Contingent capture in cueing: The role of color search templates and cue-target color relations

Psychological Research

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 209-221

  Ansorge, Ulrich ^a,b   Becker, Stefanie I ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84894433409     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0497-5     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ansorge, U., & Becker, S. I. (2012). Automatic priming of attentional control by relevant colors. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 83-104.
2. Anderson, B. A., & Folk, C. L. (2010). Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: Testing a two-process model. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 342-352.
3. Ansorge, U., & Heumann, M. (2003). Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 937-948.
4. Ansorge, U., & Heumann, M. (2004). Peripheral cuing by abrupt-onset cues: the influence of color in S-R corresponding conditions. Acta Psychologica, 116(2), 115-143.
5. Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2007). Preemptive control of attentional capture by color: Evidence from trial-by-trial analysis and ordering of onsets of capture effects in RT distributions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 952-975.
6. Ansorge, U., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2009). Goal-driven attentional capture by invisible colors: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 648-653.
7. Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16, 437-443.
8. Bauer, B. G., Jolicoeur, P., & Cowan, W. (1998). The linear separability effect in color visual search: Ruling out the additive color hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1083-1093.
9. Becker, S. I. (2007). Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: Attentional capture or filtering costs? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 764-787.
10. Becker, S. I. (2010a). The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 247-265.
11. Becker, S. I. (2010b). Oculomotor capture by irrelevant colour singletons depends on intertrial priming. Vision Research, 50, 2116-2126.
12. Becker, S. I., Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2009). Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search? Vision Research, 49, 1738-1756.
13. Becker, S. I., Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2010). The role of relational information in contingent capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1460-1476.
14. Eckstein, M., Drescher, B., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2006). Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors. Psychological Science, 17, 973-980.
15. Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2008). Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1423-1433.
16. Einhäuser, W., Spain, M., & Perona, P. (2008). Objects predict fixations better than early salience. Journal of Vision, 8, 1-26.
17. Fecteau, J. (2007). Priming of pop-out depends on the current goals of the observers. Journal of Vision, 7, 1-11.
18. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858.
19. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2008). Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings. Visual Cognition, 16, 215-231.
20. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
21. Fortier-Gauthier, U., Dell'Acqua, R., & Jolicœur, P. (2013). The "red-alert" effect in visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychophysiology (in press).
22. Geyer, T., Krummenacher, J., & Müller, H. J. (2008). Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons. Vision Research, 48, 1315-1326.
23. Gilbert, A. L., Regier, T., Kay, P., & Ivry, R. B. (2006). Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not in the left. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 489-494.
24. Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2013). Qualitative differences in the guidance of attention during single-colour and multiple-colour visual search: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (in press).
25. Harris, A., Remington, R. W., & Becker, S. I. (2013). Feature-specificity in attentional capture by size and colour. Journal of Vision (in press).
26. Hodsoll, J. P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005). The effect of target foreknowledge on visual search for categorically separable orientation targets. Vision Research, 45, 2346-2351.
27. Irons, J. L., Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2012). All set! Evidence of simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 758-775.
28. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 4-11.
29. Kim, M.-S., & Cave, K. (1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1009-1013.
30. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672.
31. Müller, H. J., Geyer, T., Zehetleitner, M., & Krummenacher, J. (2009). Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1-16.
32. Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2007). Search goal tunes visual features optimally. Neuron, 53, 605-617.
33. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
34. Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 105-125). Cambridge: MIT Press.
35. Töllner, T., Müller, H., & Zehetleitner, M. (2012). Top-down dimensional weight set determines the capture of visual attention: Evidence from the PCN component. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1554-1563.
36. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786.
37. Witzel, C., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2011). Is there a lateralized category effect for color? Journal of Vision, 11(12), 16.
38. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2. 0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
39. Worschech, F., & Ansorge, U. (2012). Top-down search for color prevents voluntary directing of attention to informative singleton cues. Experimental Psychology, 59, 153-162.
40. Yantis, S., & Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621.