Selecting utilities placement techniques in urban underground engineering

Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 276-285

  Curiel Esparza, J ^a   Canto Perello, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

AHP Delphi; Municipal engineering; Underground space; Urban utilities

Indexed keywords

AHP-DELPHI; ASSOCIATED COSTS; CURRENT PRACTICES; PUBLIC AWARENESS; UNDERGROUND ENGINEERING; UNDERGROUND SPACE; URBAN ENVIRONMENTS; URBAN UTILITY;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING;

URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 84875911337     PISSN: 16449665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2013.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Duffaut P. Paris Conference examines the Rightful Place of the underground space in the modern city. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1996, 11(1):126-130.
2. Liu X., Li X., Ai B., Tao H., Wu S., Liu T. Multi-agent systems for simulating and planning land use development. Acta Geographica Sinica 2006, 61(10):1101-1112.
3. Choon S.W., Siwara C., Pereira J.J., Jemainc A.A., Hashima H.S., Hadib A.S. A sustainable city index for Malaysia. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 2011, 18(1):28-35.
4. He L., Song Y., Dai S., Durbak K. Quantitative research on the capacity of urban underground space - The case of Shanghai, China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2012, 32(1):168-179.
5. Steurera R., Bergerb G. The EU's double-track pursuit of sustainable development in the 2000s: how Lisbon and sustainable development strategies ran past each other. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 2011, 18(2):99-108.
6. Boegly W.J., Griffith W.L. Underground utility tunnels. Mechanical Engineering 1971, 93(9):27-32.
7. E.H.J. Oude, Underground space for utilities, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Underground Space and Earth Sheltered Structures, 1992.
8. Curiel-Esparza J., Canto-Perello J., Calvo M.A. Establishing sustainable strategies in urban underground engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 2004, 10(3):523-530.
9. Madryas C. Service tunnels in newly built residential areas. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1990, 5(4):363-366.
10. Hokkanen V., Forssén I., Niva M., Sorjonen K. Four examples of subsurface uses in Finland. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1994, 9(3):385-393.
11. Kolonko A., Madryas C. Modernization of underground pipes in towns in Poland. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1996, 11(2):215-220.
12. Legrand L., Blanpain O., Buyle-Bodin F. Promoting the urban utilities tunnel technique using a decision-making approach. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2004, 19(1):79-83.
13. Ghorbani M., Sharifzadeh M., Yasrobi S., Daiyan M. Geotechnical, structural and geodetic measurements for conventional tunnelling hazards in urban areas - The case of Niayesh road tunnel project. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2012, 31(1):1-8.
14. Madryas C. Methods of gathering data for determining the cost of underground infrastructure failure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1988, 3(3):301-303.
15. Curiel-Esparza J., Canto-Perello J. Understanding the major drivers for implementation of municipal sustainable policies in underground space. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 2012, 19(6):506-514.
16. Riera P., Pasqual J. The importance of urban underground land value in project evaluation: a case study of Barcelona's utility tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1992, 7(3):243-250.
17. Sterling R., Carmody J. Underground Space Design 1993, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
18. Sterling R. Underground technologies for livable cities. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1997, 12(4):479-490.
19. P. Duffaut, M. Labbe, From underground road traffic to underground city planning, in: Proceedings of the International Conference Urban Underground Space: a Resource for Cities, 2002.
20. Thibault S., Trépanier M., Fougères D. The urban underground of Montreal: the commission of electrical and public services. Canadian Journal of Urban Research 2003, 12(1):77-101.
21. Zevgolis I.E., Mavrikos A.A., Kaliampakos D.C. Construction, storage capacity and economics of an underground warehousing-Logistics center in Athens, Greece. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2004, 19(2):165-173.
22. I.E. Zevgolis, Building underground: special techniques for a storage facility, in: Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress: Broadening Perspectives, 2005.
23. Wang J.H., Koizumi A., Liu X. Advancing sustainable urban development in China. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Municipal Engineer 2008, 161(1):3-10.
24. Cano-Hurtado J.J., Canto-Perello J. Sustainable development of urban underground space for utilities. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1999, 14(3):335-340.
25. Zhang J.C., Ding X.M., Pang Y.S., Li W.P., Tong H.W., Zheng X.C., Xu Y. Analysis for development and utilization of underground space in Guangzhou. Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics 2009, 26(2):106-114.
26. Ozdemir M.S., Saaty T.L. The unknown in decision making, what to do about it. European Journal of Operational Research 2006, 174(1):349-359.
27. Lee G.K.L., Chan E.H.W. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach for assessment of urban renewal proposals. Social Indicators Research 2008, 89(1):155-168.
28. Syamsuddin J. Hwang The use of AHP in security policy decision making: an open office calc application. Journal of Software 2010, 5(10):1162-1169.
29. Thapa R.B., Murayama Y. Drivers of urban growth in the Kathmandu valley, Nepal: examining the efficacy of the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Geography 2010, 30(1):70-83.
30. Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Tamosaitiene J. Selection of construction enterprises management strategy based on SWOT and multi-criteria analysis. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 2011, 11(4):1063-1082.
31. Hsu C.C., Sandord B.A. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 2007, 12(10):1-7.
32. Marchais-Roubelat F. Roubelat The Delphi method as a ritual: inquiring the Delphi Oracle. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2011, 78(9):1491-1499.
33. Gracht H.A. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies, review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2012, 79(8):1525-1536.
34. Hunt D.V.L., Nash D., Rogers C.D.F. C.D.F., Sustainable utility placement via Multi-Utility Tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2012, 10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.001.
35. Laistner, H. Laistner, Proven sustainability above and below ground, in: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Urban Planning and Regional Development in the Information Society, 2012.
36. Canto-Perello J., Curiel-Esparza J. An analysis of utility tunnel viability in urban areas. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 2006, 23(1):11-19.
37. Gronostajska B. The affect of human feelings on creation of housing. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 2008, 8(1):107-117.
38. Robati M., Atabi F. Environmental impacts of urban utility tunnel construction case study: Urban utility tunnel district 22 of Tehran. Journal of Environmental Studies 2010, 36(54):59-68.
39. Canto-Perello J., Curiel-Esparza J., Calvo V. Analysing utility tunnels and highway networks coordination dilemma. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2009, 24(2):185-189.
40. Hunt D.V.L., Jefferson I., Gaterell M.R., Rogers C.D.F. Planning for sustainable utility infrastructure. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning 2009, 162(4):187-201.
41. Rogers C.D.F., Hao T., Costello S.B., Burrow M.P.N., Metje N., Chapman D.N., Parker J., Armitage R.J., Anspach J.H., Muggleton J.M., Foo K.Y., Wang P., Pennock S.R., Atkins P.R., Swingler S.G., Cohn A.G., Goddard K., Lewin P.L., Orlando G., Redfern M.A., Royal A.C.D., Saul A.J. Condition assessment of the surface and buried infrastructure - A proposal for integration. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2012, 28:202-211.
42. Jung Y.J. Evaluation of subsurface utility engineering for highway projects: Benefit-cost analysis. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2012, 27:111-122.
43. Canto-Perello J., Curiel-Esparza J. Human factors engineering in utility tunnel design. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2001, 16(3):211-215.
44. Green R. The essential role of governance in project development. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer 2009, 162(3):179-185.
45. Canto-Perello J., Curiel Esparza J. Assessing governance issues of urban utility tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2013, 33:82-87.
46. Canto-Perello J., Curiel-Esparza J. Risks and potential hazards in utility tunnels for urban areas. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer 2003, 156(1):51-56.
47. Curiel-Esparza J., Canto-Perello J. Indoor atmosphere hazard identification in person entry urban utility tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2005, 20(5):426-434.
48. A.O. Abdul Salam, Safety in automated transportation tunnels, in: Proceedings of the 15th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, 2007.
49. Tang A.-P., Li Z.-Q., Feng R.-C., Zhou X.-Y. Model experiment and analysis on seismic response of utility tunnel systems using a shaking table. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology 2009, 41(6):1-5.
50. J. Zhou, Q. Tang, J. Zhang, Dynamic risk assessment for excavation engineering based on human factors, in: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Science and Engineering, ICISE, 2009.
51. Fouladgar M.M., Yazdani-Chamzini A., Zavadskas E.K. Risk evaluation of tunnelling projects. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 2012, 12(1):1-12.
52. J.P. Godard, Urban underground space and benefits of going underground, in: Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress of the International Tunnelling Association, 2004.
53. Ping Z., Zhilong C., Hongyu Y., Hui W. On utilization of underground space to protect historical relics model. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2009, 24(3):245-249.
54. Saaty T.L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences 2008, 1(1):83-98.
55. Saaty T.L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 1990, 48(1):9-26.
56. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.