Minilaparoscopic Versus Single-Port Total Hysterectomy: A Randomized Trial

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 192-197

  Fanfani, Francesco ^a   Fagotti, Anna ^a   Gagliardi, Maria Lucia ^a   Monterossi, Giorgia ^a   Rossitto, Cristiano ^a   Costantini, Barbara ^a   Gueli Alletti, Salvatore ^a   Vizzielli, Giuseppe ^a   Ercoli, Alfredo ^b   Scambia, Giovanni ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b Abano Terme Clinic   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hysterectomy; Minilaparoscopy; Single port

Indexed keywords

PARACETAMOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANEMIA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEMALE; FEVER; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE TOTAL HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINILAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL HYSTERECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESICS; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; ILEUS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84875363164     PISSN: 15534650     EISSN: 15534669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Johnson N., Barlow D., Lethaby A., et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, CD003677.
2. Johnson N., Barlow D., Lethaby A., et al. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2005, 330(7506):1478.
3. Kluivers K.B., Johnson N.P., Chien P., et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy in terms of quality of life: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008, 136:3-8.
4. Fagotti A., Bottoni C., Vizzielli G., et al. Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2011, 96:255-259.
5. Hosono S., Osaka H. Minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007, 17:191-199.
6. Minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: results of randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011, 18:455-456.
7. Fanfani F., Rossitto C., Gagliardi M.L., et al. Total laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) hysterectomy in low-risk early endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Surg Endosc 2012, 26:41-46.
8. Kim G.W., Jung Y.W., Paek J. Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010, 203:26.
9. Kim T.J., Lee Y.Y., Cha H.H. Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 2010, 24:2248-2252.
10. Yung Y.W., Lee M., Yim G.W., et al. A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain. Surg Endosc 2011, 25:2462-2469.
11. Fanfani F., Fagotti A., Rossitto C., et al. Laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic and single-port hysterectomy: peri-operative outcomes. Surg Endosc 2012, 26:3592-3596.
12. Ghezzi F., Cromi A., Siesto G., et al. Microlaparoscopy: a further development of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer staging - initial experience. Gynecol Oncol 2009, 113:170-175.
13. Fagotti A., Boruta D.M., Scambia G., et al. First 100 early endometrial cancer cases treated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a multicentric retrospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012, 206:353.
14. Escobar P.F., Frumovitz M., Soliman P.T., et al. Comparison of single-port laparoscopy, standard laparoscopy, and robotic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2012, 19:1583-1588.
15. Bisgaard T., Klarskov B., Trap R., et al. Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized double-blinded controlled study. Surg Endosc 2000, 14:340-344.
16. Look M., Chew S.P., Tan Y.C., et al. Post-operative pain in needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial. JR Coll Surg Edinb 2001, 46:138-142.
17. Huang M.T., Wang W., Wei P.L., et al. Minilaparoscopic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Arch Surg 2003, 138:1017-1023.
18. Paek J., Kim S., Lee S.H., et al. Learning curve and surgical outcome for single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy in 100 consecutive cases. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2011, 72:227-233.
19. Lambaudie E., Houvenaeghel G., Walz J., et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. Surg Endosc 2008, 22:2743-2747.
20. Bisgaard T., Klarskov B., Trap R., et al. Microlaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc 2002, 16:458-464.
21. Novitsky Y.W., Kercher K.W., Czerniach D.R., et al. Advantages of minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2005, 140:1178-1183.