Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 190, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1583-1590

  Leschka, Sebastian ^a   Scheffel, Hans ^a   Husmann, Lars ^a   Gämperli, Oliver ^a   Marincek, Borut ^a   Kaufmann, Philipp A ^a,b   Alkadhi, Hatem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

64 MDCT; Coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; Heart rate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BRADYCARDIA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DESCENDING AORTA SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HEART VALVE SURGERY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; THORAX PAIN;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 44849083430     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2000     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:147-154
2. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:1482-1487
3. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary plaque burden using multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95:1165-1169
4. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR 2006; 187:111-117
5. Ong TK, Chin SP, Liew CK, et al. Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification. Am Heart J 2006; 151:1323;e1321-e1326
6. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:575-582
7. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:552-557
8. Lesser JR, Flygenring B, Knickelbine T, et al. Clinical utility of coronary CT angiography: coronary stenosis detection and prognosis in ambulatory patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69:64-72
9. Russo V, Gostoli V, Lovato L, et al. Clinical value of multidetector CT coronary angiography as a pre-operative screening test before noncoronary cardiac surgery. Heart 2007; 93:1591-1598
10. Pannu HK, Flohr TG, Corl FM, Fishman EK. Current concepts in multi-detector row CT evaluation of the coronary arteries: principles, techniques, and anatomy. RadioGraphics 2003; 23 [spec no]:S111-S125
11. Beohar N, Robbins JD, Cavanaugh BJ, et al. Quantitative assessment of in-stent dimensions: a comparison of 64 and 16 detector multislice computed tomography to intravascular ultrasound. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68:8-10
12. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 2005; 234:86-97
13. Pannu HK, Alvarez W Jr, Fishman EK. Beta-blockers for cardiac CT: a primer for the radiologist. AJR 2006; 186:S341-S345
14. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006; 241: 378-385
15. Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Heuschmid M, et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-slice spiral computed tomography: image quality in patients with high heart rates. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:1434-1441
16. Kovacs A, Probst C, Sommer T, et al. CT coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation [in German]. Rofo 2005; 177:1655-1662
17. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:1081-1086
18. Flohr T, Ohnesorge B. Heart rate adaptive optimization of spatial and temporal resolution for electro-cardiogram-gated multislice spiral CT of the heart. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25: 907-923
19. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51:5-40
20. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 2006; 296:403-411
21. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Marshall AJ, Roobottom CA. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography: experience in a UK centre. Clin Radiol 2003; 58:378-383
22. Kuettner A, Trabold T, Schroeder S, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:1230-1237
23. Herzog C, Abolmaali N, Balzer JO, et al. Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:2670-2678
24. Halliburton SS, Stillman AE, Flohr T, et al. Do segmented reconstruction algorithms for cardiac multi-slice computed tomography improve image quality? Herz 2003; 28:20-31
25. Mellen PB, Herrington DM. Pharmacogenomics of blood pressure response to antihypertensive treatment. J Hypertens 2005; 23:1311-1325
26. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Lemos PA, et al. Higher intracoronary attenuation improves diagnostic accuracy in MDCT coronary angiography. AJR 2006; 187:1115;[web]W430-W433
27. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:2739-2747
28. Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, et al. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 2006; 238:75-86