:e2397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002397.
53. Liang X-Z, Lee BTK, Wong S-M. 2002. Covariation in the capsid protein of Hibiscus chlorotic ringspot virus induced by serial passaging in a host that restricts movement leads to avirulence in its systemic host. J. Virol. 76: 12320-12324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.76.23.12320-12324.2002.
54. Wallis CM, Stone AL, Sherman DJ, Damsteegt VD, Gildow FE, Schneider WL. 2007. Adaptation of Plum pox virus to an herbaceous host (Pisum sativum) following serial passages. J. Gen. Virol. 88:2839-2845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.82814-0.
55. Yarwood CE. 1979. Host passage effects with plant viruses. Adv. Virus Res. 25:169-190.
56. Cronin JP, Welsh ME, Dekkers MG, Abercrombie ST, Mitchell CE. 2010. Host physiological phenotype explains pathogen reservoir potential. Ecol. Lett. 13:1221-1232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01513.x.
57. Power AG, Mitchell CE. 2004. Pathogen spillover in disease epidemics. Am. Nat. 164:S79-S89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/424610.
58. Sacristán S, Fraile A, Malpica JM, García-Arenal F. 2005. An analysis of host adaptation and its relationship with virulence in Cucumber mosaic virus. Phytopathology 95:827-833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-95-0827.