Oculomotor capture by colour singletons depends on intertrial priming

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 21, 2010, Pages 2116-2126

  Becker, Stefanie I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attention; Capture; Eye movements; Priming; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956649075     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bacon W.F., Egeth H.E. Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics 1994, 55:485-496.
2. Becker S.I. Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: Attentional capture or filtering costs?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:764-787.
3. Becker S.I. The stage of priming: Are intertrial repetition effects attentional or decisional?. Vision Research 2008, 48:664-684.
4. Becker S.I. The mechanism of priming: Episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out?. Acta Psychologica 2008, 127:324-339.
5. Becker S.I. Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1417-1440.
6. Becker S.I., Ansorge U., Horstmann G. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?. Vision Research 2009, 49:1738-1756.
7. Becker S.I. The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2010, 139:247-265.
8. Deubel H., Schneider W.X. Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research 1996, 36:1827-1837.
9. Duncan J., Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 1989, 96:433-458.
10. Folk C.L., Remington R.W. Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:847-858.
11. Folk C.L., Remington R.W. Top-down modulation of pre-attentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture. Visual Cognition 2006, 14:445-465.
12. Folk C.L., Remington R.W. Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings. Visual Cognition 2008, 16:215-231.
13. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:682-685.
14. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1030-1044.
15. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Wu S.-C. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2009, 71:308-313.
16. Findlay J.M. Saccade target selection during visual search. Vision Research 1997, 37:617-631.
17. Geyer T., Müller H.J., Krummenacher J. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons. Vision Research 2008, 48:1315-1326.
18. Godijn R., Theeuwes J. Parallel allocation of attention prior to execution of saccade sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:882-896.
19. Godijn R., Theeuwes J. Oculomotor capture and inhibition of return: Evidence for an oculomotor suppression account of IOR. Psychological Research 2002, 66:234-246.
20. Hillstrom A.P. Repetition effects in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:800-817.
21. Huang L., Holcombe A., Pashler H. Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:12-20.
22. Kristjansson A., Campana G. Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2010, 72:5-18.
23. Kristjansson A., Ingvarsdottir A., Teitsdottir U.D. Object- and feature-based priming in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:378-384.
24. Kristjansson A., Wang D., Nakayama K. The role of priming in conjunctive visual search. Cognition 2002, 85:37-52.
25. Lamy D., Bar-Anan Y., Egeth H.E., Carmel T. Effects of top-down guidance and singleton priming on visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:287-293.
26. Leber A.E., Egeth H.E. It's under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:132-138.
27. Ludwig C.J.H., Gilchrist I.D. Goal-driven modulation of oculomotor capture. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65:1243-1251.
28. Ludwig C.J.H., Gilchrist I.D. Stimulus-driven and goal-driven control over visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:902-912.
29. Maljkovic V., Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition 1994, 22:657-672.
30. Mulckhuyse M., Van Zoest W., Theeuwes J. Capture of the eyes by relevant and irrelevant onsets. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 186:225-235.
31. Olivers C.N.L., Humphreys G.W. Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:650-657.
32. Pinto Y., Olivers C.N.L., Theeuwes J. Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67:1354-1361.
33. Theeuwes J. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics 1991, 50:184-193.
34. Theeuwes J. Perceptual selectivity for colour and form. Perception & Psychophysics 1992, 51:599-606.
35. Theeuwes J., Burger R. Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1342-1353.
36. Theeuwes J., de Vries G.-J., Godijn R. Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65:735-746.
37. Van Zoest W., Donk M. Saccadic target selection as a function of time. Spatial Vision 2006, 19:61-76.
38. Van Zoest W., Donk M. The effects of salience on saccadic target selection. Visual Cognition 2005, 12:353-375.
39. Van Zoest W., Donk M. Bottom-up and top-down control in visual search. Perception 2004, 33:927-937.
40. Van Zoest W., Donk M., Theeuwes J. The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:746-759.
41. Van der Stigchel S., Meeter M., Theeuwes J. Eye movement trajectories and what they tell us. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews 2006, 30:666-679.
42. Wolfe J.M. Visual search. Attention 1998, 30-73. University College London Press, London, UK. H. Pashler (Ed.).
43. Wolfe J.M. Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1:202-238.
44. Wu S.-C., Remington R.W. Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:1050-1067.
45. Yantis S. Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:676-681.
46. Yantis S., Egeth H.E. On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:661-676.