Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment

Automation in Construction

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 120-126

  Jaskowski, Piotr ^a   Biruk, Slawomir ^a   Bucon, Robert ^a  

^a LUBLIN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Contractor selection; Multi Attribute Decision Making; Prequalification

Indexed keywords

CODES OF PRACTICE; CONTRACTOR SELECTION; DECISION MAKERS; EU GUIDELINES; FUZZY AHP; GROUP DECISION; GROUP DECISION MAKING; MULTI ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING; PRE-QUALIFICATION; PRIORITIZATION; PRIVATE SECTORS; PUBLIC PROCUREMENT; QUALITY OF WORK; SELECTION CRITERIA; SELECTION PROCEDURES; TENDERING PROCEDURE;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CONTRACTORS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 76549121003     PISSN: 09265805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.12.014     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Hatush Z., and Skitmore M. Evaluating contractor prequalification data: selection criteria and project success factors. Construction Management and Economics 15 (1997) 129-147
2. Skorupka D. The method of identification and quantification of construction projects risk. Archives of Civil Engineering 51 4 (2005) 647-662
3. Sobotka A., and Rolak Z. Multi-attribute analysis for the eco-energetic assessment of the building life cycle. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15 4 (2009) 593-611
4. Kapliński O., and Janusz L. Three phases of multifactor modelling of construction processes. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 12 2 (2006) 127-134
5. Fong P.S.W., and Choi S.K.Y. Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process. Construction Management and Economics 18 5 (2000) 547-557
6. Turkis Z. Multi-attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14 2 (2008) 224-239
7. Hatush Z., and Skitmore M. Contractor selection using multicriteria utility theory: an additive model. Building and Environment 33 2-3 (1998) 105-115
8. Banaitienê N., and Banaitis A. Analysis of criteria for contractors' qualification evaluation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12 4 (2006) 276-282
9. Russell J.S., Hancher D.E., and Skibniewski M.J. Contractor prequalification data for construction owner. Construction Management and Economics 10 2 (1992) 117-135
10. Alarcón L.F., and Mourgues C. Performance modeling for contractor selection. Journal of Management in Engineering 18 2 (2002) 52-60 ASCE
11. Palaneeswaran E., and Kumaraswamy M. Recent advances and proposed improvements in contractor prequalification methodologies. Building and Environment 36 (2001) 73-87
12. Ng S.T., and Skitmore R.M. Client an consultant perspectives of prequalification criteria. Building and Environment 34 5 (1999) 607-621
13. Wong C.H., Holt G.D., and Cooper P.A. Lowest price or value? Investigation of UK construction clients' tender selection process. Construction Management and Economics 18 7 (2000) 767-774
14. Molenaar K.R., and Johnson D.E. Engineering the procurement phase to achieve the best value. Leadership and Management 3 3 (2003) 137-141
15. Topcu Y.I.A. A decision model proposal for construction selection in Turkey. Building and Environment 39 4 (2004) 469-481
16. Jaselskis E.J., and Russel J.S. Risk analysis approach to selection of contractor evaluation method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 118 4 (1992) 814-821 ASCE
17. Crowley L.G., and Hancher D.E. Evaluation of competitive bids. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 121 2 (1995) 238-245 ASCE
18. Kumaraswamy M.M. Contractor evaluation and selection - Hong Kong perspective. Building and Environment 31 3 (1996) 273-282
19. Juan Y.-K., Perng Y.-H., Castro-Lacouture D., and Lu K.-S. Housing refurbishment contractors selection based on a hybrid fuzzy-QFD approach. Automation in Construction 18 (2009) 139-144 Elsevier
20. Lam K.Ch., Palaneeswaran E., and Yu Ch.-Y. A support vector machine model for contractor prequalification. Automation in Construction 18 (2009) 321-329 Elsevier
21. Jaskowski P. Designing the structure of a construction project operating system using evolutionary algorithm. Archives of Civil Engineering LIV 2 (2008) 371-394
22. Jaskowski P., and Sobotka A. Multicriteria construction project scheduling method using evolutionary algorithm. Operational Research. An International Journal 6 3 (2006) 283-297 Springer-Verlag
23. Lam K.C., Hu T.S., and Ng S.T. Using the principal component analysis method as a tool in contractor pre-qualification. Construction Management and Economics 23 7 (2005) 673-684
24. Russell J.S., and Skibniewski M.J. Qualifier-2: knowledge-based system for contractor prequalification. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 116 1 (1990) 157-171 ASCE
25. Singh D., and Tiong R. Contractor selection criteria: investigation of opinions of Singapore construction practitioners. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 132 9 (2006) 998-1008 ASCE
26. Yasamis F., Arditi D., and Mohammadi J. Assessing contractor quality performance. Construction Management and Economics 20 (2002) 211-223
27. Minchin R.E., and Smith G.R. Quality-based contractor rating model for qualification and bidding purposes. Journal of Management in Engineering 21 1 (2005) 38-43 ASCE
28. Holt D. Which contractor selection methodology?. International Journal of Project Management 16 3 (1998) 153-164 Elsevier
29. Anagnostopoulos K.P., and Vavatsikos A.P. An AHP model for construction contractor prequalification, operational research. International Journal 6 3 (2006) 333-346 Springer-Verlag
30. Cheng E.W.L., and Li H. Contractor selection using the analytic network process. Construction Management and Economics 22 (2004) 1021-1032
31. Saaty T.L., and Tran L.T. On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 46 (2007) 962-975 Elsevier
32. 3). Automation in Construction 17 (2008) 180-187 Elsevier
33. Pan N.-F. Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method. Automation in Construction 17 (2008) 958-965 Elsevier
34. Skibniewski M.J., and Chao L.C. Evaluation of advanced construction technology with AHP method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 118 3 (1992) 577-593 ASCE
35. Abudayyeh O., Zidan S.J., Yehia S., and Randolph D. Hybrid prequalification-based, innovative contracting model using AHP. Journal of Management in Engineering 23 2 (2007) 88-96 ASCE
36. Goldenberg M., and Shapira A. Systematic evaluation of construction equipment alternatives: case study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 133 1 (2007) 72-85 ASCE
37. Nassar N., Thabet W., and Beliveau Y. A procedure for multi-criteria selection of building assemblies. Automation in Construction 12 (2003) 543-560 Elsevier
38. Lai Y.T., Wang W.C.H., and Wang H.H. AHP- and simulation-based budget determination procedure for public building construction projects. Automation in Construction 17 (2008) 623-632 Elsevier
39. Hsueh S.-L., Perng Y.-H., Yan M.-R., and Lee J.-R. On-line multi-criterion risk assessment model for construction joint ventures in China. Automation in Construction 16 (2007) 607-619 Elsevier
40. Wong J., Li H., and Lai J. Evaluating the system intelligence of the intelligent building systems, Part 2: Construction and validation of analytical models. Automation in Construction 17 (2008) 303-321 Elsevier
41. Barzilai J. Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices. Journal of the Operational Research Society 48 12 (1997) 1226-1232
42. Van Laarhoven P.J.M., and Pedrycz W. Fuzzy extension for Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11 (1983) 229-241 Elsevier
43. Buckley J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17 (1985) 233-247 Elsevier
44. Chang D.-Y. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 95 (1996) 649-655 Elsevier
45. Wang Y.M., Luo Y., and Hua Z. On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research 186 (2008) 735-747 Elsevier
46. Hsieh T.-Y., Lu S.-T., and Tzeng G.-H. Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. International Journal of Project Management 22 (2004) 573-584 Elsevier
47. Csutora R., and Buckley J.J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: the Lambda-Max method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 120 (2001) 181-195 Elsevier
48. Mikhailov L. Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwaise comparition judgements. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 134 (2003) 365-385 Elsevier
49. Van Den Honert R.C., and Lootsma F.A. Group preference aggregation in the multiplicative AHP. The model of the group decision process and Pareto optimality. European Journal of Operational Research 96 (1996) 363-370 Elsevier
50. Cho Y.G., and Cho K.T. A loss function approach to group preference aggregation in the AHP. Computers & Operations Research 35 (2008) 884-892
51. Saaty T.L., and Vargas L.G. Dispersion of group judgements. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 46 (2007) 918-925
52. Chang Ch.-W., Wu Ch.-R., and Lin H.-H. Applying fuzzy hierarchy multiple attributes to construct an expert decision making process. Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2009) 7363-7368 Elsevier
53. Mikhailov L. Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method. Computers & Operations Research 31 (2004) 293-301
54. Open source Mixed-Integer Linear Programming system, version 5.1.0.0 of 1 May 2004, by Michel Berkelaar, Kjell Eikland, Peter Notebaert GNU LGPL.