The Role of Relational Information in Contingent Capture

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1460-1476

  Becker, Stefanie I ^a   Folk, Charles L ^b   Remington, Roger W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Contingent capture; Cuing; Linear separability; Similarity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COLOR VISION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CRITICAL FLICKER FUSION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; FLICKER FUSION; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 78650135170     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020370     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adamo M., Pun C., Pratt J., Ferber S. Your divided attention please! The maintenance of multiple attentional control sets over distinct regions in space. Cognition 2008, 107:295-303.
2. Ansorge U., Heumann M. Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:937-948.
3. Ansorge U., Heumann M. Peripheral cuing by abrupt-onset cues: The influence of color in S-R corresponding conditions. Acta Psychologica 2004, 116:115-143.
4. Ansorge U., Horstmann G. Preemptive control of attentional capture by color: Evidence from trial-by-trial analyses and orderings of onsets of capture effects in reaction time distributions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:952-975.
5. Bacon W.F., Egeth H.E. Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics 1994, 55:485-496.
6. Bauer B., Jolicoeur P., Cowan W.B. Visual search for color targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors. Vision Research 1995, 36:1439-1465.
7. Becker S.I. Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: Attentional capture or filtering costs?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:764-787.
8. Becker S.I. Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1417-1440.
9. Becker S.I. The role of target-distractor relationships in the guidance of atttention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2010, 139:247-265.
10. Becker S.I., Ansorge U., Horstmann G. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?. Vision Research 2009, 49:1738-1756.
11. D'Zmura M. Color in visual search. Vision Research 1991, 31:951-966.
12. Duncan J., Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 1989, 96:433-458.
13. Folk C.L., Remington R.W. Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:847-858.
14. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1030-1044.
15. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:682-685.
16. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Wright J.H. The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:317-329.
17. Hodsoll J., Humphreys G.W. Driving attention with the top down: The relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63:918-926.
18. Hodsoll J.P., Humphreys G.W., Braithwaite J.J. Dissociating the effects of similarity, salience, and top-down processes in search for linearly separable size targets. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68:558-570.
19. Huang L., Pashler H. Expectation and repetition effects in searching for featural singletons in very brief displays. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67:150-157.
20. Jonides J., Yantis S. Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics 1988, 43:346-354.
21. Ludwig C.J.H., Gilchrist I.D. Stimulus-driven and goal-driven control over visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:902-912.
22. Ludwig C.J.H., Gilchrist I.D. Goal-driven modulation of oculomotor capture. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65:1243-1251.
23. Minsky M., Papert S. Perceptrons 1969, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. Mozer M.C., Baldwin D.S. Experience-guided search: A theory of attentional control. Advances in neural information processing systems 20 2008, 1033-1040. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. J. Platt, D. Koller, Y. Singer (Eds.).
25. Navalpakkam V., Itti L. Top-down attention selection is fine grained. Journal of Vision 2006, 6:1180-1193.
26. Navalpakkam V., Itti L. Search goal tunes visual features optimally. Neuron 2007, 53:605-617.
27. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32:3-25.
28. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of attention. Attention and performance X 1984, 531-556. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ. H. Bouma, D. Bowhuis (Eds.).
29. Theeuwes J. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics 1991, 50:184-193.
30. Theeuwes J. Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics 1992, 51:599-606.
31. Wolfe J.M. Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1:202-238.
32. Wolfe J.M. Visual search. Attention 1998, 30-73. University College London Press, London. H. Pashler (Ed.).
33. Yantis S., Egeth H.E. On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:661-676.
34. Yantis S., Hillstrom A.P. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:95-107.
35. Yantis S., Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:121-134.