The MUS81/MMS4 endonuclease acts independently of double-holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast

Genetics

Volumn 164, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 81-94

  De los Santos, Teresa ^a   Hunter, Neil ^b   Lee, Cindy ^a   Larkin, Brittany ^a   Loidl, Josef ^c   Hollingsworth, Nancy M ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDONUCLEASE; NUCLEASE MMS 4; NUCLEASE MUS 81; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROSSING OVER; ENZYME ANALYSIS; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENOTYPE; MEIOSIS; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST;

CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; DNA, CRUCIFORM; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; ENDONUCLEASES; MEIOSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TRANS-ACTIVATORS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA; MUS; PROKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE;

EID: 0037854709     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ALLERS, T., and M. LICHTEN, 2001a Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106: 47-57.
2. ALLERS, T., and M. LIGHTEN, 2001b Intermediates of yeast meiotic recombination contain heteroduplex DNA. Mol. Cell 8: 225-231.
3. ARBEL, A., D. ZENVIRTH and G. SIMCHEN, 1999 Sister chromatidbased DNA repair is mediated by RAD54, not by DMC1 or TID1. EMBO J. 18: 2648-2658.
4. BAHLER, J., T. WYLER, J. LOIDL and J. KOHLI, 1993 Unusual nuclear structures in meiotic prophase of fission yeast: a cytological analysis. J. Cell Biol. 121: 241-256.
5. BAILIS, J. M., and G. S. ROEDER, 1998 Synaptonemal complex morphogencsis and sister-chromatid cohesion require Mek1-dependent phosphorylation of a meiotic chromosomal protein. Genes Dev. 12: 3551-3563.
6. BASCOM-SLACK, C. A., L. O. Ross and D. S. DAWSON, 1997 Chiasmata, crossovers and meiotic chromosome segregation. Adv. Genet. 35: 253-284.
7. BODDY, M. N., A. LOPEZ-GIRONA, P. SHANAHAN, H. INTERTHAL, W. D. HEYER et al., 2000 Damage tolerance protein mus81 associates with the FHA1 domain of checkpoint kinase cdsl. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 8758-8766.
8. BODDY, M. N., P.-H. L. GAILLARD, W. H. MCDONAL, P. SHANAHAN, J. R. YATES, III et al., 2001 Mus81-Eme1 are essential components of a Holliday junction resolvase. Cell 107: 537-548.
9. CHEN, X.-B., R. MELCHIONNA, C.-M. DENIS, P.-H. L. GAILLARD, A. BLASINA et al., 2001 Human Mus81-associated endonuclease cleaves Holliday junctions in vitro. Mol. Cell 8: 1117-1127.
10. CHU, S., and I. HERSKOWITZ, 1998 Gametogenesis in yeast is regulated by a transcriptional cascade dependent on Ndt80. Mol. Cell 1: 685-696.
11. CONSTANTINOU, A., X. B. CHEN, C. H. MCGOWAN and S. C. WEST, 2002 Holliday junction resolution in human cells: two junction endonucleases with distinct substrate specificities. EMBO J. 21: 5577-5585.
12. COPENHAVER, G. P., E. A. HOUSWORTH and F. W. STAHL, 2002 Crossover interference in Arabidopsis. Genetics 160: 1631-1639.
13. DE LOS SANTOS, T., and N. M. HOLLINGSWORTH, 1999 Red1p: a MEK1-dependent phosphoprotein that physically interacts with Hop1p during meiosis in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 1783-1790.
14. DE LOS SANTOS, T., J. LOIDL, B. LARKIN and N. M. HOLLINGSWORTH, 2001 A role for MMS4 in the processing of recombination intermediates during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159: 1511-1525.
15. - phenotype by expression of a bacterial Holliday junction resolvase. EMBO J. 19: 2751-2762.
16. DOE, C. L., J. S. AHN, J. DIXON and M. C. WHITBY, 2002 Mus81Eme1 and Rqh1 involvement in processing stalled and collapsed replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 32753-32759.
17. ENZLIN, J. H., and O. D. SCHARER, 2002 The active site of the DNA repair endonuclease XPF-ERCC1 forms a highly conserved nuclease motif. EMBO J. 21: 2045-2053.
18. GERTON, J. L., J. DERISI, R. SCROFF, M. LICHTEN, P. O. BROWN et al., 2000 Inaugural article: global mapping of meiotic recombination hotspots and coldspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 11383-11390.
19. HABER, J. E., and W. D. HEYER, 2001 The fuss about Mus81. Cell 107: 551-554.
20. HABRAKEN, Y., P. SUNG, L. PRAKASH and S. PRAKASH, 1994 Holliday junction cleavage by yeast Rad1 protein. Nature 371: 531-534.
21. HABRAREN, Y., P. SUNG, L. PRAKASH and S. PRAKASH, 1995 Structurespecific nuclease activity in yeast nucleotide excision repair protein Rad2. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 30194-30198.
22. HOLLINGSWORTH, N. M., L. PONTE and C. HALSEY, 1995 MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 9: 1728-1739.
23. HUNTER, N., and N. KLECKNER, 2001 The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to doubleholliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106: 59-70.
24. INTERTHAL, H., and W. D. HEYER, 2000 MUS81 encodes a novel helix-hairpin-helix protein involved in the response to UV- and methylation-induced DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263: 812-827.
25. JONES, G. H., 1984 The control of chiasma distribution. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 38: 293-320.
26. KABACK, D. B., H. Y. STEENSMA and P. DE JONGE, 1989 Enhanced meiotic recombination on the smallest chromosome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 3694-3698.
27. KABACK, D. B., D. BARBER, J. MAHON, J. LAMB and J. You, 1999 Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic reciprocal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of crossover interference. Genetics 152: 1475-1486.
28. KALIRAMAN, V., J. R. MULLEN, W. M. FRICKE, S. A. BASTIN-SHANOWER and S. J. BRILL., 2001 Functional overlap between the 8gs1-Top3 and the fork endonuclease Mms4-Mus81: potential mechanisms for re-establishing replication forks. Genes Dev. 15: 2730-2740.
29. KAO, H. I., L. A. HENRICKSEN, Y. LIU and R. A. BAMBARA, 2002 Cleavage specificity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae flap endonuclease 1 suggests a double-flap structure as the cellular substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 14379-14389.
30. KEENEY, S., 2001 Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 52: 1-53.
31. KELLY, K. O., A. F. DERNBERG, G. M. STANFIELD and A. M. VILLENEUVE, 2000 Caenorhabditis elegans msh-5 is required for both normal and radiation-induced meiotic crossing over but not for completion of meiosis. Genetics 156: 617-630.
32. LONGTINE, M. S., A. MCKENZIE, III, D. J. DEMARINI, N. G. SHAH, A. WACH et al., 1998 Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14: 953-961.
33. MANIATIS, T., E. F. FRITSCH and J. SAMBROOK, 1982 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
34. MCKEE, A. H. Z., and N. KLECKNER, 1997 A general method for identifying recessive diploid-specific mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, its application to the isolation of mutants blocked at intermediate stages of meiotic prophase and characterization of a new gene SAE2. Genetics 146: 797-816.
35. MULLEN, J. R., V. KALIRAMAN, S. S. IBRAHIM and S. J. BRILL, 2001 Requirement for three novel protein complexes in the absence of the Sgs1 DNA helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 157: 103-118.
36. MULLER, H. J., 1916 The mechanism of crossing over. Am. Nat. 50: 193-221.
37. MUNZ, P., 1994 An analysis of interference in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 137: 701-707.
38. NOVAK, J. E., P. B. ROSS-MACDONALD and G. S. ROEDER, 2001 The budding yeast Msh4 protein functions in chromosome synapsis and the regulation of crossover distribution. Genetics 158: 1013-1025.
39. PAPAZIAN, H. P., 1952 The analysis of tetrad data. Genetics 37: 175-188.
40. PERKINS, D. D., 1947 Biochemical mutants in the smut fungus Ustilago maydis. Genetics 34: 607-626.
41. ROEDER, G. S., and J. M. BAILIS, 2000 The pachytene checkpoint. Trends Genet. 16: 395-403.
42. ROCKMILL, B., and G. S. ROEDER, 1990 Meiosis in asynaptic yeast. Genetics 126: 563-574.
43. ROCKMILL, B., and G. S. ROEDER, 1991 A meiosis-specific protein kinase homologue required for chromosome synapsis and recombination. Genes Dev. 5: 2392-2404.
44. ROSS-MACDONALD, P., and G. S. ROEDER, 1994 Mutation of a meiosisspecific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell 79: 1069-1080.
45. SAN-SEGUNDO, P. A., and G. S. ROEDER, 1999 Pch2 links chromatin silencing to meiotic checkpoint control. Cell 97: 313-324.
46. SCHWACHA, A., and N. KLECKNER, 1994 Identification of joint molecules that form frequently between homologs but rarely between sister chromatids. Cell 76: 51-63.
47. SCHWACHA, A., and N. KLECKNER, 1995 Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell 83: 783-791.
48. SCHWACHA, A., and N. KLECKNER, 1997 Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway. Cell 90: 1123-1135.
49. SMITH, A. V., and G. S. ROEDER, 1997 The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 136: 957967.
50. SNOW, R., 1979 Maximum likelihood estimation of linkage and interference from tetrad data. Genetics 92: 231-245.
51. STORLAZZI, A., L. XU, L. CAO and N. KLECKNER, 1995 Crossover and noncrossover recombination during meiosis: timing and pathway relationships. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 8512-8516.
52. STURTEVANT, A. H., 1913 The linear arrangement of six X-linked factors in Drosophila, as shown by their mode of association. J. Exp. Zool. 14: 43-59.
53. SYM, M., and G. S. ROEDER, 1994 Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein. Cell 79: 283-292.
54. SZOSTAK, J. W., T. L. ORR-WEAVER, R. J. ROTHSTEIN and F. W. STAHL, 1983 The double strand-break model for recombination. Cell 33: 25-35.
55. TONG, A. H., M. EVANGELISTA, A. B. PARSONS, H. Xu, G. D. BADER et al., 2001 Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294: 2364-2368.
56. VERSHON, A. K., N. M. HOLLINGSWORTH and A. D. JOHNSON, 1992 Meiotic induction of the yeast HOP1 gene is controlled by positive and negative regulatory elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 3706-3714.
57. VILLENEUVE, A. M., and K. J. HILLERS, 2001 Whence meiosis? Cell 106: 647-650.
58. WEST, R. W., R. R. YOCUM and M. PTASHNE, 1984 Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL1-GAL10 divergent promoter region: location and function of the upstream activation sequence UASG. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4: 2467-2478.
59. WOLTERING, D., B. BAUMGARTNER, S. BAGHI, B. LARKIN, J. LOIDL et al., 2000 Meiotic segregation, synapsis, and recombination checkpoint functions require physical interaction between the chromosomal proteins Red1p and Hop1p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 6646-6658.
60. XU, L., M. AJIMURA, R. PADMORE, C. KLEIN and N. KLECKNER, 1995 NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15: 6572-6581.
61. XU, L., B. M. WEINER and N. KLECKNER, 1997 Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex. Genes Dev. 11: 106-118.
62. ZALEVSKY, J., A. J. MACQUEEN, J. B. DUFFY, K. J. KEMPHUES and A. M. VILLENEUVE, 1999 Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast. Genetics 153: 1271-1283.