Performance of ceramic ultrafiltration membranes and fouling behavior of a dye-polysaccharide binary system

Water Research

Volumn 54, Issue , 2014, Pages 199-210

  Zuriaga Agusti E ^a   Alventosa deLara, E ^a   Barredo Damas, S ^a   Alcaina Miranda, M I ^a   Iborra Clar, M I ^a   Mendoza Roca, J A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Azo dye; Ceramic membrane; Membrane fouling; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

AZO DYES; EFFICIENCY; EFFLUENTS; MEMBRANE FOULING; MICROFILTRATION; PORE SIZE; REMOVAL; ULTRAFILTRATION;

AZO-DYES; BINARY SYSTEMS; CAKE LAYER; CERAMIC ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANE; FOULANTS; FOULING BEHAVIOR; MEMBRANE BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; SEPARATION EFFICIENCY;

CERAMIC MEMBRANES;

AZO DYE; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; ORGANIC MATTER; POLYSACCHARIDE; SODIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

CERAMICS; COLLOID; DYE; EFFLUENT; MEMBRANE; PARAMETERIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLLUTION CONTROL; POLYSACCHARIDE; PORE SPACE; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CERAMIC MEMBRANE; FILTRATION; FOULING BEHAVIOR; HYDRODYNAMICS; MEMBRANE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTE WATER;

AZO DYE; CERAMIC MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE FOULING; ULTRAFILTRATION;

BIOFOULING; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE SODIUM; CERAMICS; COLORING AGENTS; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NAPHTHALENESULFONATES; PERMEABILITY; PILOT PROJECTS; PRESSURE; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 84894345094     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: 18792448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.064     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abrahamse A., Lipreau C., Li S., Heijman S. Removal of divalent cations reduces fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2008, 323:153-158.
2. 2 ceramic membrane as applied to the ultrafiltration of post-electrodeposition rinse wastewater. Desalination 2011, 278:325-332.
3. Akdemir E.O., Ozer A. Investigation of two ultrafiltration membranes for treatment of olive oil mill wastewater. Desalination 2009, 249:660-666.
4. Arkhangelsky E., Wicaksana F., Tang C., Al-Rabiah A.a, Al-Zahrani S.M., Wang R. Combined organic-inorganic fouling of forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. Water Res. 2012, 46:6329-6338.
5. Barredo-Damas S., Alcaina-Miranda M.I., Iborra-Clar M.I., Mendoza-Roca J.A. Application of tubular ceramic ultrafiltration membranes for the treatment of integrated textile wastewaters. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 192:211-218.
6. Beicha A., Zaamouche R., Sulaiman N.M. Dynamic ultrafiltration model based on concentration polarization-cake layer interplay. Desalination 2009, 242:138-148.
7. Biswas S., Chattoraj D. Polysaccharide-surfactant interaction. 2. Binding of cationic surfactants to carboxymethyl cellulose and dextrin. Langmuir 1997, 13:4512-4519.
8. Blackburn R.S. Natural polysaccharides and their interactions with dye molecules: applications in effluent treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38:4905-4909.
9. Cai M., Zhao S., Liang H. Mechanisms for the enhancement of ultrafiltration and membrane cleaning by different ultrasonic frequencies. Desalination 2010, 263:133-138.
10. Chen Y., Hu X., Kim H. Monte Carlo simulation of pore blocking phenomena in cross-flow microfiltration. Water Res. 2011, 45:6789-6797.
11. Chon Kangmin, Cho J., Shon H.K., Chon Kyongmi Advanced characterization of organic foulants of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis from water reclamation. Desalination 2012, 301:59-66.
12. Crini G. Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2005, 30:38-70.
13. Das R., Bhattacherjee C., Ghosh S. Effects of operating parameters and nature of fouling behavior in ultrafiltration of sesame protein hydrolysate. Desalination 2009, 237:268-276.
14. Ellouze E., Tahri N., Amar R.Ben Enhancement of textile wastewater treatment process using Nanofiltration. Desalination 2012, 286:16-23.
15. Field R.W., Pearce G.K. Critical, sustainable and threshold fluxes for membrane filtration with water industry applications. Adv. Coll. Inter. Sci. 2011, 164:38-44.
16. He Y., Li G., Wang H., Zhao J., Su H., Huang Q. Effect of operating conditions on separation performance of reactive dye solution with membrane process. J. Memb. Sci. 2008, 321:183-189.
17. Hofs B., Ogier J., Vries D., Beerendonk E.F., Cornelissen E.R. Comparison of ceramic and polymeric membrane permeability and fouling using surface water. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 79:365-374.
18. Işik M. Efficiency of simulated textile wastewater decolorization process based on the methanogenic activity of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor in salt inhibition condition. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2004, 35:399-404.
19. Işik M., Sponza D.T. Substrate removal kinetics in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor decolorising simulated textile wastewater. Proc. Biochem. 2005, 40:1189-1198.
20. Jermann D., Pronk W., Meylan S., Boller M. Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production. Water Res. 2007, 41:1713-1722.
21. Kim A.S., Contreras A.E., Li Q., Yuan R. Fundamental mechanisms of three-component combined fouling with experimental verification. Langmuir 2009, 25:7815-7827.
22. Kokol V. Interactions between polysaccharide polymer thickener and bifunctional bioreactive dye in the presence of nonionic surfactants. Part 1: surface tension and rheological behavior of different polysaccharide solutions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2002, 50:227-236.
23. Krawczyk H., Arkell A., Jönsson A.-S. Membrane performance during ultrafiltration of a high-viscosity solution containing hemicelluloses from wheat bran. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 83:144-150.
24. Lee S., Cho J. Comparison of ceramic and polymeric membranes for natural organic matter (NOM) removal. Desalination 2004, 160:223-232.
25. Lee S.-J., Dilaver M., Park P.-K., Kim J.-H. Comparative analysis of fouling characteristics of ceramic and polymeric microfiltration membranes using filtration models. J. Memb. Sci. 2013, 432:97-105.
26. Lee S.-J., Kim J.-H. Differential natural organic matter fouling of ceramic versus polymeric ultrafiltration membranes. Water Res. 2014, 48:43-51.
27. Macedo A., Duarte E., Pinho M. The role of concentration polarization in ultrafiltration of ovine cheese whey. J. Memb. Sci. 2011, 381:34-40.
28. Majewska-Nowak K.M. Application of ceramic membranes for the separation of dye particles. Desalination 2010, 254:185-191.
29. Mondal S., Rai C., De S. Identification of fouling mechanism during ultrafiltration of Stevia extract. Food Bioproc. Technol. 2013, 6:931-940.
30. Muthukumaran S., Nguyen D.A., Baskaran K. Performance evaluation of different ultrafiltration membranes for the reclamation and reuse of secondary effluent. Desalination 2011, 279:383-389.
31. Persson T., Jönsson A.-S. Isolation of hemicelluloses by ultrafiltration of thermomechanical pulp mill process water-influence of operating conditions. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2010, 88:1548-1554.
32. Qu F., Liang H., Wang Z., Wang H., Yu H., Li G. Ultrafiltration membrane fouling by extracellular organic matters (EOM) of Microcystis aeruginosa in stationary phase: influences of interfacial characteristics of foulants and fouling mechanisms. Water Res. 2012, 46:1490-1500.
33. Resosudarmo A., Ye Y., Le-Clech P., Chen V. Analysis of UF membrane fouling mechanisms caused by organic interactions in seawater. Water Res. 2013, 47:911-921.
34. Sabaté J., Pujolà M., Llorens J. Comparison of polysulfone and ceramic membranes for the separation of phenol in micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 246:157-163.
35. Sarkar B. A combined complete pore blocking and cake filtration model during ultrafiltration of polysaccharide in a batch cell. J. Food Eng. 2013, 116:333-343.
36. Sarkar P., Ghosh S., Dutta S., Sen D., Bhattacharjee C. Effect of different operating parameters on the recovery of proteins from casein whey using a rotating disc membrane ultrafiltration cell. Desalination 2009, 249:5-11.
37. Sharma C., Mondal S., Majumdar G.C., De S. Clarification of Stevia extract by ultrafiltration: selection criteria of the membrane and effects of operating conditions. Food Bioprod. Proc. 2012, 90:525-532.
38. Sharma P., Sarkar B. Prediction of permeate flux during ultrafiltration of polysaccharide in a Stirred batch cell. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6:3634-3643.
39. Shaw C.B., Carliell C.M., Wheatley a D. Anaerobic/aerobic treatment of coloured textile effluents using sequencing batch reactors. Water Res. 2002, 36:1993-2001.
40. Srisukphun T., Chiemchaisri C., Urase T., Yamamoto K. Experimentation and modeling of foulant interaction and reverse osmosis membrane fouling during textile wastewater reclamation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 68:37-49.
41. Stoller M., Bravi M., Chianese A. Threshold flux measurements of a nanofiltration membrane module by critical flux data conversion. Desalination 2013, 315:142-148.
42. Stoller M., De Caprariis B., Cicci A., Verdone N., Bravi M., Chianese A. About proper membrane process design affected by fouling by means of the analysis of measured threshold flux data. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 114:83-89.
43. Subhi N., Verliefde A.R.D., Chen V., Le-Clech P. Assessment of physicochemical interactions in hollow fibre ultrafiltration membrane by contact angle analysis. J. Memb. Sci. 2012, 403-404:32-40.
44. Susanto H., Arafat H., Janssen E.M.L., Ulbricht M. Ultrafiltration of polysaccharide-protein mixtures: elucidation of fouling mechanisms and fouling control by membrane surface modification. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:558-565.
45. Susanto H., Ulbricht M. High-performance thin-layer hydrogel composite membranes for ultrafiltration of natural organic matter. Water Res. 2008, 42:2827-2835.
46. Tahri N., Jedidi I., Cerneaux S., Cretin M., Ben Amar R. Development of an asymmetric carbon microfiltration membrane: application to the treatment of industrial textile wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 118:179-187.
47. Tahri N., Masmoudi G., Ellouze E., Jrad A., Drogui P., Ben Amar R. Coupling microfiltration and nanofiltration processes for the treatment at source of dyeing-containing effluent. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 33:226-235.
48. Tian J., Ernst M., Cui F., Jekel M. Correlations of relevant membrane foulants with UF membrane fouling in different waters. Water Res. 2013, 47:1218-1228.
49. Van der Bruggen B., Cornelis G., Vandecasteele C., Devreese I. Fouling of nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes applied for wastewater regeneration in the textile industry. Desalination 2005, 175:111-119.
50. Vergili I., Kaya Y., Sen U., Gönder Z.B., Aydiner C. Techno-economic analysis of textile dye bath wastewater treatment by integrated membrane processes under the zero liquid discharge approach. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 58:25-35.
51. Wang L., Miao R., Wang X., Lv Y., Meng X., Yang Y., Huang D., Feng L., Liu Z., Ju K. Fouling behavior of typical organic foulants in Polyvinylidene Fluoride ultrafiltration membranes: characterization from Microforces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:3708-3714.
52. Wang Y.-N., Tang C.Y. Fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes by protein mixtures: the role of inter-foulant-species interaction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:6373-6379.
53. Zahrim A.Y., Tizaoui C., Hilal N. Coagulation with polymers for nanofiltration pre-treatment of highly concentrated dyes: a review. Desalination 2011, 266:1-16.
54. Zhu H., Wen X., Huang X. Characterization of membrane fouling in a microfiltration ceramic membrane system treating secondary effluent. Desalination 2012, 284:324-331.
55. Zularisam A.W., Ahmad A., Sakinah M., Ismail A.F., Matsuura T. Role of natural organic matter (NOM), colloidal particles, and solution chemistry on ultrafiltration performance. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 78:189-200.