Innovations in minimally invasive hysterectomy

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 83-94

  Ridgeway, Beri ^a   Falcone, Tommaso ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Hemostatic agents; Hysterectomy; Laparoendoscopic single site surgery; Laparoscopic energy sources; Laparoscopy; Robotics

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE DISEASES;

EID: 84894046902     PISSN: 00099201     EISSN: 15325520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Basket TF. Hysterectomy: Evolution and trends. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;19: 295-305
2. Gendy R, Walsh CA, Walsh SR, et al. Vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:388; e1-8
3. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2: CD003677
4. Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA III. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using a single-umbilical puncture (mini-laparoscopy). J Reprod Med. 1992;37:777-784
5. Fader AN, Cohen S, Escobar PF, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:331-338
6. Chen YJ,Want PH, Ocampo EJ, et al. Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-Assisted vaginal hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:906-912
7. Jung YW, Lee M, Yim GW, et al. A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2462-2469
8. Li M, Han Y, Feng YC. Single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: A prospective randomized trial. J Int Med Res. 2012;40:701-708
9. Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML, et al. Minilaparoscopic versus single-port total hysterectomy: A randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20:192-197
10. Murgi A, Patel V, Leyland N, et al. Single-incision laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery. A systematic review and meta-Analysis. Obstet and Gynecol. 2013;121:819-828
11. Park JY, Kim TJ, Kang HJ, et al. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery in benign gynecology: Perioperative and late complications of 515 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;167:215-218
12. Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, et al. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: Outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150:92-96
13. Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, et al. Comparing robot-Assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: Impact on cost and clinical outcomes. JMinim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:730-738
14. Liu H, Lu D, Wang L, et al. Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2:CD008978
15. Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, et al. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:604-611
16. Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Park AJ, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:e1-e7
17. Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden UJ. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:589-594
18. Bush AJ, Morris SN, Millham FH, et al. Womens preferences of minimally invasive incisions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:640-643
19. Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA. 2013;309:689-698
20. Statement on Robotic Surgery by ACOG President James T. Breeden, MD. Available at: Http:// www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/News-Releases/2013/ Statement-on-Robotic-Surgery. Accessed May 31, 2013
21. AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. Position statement: Robotic-Assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Min Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20:2-9
22. Escobar PF, HaberGP, Kaouk J, et al. Single-port surgery: Laboratory experience with the da Vinci single-site platform. JSLS. 2011;15:136-141
23. Escobar PF, Fader AN, Paraiso MF, et al. Robotic-Assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: Initial report and technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:589-591
24. Carbonell AM, Joels CS, Kercher KW, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2003;13:377-380
25. Levy B, Emery L. Randomized trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102: 147-151
26. Lyons SD, Law KS. Laparoscopic vessel sealing technologies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20: 301-307
27. Bessa SS, Al-Fayoumi TA, Katri KM, et al. Clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;18:593-598
28. dos Santos LA, Menzin A. Your surgical toolbox should include topical hemostatic agents-here is why. OBG Management. 2012;24:34-43
29. Weaver FA, Hood DB, Zatina M, et al. Gelatinthrombin-based hemostatic sealant for intraoperative bleeding in vascular surgery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2002;16:286-293
30. Renkens KL Jr, Payner TD, Leipzig TJ, et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating a new hemostatic agent for spinal surgery. Spine. 2001;26:1645-1650
31. Oz MC, Cosgrove DM 3rd, Badduke BR, et al. Controlled clinical trial of a novel hemostatic agent in cardiac surgery. The Fusion Matrix StudyGroup. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1376-1382
32. Hanks JB, Kjaergard HK, Hollingsbee DA. A comparison of the haemostatic effect of Vivostat patient-derived fibrin sealant with oxidised cellulose (Surgicel) in multiple surgical procedures. Eur Surg Res. 2003;35:439-444
33. Rousou J, Levitsky S, Gonzalez-Lavin L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of fibrin sealant in patients undergoing resternotomy or reoperation after cardiac operations. A multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;97:194-203
34. Cronin B, Sung VW, Matteson KA. Vaginal cuff dehiscence: Risk factors and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:284-288
35. Hur HC, Donnellan N, Mansuria S, et al. Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:794-801
36. Uccella S, Ceccaroni M, Cromi A, et al. Vaginal cuff dehiscence in a series of 12,398 hysterectomies: Effect of different types of colpotomy and vaginal closure. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120: 516-523
37. Falcone T. Vaginal cuff dehiscence after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:511-512
38. Siedhoff MT, Yunker AC, Steege JF. Decreased incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence after laparoscopic closure with bidirectional barbed suture. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:218-223
39. Einarsson JI, Cohen SL, Gobern JM, et al. Barbed versus standard suture: A randomized trial for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;pii:S1553-S4650. (13)00109-X
40. Donnellan NM, Mansuria SM. Small bowel obstruction resulting from laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure with a barbed suture. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:528-530
41. Einarsson JI, Vellinga TT, Twijnstra AR, et al. Bidirectional barbed suture: An evaluation of safety and clinical outcomes. JSLS. 2010;14:381-385