Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science

Research Evaluation

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 145-158

  Falk Krzesinski, Holly J ^a   Contractor, Noshir ^b   Fiore, Stephen M ^c   Hall, Kara L ^d   Kane, Cathleen ^e   Keyton, Joann ^f   Klein, Julie Thompson ^g   Spring, Bonnie ^h   Stokols, Daniel ⁱ   Trochim, William ^j  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Northwestern University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^f NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^j Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959821642     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876580     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Aboelela, S W, J A Merrill, K M Carley and E Larson 2007. Social network analysis to evaluate an interdisciplinary research center. Journal of Research Administration, 38, 97-108.
2. Adamopoulos, J 1982. The perception of interpersonal-behavior: dimensionality and importance of the social-environment. Environment and Behavior, 14, 29-44.
3. Adler, N E and J Stewart 2010. Using team science to address health disparities: MacArthur network as case example. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186, 252-260.
4. Anderberg, M R 1973. Cluster Analysis for Applications. New York, NY: Academic Press.
5. Anderson, L A, M K Gwaltney, D L Sundra et al 2006. Using concept-mapping to develop a logic model for the prevention research centers program. Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy, 3, 1-9.
6. Annual International Science of Team Science Conference Homepage 2010. Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute.
7. Bennett, L M, H Gadlin and S Levine-Finley 2010. Collaboration and Team Science: a Field Guide. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
8. Börner, K, N Contractor, H J Falk-Krzesinski et al 2010. A multilevel systems perspective for the science of team science. Science Translational Medicine, 2, cm24.
9. Borrego, M and L K Newswander 2010. Definitions of interdisciplinary research: toward graduate-level interdisciplinary learning outcomes. Review of Higher Education, 34, 61+.
10. Churchman, C W 1984. The Systems Approach. Dell.
11. Contractor, N 2009. The emergence of multidimensional networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 743-747.
12. Coxon, A P M 1999. Sorting Data: Collection and Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Crowley, S, S D Eigenbrode M O'Rourke and J D Wulfhorst 2010. Cross-disciplinary localization:a philosophical approach. Multi-Lingual, September, 1-4.
14. Cummings, J N and S Kiesler 2005. Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35, 703-722.
15. Cummings, J N and S Kiesler 2007. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy, 36, 1620-1634.
16. Cummings, J N and S Kiesler 2008. Who collaborates successfully? Prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Diego, CA.
17. Department of Energy 2009. Energy Innovation Hubs. US Department of Energy.
18. Derry, S J, M A Gernsbacher and C D Schunn 2005. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: an Emerging Cognitive Science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Disis, M and J Slattery 2010. The road we must take: multidisciplinary team science. Science Translational Medicine, 2, 22cm29.
20. Emery, F E 1969. Systems Thinking: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
21. Everitt, B 1980. Cluster Analysis. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Halsted Press, a division of John Wiley & Sons.
22. Falk-Krzesinski, H 2010. Science of Team Science. End Note Reference Library. Northwestern University.
23. Falk-Krzesinski, H J, K Börner, N Contractor et al 2010a. Advancing the science of team science. Clinical and Translational Sciences, 3, 263-266.
24. Falk-Krzesinski, H J, K Hall, D Stokols and A Vogel 2010b. Science of team science. In Wikipedia: the Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation.
25. Fiore, S M 2008. Interdisciplinarity as teamwork: how the science of teams can inform team science. Small Group Research, 39, 251-277.
26. Fuqua, J, D Stokols, J Gress et al 2004. Critical issues in the study of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration. Substance Use and Misuse, 39, 2073-2074.
27. Gray, B 2008a. Enhancing transdisciplinary research through collaborative leadership. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S124-S132.
28. Gray, D O 2008b. Making team science better: applying improvement-oriented evaluation principles to evaluation of cooperative research centers. In New Directions for Evaluation, eds C L S Coryn and M Scriven, pp. 73-87. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
29. Guimerà, R, B Uzzi, J Spiro and L A N Amaral 2005. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308, 697-702.
30. Hackman, J R 1987. The design of work teams. In Handbook of Organizational Behavior, ed. J W Lorsch, pp. 315-342. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31. Hackman, J R 1990. Groups that Work (and Those that Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork. 1st edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32. Hackman, J R 2011. Collaborative Intelligence: Using Teams to Solve Hard Problems. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
33. Haines, V, J Godley and P Hawe 2010. Understanding interdisciplinary collaborations as social networks. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1-11.
34. Hall, K L, A X Feng, R S Moser et al 2008a. Moving the science of team science forward: collaboration and creativity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S243-S249.
35. Hall, K L, D Stokols, R P Moser et al 2008b. The collaboration readiness of transdisciplinary research teams and centers findings from the National Cancer Institute's TREC Year-One evaluation study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S161-S172.
36. Hirsch Hadorn, G 2008. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Dordrecht/London: Springer.
37. Huerta, M F, G K Farber, E L Wilder et al 2005. NIH roadmap interdisciplinary research initiatives. PLoS Computational Biology, 1, e59.
38. Jordan, G B 2006. Factors influencing advances in basic and appplied research: variation due to diversity in research profiles. In Innovation, Science, and Institutional Change, eds J Hage and M T H Meeus, pp. 173-195. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39. Kagan, J M, S R Rosas and W Trochim 2010. Integrating utilization-focused evaluation with business process modeling for clinical research improvement. Research Evaluation, 19(4), October, 239-250.
40. Kahn, R L 1992. The MacArthur Foundation Program in Mental Health and Human Development: an experiment in scientific organization. A MacArthur Foundation Occasional Paper.
41. Kessel, F S, P L Rosenfield and N B Anderson 2008. Interdisciplinary Research: Case Studies from Health and Social Science. 2nd edn. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Keyton, J, D J Ford and F L Smith 2008. A mesolevel communicative model of collaboration. Communication Theory, 18, 376-406.
43. Klein, J T 1996. Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
44. Klein, J T 2008. Education. In Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, eds G Hirsch Hadorn, H Hoffmann-Riem, S Biber-Klemm et al, pp. 399-410. Dordrecht/London: Springer Science.
45. Klein, J T 2010. A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, eds R Frodeman, J T Klein and C Mitcham, pp. 15-30. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46. Kruskal, J B and M Wish 1978. Multidimensional Scaling. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, number 07-011. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47. Leischow, S J, A Best, W M Trochim et al 2008. Systems thinking to improve the public's health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S196-S203.
48. Mabry, P L, D H Olster, G D Morgan and D B Abrams 2008. Interdisciplinarity and systems science to improve population health: a view from the NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S211-S224.
49. Mason, J 1996. Qualitative Researching. London: Sage.
50. Mâsse, L C, R P Moser, D Stokols et al 2008. Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S151-S160.
51. McGrath, J E 1964. Social Psychology: a Brief Introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
52. Miller, K 2008. Successful collaborations: social scientists who study science have noticed a trend. In Biomedical Computation Review (Simbios at Stanford University, National NIH Center for Biomedical Computing), pp. 7-15.
53. Misra, S, D Stokols K L Hall and A Feng 2010. Transdisciplinary training in health research: distinctive features and future directions. In Converging Disciplines: a Transdisciplinary Research Approach to Urban Health Problems, eds M Kirst, N Schaefer-McDaniel, S Huang and P O'Campo. New York: Springer.
54. Mitrany, M and D Stokols 2005. Gauging the transdisciplinary qualities and outcomes of doctoral training programs. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, 437-449.
55. Nash, J M 2008. Transdisciplinary training: key components and prerequisites for success. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S133-S140.
56. NAS, National Academy of Sciences 2004. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: NAS.
57. NIH, National Institutes of Health 2010. The NIH Common Fund Interdisciplinary Research. NIH.
58. NSF, National Science Foundation 2008. NSF-Wide Investments. NSF.
59. Olson, G M and J S Olson 2000. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139-178.
60. Olson, J S, E C Hofer, N Bos et al 2008. A theory of remote scientific collaboration (TORSC). In Scientific Collaboration on the Internet, eds G M Olson, A Zimmerman and N Bos. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Osborn, A F 1948. Your Creative Power. New York: Scribner.
62. Paletz, S B F and C D Schunn 2010. A social-cognitive framework of multidisciplinary team innovation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 73-95.
63. Quinlan, K M, M Kane and W Trochim 2008. Evaluation of large research initiatives: outcomes, challenges, and methodological considerations. New Directions for Evaluation, 118, 61-72.
64. Rhoten, D 2003. A Multi-Method Analysis of the Social and Technical Conditions for Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Hybrid Vigor Institute.
65. Rhoten, D 2004. Interdisciplinary research: trend or transition. Items and Issues: Social Science Research Council, 5, 6-11.
66. Rhoten, D and A Parker 2004. Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science, 306, 2046.
67. Robinson, J M and W M K Trochim 2007. An examination of community members', researchers' and health professionals' perceptions of barriers to minority participation in medical research: an application of concept-mapping. Ethnicity and Health, 12, 521-539.
68. Rosenberg, S and M P Kim 1975. The method of sorting as a data gathering procedure in multivariate research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 489-502.
69. Rosenfield, P L 1992. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social-sciences. Social Science and Medicine, 35, 1343-1357.
70. Stillman, F, M Hoang, R Linton et al 2008. Mapping tobacco industry strategies in South East Asia for action planning and surveillance. Tobacco Control, 17.
71. Stipelman, B, A Feng, K Hall et al 2010. The relationship between collaborative readiness and scienctific productivity in the Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer (TREC) Centers. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 39, s143.
72. Stokols, D 2006. Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 63-77.
73. Stokols, D, J Fuqua, J Gress et al 2003. Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine Tobacco Research, 5, Suppl 1, S21-39.
74. Stokols, D, R Harvey, J Gress et al 2005. In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration: lessons learned and implications for active living research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 202-213.
75. Stokols, D, K L Hall, B K Taylor and R P Moser 2008a. The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S77-S89.
76. Stokols, D, S Misra, R P Moser et al 2008b. The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S96-S115.
77. Stokols, D, K L Hall, R P Moser et al 2010. Evaluating crossdisciplinary team science initiatives: conceptual, methodological, and translational perspectives. In The Oxford Handbook on Interdisciplinarity, eds R Frodeman, J T Klein and C Mitcham, pp. 471-493. New York: Oxford University Press.
78. Trochim, W M K 1989. An introduction to concept-mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 1-16.
79. Trochim, W M K 1993. The reliability of concept-mapping. In Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association. Dallas, TX.
80. Trochim, W and M Kane 2005. Concept-mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 17, 187-191.
81. Trochim, W, D A Cabrera, B Milstein et al 2006a. Practical challenges of systems thinking and modeling in public health. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 538-546.
82. Trochim, W M, D A Cabrera, B Milstein et al 2006b. Practical challenges of systems thinking and modeling in public health. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 538-546.
83. Trochim, W M, S E Marcus, L C Masse et al 2008. The evaluation of large research initiatives: a participatory integrative mixed methods approach. American Journal of Evaluation, 29, 8-28.
84. Von Bertalanffy, L 1950. An outline of general system theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1, 134-165.
85. Wagner, C S, J D Roessner, K Bobb et al 2011. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): a review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics. In press, 1-13.
86. Weller, S C and A K Romney 1988. Systematic Data Collection. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
87. Whitfield, J 2008. Group theory. Nature, 455, 720-723.
88. Wicker, A W 1972. Processes which mediate behaviorenvironment congruence. Behavioral Science, 17, 265-277.
89. Wuchty, S, B F Jones and B Uzzi 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316, 1036-1038.