Single-incision laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 121, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 819-828

  Murji, Ally ^a   Patel, Virendra I ^a   Leyland, Nicholas ^a   Choi, Matthew ^a  

^a not available

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; SURGICAL RISK; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84876252263     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318288828c     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. Art No: CD003677. DOI: 10. 1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4.
2. Wheeless CR. Elimination of second incision in laparoscopic sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1972; 39: 134-6.
3. Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA III. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using a single-umbilical puncture (mini-laparoscopy). J Reprod Med 1992; 37: 777-84.
4. Jackson T, Einarsson J. Single-port gynecologic surgery. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2010; 3: 133-9.
5. Uppal S, Frumovitz M, Escobar P, Ramirez PT. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: review of literature and available technology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18: 12-23.
6. Fader AN, Levinson KL, Gunderson CC, Winder AD, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynaecology: a new frontier in minimally invasive surgery. J Minim Access Surg 2011; 7: 71-7.
7. HigginsJPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org. Retrieved October 25, 2012.
8. Wells GA Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical- epidemiology/oxford.asp. Retrieved October 25, 2012.
9. Owens DK, Lohr KN, Atkins D, Treadwell JR Reston JT, Bass EB, et al. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventionsagency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 513-23.
10. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 13.
11. Jung YW, Lee M, Yim GW, Lee SH, Paek JH, Kwon HY, et al. A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2462-9.
12. Im KS, Koo YJ, Kim JB, Kwon YS. Laparoendoscopic singlesite surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors: a comparison of surgical outcomes and postoperative pain outcomes. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2011; 27: 91-5.
13. Fagotti A Bottoni C, Vizzielli G, Alletti SG, Scambia G, Marana E, et al. Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: 255-9.e2.
14. Hoyer-Sørensen C, Vistad I, Ballard K. Is single-port laparoscopy for benign adnexal disease less painful than conventional laparoscopy? A single-center randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 973-9.
15. Cho YJ, Kim ML, Lee SY, Lee HS, Kim JM, Joo KY. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for adnexal preservation: a randomized controlled study. Int J Womens Health 2012; 4: 85-91.
16. Chen YJ, Wang PH, Ocampo EJ, Twu NF, Yen MS, Chao KC. Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 906-12.
17. Li M, Han Y, Feng YC. Single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized trial. J Int Med Res 2012; 40: 701-8.
18. Bedaiwy MA, Starks D, Hurd W, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease: a comparative study. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2012; 73: 294-8.
19. Fagotti A, Rossitto C, Marocco F, Gallotta V, Bottoni C, Scambia G, et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopy for adnexal disease: a case-control study. Surg Innov 2011; 18: 29-33.
20. Kavallaris A, Chalvatzas N, Hornemann A, Luedders D, Diedrich K, Bohlmann MK. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) - is it feasible in gynecological surgery? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90: 195-7.
21. Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, Park HS, Choi CH, Lee JW, et al. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 151: 181-4.
22. Marcelli M, Lamourdedieu C, Lazard A, Cravello L, Gamerre M, Agostini A. Salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy by transumbilical single-site laparoscopy with the SILS system. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 162: 67-70.
23. Yoon BS, Park H, Seong SJ, Park CT, Jun HS, Kim IH. Singleport versus conventional laparoscopic salpingectomy in tubal pregnancy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 159: 190-3.
24. Jung MH, Lee BY. Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy via 12-mm trocar incision site. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011; 21: 599-602.
25. Kim TJ, Lee YY, Cha HH, Kim CJ, Choi CH, Lee JW, et al. Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2248-52.
26. Koyanagi T, Motomura S. Single-incision laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: operative outcomes and its learning curve. Exp Ther Med 2011; 2: 867-71.
27. Lee JH, Choi JS, Jeon SW, Son CE, Hong JH, Bae JW. A prospective comparison of single-port laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy using transumbilical GelPort access and multiport laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 158: 294-7.
28. Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Rossitto C, Gagliardi ML, Ercoli A, Gallotta V, et al. Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic and single-port hysterectomy: perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 2012; 1-5.
29. Wang T, Chong GO, Park NY, Hong DG, Lee YS. Comparison study of single-port (Octoport™) and four-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 161: 215-8.
30. Yim GW, Jung YW, Paek J, Lee SH, Kwon HY, Nam EJ, et al. Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 26.e1-6.
31. Escobar PF, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Frasure HE, Fader AN, Schmeler KM, et al. Comparison of single-port laparoscopy, standard laparoscopy, and robotic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 1583-8.