A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 2462-2469

  Jung, Yong Wook ^a   Lee, Maria ^b   Yim, Ga Won ^b   Lee, San Hui ^b   Paek, Ji Heum ^b   Kwon, Ha Yan ^b   Nam, Eun Ji ^b   Kim, Sang Wun ^b   Kim, Young Tae ^b  

^a CHA University   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Hysterectomy; Laparoscope; Postoperative pain; Prospective study

Indexed keywords

KETOROLAC; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; PETHIDINE; TANIFLUMATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FEVER; FOUR PORT TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; ILEUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE PORT TRANSUMBILICAL TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 80051703756     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1567-z     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. JM Wu ME Wechter EJ Geller TV Nguyen AG Visco 2007 Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003 Obstet Gynecol 110 1091 1095 17978124 10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b (Pubitemid 350059415)
2. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R (2006) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003677
3. MA Pelosi MA Pelosi III 1991 Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture N J Med 88 721 726 1836254 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2Fos1Wrtw%3D%3D
4. YY Lee TJ Kim CJ Kim H Kang CH Choi JW Lee BG Kim JH Lee DS Bae 2009 Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: A novel method with a wound retractor and a glove J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16 450 453 19487164 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.022
5. MC Lim TJ Kim S Kang DS Bae SY Park SS Seo 2009 Embryonic natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES) for adnexal tumors Surg Endosc 23 2445 2449 19343442 10.1007/s00464-009-0408-4
6. YW Jung SW Kim YT Kim 2009 Recent advances of robotic surgery and single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology J Gynecol Oncol 20 137 144 19809546 10.3802/jgo.2009.20.3.137
7. YW Jung YT Kim DW Lee YI Hwang EJ Nam JH Kim SW Kim 2010 The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: initial clinical experience Surg Endosc 24 1686 1692 20035346 10.1007/s00464-009-0830-7
8. AN Fader PF Escobar 2009 Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report Gynecol Oncol 114 157 161 19481243 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.05.020
9. H Breivik PC Borchgrevink SM Allen LA Rosseland L Romundstad EK Hals G Kvarstein A Stubhaug 2008 Assessment of pain Br J Anaesth 101 17 24 18487245 10.1093/bja/aen103 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czosVGnug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 351881909)
10. TJ Kim YY Lee HH Cha CJ Kim CH Choi JW Lee DS Bae JH Lee BG Kim 2010 Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: A comparison of perioperative outcomes Surg Endosc 24 2248 2252 20177921 10.1007/s00464-010- 0944-y
11. EC Tsimoyiannis KE Tsimogiannis G Pappas-Gogos C Farantos N Benetatos P Mavridou A Manataki 2010 Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial Surg Endosc 24 1842 1848 20174950 10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3
12. T Bisgaard B Klarskov R Trap H Kehlet J Rosenberg 2000 Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind controlled study Surg Endosc 14 340 344 10790551 10.1007/s004640020014 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3c3ltlyntA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30262375)
13. PL Leggett R Churchman-Winn G Miller 2000 Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 14 32 36 10653232 10.1007/s004649900006 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7hs12gsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30036698)
14. CM Poon KW Chan DW Lee KC Chan CW Ko HY Cheung KW Lee 2003 Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 17 1624 1627 12874694 10.1007/s00464-002-8718-9 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3sngs1Ohtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 37467632)
15. J Drahonovsky L Haakova M Otcenasek L Krofta E Kucera J Feyereisl 2010 A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 148 172 176 19926201 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.10.019
16. JI Alexander MG Hull 1987 Abdominal pain after laparoscopy: he value of a gas drain Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94 267 269 2952161 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987. tb02366.x 1:STN:280:DyaL2s7osFehsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 17036910)
17. M Korell F Schmaus T Strowitzki SG Schneeweiss H Hepp 1996 Pain intensity following laparoscopy Surg Laparosc Endosc 6 375 379 8890423 10.1097/00019509-199610000-00008 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FksFelug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26322380)
18. 2O-induced discomfort during peritoneoscopy under local anesthesia Gastroenterology 82 453 456 6459262 1:STN:280:DyaL38%2Fps1WhtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 12166805)
19. GC Vitale D Collet GM Larson WG Cheadle FB Miller J Perissat 1991 Interruption of professional and home activity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among French and American patients Am J Surg 161 396 398 1825766 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90606-E 1:STN:280:DyaK3M7lvVSqtg%3D%3D
20. A Chow S Purkayastha O Aziz P Paraskeva 2010 Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique Surg Endosc 24 709 714 19688389 10.1007/s00464-009-0655-4