Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: Entering an era of increased expectations for efficacy

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 458-462

  Rex, Douglas K ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; PREOPERATIVE CARE;

EID: 84893974766     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.11.003     Document Type: Editorial

References (49)

1. Serper M., Gawron A.J., Smith S.G., et al. Patient factors that affect quality of colonoscopy preparation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014, 12:451-457.
2. Lebwohl B., Kastrinos F., Glick M., et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:1207-1214.
3. Ness R.M., Manam R., Hoen H., et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:1797-1802.
4. Harewood G.C., Sharma V.K., de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003, 58:76-79.
5. Froehlich F., Wietlisbach V., Gonvers J.J., et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:378-384.
6. Hendry P.O., Jenkins J.T., Diament R.H. The impact of poor bowel preparation on colonoscopy: a prospective single centre study of 10,571 colonoscopies. Colorectal Dis 2007, 9:745-748.
7. Chung Y.W., Han D.S., Park K.H., et al. Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea. JClin Gastroenterol 2009, 43:448-452.
8. Chan W.K., Saravanan A., Manikam J., et al. Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol 2011, 11:86.
9. Fatima H., Johnson C.S., Rex D.K. Patients' description of rectal effluent and quality of bowel preparation at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 71:1244-1252.
10. Borg B.B., Gupta N.K., Zuckerman G.R., et al. Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009, 7:670-675.
11. Rex D.K., Johnson D.A., Anderson J.C., et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2008. Am J Gastroenterol 2009, 104:739-750.
12. Chokshi R.V., Hovis C.E., Hollander T., et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 75:1197-1203.
13. Longcroft-Wheaton G., Bhandari P. Same-day bowel cleansing regimen is superior to a split-dose regimen over two days for afternoon colonoscopy: results from a large prospective series. JClin Gastroenterol 2012, 46:57-61.
14. Rex D.K., Imperiale T.F., Latinovich D.R., et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:1696-1700.
15. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:1296-1308.
16. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:S16-S28.
17. Nguyen D.L., Wieland M. Risk factors predictive of poor quality preparation during average risk colonoscopy screening: the importance of health literacy. JGastrointestin Liver Dis 2010, 19:369-372.
18. Lebwohl B., Wang T.C., Neugut A.I. Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality. Dig Dis Sci 2010, 55:2014-2020.
19. Smith S.G., von Wagner C., McGregor L.M., et al. The influence of health literacy on comprehension of a colonoscopy preparation information leaflet. Dis Colon Rectum 2012, 55:1074-1080.
20. Markowitz G.S., Stokes M.B., Radhakrishnan J., et al. Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure. JAm Soc Nephrol 2005, 16:3389-3396.
21. DiPalma J.A., Wolff B.G., Meagher A., et al. Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 2003, 98:2187-2191.
22. Kilgore T.W., Abdinoor A.A., Szary N.M., et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:1240-1245.
23. Gurudu S.R., Ramirez F.C., Harrison M.E., et al. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 76:603-608.
24. Seo E.H., Kim T.O., Park M.J., et al. Optimal preparation-to-colonoscopy interval in split-dose PEG bowel preparation determines satisfactory bowel preparation quality: an observational prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 75:583-590.
25. Matro R., Shnitser A., Spodik M., et al. Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:1954-1961.
26. Varughese S., Kumar A.R., George A., et al. Morning-only one-gallon polyethylene glycol improves bowel cleansing for afternoon colonoscopies: a randomized endoscopist-blinded prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:2368-2374.
27. Enestvedt B.K., Tofani C., Laine L.A., et al. 4-Liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012, 10:1225-1231.
28. Sipe B.W., Fischer M., Baluyut A.R., et al. Alow-residue diet improved patient satisfaction with split-dose oral sulfate solution without impairing colonic preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2013, 77:932-936.
29. Huffman M., Unger R.Z., Thatikonda C., et al. Split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and residual gastric fluid volume: an observational study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 72:516-522.
30. Agrawal D., Robbins R., Rockey D.C. Gastric residual volume is trivial soon after polyethylene glycol bowel preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2013, 77:AB149-AB150.
31. Hassan C., Fuccio L., Bruno M., et al. Apredictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012, 10:501-506.
32. Verma S., Fogel J., Beyda D.J., et al. Chronic methadone use, poor bowel visualization and failed colonoscopy: a preliminary study. World J Gastroenterol 2012, 18:4350-4356.
33. DiPalma J.A., Rodriguez R., McGowan J., et al. Arandomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2009, 104:2275-2284.
34. Katz P.O., Rex D.K., Epstein M., et al. Adual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study. Am J Gastroenterol 2013, 108:401-409.
35. Spiegel B.M., Talley J., Shekelle P., et al. Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 2011, 106:875-883.
36. Rosenfeld G., Krygier D., Enns R.A., et al. The impact of patient education on the quality of inpatient bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 2010, 24:543-546.
37. Tae J.W., Lee J.C., Hong S.J., et al. Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 76:804-811.
38. Cavanagh M.F., Lane D.S., Messina C.R., et al. Clinical case management and navigation for colonoscopy screening in an academic medical center. Cancer 2013, 119(Suppl 15):2894-2904.
39. Jandorf L., Braschi C., Ernstoff E., et al. Culturally targeted patient navigation for increasing African Americans' adherence to screening colonoscopy: a randomized clinical trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013, 22:1577-1587.
40. Braschi C.D., Sly J.R., Singh S., et al. Increasing colonoscopy screening for Latino Americans through a patient navigation model: a randomized clinical trial. JImmigr Minor Health 2013 Jun 5, Epub ahead of print.
41. Jandorf L., Stossel L.M., Cooperman J.L., et al. Cost analysis of a patient navigation system to increase screening colonoscopy adherence among urban minorities. Cancer 2013, 119:612-620.
42. Horiuchi A., Nakayama Y., Kajiyama M., et al. Colonoscopic enema as rescue for inadequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a prospective, observational study. Colorectal Dis 2012, 14:e735-e739.
43. Kiesslich R., Schuster N., Hoffman A., et al. MedJet-a new CO2-based disposable cleaning device allows safe and effective bowel cleansing during colonoscopy: a pilot study. Endoscopy 2012, 44:767-771.
44. Eliakim R., Yassin K., Lachter J., et al. Anovel device to improve colon cleanliness during colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2012, 44:655-659.
45. Rigaux J., Juriens I., Deviere J. Anovel system for the improvement of colonic cleansing during colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2012, 44:703-706.
46. Aronchick C.A., Lipshutz W.H., Wright S.H., et al. Anovel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 52:346-352.
47. Rostom A., Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:482-486.
48. Church J., Bast J., Elayi E., et al. Keeping the cecum clean: a randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled trial of loperamide as part of preparation for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2013, 56:120-125.
49. Sharara A.I., El-Halabi M.M., Abou Fadel C.G., et al. Sugar-free menthol candy drops improve the palatability and bowel cleansing effect of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution. Gastrointest Endosc 2013, 78:886-891.