Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: Meta analysis

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 82, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1749-1754

  Sun, Gang ^a   Li, Min ^a   Jiang, Zhi Wei ^b   Xu, Lin ^a   Peng, Zhao Hui ^a   Ding, Juan ^a   Li, Li ^a   Jin, Zhi Tao ^c  

^a JINAN MILITARY GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

^b FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c General Hospital of the Second Artillery   (China)

Author keywords

Angiography; Atrial fibrillation; Computed tomography; Coronary; Diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DATA SYNTHESIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DUAL SOURCE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY; DIAGNOSIS;

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; PREVALENCE; RADIOGRAPHY, DUAL-ENERGY SCANNED PROJECTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84893647337     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.034     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Leschka S, Scheffel H, Husmann L, et al. Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 2008;190(6):1583-90.
2. Luecke C, Andres C, Foldyna B, et al. Impact of heart rate and rhythm on radiation exposure in prospectively ECG triggered computed tomography. European Journal of Radiology 2011;81(9):2221-30.
3. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006;241(2):378-85.
4. Sun G, Li M, Jiang XS, et al. 320-detector row CT coronary angiography: effects of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure. British Journal of Radiology 2012;85(1016):388-94.
5. Rist C, Johnson TR, Muller-Starck J, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using dual-source computed tomography in patients with atrial fibrillation. Investigative Radiology 2009;44(3):159-67.
6. Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2006;114(7):257-354.
7. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A. Effectiveness of dual-source CT coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. Radiology 2007;245(3): 703-11.
8. Tsiflikas I, Drosch T, Brodoefel H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and image quality of cardiac dual-source computed tomography in patients with arrhythmia. International Journal of Cardiology 2010;143(1):79-85.
9. Marwan M, Pflederer T, Schepis T, et al. Accuracy of dual-source computed tomography to identify significant coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison with coronary angiography. European Heart Journal 2010;31(18):2230-7.
10. Yang L, Zhang Z, Fan Z, et al. 64-MDCT coronary angiography of patients with atrial fibrillation: influence of heart rate on image quality and efficacy in evaluation of coronary artery disease. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 2009;193(3):795-801.
11. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2000;283(15):2008-12.
12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009;151(4):264-9. W64.
13. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2005;41(1):68-73.
14. Whiting P, Rutjes A, Reitsma J, Bossuyt P, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2003;3(25):1-13.
15. Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2005;58(9):882-93.
16. Higgins J, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in metaanalyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557.
17. Chu H, Cole SR, Reitsma J, Zwinderman A. Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: A generalized linear mixed model approach. Authors' reply. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2006;59(12):1331-3.
18. van Houwelingen, HC, Zwinderman KH, Stijnen T. A bivariate approach to metaanalysis. Stat Med 1993;12(24):2273-84.
19. Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AWS, Scholten RJPM, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2005;58(10):982-90.
20. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, et al. Users' guides to the medical literature. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 1994;271(9): 703-7.
21. Stengel D, Bauwens K, Sehouli J, Ekkernkamp A, Porzsolt F. A likelihood ratio approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies. Journal of Medical Screening 2003;10(1):47-51.
22. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988;240(4857):1285-93.
23. Zhang JJ, Liu T, Feng Y, Wu WF, Mou CY, Zhai LH. Diagnostic value of 64- slice dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Korean Journal of Radiology 2011;12(4):416-23.
24. Mowatt G, Cummins E, Waugh N, et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. Health Technology Assessment 2008;12(17):1-164.
25. Vanhoenacker PK, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Van Heste R, et al. Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. Radiology 2007;244(2):419-28.
26. Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. New England Journal of Medicine 2012;367(4):299-308.
27. Litt HI, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. New England Journal of Medicine 2012;366(15):1393-403.
28. Schlattmann P, Schuetz GM, Dewey M. Influence of coronary artery disease prevalence on predictive values of coronary CT angiography: A meta-regression analysis. European Radiology 2011;21(9):1904-13.
29. Salavati A, Radmanesh F, Heidari K, Dwamena BA, Kelly AM, Cronin P. Dualsource computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 2012;6(2):78-90.
30. Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, et al. A long-term prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in suspected coronary artery disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2012;5(7):690-701.
31. Vorre MM, Abdulla J. Diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose of CT coronary angiography in atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2013;267(2):376-86.
32. Westwood ME, Raatz HD, Misso K, et al. Systematic review of the accuracy of dual-source cardiac CT for detection of arterial stenosis in difficult to image patient groups. Radiology 2013;267(2):387-95.
33. Xu L, Yang L, Fan Z, Yu W, Lv B, Zhang Z. Diagnostic performance of 320-detector CT coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: preliminary results. European Radiology 2011;21(5):936-43.