Relevance to Practice as a Criterion for Rigor

Educational Researcher

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 19-23

  Gutiérrez, Kris D ^a   Penuel, William R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

educational policy; educational reform; research methodology; research utilization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893491424     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X13520289     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bang M.,Medin D.,Washinawatok K.,Chapman S.New science of learning: Cognition, computers, and collaboration in education. Khine M. S.Saleh M. I., ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2010:569-592.
2. Berliner D. C.Comment: Educational research. The hardest science of all.Educational Researcher. 2002;31 (8): 18-20.
3. Bryk A. S.Support a science of performance improvement.Phi Delta Kappan. 2009;90 (8): 597-600.
4. Bryk A. S.,Gomez L. M.,Grunow A.Frontiers in sociology of education. Hallinan M., ed. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Verlag; 2011:127-162.
5. Cobb P. A.,Jackson K.Analyzing educational policies: A learning design perspective.Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2012;21:487-521.
6. Coburn C. E.Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change.Educational Researcher. 2003;32 (6): 3-12.
7. Coburn C. E.,Russell J. L.,Kaufman J. H.,Stein M. K.Supporting sustainability: Teachers' advice networks and ambitious instructional reform.American Journal of Education. 2012;119 (1): 137-182.
8. Cole M.,Engeström Y.The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology. Valsiner J.Rosa A., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006:484-507.
9. Easton J.Using measurement as leverage between developmental research and education practice. Charlottesville: Talk given at the Center for the Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning, Curry School of Education, University of Virginia; 2013:.
10. Engeström Y.Development as breaking away and opening up: A challenge to Vygotsky and Piaget.Swiss Journal of Psychology. 1996;55:126-132.
11. Engeström Y.From teams to knots: Activity theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2008:.
12. Engeström Y.From design experiments to formative interventions.Theory & Psychology. 2011;21 (5): 598-628.
13. Engeström Y.,Sannino A.Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges.Educational Research Review. 2010;5:1-24.
14. Engeström Y.,Virkkunen J.,Helle M.,Pihlaja J.,Poikela R.Change laboratory as a tool for transforming work.Lifelong Learning in Europe. 1996;1 (2): 10-17.
15. Erickson F.Innovations in educational ethnography: Theory, methods and results. Spindler G.Hammond L., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006:235-257.
16. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
17. Erickson F.,Gutiérrez K.Culture, rigor, and science in educational research.Educational Researcher. 2002;31 (8): 21-24.
18. Feuer M.,Towne L.,Shavelson R.Scientific culture and education research.Educational Researcher. 2002;31:4-14.
19. Fishman B. J.,Penuel W. R.,Hegedus S.,Roschelle J.What happens when the research ends? Factors related to the sustainability of a technology-infused mathematics curriculum.Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 2011;30 (4): 329-353.
20. Gutiérrez K.Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space.Reading Research Quarterly. 2008;43 (2): 148-164.
21. Gutiérrez K. D.,Vossoughi S.Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments.Journal of Teacher Education. 2010;61 (1/2): 100-117.
22. Morris A.,Hiebert J.Creating shared instructional products: An alternative approach to improving teaching.Educational Researcher. 2011;40 (1): 5-14.
23. Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002:.
24. O'Connor K.,Allen A.Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Penuel W.O'Connor K., ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2010:160-175.
25. O'Connor K.,Penuel W. R.Learning research as a human science: Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Penuel W. R.O'Connor K., ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2010:1-16.
26. Penuel W. R.,Fishman B. J.,Cheng B.,Sabelli N.Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design.Educational Researcher. 2011;40 (7): 331-337.
27. Penuel W. R.,Spillane J. P.Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. 2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Sawyer R. K., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; in press:.
28. Pickering A.The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2010:.
29. RoschelleJ.HedgesL. V.TiptonE.ShechtmanN. (2012). Generalizability of integrating dynamic representation technology with curriculum and teaching to enhance understanding of mathematics. Unpublished manuscript.
30. Roschelle J.,Knudsen J.,Hegedus S. J.Designs for learning environments of the future: International perspectives from the learning sciences. Jacobson M. J.Reimann P., ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2010:233-262.
31. Roschelle, J., Pierson, J., Empson, S., Shechtman, N., Dunn, M., & Tatar, D. (2010). Equity in scaling up SimCalc: Investigating differences in student learning and classroom implementation. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 333-340). Chicago, IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
32. Roschelle J.,Shechtman N.,Tatar D.,Hegedus S.,Hopkins B.,Empson S., Gallagher L. P.Integration of technology, curriculum, and professional development for advancing middle school mathematics: Three large-scale studies.American Educational Research Journal. 2010;47 (4): 833-878.
33. Vossoughi S.,Gutiérrez K.NSEE yearbook. Vadeboncoeur J., ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; in press:.