Two stage procurement processes with competitive suppliers and uncertain supplier quality

IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 147-158

  Jin, Yue ^a   Ryan, Jennifer K ^b   Yund, Walter ^c  

^a LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c GE GLOBAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Competitive analysis; decisions under risk and uncertainty; economic modeling; manufacturing supply chain; supply chain integration

Indexed keywords

OPTIMIZATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUPPLY CHAINS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COMPETING SUPPLIERS; COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC MODELING; PROCUREMENT PROCESS; QUALIFICATION PROCESS; QUALIFICATION STANDARDS; RISK AND UNCERTAINTY; SUPPLY-CHAIN INTEGRATION;

MANUFACTURE;

EID: 84893723194     PISSN: 00189391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2013.2266276     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. A. Amindoust, S. Ahmed, and A. Saghafinia, A taxonomy and review on supplier selection methods under uncertainty, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Bus. Manag., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33-43, 2012.
2. R. U. Bilsel and A. Ravindran, A multiobjective chance constrained programming model for supplier selection under uncertainty, Transp. Res.: Part B, vol. 45, pp. 1284-1300, 2011.
3. F. Branco, The design of multidimensional auctions, Rand J. Econ., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 63-81, 1997.
4. W. E. Brown and L. D. Ray, Electronic reverse auctions in the federal government, MBA Professional Report, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA, Dec. 2007. Available: http://edocs.nps.edu/npspubs/scholarly/MBAPR/2007/ Dec/07Dec-Brown-W-MBA.pdf
5. G. Bruno, E. Esposito, A. Genovese, and R. Passaro, AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: Problems and perspectives, J. Purchasing Supply Manag., vol. 19, pp. 159-172, 2012.
6. S. Carr, Note on online auctions with costly bid evaluation, Manag. Sci., vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1521-1528, 2003.
7. J. Chai, J. Liu, and E. Ngai, Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature, Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 3872-3885, Aug. 2013.
8. Y. Che, Design competition through multidimensional auctions, Rand J. Econ., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 668-680, 1993.
9. V. Choudhary, A. Ghose, T. Mukhopadhyay, and U. Rajan, Personalized pricing and quality differentiation, Manag. Sci., vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1120-1130, 2005. (Pubitemid 41344644)
10. M. Cripps and N. Ireland, The design of auctions and tenders with quality thresholds: The symmetric case, Econ. J., vol. 104, pp. 316-326, Mar. 1994.
11. I. Dogan and N. Aydin, Combining Bayesian networks and total cost of ownership method for supplier selection analysis, Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 61, pp. 1072-1085, 2011.
12. R. M. Engelbeck, Acquisition Management, Management Concepts, Vienna, VA, USA, 2001
13. R. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, E. Haruvy, and E.Katok, Comparison of buyerdetermined and price-based multiattribute mechanisms, Market. Sci., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 629-641, 2007.
14. C. Ewerhart and K. Fieseler, Procurement auctions and unit-price contracts, Rand J. Econ., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 569-581, 2003. (Pubitemid 37395815)
15. W. Ho, X. Xu, and P. K. Dey, Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review, Eur. J. Oper. Rev., vol. 202, pp. 16-24, 2010.
16. Y. Jin, J. K. Ryan, and W. Yund, Sourcing decisions with competitive suppliers and imperfect information, Working paper, Dept. Ind. Syst. Eng., RPI, Troy, NY, May 2013.
17. P. Klemperer, Chapter one: A survey of auction theory, in Auctions: Theory and Practice, P. Klemperer, Ed. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton Univ. Press, 2004, pp. 9-61.
18. D. Kostamis, D. R. Beil, and I. Duenyas, Total-cost procurement auctions: Impact of suppliers cost adjustments on auction format choice, Manag. Sci., vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 1985-1999, 2009.
19. J. Lamping. (2007). Against Better Judgement: Prequalification in Procurement Auctions
20. [Online]. Available:http://www.colorado.edu/Economics/news/fall07- newsletter/fall07-lamping.html
21. W. S. Lim, Product-supplier contracts with incomplete information, Manag. Sci., vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 709-715, 2001.
22. R. McIvor, Outsourcing: Insights from the telecommunications industry, Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 380-394, 2003. (Pubitemid 38947745)
23. I. R. Merson. (2000, Jul.). Reverse auctions: An overview. Acquisition Solutions, Inc. Advisory
24. [Online]. Available:http://www.hertz-sef.org/files/Library/General/ ReverseAuctions.pdf
25. E. Pinker, A. Seidmann, and Y. Vakrat, Managing online auctions: Current business and research issues, Manag. Sci., vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1457-1484, 2003.
26. D. J. Reyniers and C. S. Tapiero, The delivery and control of quality in supplier-producer contracts, Manag. Sci., vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1581-1589, 1995.
27. M. H. Riordan, Contracting with qualified suppliers, Int. Econ. Rev., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 115-128, 1996.
28. J. Shachat and J. T. Swarthout, Procurement auctions for differentiated goods, Decis. Anal., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 6-22, 2007.
29. S. A. Starbird, Acceptance sampling, imperfect production, and the optimality of zero defects, Naval Res. Logist., vol. 44, pp. 515-530, 1997. (Pubitemid 127586073)
30. G. Tagaras and H. Lee, Economic models for vendor evaluation with quality cost analysis, Manag. Sci., vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1531-1543, 1996. (Pubitemid 126590220)
31. S. Talluri, R. Narasimhan, and A. Nair, Vendor performance with supply risk: A chance-constrained DEA approach, Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 100, pp. 212-222, 2006. (Pubitemid 41737522)
32. S. Thiel, Multidimensional auctions, Econ. Lett., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 37-40, 1988.
33. Z.Wan and D. Beil, RFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening, Oper. Res., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 934-949, 2009.
34. Z. Wan, D. Beil, and E. Katok, When does it pay to delay supplier qualification Theory and experiments, Working Paper, Ross School of Business, Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2010
35. D. D.Wu, A systematic stochastic efficiency analysis model and application to international supplier performance evaluation, Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 37, pp. 6257-6264, 2010.
36. D. D. Wu and D. L. Olson, A comparison of stochastic dominance and stochastic DEA for vendor evaluation, Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 8, no. 15, pp. 2313-2327, 2008a. (Pubitemid 351272743)
37. D. D. Wu and D. L. Olson, Supply chain risk, simulation, and vendor selection, Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 646-655, 2008b.
38. H. Yan, H. Zhao, and K. Tang, Promise or requirement Quality-based supplier selectionwith asymmetric information,Working paper, Krannert School of Management, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN, USA, 2010
39. K. Zhu, R. Zhang, and F. Tsung, Pushing quality improvement along supply chains, Manag. Sci., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 421-436, 2007. (Pubitemid 46652842)