Assessment of priority alternatives for preservation of historic buildings using model based on ARAS and AHP methods

Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 287-294

  Kutut, V ^a   Zavadskas, E K ^a   Lazauskas, M ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Analytical Hierarchy Process; ARAS; Cultural heritage building; Decision method

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; ARAS; CULTURAL HERITAGES; CULTURAL PROPERTIES; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; DECISION METHOD; HISTORICAL HERITAGES; NATIONAL LEGISLATION;

BUILDINGS; DECISION MAKING; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; HISTORIC PRESERVATION;

MAINTENANCE;

EID: 84893715236     PISSN: 16449665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2013.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Nyseth T., Sognnaes J. Preservation of old towns in Norway: heritage discourses, community processes and the new cultural economy. Cities 2012, 31:69-75.
2. Sirisrisak T. Conservation of Bangkok old town. Habitat International 2009, 33:405-411.
3. Kim J.Ch., Yoo W.S., Lee U.K., Song K.J., Kang K.I., Cho H. An experience curve-based decision support model for prioritizing restoration needs of cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage 2010, 11:430-437.
4. Kahraman C., Kaya T. A fuzzy multiple attribute utility model for intelligent building assessment. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 2012, 18(6):811-820.
5. Jakučionis S., Ustinovičius L. Multicriteria analysis of the variants of the old town building renovation in marketing aspect. Statyba 2000, 6(6):469-475.
6. Cohen N. Urban Conservation 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Elsorady D.A. Heritage conservation in Rosetta (Rashid): a tool for community improvement and development. Cities 2012, 29:379-388.
8. Srdič A., Šelih J. Integrated quality and sustainability assessment in construction: a conceptual model. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 2011, 17(4):611-626.
9. Kliukas R., Kačianauskas R., Jaras A. A monument of historical heritage - Vilnius Archcathedral belfry: the dynamic investigation. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 2008, 14(2):139-146.
10. Fuente D., Vega J., Viejo F., Diaz I., Morcillo M. Mapping air pollution effects on atmospheric degradation of cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage 2012, 14(2):138-145.
11. Turskis Z., Gajzler M., Dziadosz A. Reliability risk management, and contingency of construction processes and projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 2012, 18(2):290-298.
12. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
13. Podvezko V., Mitkus S., Trinkūniene E. Complex evaluation of contracts for construction. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 2010, 16(2):287-297.
14. Turskis Z., Zavadskas E.K. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 2010, 16(2):159-172.
15. Al-Mukhtar M. Editorial: built heritage. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 2012, 16(5):525-526.
16. Burinskiene M., Rudzkiene V., Venckauskaite J. Effects of quality of life on the price of real estate in Vilnius city. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 2011, 15(3):295-311.
17. Murzyn-Kupisz M. The socio-economic impact of built heritage projects conducted by private investors. Journal of Cultural Heritage 2012, 14(2):156-162.
18. Chen W.T., Chen T.T., Lu C.S., Liu S.S. Analyzing relationships among success variables of construction partnering using structural equation modeling: a case study of Taiwan's construction industry. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 2012, 18(6):783-794.
19. Wong J., Li H. Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems. Building and Environment 2008, 43:108-125.
20. Kuo Y.Ch., Lu S. Using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making approach to enhance risk assessment for metropolitan construction projects. International Journal of Project Management 2012, 31(4):602-614.
21. Ishizaka A., Labib A. Review of the main developments of the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications 2011, 39(11):14336-14345.
22. Saaty T.L. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process 2000, 477. RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburg, PA 15413. 1st edition.
23. Saaty T.L. Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research 2003, 145(1):85-91.
24. Piltan M., Mehmanchi E., Ghaderi S.F. Proposing a decision-making model using analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy expert system for prioritizing industries in installation of combined heat and power systems. Expert Systems with Applications 2012, 39:1124-1133.
25. Heo E., Kim J., Boo K.J. Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010, 14(8):2214-2220.
26. Brucker K.D., Macharis C., Verbeke A. Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: a stakeholder management approach. European Journal of Operational Research 2013, 224:122-131.
27. Curiel-Esparza J., Canto-Perello J. Selecting utilities placement techniques in urban underground engineering. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 2013, 13:276-285.
28. Lin K.L. Determining key ecological indicators for urban land consolidation. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 2010, 14(2):89-103.
29. Sivilevičius H. Modelling the interaction of transport system elements. Transport 2011, 26(1):20-34.
30. Turskis Z., Lazauskas M., Zavadskas E.K. Fuzzy multiple criteria assessment of construction site alternatives for non-hazardous waste incineration plant in Vilnius city, applying ARAS-F and AHP methods. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management 2012, 20(2):110-120.
31. Jaskowski P., Biruk S., Bucon R. Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment. Automation in Construction 2010, 19(2):120-126.
32. Podvezko V. Application of the AHP technique. Journal of Business Economics and Management 2009, 10(2):181-189.
33. Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Vilutiene T. Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 2010, 10(3):123-141.