Open innovation drug discovery (OIDD): A potential path to novel therapeutic chemical space

Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 294-303

  Alvim Gaston, Maria ^a   Grese, Timothy ^a   Mahoui, Abdelaziz ^a   Palkowitz, Alan D ^a   Pineiro Nunez, Marta ^a   Watson, Ian ^a  

^a ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemical space; Drug discovery; Open innovation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHEMINFORMATICS; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG PENETRATION; DRUG POTENCY; DRUG POTENTIATION; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG SELECTIVITY; DRUG SOLUBILITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SCIENCE; LIPOPHILICITY; OPEN INNOVATION DRUG DISCOVERY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SCIENTIST; SCORING SYSTEM;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DRUG DISCOVERY; HUMANS;

EID: 84894094150     PISSN: 15680266     EISSN: 18734294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1568026613666131127125858     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. http://www.manufacturing.net/articles/2009/02/the-innovation-gap
2. Making Academic-Industry Parternerships Work for both parties. Tuffs CSDD R&D. Management Report, 2012, 7(3), 1-4.
3. http://www.ngpharma.eu.com/article/A-new-model-for-drug-discovery/
4. Medina-Franco, J. L.; Martínez-Mayorga, K.; Giulianotti, M. A.; Houghten, R. A.; Pinilla, C.; Visualization of the Chemical Space in Drug Discovery Current. Computer-Aided Drug Design, 2008, 4, 322-333.
5. Bruns, R. F.; Watson, I. A.; Rules for Identifying Potentially Reactive or Promiscuous Compounds. J. Med. Chem., 2012, 55(22), 9763-9772.
6. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M.; Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 1998, 38(6), 983-996.
7. Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc. www.daylight.com
8. ChemAxon www.chemaxon.com
9. Tripos, A Certara™ Company, www.tripos.com
10. Pipeline Pilot, Accelrys Software Inc.; www.accelrys.com
11. Dandapani, S.; Marcaurelle, L. A.; Grand Challenge Commentary: Accessing New Chemical Space for "Undruggable" Targets. Nat. Chem. Biol., 2010, 6, 861-863.
12. Sauer, W. H. B.; Schwarz, M. K.; Molecular Shape Diversity of Combinatorial Libraries: A Prerequisite for Broad Bioactivity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2003, 43(3), 987-1003.
13. Wilson, J. A.; Bender, A.; Kaya, T.; Clemon, P. A.; Alpha Shapes Applied to Molecular Shape Characterization Exhibit Novel Properties Compared to Established Shape Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2009, 49, 2231-2241.
14. Alsenz, J.; Kansy, M.; High Throughput Solubility Measurement in Drug Discovery and Development. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2007, 59, 546-567.
15. Bergstrom, K.; Luthman, P.; Accuracy of Calculated pH Dependent Aqueous Drug Solubility. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 2004, 22(5) 387-398.
16. Avdeef, A.; pH-Metric Solubility 1:Solubility-pH Profiles from Bjerrum Plots, Gibbs Buffer and pKa in the Solid State. Pharm. Pharmacol. Commun. 1998, 4, 165-178.
17. Avdeef, A.; Berger, M.; Brownell, C.; pH-Metric Solubility 2: Correlation Between the Acid-base Titration and the Saturation Shake-flask Solubility-pH Methods. Pharm. Res. 2000, 17, 85-89.
18. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J.; Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 1997, 23, 3-25.
19. Lipinski, C. A.; Navigating Chemical Space for Biology and Medicine. Nature, 2004, 432, 855-861.
20. Rishton, G. M.; Nonleadlikeness and Leadlikeness in Biochemical Screening. Drug Discovery Today, 2003, 8, 86-96.
21. Bhal, S. K.; Kassam, K.; Peirson, I. G.; Pearl, G. M.; The Rule of Five Revisited: Applying LogD in Place of LogP in Drug-Likeness Filters. Mol. Pharma., 2007, 4, 556.
22. Ghose, A. K.; Viswanadhan, V. N.; Wendoloski, J. J.; A Knowledge-Based Approach in Designing Combinatorial or Medicinal Chemistry Libraries for Drug Discovery. J. Combin. Chem., 1999, 1, 55-68.
23. Veber, D. F.; Johnson, S. R.; Cheng, H.Y, Smith, B.R.; Ward, K.W.; Kopple, K. D.; Molecular Properties that Influence the Oral Bioavailability of Drug Candidate. J. Med. Chem., 2002, 45(12), 2615-23.
24. Congreve, M.; Carr, R.; Murray, C.; Jhoti, H.; A 'Rule of Three' for Fragment-Based Lead Discovery? Drug Discov. Today, 2003, 8(19), 876-7.
25. Wager, T. T.; Hou, X.; Verhoest, P. R.; Villalobos, A.; Moving beyond Rules: The Development of a Central Nervous System Multiparameter Optimization (CNS MPO) Approach To Enable Alignment of Drug-like Properties. ACS Chem. Neurosci., 2010, 1(6) 435-449.
26. Ritchie, T. J.; Macdonald, S. J. F.; The Impact of Aromatic Ring Count on Compound Developability- Are Too Many Aromatic Rings a Liability in Drug Design? Drug Discovery Today, 2009, 14, 1011-1020.
27. Ritchie, T. J.; Macdonald, S. J. F.; Young, R. J.; Pickett, S. D.; The Impact of Aromatic Ring Count on Compound Developability: Further Insights by Examining Carbo- and Hetero-aromatic and Aliphatic Ring Types. Drug Discovery Today, 2011, 16, 164-171.
28. Lovering, F.; Bikker, J.; Humblet, C.; Escape from Flatland: Increasing Saturation as an Approach to Improving Clinical Success. J. Med. Chem., 2009, 52, 6752-6756.
29. Yan, A.; Gasteiger, J.; Prediction of Aqueous Solubility of Organic Compounds by Topological Descriptors QSAR. Comb. Sci., 2003, 22, 821-829.
30. Leeson, P. D.; St-Gallay, S. A.; Wenlock, M. C.; Impact of Ion Class and Time on Oral Drug Molecular Properties. Med. Chem. Commun., 2011, 2, 91-105.
31. Yang, Y.; Chen, H.; Nilsson, I.; Muresan, S.; Engkvist, O.; Investigation of the Relationship Between Topology and Selectivity for Drug-like Molecules. J. Med. Chem,. 2010, 53, 7709-7714.
32. Yang, Y.; Engkvist, O.; Llinàs, A.; Chen, H.; Beyond Size, Ionization State, and Lipophilicity: Influence of Molecular Topology on Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity for Drug-like Compounds. J. Med. Chem., 2012, 55(8), 3667-3677.
33. Andrews, P. R.; Craik, D. J.; Martin, J. L.; Functional Group Contributions to Drug-receptor Interactions. J. Med. Chem., 1984, 27, 1648-1657.
34. McGrath, N. A.; Brichacek, M.; Njardarson, J. T.; A Graphical Journey of Innovative Organic Architectures that Have Improved Our Lives. J. Chem. Ed., 2010, 87, 1348-1349.