Coarse-grained versus atomistic simulations: Realistic interaction free energies for real proteins

Bioinformatics

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 326-334

  May, Ali ^a,b,c   Pool, René ^a,b,d   Van Dijk, Erik ^a,b   Bijlard, Jochem ^a,b   Abeln, Sanne ^a,b   Heringa, Jaap ^a,b,d   Feenstra, K Anton ^a,b,d  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b AMSTERDAM INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULES   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d NETHERLANDS BIOINFORMATICS CENTRE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MUTATION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; MUTATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84893257466     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt675     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Berendsen, H.J.C., et al. (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys., 81, 3684.
2. Chang, C.E., et al. (2008) Entropic contributions and the influence of the hydrophobic environment in promiscuous protein-protein association. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 7456-7461.
3. Cheng, A. and Merz, K.M. (1996) Application of the nosehoover chain algorithm to the study of protein dynamics. J. Phys. Chem., 100, 1927-1937.
4. Cuendet, M.A. and Michielin, O. (2008) Protein-protein interaction investigated by steered molecular dynamics: the TCR- pMHC complex. Biophys. J., 95, 3575-3590.
5. Cui, Q., et al. (2008) Molecular dynamics-solvated interaction energy studies of protein- protein interactions: the MP1-p14 scaffolding complex. J. Mol. Biol., 379, 787-802.
6. Davis-Harrison, R., et al. (2007) T cell receptor binding transition states and recognition of peptide/MHC. Biochemistry, 46, 1840-1850.
7. Ding, Y., et al. (1999) Four A6-TCR/peptide/HLA-A2 structures that generate very different T cell signals are nearly identical. Immunity, 11, 45-56.
8. Dror, R.O., et al. (2012) Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology. Annu. Rev. Biophys., 41, 429-452.
9. Ezkurdia, I., et al. (2009) Progress and challenges in predicting protein-protein interaction sites. Brief Bioinformatics, 10, 233-246.
10. Feenstra, K.A., et al. (1999) Improving efficiency of large time-scale molecular dynamics simulations of hydrogen-rich systems. J. Comput. Chem., 20, 786-798.
11. Fennell, C.J. and Dill, K.A. (2011) Physical modeling of aqueous solvation. J. Stat. Phys., 145, 209-226.
12. Frenkel, D. and Smit, B. (2002) Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications. 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
13. Garboczi, D.N., et al. (1996) Structure of the complex between human t-cell receptor, viral peptide and HLA-A2. Nature, 384, 134-141.
14. Gilson, M.K., et al. (1997) The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review. Biophys. J., 72, 1047-1069.
15. Grunberg, R., et al. (2006) Flexibility and conformational entropy in protein-protein binding. Structure, 14, 683-693.
16. Guharoy, M. and Chakrabarti, P. (2005) Conservation and relative importance of residues across protein-protein interfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 15447-15452.
17. Hadley, K.R. and McCabe, C. (2012) Coarse-grained molecular models of water: a review. Mol. Simul., 38, 671-681.
18. Henikoff, S. and Henikoff, J.G. (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 10915-10919.
19. Hess, B., et al. (2008) Gromacs 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 4, 435-447.
20. Homeyer, N. and Gohlke, H. (2012) Free energy calculations by the molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area method. Mol. Inform., 31, 114-122.
21. Humphrey, W., et al. (1996) VMD - visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph., 14, 33-38.
22. Kabsch, W. and Sander, C. (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 22, 2577-2637.
23. Kastritis, P. and Bonvin, A. (2010) Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark. J. Proteome Res., 9, 2216-2225.
24. Kurzbauer, R., et al. (2004) Crystal structure of the p14/mp1 scaffolding complex: How a twin couple attaches mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling to late endosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 10984-10989.
25. Lensink, M. and Wodak, S. (2010) Blind predictions of protein interfaces by docking calculations in capri. Proteins, 78, 3085-3095.
26. Luo, G., et al. (2006) Dynamic distance disorder in proteins is caused by trapping. J. Phys. Chem. B, 110, 9363-9367.
27. Marrink, S.J., et al. (2007) The martini force field: coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B, 111, 7812-7824.
28. Mizuguchi, K., et al. (1998) Joy: protein sequence-structure representation and analysis. Bioinformatics, 14, 617-623.
29. Monticelli, L., et al. (2008) The martini coarse-grained force field: extension to proteins. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 4, 819-834.
30. Ofran, Y. and Rost, B. (2007) Protein-protein interaction hotspots carved into sequences. PLoS Comput. Biol., 3, e119.
31. Oshima, H., et al. (2011) Crucial importance of the water-entropy effect in predicting hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 16236-16246.
32. Parrinello, M. and Rahman, A. (1981) Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys., 52, 7182-7190.
33. Periole, X., et al. (2012) Structural determinants of the supramolecular organization of g protein-coupled receptors in bilayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 10959-10965.
34. Pons, C., et al. (2010) Present and future challenges and limitations in protein-protein docking. Proteins, 78, 95-108.
35. Pool, R. and Bolhuis, P.G. (2010) The influence of micelle formation on the stability of colloid surfactant mixtures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 12, 14789-14797.
36. Pool, R., et al. (2012) Enabling grand-canonical monte carlo: extending the flexibility of gromacs through the grompy python interface module. J. Comput. Chem., 33, 1207-1214.
37. Sali, A. and Blundell, T.L. (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol., 234, 779-815.
38. Schueler-Furman, O., et al. (2005) Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions. Science, 310, 638-642.
39. Sprinzak, E., et al. (2003) How reliable are experimental protein-protein interaction data? J. Mol. Biol., 327, 919-923.
40. Tamura, A. and Privalov, P.L. (1997) The entropy cost of protein association. J. Mol. Biol., 273, 1048-1060.
41. Tobi, D. (2010) Designing coarse grained-and atom based-potentials for proteinprotein docking. BMC Struct. Biol., 10, 40.
42. Trzesniak, D., et al. (2007) A comparison of methods to compute the potential of mean force. ChemPhysChem., 8, 162-169.
43. Tuffery, P. and Derreumaux, P. (2012) Flexibility and binding affinity in protein- ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches. J. R. Soc. Interface, 9, 20-33.
44. Tuncbag, N., et al. (2009) A survey of available tools and web servers for analysis of protein-protein interactions and interfaces. Brief Bioinformatics, 10, 217-232.
45. van Gunsteren, W.F., et al. (1996) Biomolecular Simulation: The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide. Vdf Hochschulverlag, AG an der ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
46. Wereszczynski, J. and McCammon, J.A. (2012) Statistical mechanics and molecular dynamics in evaluating thermodynamic properties of biomolecular recognition. Q. Rev. Biophys., 45, 1-25.
47. Wollacott, A., et al. (2007) Prediction of structures of multidomain proteins from structures of the individual domains. Protein Sci., 16, 165-175.
48. Wu, L.C., et al. (2002) Two-step binding mechanism for T-cell receptor recognition of peptide MHC. Nature, 418, 552-556.
49. Yu, Y.B., et al. (2001) Contribution of translational and rotational motions to molecular association in aqueous solution. Biophys. J., 81, 1632-1642.
50. Zhang, H., et al. (2013) Quantification of solvent contribution to the stability of noncovalent complexes. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 9, 4542-4551.