Linking Employee Stakeholders to Environmental Performance: The Role of Proactive Environmental Strategies and Shared Vision

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 128, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 167-181

  Alt, Elisa ^a   Díez de Castro, Emilio Pablo ^b   Lloréns Montes, Francisco Javier ^c  

^a ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Employee stakeholders; Environmental management; Environmental performance; Natural resource based view (NRBV); Organisations and the natural environment (ONE); Proactive environmental strategies (PES); Shared vision; Stakeholder integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893682275     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2095-x     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal,42(5), 507–525.
2. Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
3. Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives,22(4), 45–62.
4. Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in U.S. business organizations. Academy of Management Journal,43(4), 548–570.
5. Anton, W. R. Q., Deltas, G., & Khanna, M. (2004). Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,48(1), 632–654.
6. Aragón-Correa, J. A. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal,41(5), 556–567.
7. Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management,86(1), 88–103.
8. Aragón-Correa, J. A., Matías-Reche, F., & Senise-Barrio, M. E. (2004). Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Research,57(9), 964–975.
9. Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Rubio-López, E. A. (2007). Proactive corporate environmental strategies: Myths and misunderstandings. Long Range Planning,40(3), 357–381.
10. Armstrong, J., & Overton, T. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research,14(3), 396–402.
11. Banerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S., & Kashyap, R. K. (2003). Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing,67(2), 106–122.
12. Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal,26(3), 197–218.
13. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6), 1173–1182.
14. Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods,8(3), 274–289.
15. Berchicci, L., & King, A. (2007). Postcards from the edge: A review of the business and environment literature. Academy of Management Annals,1(1), 513–547.
16. Boiral, O. (2002). Tacit knowledge and environmental management. Long Range Planning,35(3), 291–317.
17. Boiral, O. (2005). The impact of operator involvement in pollution reduction: Case studies in Canadian chemical companies. Business Strategy and the Environment,14(6), 339–360.
18. Bowen, F. E. (2007). Corporate social strategy: Competing views from two theories of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics,75(1), 97–113.
19. Branzei, O., Ursacki-Bryant, T. J., Vertinsky, I., & Zhang, W. (2004). The formation of green strategies in Chinese firms: Matching corporate environmental responses and individual principles. Strategic Management Journal,25(11), 1075–1095.
20. Brenneke, M., & Spitzeck, H. (2010). Social intrapreneurs: Bottom–up social innovation. International Review of Entrepreneurship,8(2), 157–176.
21. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review,20(2), 343–378.
22. Bunge, J., Cohen-Rosenthal, E., & Ruiz-Quintanilla, A. (1996). Employee participation in pollution reduction: Preliminary analysis of the Toxics Release Inventory. Journal of Cleaner Production,4(1), 9–16.
23. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal,24(5), 453–470.
24. Buzzelli, D. T. (1991). Time to structure an environmental policy strategy. Journal of Business Strategy,12(2), 17–20.
25. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management,31(6), 515–524.
26. Cantor, D. E., Morrow, P. C., & Montabon, F. (2012). Engagement in environmental behaviors among supply chain management employees: An organizational support theoretical perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management,48(3), 33–51.
27. Chan, R. Y. K. (2005). Does the natural-resource-based view of the firm apply in an emerging economy? A survey of foreign invested enterprises in China. Journal of Management Studies,42(3), 625–672.
28. Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal,43(4), 663–680.
29. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review,20(1), 92–117.
30. Clemens, B. (2006). Economic incentives and small firms: Does it pay to be green? Journal of Business Research,59(4), 492–500.
31. Collier, N., Fishwick, F., & Floyd, S. W. (2004). Managerial involvement and perceptions of strategy process. Long Range Planning,37(1), 67–83.
32. Cordeiro, J. J., & Sarkis, J. (1997). Environmental proactivism and firm performance: Evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Business Strategy and the Environment,6(2), 104–114.
33. CorporateRegister.com. Global directory of corporate social responsibility (CSR) resources. Retrieved April 1, 2009 from http://www.corporateregister.com/.
34. Coulson-Thomas, C. (1992). Strategic vision or strategic con?: Rhetoric or reality? Long Range Planning,25(1), 81–89.
35. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics, a European perspective: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Darnall, N., & Edwards, D, Jr. (2006). Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: The role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strategic Management Journal,27(4), 301–320.
37. Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2008a). Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? Journal of International Management,14(4), 364–376.
38. Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies,47(6), 1072–1094.
39. Darnall, N., Jolley, G. J., & Handfield, R. (2008b). Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: Complements for sustainability? Business Strategy and the Environment,17(1), 30–45.
40. de Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P., & den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business and Society,44(3), 283–317.
41. Delgado-Ceballos, J., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2012). The effect of internal barriers on the connection between stakeholder integration and proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Business Ethics,107(3), 281–293.
42. Delmas, M. (2001). Stakeholders and competitive advantage: The case of ISO 14001. Production and Operations Management,10(3), 343–358.
43. Delmas, M., & Keller, A. (2005). Free riding in voluntary environmental programs: The case of the U.S. EPA WasteWise program. Policy Sciences,38(2–3), 91–106.
44. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal,29(10), 1027–1055.
45. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review,20(1), 65–91.
46. Earley, K. (2013a). The Co-operative: Food employees are energy-saving heroes. The Guardian Sustainable Business Sustainability Case Studies. Retrieved December 7, 2013 from http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/co-operative-food-employees-energy-saving.
47. Earley, K. (2013b). B&Q—One Planet Home: Powered by employees. The Guardian Sustainable Business Sustainability Case Studies. Retrieved December 7, 2013 from http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/b-and-q-powered-employees.
48. Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A. (2008). Corporate responsibility: A review of international management research from 1998 to 2007. Journal of International Management,14(4), 319–339.
49. Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,36(3), 305–323.
50. Fahey, L., & Prusak, L. (1998). The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California Management Review,40(3), 265–276.
51. Fineman, S., & Clarke, K. (1996). Green stakeholders: Industry interpretations and response. Journal of Management Studies,33(6), 715–730.
52. Florida, R. (1996). Lean and green: The move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. California Management Review,39(1), 80–105.
53. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review,24(2), 191–205.
54. García-Morales, V. J., Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. M., & Mihi-Ramírez, A. (2011). The influence of strategic dynamic capabilities on organizational outcomes through the organizational learning process. Industry and Innovation,18(7), 685–708.
55. González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, O. (2006). A review of determinant factors of environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment,15(2), 87–102.
56. Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics,74(4), 315–327.
57. Halme, M. (2002). Corporate environmental paradigms in shift: Learning during the course of action at UPM-Kymmene. Journal of Management Studies,39(8), 1087–1109.
58. Hanna, M. D., Newman, W. R., & Johnson, P. (2000). Linking operational and environmental improvement through employee involvement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,20(2), 148–165.
59. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review,20(4), 986–1014.
60. Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management,37(5), 1464–1479.
61. Harvey, B., & Schaefer, A. (2001). Managing relationships with environmental stakeholders: A study of U.K. water and electricity utilities. Journal of Business Ethics,30(3), 243–260.
62. Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods,41(3), 924–936.
63. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1996). The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,30(3), 381–395.
64. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal,42(1), 87–99.
65. Henriques, I., & Sharma, S. (2005). Pathways of stakeholder influence in the Canadian forestry industry. Business Strategy and the Environment,14(6), 384–398.
66. Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder–agency theory. Journal of Management Studies,29(2), 131–154.
67. Hillary, R. (2004). Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. Journal of Cleaner Production,12(6), 561–569.
68. Hubbard, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Beyond the triple bottom line. Business Strategy and the Environment,18(3), 177–191.
69. Huzzard, T., & Östergren, K. (2002). When norms collide: Learning under organizational hypocrisy. British Journal of Management,13(S2), S47–S59.
70. Jabbour, C. J. C., Santos, F. C. A., & Nagano, M. S. (2010). Contributions of HRM throughout the stages of environmental management: Methodological triangulation applied to companies in Brazil. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,21(7), 1049–1089.
71. Jansen, J. J. P., George, G., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies,45(5), 982–1007.
72. Jawahar, I. M., & McLaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive theory of stakeholder theory: An organizational life-cycle approach. Academy of Management Journal,26(3), 397–414.
73. Jones, T. M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Journal,32(1), 137–155.
74. Judge, W. Q., & Douglas, T. J. (1998). Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Journal of Management Studies,35(2), 241–262.
75. Kassinis, G. I., & Soteriou, A. C. (2003). Greening the service profit chain: The impact of environmental management practices. Production and Operations Management,12(3), 386–403.
76. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal,49(1), 145–159.
77. King, A., & Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science,48(2), 289–299.
78. Kitazawa, S., & Sarkis, J. (2000). The relationship between ISO 14001 and continuous source reduction programs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,20(2), 225–248.
79. Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management,34(6), 1152–1189.
80. Lee, M. D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews,10(1), 53–73.
81. Lindley, E., & Wheeler, F. P. (2000). The learning square: Four domains that impact on strategy. British Journal of Management,11(4), 357–364.
82. Linnenluecke, M. K., & Griffiths, A. (2013). Firms and sustainability: Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability field. Global Environmental Change,23, 382–391.
83. Linnenluecke, M. K., Russell, S. V., & Griffiths, A. (2009). Subcultures and sustainability practices: The impact on understanding corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment,18(7), 432–452.
84. MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science,1(4), 173–181.
85. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods,7(1), 83–104.
86. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research,39(1), 99–128.
87. Melnyk, S. A., Sroufe, R. P., & Calantone, R. L. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management,21(3), 329–351.
88. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review,22(4), 853–886.
89. Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology,15, 263–280.
90. Neville, B. A., & Menguc, B. (2006). Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics,66(4), 377–391.
91. Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Delgado-Ceballos, J., & Ferrón-Vílchez, V. (2012). The effect of director interlocks on firms’ adoption of proactive environmental strategies. Corporate Governance: An International Review,20(2), 164–178.
92. Oswald, S. L., Mossholder, K. W., & Harris, S. G. (1994). Vision salience and strategic involvement: Implications for psychological attachment to organization and job. Strategic Management Journal,15(6), 477–489.
93. Parent, M. M., & Deephouse, D. L. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics,75(1), 1–23.
94. Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,46(3), 598–609.
95. Pearce, C. G., & Ensley, M. D. (2004). A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: The central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs). Journal of Organizational Behavior,25(2), 259–278.
96. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
97. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management,12(4), 531–544.
98. Powell, T. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal,16(1), 15–37.
99. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers,36(4), 717–731.
100. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods,40(3), 879–891.
101. Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods,16(2), 93–115.
102. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research,42(1), 185–227.
103. Raines, S. S., & Prakash, A. (2005). Leadership matters: Policy entrepreneurship in corporate environmental policy making. Administration & Society,37(1), 3–22.
104. Ramus, C. A. (2001). Organizational support for employees: Encouraging creative ideas for environmental sustainability. California Management Review,43(3), 85–105.
105. Ramus, C. A., & Killmer, A. B. (2007). Corporate greening through prosocial extrarole behaviors—A conceptual framework for employee motivation. Business Strategy and the Environment,16(8), 554–570.
106. Ramus, C. A., & Steger, U. (2000). The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee ‘ecoinitiatives’ at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal,43(4), 605–626.
107. Real, J. C., Roldán, J. L., & Leal, A. (2012). From entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation to business performance: Analysing the mediating role of organizational learning and the moderating effects of organizational size. British Journal of Management. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00848.x.
108. Reinhardt, F. (1999). Market failure and the environmental policies of firms: Economic rationales for “beyond compliance” behavior. Journal of Industrial Ecology,3(1), 9–21.
109. Rothenberg, S. (2003). Knowledge content and worker participation in environmental management at NUMMI. Journal of Management Studies,40(7), 1783–1802.
110. Rueda-Manzanares, A., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2008). The influence of stakeholders on the environmental strategy of service firms: The moderating effects of complexity, uncertainty and munificence. British Journal of Management,19(2), 185–203.
111. Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Bunge, J., Freeman-Gallant, A., & Cohen-Rosenthal, E. (1996). Employee participation in pollution reduction: A socio-technical perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment,5(3), 137–144.
112. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal,40(3), 534–559.
113. Sarkis, J., González-Torre, P., & Adenso-Díaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management,28(2), 163–176.
114. Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive,5(2), 61–75.
115. Schmalensee, R. (1989). Inter-industry studies of structure and performance. In R. Schmalensee & R. D. Willig (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. 2, pp. 951–1009). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
116. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Currency Doubleday.
117. Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal,26(2), 159–180.
118. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal,19(8), 729–753.
119. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods,7(4), 422–445.
120. Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods,13(3), 456–476.
121. Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E., & Noordewier, T. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,25(4), 305–318.
122. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing,59(3), 63–74.
123. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
124. Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. In N. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1986 (pp. 159–186). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
125. Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR–financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies,49(7), 1274–1303.
126. Thomas, H., & Venkatraman, N. (1988). Research on strategic groups: Progress and prognosis. Journal of Management Studies,25(6), 537–555.
127. Torugsa, N. A., O’Donohue, W., & Hecker, R. (2012). Capabilities, proactive CSR and financial performance in SMEs: Empirical evidence from an Australian manufacturing industry sector. Journal of Business Ethics,109(4), 483–500.
128. Wagner, M. (2011). Corporate performance implications of extended stakeholder management: New insights on mediation and moderation effects. Ecological Economics,70(5), 942–950.
129. Winn, M. I., & Angell, L. C. (2000). Towards a process model of corporate greening. Organization Studies,21(6), 1119–1147.
130. Wolf, J. (2013). Improving the sustainable development of firms: The role of employees. Business Strategy and the Environment,22(2), 92–108.
131. Wolfe, R. A., & Putler, D. S. (2002). How tight are the ties that bind stakeholder groups. Organization Science,13(1), 64–80.
132. WWF. (2012). Living Planet Report. Retrieved January 5, 2013 from http://assets.wwf.org.uk/downloads/lpr_2012_summary_booklet_final_7may2012.pdf.
133. Zutshi, A., & Sohal, A. (2004). A study of the environmental management system (EMS) adoption process within Australasian organisations—2. Role of stakeholders. Technovation,24(5), 371–386.