Structural insights into Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh4-Msh5 complex function using homology modeling

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Rakshambikai, Ramaswamy ^a   Srinivasan, Narayanaswamy ^a   Nishant, Koodali Thazath ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA, CRUCIFORM; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; MUTS DNA MISMATCH-BINDING PROTEIN; POINT MUTATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 84893695607     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078753     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Obmolova G, Ban C, Hsieh P, Yang W (2000) Crystal structures of mismatch repair protein MutS and its complex with a substrate DNA. Nature 407: 703-710.
2. Kunkel TA, Erie DA (2005) DNA mismatch repair. Annu Rev Biochem 74: 681-710. (Pubitemid 40995521)
3. Ross-Macdonald P, Roeder GS (1994) Mutation of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell 79: 1069-1080.
4. Hollingsworth NM, Ponte L, Halsey C (1995) MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev 9: 1728-1739.
5. Novak JE, Ross-Macdonald PB, Roeder GS (2001) The budding yeast Msh4 protein functions in chromosome synapsis and the regulation of crossover distribution. Genetics 158: 1013-1025. (Pubitemid 32667088)
6. Nishant KT, Chen C, Shinohara M, Shinohara A, Alani E (2010) Genetic analysis of baker's yeast Msh4-Msh5 reveals a threshold crossover level for meiotic viability. PLoS Genetics 6: e1001083.
7. Jiricny J (2000) Mismatch repair: the praying hands of fidelity. Curr Biol 10: R788-790.
8. Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N (1997) Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88: 375-384. (Pubitemid 27131379)
9. Bergerat A, de Massy B, Gadelle D, Varoutas PC, Nicolas A, et al. (1997) An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature 386: 414-417. (Pubitemid 27154484)
10. Maleki S, Neale MJ, Arora C, Henderson KA, Keeney S (2007) Interactions between Mei4, Rec114, and other proteins required for meiotic DNA doublestrand break formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chromosoma 116: 471-486. (Pubitemid 47456915)
11. Zakharyevich K, Ma Y, Tang S, Hwang PY, Boiteux S, et al. (2010) Temporally and biochemically distinct activities of Exo1 during meiosis: double-strand break resection and resolution of double Holliday junctions. Mol Cell 40: 1001-1015.
12. Hunter N, Kleckner N (2001) The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106: 59-70. (Pubitemid 32709958)
13. Borner GV, Kleckner N, Hunter N (2004) Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117: 29-45. (Pubitemid 38469896)
14. Schwacha A, Kleckner N (1995) Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell 83: 783-791. (Pubitemid 3006321)
15. Allers T, Lichten M (2001) Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106: 47-57. (Pubitemid 32709957)
16. Garcia V, Phelps SE, Gray S, Neale MJ (2011) Bidirectional resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 and Exo1. Nature 479: 241-244.
17. Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S (2005) Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436: 1053-1057. (Pubitemid 41191692)
18. Mimitou EP, Symington LS (2009) DNA end resection: many nucleases make light work. DNA Repair 8: 983-995.
19. Bishop DK, Park D, Xu L, Kleckner N (1992) DMC1: a meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression. Cell 69: 439-456.
20. Shinohara A, Ogawa H, Ogawa T (1992) Rad51 protein involved in repair and recombination in S. cerevisiae is a RecA-like protein. Cell 69: 457-470.
21. Snowden T, Acharya S, Butz C, Berardini M, Fishel R (2004) hMSH4-hMSH5 recognizes Holliday Junctions and forms a meiosis-specific sliding clamp that embraces homologous chromosomes. Mol Cell 15: 437-451. (Pubitemid 39092759)
22. Nishant KT, Plys AJ, Alani E (2008) A mutation in the putative MLH3 endonuclease domain confers a defect in both mismatch repair and meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179: 747-755.
23. Zakharyevich K, Tang S, Ma Y, Hunter N (2012) Delineation of joint molecule resolution pathways in meiosis identifies a crossover-specific resolvase. Cell 149: 334-347.
24. Argueso JL, Wanat J, Gemici Z, Alani E (2004) Competing crossover pathways act during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 168: 1805-1816. (Pubitemid 40066323)
25. Kneitz B, Cohen PE, Avdievich E, Zhu L, Kane MF, et al. (2000) MutS homolog 4 localization to meiotic chromosomes is required for chromosome pairing during meiosis in male and female mice. Genes Dev 14: 1085-1097. (Pubitemid 30324422)
26. Edelmann W, Cohen PE, Kneitz B, Winand N, Lia M, et al. (1999) Mammalian MutS homologue 5 is required for chromosome pairing in meiosis. Nat Genet 21: 123-127. (Pubitemid 29036298)
27. de Vries SS, Baart EB, Dekker M, Siezen A, de Rooij DG, et al. (1999) Mouse MutS-like protein Msh5 is required for proper chromosome synapsis in male and female meiosis. Genes Dev 13: 523-531. (Pubitemid 29131877)
28. Nagaoka SI, Hassold TJ, Hunt PA (2012) Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem. Nat Rev Genet 13: 493-504.
29. Santucci-Darmanin S, Neyton S, Lespinasse F, Saunieres A, Gaudray P, et al. (2002) The DNA mismatch-repair MLH3 protein interacts with MSH4 in meiotic cells, supporting a role for this MutL homolog in mammalian meiotic recombination. Hum Mol Genet 11: 1697-1706. (Pubitemid 34812091)
30. Santucci-Darmanin S, Walpita D, Lespinasse F, Desnuelle C, Ashley T, et al. (2000) MSH4 acts in conjunction with MLH1 during mammalian meiosis. FASEB J 14: 1539-1547. (Pubitemid 30636558)
31. Kolas NK, Cohen PE (2004) Novel and diverse functions of the DNA mismatch repair family in mammalian meiosis and recombination. Cytogenet Genome Res 107: 216-231. (Pubitemid 39370384)
32. Kolas NK, Svetlanov A, Lenzi ML, Macaluso FP, Lipkin SM, et al. (2005) Localization of MMR proteins on meiotic chromosomes in mice indicates distinct functions during prophase I. J Cell Biol 171: 447-458. (Pubitemid 41586934)
33. Svetlanov A, Cohen PE (2004) Mismatch repair proteins, meiosis, and mice: understanding the complexities of mammalian meiosis. Exp Cell Res 296: 71-79. (Pubitemid 38543215)
34. Baker SM, Plug AW, Prolla TA, Bronner CE, Harris AC, et al. (1996) Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over. Nat Genet 13: 336-342. (Pubitemid 26230500)
35. Barlow AL, Hulten MA (1998) Crossing over analysis at pachytene in man. Eur J Hum Genet 6: 350-358. (Pubitemid 28395797)
36. Cole F, Kauppi L, Lange J, Roig I, Wang R, et al. (2012) Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis. Nat Cell Biol 14: 424-430.
37. de los Santos T, Hunter N, Lee C, Larkin B, Loidl J, et al. (2003) The Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease acts independently of double-Holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast. Genetics 164: 81-94. (Pubitemid 36617695)
38. Guillon H, Baudat F, Grey C, Liskay RM, de Massy B (2005) Crossover and noncrossover pathways in mouse meiosis. Mol Cell 20: 563-573. (Pubitemid 41668641)
39. Holloway JK, Booth J, Edelmann W, McGowan CH, Cohen PE (2008) MUS81 generates a subset of MLH1-MLH3-independent crossovers in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genetics 4: e1000186.
40. Marti-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sanchez R, Melo F, et al. (2000) Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 29: 291-325. (Pubitemid 30599596)
41. Sanchez R, Sali A (1998) Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 13597-13602. (Pubitemid 28523017)
42. Warren JJ, Pohlhaus TJ, Changela A, Iyer RR, Modrich PL, et al. (2007) Structure of the human MutSalpha DNA lesion recognition complex. Mol Cell 26: 579-592. (Pubitemid 46765184)
43. Tseng Q, Orans J, Hast MA, Iyer RR, Changela A, et al. (2011) Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the human mismatch repair protein MutSbeta. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 67: 947-952.
44. Gupta S, Gellert M, Yang W (2012) Mechanism of mismatch recognition revealed by human MutSbeta bound to unpaired DNA loops. Nat Struct Mol Bio 19: 72-78.
45. Bowers J, Sokolsky T, Quach T, Alani E (1999) A mutation in the MSH6 subunit of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2-MSH6 complex disrupts mismatch recognition. J Biol Chem 274: 16115-16125.
46. Drotschmann K, Yang W, Brownewell FE, Kool ET, Kunkel TA (2001) Asymmetric recognition of DNA local distortion. Structure-based functional studies of eukaryotic Msh2-Msh6. J Biol Chem 276: 46225-46229.
47. Dufner P, Marra G, Raschle M, Jiricny J (2000) Mismatch recognition and DNA-dependent stimulation of the ATPase activity of hMutSalpha is abolished by a single mutation in the hMSH6 subunit. J Biol Chem 275: 36550-36555. (Pubitemid 32002052)
48. Lee SD, Surtees JA, Alani E (2007) Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2-MSH3 and MSH2-MSH6 complexes display distinct requirements for DNA binding domain I in mismatch recognition. J Mol Biol 366: 53-66. (Pubitemid 46123324)
49. Goldfarb T, Alani E (2005) Distinct roles for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mismatch repair proteins in heteroduplex rejection, mismatch repair and nonhomologous tail removal. Genetics 169: 563-574. (Pubitemid 40404294)
50. Surtees JA, Alani E (2006) Mismatch repair factor MSH2-MSH3 binds and alters the conformation of branched DNA structures predicted to form during genetic recombination. J Mol Biol 360: 523-536. (Pubitemid 43975113)
51. Ramachandran GN, Sasisekharan V (1968) Conformation of polypeptides and proteins. Adv Protein Chem 23: 283-438.
52. Lamers MH, Perrakis A, Enzlin JH, Winterwerp HH, de Wind N, et al. (2000) The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G x T mismatch. Nature 407: 711-717.
53. Martik D, Baitinger C, Modrich P (2004) Differential specificities and simultaneous occupancy of human MutSalpha nucleotide binding sites. J Biol Chem 279: 28402-28410. (Pubitemid 38900120)
54. Bjornson KP, Modrich P (2003) Differential and simultaneous adenosine di- and triphosphate binding by MutS. J Biol Chem 278: 18557-18562. (Pubitemid 36799482)
55. Antony E, Khubchandani S, Chen S, Hingorani MM (2006) Contribution of Msh2 and Msh6 subunits to the asymmetric ATPase and DNA mismatch binding activities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh6 mismatch repair protein. DNA Repair 5: 153-162. (Pubitemid 43069516)
56. Snowden T, Shim KS, Schmutte C, Acharya S, Fishel R (2008) hMSH4-hMSH5 adenosine nucleotide processing and interactions with homologous recombination machinery. J Biol Chem 283: 145-154.
57. Lilley DM (2000) Structures of helical junctions in nucleic acids. Q Rev Biophys 33: 109-159.
58. Liu Y, West SC (2004) Happy Hollidays: 40th anniversary of the Holliday junction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 937-944. (Pubitemid 39486545)
59. Segura J, Jones PF, Fernandez-Fuentes N (2012) A holistic in silico approach to predict functional sites in protein structures. Bioinformatics 28: 1845-1850.
60. De Muyt A, Jessop L, Kolar E, Sourirajan A, Chen J, et al. (2012) BLM helicase ortholog Sgs1 is a central regulator of meiotic recombination intermediate metabolism. Mol Cell 46: 43-53.
61. Kelley LA, Sternberg MJ (2009) Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat Protoc 4: 363-371.
62. Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y (2010) I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc 5: 725-738.
63. Zhang Y (2008) I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 40.
64. Von Grotthuss M, Pas J, Wyrwicz L, Ginalski K, Rychlewski L (2003) Application of 3D-Jury, GRDB, and Verify3D in fold recognition. Proteins 53: 418-423. (Pubitemid 37352200)
65. Alani E, Lee S, Kane MF, Griffith J, Kolodner RD (1997) Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2, a mispaired base recognition protein, also recognizes Holliday junctions in DNA. J Mol Biol 265: 289-301. (Pubitemid 27110685)
66. Marsischky GT, Lee S, Griffith J, Kolodner RD (1999) 'Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2/6 complex interacts with Holliday junctions and facilitates their cleavage by phage resolution enzymes. J Biol Chem 274: 7200-7206.
67. Eswar N, Webb B, Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Eramian D, et al. (2007) Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. In: John E . Coligan et al editors Current protocols in protein science. Chapter 2: Unit 2.9.
68. Guerois R, Nielsen JE, Serrano L (2002) Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J Mol Biol 320: 369-387. (Pubitemid 34722226)
69. Schymkowitz JW, Rousseau F, Martins IC, Ferkinghoff-Borg J, Stricher F, et al. (2005) Prediction of water and metal binding sites and their affinities by using the Fold-X force field. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 10147-10152. (Pubitemid 41023340)
70. Schymkowitz J, Borg J, Stricher F, Nys R, Rousseau F, et al. (2005) The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic Acids Res 33: W382-388. (Pubitemid 44529948)
71. Tina KG, Bhadra R, Srinivasan N (2007) PIC: Protein Interactions Calculator. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W473-476.
72. Armougom F, Moretti S, Poirot O, Audic S, Dumas P, et al. (2006) Expresso: automatic incorporation of structural information in multiple sequence alignments using 3D-Coffee. Nucleic Acids Res 34: W604-608. (Pubitemid 44529841)
73. Gouet P, Courcelle E, Stuart DI, Metoz F (1999) ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript. Bioinformatics 15: 305-308. (Pubitemid 29213756)
74. Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM (1993) NACCESS, Computer Program. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London.
75. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402. (Pubitemid 27359211)
76. UniProt Consortium (2012) Reorganizing the protein space at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 40: D71-75.
77. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 3059-3066. (Pubitemid 34851225)
78. Valdar WS (2002) Scoring residue conservation. Proteins 48: 227-241.
79. Voss NR, Gerstein M (2010) 3V: cavity, channel and cleft volume calculator and extractor. Nucleic Acids Res 38: W555-562.