The use of a Classroom Response System to more effectively flip the classroom

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 491-495

  Lucke, Terry ^a   Keyssner, Ulrike ^a   Dunn, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST   (Australia)

Author keywords

Classroom response systems (CRS); Engagement; Flipped classroom; Hand e lecture; Top Hat Monocle

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOM RESPONSE SYSTEMS; ENGAGEMENT; FLIPPED CLASSROOM; HAND-E-LECTURE; TOP HAT;

CURRICULA; MOBILE DEVICES; TEACHING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84893271536     PISSN: 15394565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2013.6684872     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. D. Bruff, "Teaching with classroom response systems: Creating active learning environments, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2009.
2. S. Brown, "Assessment for learning," Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 2004-2005, 1, 81-89.
3. P.K. Dunn, A. Richardson, F. Oprescu and C. McDonald, "Mobilephone-based classroom response systems: Students' perceptions of engagement and learning in a large undergraduate course," (In Press, Int. J. of Math. Edu. in Science and Tech., 2013 Vol. 00, 1-15, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1080/0020739X.2012.756548)
4. G. Gibbs and C. Simpson, "Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning," Learn. Teach. Higher Educ. 1, 2004, 3-31.
5. R.A. Bartsch and W. Murphy, "Examining the effects of an electronic classroom response system on student engagement and performance," Journal of Edu. Computing Research, 44, 2011, 25-33.
6. P.K. Dunn, A. Richardson, C. McDonald and F. Oprescu, F. (2012), Instructor perceptions of using a mobile-phone-based free classroom response system in first-year statistics undergraduate courses, Int. J. of Math. Edu. in Science and Technology, 43(8), 2012, 1041-1056.
7. S. Bakrania, "A study on the influence of rich versus traditional classroom response system (CRS) questions on concept retention," 42nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 3-6, 2012, Seattle, Washington. pp. 629-634.
8. R. Toto and H. Nguyen, "Flipping the work design in an industrial engineering course," 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 18-21, 2009, San Antonio, TX.
9. I.D. Beatty, W.J. Gerace, W.J. Leonard and R.J. Dufresne, "Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching," American Journal of Physics, 74(1), 2006, 31-39.
10. C. Demetry, Work in Progress: "An innovation merging "classroom flip" and team-based learning," 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., October 27-30, 2010, Washington, DC.
11. A.R. Carberry and A. Amresh, Work in Progress: "Teaching game design and robotics together: A natural marriage of computing and engineering design in a first-year engineering course," 42nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., October 3-6, 2012, Washington.
12. B. Tucker 2012, "The Flipped Classroom - Online instruction at home frees class time for learning," available at: http://educationnext.org/ files/ednext-20121-BTucker.pdf
13. R. Kaleta and T. Joosten, "Student response systems: A University of Wisconsin system study of clickers," ECAR Res. Bull. 2007, 2-12.
14. K. Crossgrove and K.L. Curran, "Using clickers in nonmajors-and majors-level biology courses: Student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material," Life Sci. Educ. 7, 2008, 146-154.
15. K. Ash, 2011, "Educators Evaluate 'Flipped Classrooms' - Benefits and drawbacks seen in replacing lectures with on-demand video," at: http://216.78.200.159/Documents/RandD/Education%20Week/Flipped% 20Classrooms.pdf
16. L. Blasco-Arcas, I. Buil, B. Hernández-Ortega and F. Javier Sese, "Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance," Computers & Education, 62, 2013, 102-110.