Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategies: Myths and Misunderstandings

Long Range Planning

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 357-381

  Aragón Correa, Juan Alberto ^a   A Rubio López, Enrique ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MANAGERS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGIC PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

CUSTOMER PREFERENCES; MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES; STAKEHOLDERS;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT;

CORPORATE STRATEGY; MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISE;

EID: 34547734620     PISSN: 00246301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2007.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. See, for example,. Christmann P. Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal 43 (2000) 663-680
2. Klassen R.D., and Whybark D.C. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal 42 (1999) 599-615
3. Marcus A.A., and Geffen D. The dialectics of competency acquisition: Pollution prevention in electric generation. Strategic Management Journal 19 (1998) 1145-1168
4. Sharma S., and Vredenburg H. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19 (1998) 729-753
5. Although different works have proposed multiple names and typologies of corporate environmental strategies, the vast majority of them are based on the use of a continuum ranging from the most proactive to the least proactive (reactive) environmental strategy of the company. For instance, Buysse and Verbeke review a wide sample of these works (. Buysse K., and Verbeke A. Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal 24 (2003) 453-470 )
6. Other work (such as by. Aragón-Correa J.A. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal 41 (1998) 556-567 ) have specifically shown the positive association between proactivity in corporate environmental strategy and proactivity in the general strategic posture
7. Finally, Worthington and Patton describe the different patterns and implications in a sample of SMEs' firms (. Worthington I., and Patton D. Strategic Intent in the Management of the Green Environment within SMEs: An Analysis of the UK Screen-printing Sector. Long Range Planning 38 (2005) 197-212 )
8. Different works have recently argued the necessity of looking for new ways to better understand stakeholders' expectations and knowledge about corporate environmental management. For example, see. Hart S.L., and Sharma S. Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive 18 (2004) 7-18
9. Husted B.W. Governance choices for corporate social responsibility: To contribute, collaborate or internalize?. Long Range Planning 36 (2003) 481-498
10. Epstein M.J., and Roy M.J. Sustainability in Action: Identifying and Measuring the Key Performance Drivers. Long Range Planning 34 (2001) 585-604
11. Some examples of these critics' academic papers are following: Banerjee explores the contradictions in the concept of sustainable development (. Banerjee S.B. Who sustains whose development? Sustainable Development and the Reinvention of Nature. Organization Studies 24 (2003) 143-180 );
12. Newton and Newton and Harte provide a severe critique of works on the "greening" of organizations based on ecocentric arguments (. Newton T.J. Creating the new ecological order?. Academy of Management Review 27 (2002) 523-540
13. Newton T., and Harte G. Green business: Technicist kitsch. Journal of Management Studies 34 (1997) 75-98
14. Finally, Crane proposes that there is a tendency in corporations for greening to be accompanied by a process of amoralization (. Crane A. Corporate greening as amoralization. Organization Studies 21 (2000) 673-696 )
15. Ansoff H.I., and McDonnell E. Implanting strategic management. 2nd edition (1990), Prentice-Hall, London
16. Mintzberg H. The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 11 (1990) 171-195
17. Starik M., and Marcus A. Introduction to the special research forum on the management of organizations in the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal 43 (2000) 539-546
18. Partos L. European food industry 2002: the facts and figures. Product & Supplier News (15/04/2005 (2005))
19. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Value Added by Industry in Current Dollars as a Percentage of Gross Domestic Product 1947-2004 (2005), U.S. Department of Commerce
20. The data is from the Yale University National Poll on the Environment, conducted by the Global Strategy Group from 26 April to 3 May 2004 (overall margin of error of 3.1% at the 95% confidence level). The LCV Education Fund commissioned a national poll, which was conducted 6-13 February 2000, showing 89% of respondents believing that business that pollute should pay higher fees for permits to help pay for environmental law enforcement (margin of error 3%). The Gallup national poll (conducted 3-6 March 2003 margin of error 5%), showed that 80% of Americans generally favour setting higher emissions and pollution standards for business and industry.
21. For more details see for instance,. Derksen L., and Gartrell J. The social context of recycling. American Sociological Review 58 (1993 June) 43-49
22. European Commission, The attitudes of Europeans towards the environment, Eurobarometer 58.0, Directorate-General Environment, Brussels (2002).
23. See also note 5.
24. An example of early delimitation of environmental sector is. Kolluru R.V., and Silverstein M.E. Environmental business: Markets and prospects. In: Kolluru R.V. (Ed). Environmental strategies handbook (1994), McGraw Hill, New York 681-780 ; The listed categories in the text are included in the Classification of Environmental Protection Activities (CEPA) and accepted by UNECE, Eurostat, and the United Nations Expert Group of International Economic and Social Classifications
25. In the United States, data on pollution abatement and control expenditures have been collected since 1972 by the Bureau of Economic Analysis and published in the Survey of Current Business. These efforts were suspended in 1995 because of budget cuts. A new survey covering 1999 data was published in November 2002, including changes in the design of the collection of data. See US Census Bureau, Pollution abatement costs and expenditures: 1999 (2002). See also for different countries, OECD, Pollution abatement and control expenditure in OECD countries: 2002, Working group on Environmental information and outlooks (2003).
26. See for example the special issue on "Global Markets" of the Environmental Business Journal, (vol. 15, 11/12, 2003) or the different environmental markets report of Environmental Business International, Inc (http://www.ebiusa.com)
27. Russo M.V. The emergence of sustainable industries: Building on natural capital. Strategic Management Journal 24 (2003) 317-331
28. Just for illustration, see for example,. Bellesi F., Lehrer D., and Tal A. Comparative Advantage: The Impact of ISO 14001 Environmental Certification on Exports. Environmental Science & Technology 39 7 (2005) 1943-1953 or
29. Tan L.P. Implementing ISO 14001: is it beneficial for firms in newly industrialized Malaysia?. Journal of Cleaner Production 13 4 (2005) 397-404
30. For details, see for example,. Christmann P., and Taylor G. Globalization and the environment: Strategies for international voluntary environmental initiatives. Academy of Management Executive 16 (2002) 121-135
31. Tenbrunsel A.E., Wade-Benzoni K.A., Messick D.M., and Bazerman M.H. Understanding the influence of environmental standards on judgments and choices. Academy of Management Journal 43 (2000) 854-866
32. See for details. Bansal P., and Bogner W.C. Deciding on ISO 14001: Economics, institutions, and context. Long Range Planning 35 (2002) 269-290
33. International Organisation for Standardization. The ISO Survey of ISO 9001: 2000 and ISO 14001 Certificates - 2003 (2004), ISO, Geneva
34. Data from EMAS Helpdesk, European Commission (webpage), 2006-02-02.
35. Tenbrunsel A.E., Wade K.A., Messick D.M., and Bazerman M.H. Understanding the influence of environmental standards on judgement and choices. Academy of Management Journal 43 (2000) 854-866
36. For example,. Walley N., and Whitehead B. It's not easy being green. Harvard Business Review 72 (1994) 46-52
37. Hart S.L., and Ahuja G. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 5 (1996) 30-37
38. For details, see Schmidheiny was one of the pioneers in delimiting this concept and he developed it from his managerial position and simultaneously working in an UN environmental working group. Schmidheiny S. Changing course: A global business perspective on development and the environment (1992), MIT Press, London
39. See for example,. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Eco-efficiency (1998), OECDE, Paris
40. Moll S., and Gee D. Making sustainability accountable: Eco-efficiency, resource, productivity and innovation (1999), European Environment Agency, Luxembourg
41. Lehni M. Eco-efficiency: Creating more value with less impact (2000), World Business Center for Sustainable Development, Geneva
42. See note 22.
43. Some pioneers were. J. B. Barney, Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1991) 99-120
44. Rumelt R. Toward a strategic theory of the firm, in Competitive strategic management. In: Lamb R. (Ed) (1984), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 556-570
45. Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5 (1984) 171-180
46. Hart S.L. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20 (1995) 874-907
47. See, for example. Lehni M. Eco-efficiency: Creating more value with less impact (2000), World Business Center for Sustainable Development, Geneva
48. Porter M.E., and Van der Linde C. Green and competitive. Harvard Business Review 73 (1995) 120-134
49. Porter M.E. America's green strategy (1991), Scientific American, April, p. 168
50. See note 1.
51. A good example in O. Boiral, Global warming: Should companies adopt a proactive strategy?. Long Range Planning 39 (2006) 315-330
52. See illustration in. Aragón-Correa J.A., Matías-Reche F., and Senise-Barrio M.E. Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Research 57 9 (2004) 964-975
53. Aragón-Correa J.A., and Sharma S. A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review 28 (2003) 71-88
54. Chiesa V., Manzini R., and Noci G. Towards a sustainable view of the competitive system. Long Range Planning 32 (1999) 519-530
55. Eisenhardt K.M., and Martin J.A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they?. Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000) 1105-1121