A fuzzy multiple attribute utility model for intelligent building assessment

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 811-820

  Kahraman, Cengiz ^a   Kaya, Ihsan ^b  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Assessment; Decision making; Fuzzy; Intelligent building; Multiple attribute; Utility model

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT; EVALUATION SCHEME; FUZZY; FUZZY MULTIPLE-ATTRIBUTE; MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY; MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTES; UTILITY MODEL; VALUE DIMENSIONS;

DECISION MAKING;

INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS;

EID: 84875454752     PISSN: 13923730     EISSN: 18223605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2012.720932     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abouelnaga, A. E.; Metwally, A.; Nagy, M. E.; Agamy, S. 2009. Optimum selection of an energy resource using fuzzy logic, Nuclear Engineering and Design 2399(12):3062-3068. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.09.002
2. Alwaer, H.; Clements-Croome, D. J. 2010. Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings, Building and Environment 45(4):799-807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.019
3. Beliakov, G.; Warren, J. 2001. Appropriate choice of aggregation operators in fuzzy decision support systems, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 9(6):773-784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/91.971696
4. Butler, J.; Morrice, D. J.; Mullarkey, P. W. 2001. A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection, Management Science 47(6):800-816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.6.800.9812
5. Canada, J. R.; Sullivian, W. G. 1988. Economic and multiat-tribute evaluation of advanced manufacturing systems. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 480 p.
6. Chen, Z.; Clements-Croome, D.; Hong, J.; Li, H.; Xu, Q. 2006. A multicriteria lifespan energy efficiency approach to intelligent building assessment, Energy and Buildings 38(5):393-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. enbuild.2005.08.001
7. Cirtita, H.; Ilies, L. 2009. Does structure influence performance in downstream supply chain?, Review of International Comparative Management 10(1):106-112.
8. De Melo Brito, A. J.; De Almeida Filho, A. T.; De Almeida, A. T. 2010. Multi-criteria decision model for selecting repair contracts by applying utility theory and variable interdependent parameters, IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 21(4):349-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpn014
9. Hong, J.; Chen, Z.; Li, H.; Xu, Q. 2006. An information visualization approach to intelligent building assessment, in Proc. of the 6th International Conference for Enhanced Building Operations, Shenzhen, China, 6-9 November, 2006, Vol. VIII-6-4:ESL-IC-06-11-284.
10. Jiménez, A.; Mateos, A.; Rios-Insua, S. 2009. Missing consequences in multiattribute utility theory, Omega 37(2):395-410. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.omega.2007.04.003
11. Jiménez, A.; Rios-Insua, S.; Mateos, A. 2003. A decision support system for multiattribute utility evaluation based on imprecise assignments, Decision Support Systems 36(1):65-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(02) 00137-9
12. Kainuma, Y.; Tawara, N. 2006. A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply chain management, International Journal of Production Economics 101(1):99-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.05.010
13. Keeney, R. L.; Raiffa, H. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Wiley, New York. 569 p.
14. Kolokotsa, D.; Sutherland, G.; Stavrakakis, G.; Karatassou, S.; Santamouris, M. 2007. A matrix tool for assessing the performance of intelligent buildings, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 18(1):36-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777830710717703
15. Liou, T. S.; Wang, M. J. J. 1992. Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 50(3):247-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165- 0114(92)90223-Q
16. Malakooti, B. 1989. Ranking multiple criteria alternatives with half-space, convex, and non-convex dominating cones: quasi-concave and quasi-convex multiple attribute utility functions, Computers & Operations Research 16(2):117-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(89)90014-2
17. Malakooti, B.; Subramanian, S. 1999. Generalized polynomial decomposable multiple attribute utility functions for ranking and rating multiple criteria discrete alternatives, Applied Mathematics and Computation 106(1):69-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(98)10113-3
18. Nishizaki, I.; Katagiri, H.; Hayashida, T. 2010. Sensitivity analysis incorporating fuzzy evaluation for scaling constants of multiattribute utility functions, Central European Journal of Operations Research 18(3):383-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10100-009-0115-1
19. SAVE, 2010. Available Intelligent Buildings Assessment methodology [accessed 10 January 2011]. Available from Internet: http://www.ibuilding.gr
20. Sohn, K. Y.; Yang, J. W.; Kang, C. S. 2001. Assimilation of public opinions in nuclear decision-making using risk perception, Annals of Nuclear Energy 28(6):553-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4549(00)00076-1
21. Streicher-Porte, M.; Marthaler, C.; Böni, H.; Schluep, M.; Camacho, A.; Hilty, L. M. 2009. One laptop per child, local refurbishment or overseas donations? Sustainability assessment of computer supply scenarios for schools in Colombia, Journal of Environmental Management 90(11):3498-3511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.002
22. Tran, L.; Duckstein, L. 2002. Comparison of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure, Fuzzy Sets and Systems - Fuzzy Intervals 130(3):331-341.
23. Tupenaite, L.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Turskis, Z.; Seniut, M. 2010. Multiple criteria assessment of alternatives for built and human environment renovation, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16(2):257-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.30
24. Wang, M.-L.; Kuo, T.-C.; Liu, J.-W. 2009. Identifying target green 3C customers in Taiwan using multiattribute utility theory, Expert Systems with Applications 36(10):12562-12569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.033
25. Wong, J. K. W.; Li, H. 2008. Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems, Building and Environment 43(1):108-125. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.019
26. Wong, J. K. W.; Li, H.; Wang, S. W. 2005. Intelligent building research: a review, Automation in Construction 14(1):143-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. autcon.2004.06.001
27. Xu, N.; Huang, S. H. 2006. Multiple attributes utility analysis in setup plan evaluation, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 128(1):220-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2117407
28. Yang, Z. L.; Bonsall, S.; Wang, J. 2009. Use of hybrid multiple uncertain attribute decision making techniques in safety management, Expert Systems with Applications 36(2):1569-1586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.054
29. Zadeh, L. A. 1965. Fuzzy sets, Information and Control 8(3):338-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
30. Zhang, H. 2008. Multi-objective simulation-optimization for earthmoving operations, Automation in Construction 18(1):79-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. autcon.2008.05.002
31. Zhang, H.; Xing, F. 2010. Fuzzy-multi-objective particle swarm optimization for time-cost-quality tradeoff in construction, Automation in Construction 19(8):1067-1075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.07.014
32. Zimmermann, H. J. 1991. Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications. 2nd ed. Boston: Kluwer. 399 p.