Higher education change and social networks: A review of research

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 91-125

  Kezar, Adrianna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893374671     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: 15384640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2014.0003     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks: Structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
2. Atteberry, A., & Bryk, A. (2010). Centrality, connection, and commitment: The role of social networks in a school based literacy initiative. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 51-76). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
3. Balconi, M., & Laboranti, A. (2006). University-industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics. Research Policy, 35(10), 1616-1630.
4. Baldridge, J. V., Curtis, D. V., Ecker, G. P., & Riley, G. L. (1977). Alternative models of governance in higher education. In G. L. Riley & J. V. Baldridge (Eds.), Governing academic organizations. Berkley: McCutchan.
5. Balkundi, P., & Harrison, D. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structures effects on team viability and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 49-68.
6. Berquist, W. (2007). The six cultures of the academy. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
7. Biddix, J. P., & Park, H. W. (2008). Online networks of student protest: The case of the living wage campaign. New Media & Society, 10(6), 871-891.
8. Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
9. Borgatti, S., & Cross, R. (2003). A relationship view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445.
10. Borgatti, S., & Foster., P. (2003). The new paradigm of organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013.
11. Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002) Trust in schools: A core resource for school improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12. Burgan, M. (2006). What happened to faculty governance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Burt, R. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In R. Sutton & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1-83), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
15. Clark, B. R. (1983). The contradictions of change in academic systems. Higher Education, 12(1), 101-116.
16. Coburn, C., Choi, L., & Matta, W. (2010). "I would go to her because her mind is math": Network formation in the context of a district based mathematics reform. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 33-51). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
17. Coburn, C., & Russell, J. (2008). District policy and teachers' social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203-235.
18. Cole, R., & Weinbaum, E. (2010). Change in attitude: Peer influence in high school reform. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 77-96). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
19. Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
20. Crossley, N. (2008). Social networks and student activism: On the politicising effect of campus connections. The Sociological Review, 56(1), 18-38.
21. Daly, A. (2010a). Mapping the terrain: Social network theory and educational change. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 1-17). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
22. Daly, A. (2010b). Surveying the terrain ahead: Social network theory and educational change. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 259-274). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
23. Daly, A. (Ed.). (2010c). Social network theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
24. Daly, A., & Finnigan, K. (2008). A bridge between worlds: Understanding network structure to understand change strategy. Journal of Educational Change, 11(2), 111-138.
25. Fairweather, J. (2009). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education. Paper for the National academies National Research Council board of Science Education.
26. Finnigan K., & Daly, A. (2010). Learning at a system level: Ties between principals of low-performing schools and central office leaders. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 179-196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
27. Freemen, C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
28. Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. The Academy of Management Journal, 25(1), 63-81.
29. Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 370-403.
30. Granvetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
31. Hartley, M. (2009a) Reclaiming the democratic purpose of american higher education: Tracing the trajectory of the civic engagement movement. Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 11-30.
32. Hartley, M. (2009b). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal of Change Management, 9(3), 323-338.
33. Heck, R., Price, C., & Thomas, S. (2004). Tracks as emergent structures: A network analysis of student differentiation in a high school. American Journal of Education, 110(4), 321-353.
34. Honig, M. (2006). Street level bureaucracy revisited: Frontline district central office administrators as boundary spanners in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(4), 357-383.
35. Keller, G. (1983). Shaping an academic strategy. In G. Keller (Ed.), Academic strategy: The management revolution in American higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36. stCentury: Recent research and conceptualizations. Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
37. Kezar, A. (2005). Redesigning for collaboration with higher education institutions: An exploration into the developmental process. Research in Higher Education, 46(7), 831-860.
38. Kezar, A., & Lester, J. (2009). Organizing for collaboration in higher education: A guide for campus leaders. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
39. Kezar, A., & Lester, J. (2011). Enhancing campus capacity for leadership: An examination of grassroots leaders. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Press.
40. Kezar, A., & Sam. C. (2010). Understanding the new majority: Contingent faculty in higher education (Vol. I). ASHE Higher Education Report Series. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
41. Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D. (2008). Interpersonal networks in organizations: Cognition, personality, dynamics, and culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502-527.
44. Kraatz, M. (1998). Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 621-643.
45. Larivire, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519-533.
46. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Linton, F. (2006). The development of social network analysis. Vancouver, BC: Empirical Press.
48. Lumina Foundation, (2010). Lessons: When networks build a platform students step up. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation Press.
49. Marion, L. S., Garfield, E., Hargens, L. L., Lievrouw, L. A., White, H. D., & Wilson, C. S. (2003). Social network analysis and citation network analysis: Complementary approaches to the study of scientific communication. Sponsored by SIG MET. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40(1), 486-487.
50. Maroulis, S., & Gomez, L. M. (2008). Does "connectedness" matter? Evidence from asocial network analysis within a small school reform. Teachers College Record, 110(9), 1901-1929.
51. Mayer, A., & Puller, S. L. (2008). The old boy (and girl) network: Social network formation on university campuses. Journal of Public Economics, 92(1), 329-347.
52. McGrath, C., & Krackhardt, D. (2003). Network conditions for organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 304-336.
53. McMillan, G. S. (2008). Mapping the invisible colleges of R&D management. R&D Management, 38(1), 69-83.
54. Metcalfe, A. S. (2006). The corporate partners of higher education associations: A social network analysis. Industry and Innovation, 13(4), 459-479.
55. Meyerson, D. (2003). Tempered radicals: How everyday leaders inspire change at work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
56. Mohrman, S., Tenkasi, R., & Micomonaco, J. P., & Austin, A. E. (November, 2010). Examining inter-institutional learning communities: The Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning as a collaboration for institutional learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE). Indianapolis, IN.
57. Mohrman, A. (2003). The role of networks in fundamental organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 301-323.
58. Moody, J., McFarland, D., & Bender-deMoll, S. (2005). Dynamic network visualization. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1206-1241.
59. Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 103-127.
60. Moolenaar, N., & Sleegers, P. (2010). Social networks, trust, and innovation: The role of relationships in supporting an innovative climate in Dutch schools. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 97-114). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
61. Mullen, C., & Kochan, F. (2000). Creating a collaborative leadership network: An organic view of change. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3(3), 183-200.
62. Nelson, R. (1989). The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 377-401.
63. nded.). Boston: Harvard Business Press.
64. Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy. Journal of Information Science, 28, 441-451.
65. Perna, L. W., Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., Thomas, S. L., Bell, A., Anderson, R., & Li, C. (2008). The role of college counseling in shaping college opportunity: Variations across high schools. The Review of Higher Education, 31(2), 131-159.
66. Pusser, B., Slaughter, S., & Thomas, S. (2006). Playing the board game: An empirical analysis of university trustee and corporate board interlocks. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 747-775
67. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
68. Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240-267.
69. Rhoades, G. (1996). Reorganizing the faculty workforce for flexibility: Part-time professional labor. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(6), 626-659.
70. Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (2004). Academic capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
71. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster.
72. Rogers, J. D., Bozeman, B., & Chompalov, I. (2001). Obstacles and opportunities in the application of network analysis to the evaluation of R&D. Research Evaluation, 10(3), 161-172.
73. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis. London: Sage.
74. Sharma, M., & Urs, S. R. (2008, October). Network dynamics of scholarship: A social network analysis of digital library community. In Proceedings of the 2nd PhD Workshop on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 101-104). New York: ACM.
75. Skahill, M. (2003). The role of social support network in college persistence among freshman students. Journal of College Student Retention, 4(10), 39-52.
76. Solem, M. N. (2000). Differential adoption of internet-based teaching practices in college geography. Journal of Geography, 99, 219-227.
77. Spillane, J., Healey, K., & Chong, M. (2010). Leading and managing instruction: Formal and informal aspects of the elementary school organization. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 129-158). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
78. Szulanski, G. (1996). Internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43.
79. Tenkasi, R., & Chesmore, M. (2003). Social networks and planned change: The impact of strong ties on effective change implementation and use. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 281-300.
80. Teranishi, R., & Briscoe, K. (2006). Social capital and the racial stratification of college opportunity. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 591-614). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
81. Thomas, S. (2000). Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 591-615.
82. Tierney, W. (1988). Organizational culture in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(1), 2-21.
83. Tierney, W. (2006). Trust and the public good. New York: Peter Lang.
84. Tierney, W. G., Corwin, Z., & Colyar, J. (2005). Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
85. Tilly, C. (2005). Identities, boundaries, and social ties. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press.
86. Traud, A. L., Kelsic, E. D., Mucha, P. J., & Porter, M. A. (2011). Comparing community structure to characteristics in online collegiate social networks. SIAM Review, 53(3), 526-543.
87. Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of competition within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intra-organizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179-190.
88. Valente, T. (1995). Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
89. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
90. Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. (Eds.). (1988). Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
91. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5).
92. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002) Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
93. White, H. D. (2003). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 423-434.
94. White, M. D. (2001). Diffusion of an innovation: Digital reference service in Carnegie Foundation Master's (Comprehensive) Academic Institution Libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27, 173-187.