Examining the effects of an electronic classroom response system on student engagement and performance

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 25-33

  Bartsch, Robert ^a   Murphy, Wendy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953214051     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.44.1.b     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bartsch, R. A., & Cobern, K. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers and Education, 41, 77-86.
2. Beekes, W. (2006). The 'millionaire' method for encouraging participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7, 25-36. (Pubitemid 43398184)
3. Byrd, G., Coleman, S., & Werneth, C. (2004). Exploring the universe together: Cooperative quizzes with and without classroom performance system in astronomy 101. Astronomy Education Review, 3, 26-30.
4. Conoley, J., Moore, G., & Croom, B. (2006). A toy or a teaching tool? The use of audience response systems in the classrooms. Techniques, 81(7), 46-48.
5. Duncan, D. (2006). Clickers: A new teaching aid with exceptional promise. Astronomy Education Review, 5, 70-88.
6. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109. (Pubitemid 38651980) (Pubitemid 38651980)
7. Hatch, J., Jensen, M., & Moore, R. (2005). Manna from heaven or "clickers" from hell: Experiences with an electronic response system. Journal of College and Science Teaching, 34(7), 36-42.
8. Hines, L. (2005). Interactive learning environment keeps Modesto students engaged. T.H.E. Journal, 33(2), 40-41.
9. Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 540-563.
10. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Morling, B., McAuliffe, M., Cohen, L., & DiLorenzo, T. M. (2008). Efficacy of personal response systems ("clickers") in large, introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 45-50.
12. O'Hanlon, C. (2007). Press '2' for 'Not Guilty.' T.H.E. Journal, 34(5), 52-53.
13. Poirier, C. R., & Feldman, R. S. (2007). Promoting active learning using individual response technology in large introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 194-196.
14. Preszler, R. W., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B., & Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 6, 29-41. (Pubitemid 46364414) (Pubitemid 46364414)
15. Reay, N. W., Li, P., & Bao, L. (2008). Testing a new voting machine question methodology. American Journal of Physics, 76, 171-178.
16. Schackow, T. E., Chavez, M., Loya, L., & Friedman, M. (2004). Audience response system: Effect on learning in family medicine residents. Family Medicine, 36, 496-504. (Pubitemid 38924649) (Pubitemid 38924649)
17. Simon, D. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2001). Metacognition in motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 907-912. (Pubitemid 33683960) (Pubitemid 33683960)
18. Slain, D., Abate, M., Hodges, B. M., Stamatakis, M. K., & Wolak, S. (2004). An interactive response system to promote active learning in the doctor of pharmacy curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 68(5), 1-9. (Pubitemid 40340760) (Pubitemid 40340760)
19. Snyder, K. D. (2003). Ropes, poles, and space. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4, 159-167.
20. Ulrich, C. (2006). Remote control devices activate learning. Human Ecology, 34(2), 20.