320-Detector row CT coronary angiography: Effects of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 85, Issue 1016, 2012, Pages

  Sun, Gang ^a   Li, M ^a   Jiang, X S ^a   Li, L ^a   Peng, Z H ^a   Li, G Y ^a   Xu, L ^a  

^a JINAN MILITARY GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

320 DETECTOR ROW COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DOSE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; R WAVE; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RR INTERVAL;

AGED; ARTIFACTS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84864830539     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/92160185     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Pelberg RA, Mazur W, Clarke G, Szawaluk J. The what and why of cardiac CT angiography: data interpretation and clinical practice integration. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2009;10: 152-63.
2. Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I, Reimann A, Schroeder S, Claussen CD, et al. Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2008;247: 346-55.
3. Matt D, Scheffel H, Leschka S, Flohr TG, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, et al. Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:567-73. (Pubitemid 47328537)
4. Weustink A, Neefjes L, Kyrzopoulos S, van Straten M, Neoh ER, Meijboom W, et al. Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography. Radiology 2009;253:672-80.
5. Kitagawa K, Lardo A, Lima J, George R. Prospective ECG-gated 320 row detector computed tomography: implications for CT angiography and perfusion imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:201-8.
6. Bastarrika G, Lee Y, Huda W, Ruzsics B, Costello P, Schoepf U. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 2009;253: 317-38.
7. Choi SI, George RT, Schuleri KH, Chun EJ, Lima JA, Lardo AC. Recent developments in wide-detector cardiac computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25(suppl. 1):23-9.
8. Klass O, Walker M, Siebach A, Stuber T, Feuerlein S, Juchems M, et al. Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and effective radiation dose between 64- and 256-slice CT. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1124-31.
9. Gang S, Min L, Li L, Guo-Ying L, Lin X, Qun J, et al. Evaluation of CT coronary artery angiography with 320-row detector CT in a high-risk population. Br J Radiol 2012;85:562-70.
10. Coats AJ. Ethical authorship and publishing. Int J Cardiol 2009;131:149-50.
11. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F, Laule M, Dubel HP, Schlattmann P, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation 2009;120: 867-75.
12. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:5-40.
13. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Plass A, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006;241:378-85. (Pubitemid 44632882)
14. Einstein AJ, Elliston CD, Arai AE, Chen MY, Mather R, Pearson GD, et al. Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner. Radiology 2010;254:698-706.
15. Husmann L, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Seifert B, et al. Coronary artery motion and cardiac phases: dependency on heart rate - implications for CT image reconstruction. Radiology 2007;245:567-76. (Pubitemid 47612540)
16. Yang L, Zhang Z, Fan Z, Xu C, Zhao L, Yu W, et al. 64-MDCT coronary angiography of patients with atrial fibrillation: influence of heart rate on image quality and efficacy in evaluation of coronary artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:795-801.
17. Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I, Reimann A, Schroeder S, Claussen C, et al. Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2008;247: 346-55.
18. Leschka S, Scheffel H, Husmann L, Gamperli O, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, et al. Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1583-90. (Pubitemid 351798529)
19. Baumüller S, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Seifert B, et al. Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose. Radiology 2009;253: 56-64.
20. Weustink AC, Neefjes LA, Kyrzopoulos S, van Straten M, Neoh ER, Meijboom WB, et al. Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography. Radiology 2009;253:672-80.
21. Cademartiri F, Mollet N, Runza G, Baks T, Midiri M, McFadden E, et al. Improving diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in patients with mild heart rhythm irregularities using ECG editing. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:634-8. (Pubitemid 46100249)
22. Weustink A, Mollet N, Neefjes L, van Straten M, Neoh E, Kyrzopoulos S, et al. Preserved diagnostic performance of dual-source CT coronary angiography with reduced radiation exposure and cancer risk. Radiology 2009;252: 53-60.
23. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H, Krauss T, Desbiolles L, Plass A, et al. Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 2008;249:71-80.
24. Earls J, Berman E, Urban B, Curry C, Lane J, Jennings R, et al. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 2008;246:742-53.
25. Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Anders K, Flohr T, et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol 2009;19: 2576-83.
26. Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Bruder H, Allmendinger T, et al. High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3:117-21.