Integrating stakeholders’ demands and scientific knowledge on ecosystem services in landscape planning

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1423-1433

  Palacios Agundez, Igone ^a   Fernández de Manuel, Beatriz ^a   Rodríguez Loinaz, Gloria ^a   Peña, Lorena ^a   Ametzaga Arregi, Ibone ^a   Alday, Josu G ^a,b   Casado Arzuaga, Izaskun ^a   Madariaga, Iosu ^a,c   Arana, Xabier ^c   Onaindia, Miren ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c Department of Environment   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Carbon storage; Ecosystem services; Forest sustainable management; Landscape multi functionality; Spatial explicit indicators; Stakeholder participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893171247     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: 15729761     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-014-9994-1     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. An L, López-Carr D (2012) Understanding human decisions in coupled natural and human systems. Ecol Model 229:1–4
2. Azerrad JM, Nilon CH (2006) An evaluation of agency conservation guidelines to better address planning efforts by local government. Landsc Urban Plan 77:255–262
3. Basque Government (2009) Hábitats EUNIS in 1:10,000 scale. Environmental and Landscape Policy Department of the Basque Government, Vitoria-Gasteiz. ftp://ftp.geo.euskadi.net/cartografia/ (Accessed Sept 2013)
4. Basque Government (2011) Advance of the agricultural sector accounts of Biscay. Department of Economic Development and Competitiveness of the Basque Government, Vitoria-Gasteiz. http://www.nasdap.ejgv.euskadi.net/r50-774/es/contenidos/estadistica/4729/es_2659/adjuntos/avance_bizkaia_2011.pdf (Accessed May 2013)
5. Basque Government (2012) Threatened animal species distribution in the Basque Country. Cartography of the Basque catalogue of threatened species. Environmental and Landscape Policy Department of the Basque Government, Vitoria-Gasteiz. www.geo.euskadi.net (Accessed Sept 2013)
6. Basque Government (2013) Forest inventory of the Basque Country 2011. http://www.nasdap.ejgv.euskadi.net/r50-7212/es/contenidos/informacion/inventario_forestal_2011/es_agripes/inventario_forestal_2011.html (Accessed Dec 2013)
7. Beunen R, Opdam P (2011) When landscape planning becomes landscape governance, what happens to the science? Landsc Urban Plan 100:324–326
8. CPF: Centre de la Propietat Forestal (2004) Annexe Indicadors dendrométrics En: Manual de redacción de plans tècnics de gestió i millota forestal (PTGMF) I plans simples de gestió forestal (PSGF). Instruccions de redacció i l’inventari forestal. Generalitat de Catalunya, Departament de Medi Ambient i Habitatge, Centre de la Propietat Forestal, Barcelona España, pp 211–314
9. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester
10. DFB: County Council of Biscay (2012). Approval of the updated Biscay 21 program: a county council of Biscay strategy for sustainability 2011–2016. Official Bulletin of Biscay (BOB) 130: Friday, 6 of July 2012. http://www.bizkaia.net/lehendakaritza/Bao_bob/2012/07/20120706a130.pdf#page=3 (Accessed Oct 2013)
11. Dymond JR, Ausseil AGE, Ekanayake JC, Kirschbaum MUF (2012) Tradeoffs between soil, water, and carbon. A national analysis from New Zealand. J Environ Manag 95:124–131
12. EEA: European Environmental Agency (2002) EUNIS Hábitat classification web application. http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/ (Accessed Dec 2013)
13. ESRI (2009) ArcGIS 9.3. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands
14. FAO (2003) Cross-sectoral policy impacts between forestry and other sectors. FAO, Rome
15. Gamfeldt L, Snäll T, Bagchi R, Jonsson M, Gustafsson L, Kjellander P, Ruiz-Jaen MC, Fröberg M, Stendahl J, Philipson CD, Mikusiński G, Andersson E, Westerlund B, Andrén H, Moberg F, Moen J, Bengtsson J (2013) Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nat Commun 4(1340). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3562447/ (Accessed Dec 2013)
16. Hall JM, Van Holt T, Daniels AE, Balthazar V, Lambin EF (2012) Trade-offs between tree cover, carbon storage and floristic biodiversity in reforesting landscapes. Landscape Ecol 27(8):1135–1147
17. Hauck J, Görg C, Varjopuro R, Ratamäki O, Jax K (2013) Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: some stakeholder perspectives. Environ Sci Policy 25:13–21
18. Horner GJ, Baker PJ, Mac Nally R, Cunningham SC, Thomson JR, Hamilton F (2010) Forest structure, habitat and carbon benefits from thinning floodplain forests: managing early stand density makes a difference. For Ecol Manag 259(3):286–293
19. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2003) LUCF sector good practice guidance, Chapter 3. In: Penmam J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Krug T, Kruger D, Pipatti R, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, Wagner F (eds) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
20. Johnsen HCG (2005) Action research and knowledge co-generation: a not so dangerous liaison with conventional social research. AI Soc 19(4):543–551
21. Kessler M, Hertel D, Jungkunst HF, Kluge J, Abrahamczyk S, Bos M, Buchori D, Gerold G, Gradstein SR, Kohler S, Leuschner C, Moser G; Pitopang R, Saleh S, Schulze CH, Sporn SG, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tjitrosoedirdjo SS, Tscharntke T (2012) Can joint carbon and biodiversity management in tropical agroforestry landscapes be optimized? PloS One 7(10):e47192. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0047192 (Accessed Dec 2013)
22. Kok K, Biggs R, Zurek M (2007) Methods for developing multiscale participatory scenarios: insights from southern Africa and Europe. Ecol Soc 12(1):8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art8/ (Accessed Dec 2013)
23. MAAMA, Spanish Ministry on Agriculture, Food and Environment (2008) National biodiversity inventory: vertebrates 2008. http://www.magrama.gob.es/es (Accessed Mar 2013)
24. Madrigal A, Álvarez JG, Rodríguez R, Rojo A (eds) (1999) Tablas de producción para los montes españoles. Fundación Conde del Valle de Salazar, Madrid
25. McCool SF, Clark RN, Stankey GH (2007) An assessment of frameworks useful for public land recreation planning. General technical report PNW-GTR-705, US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland
26. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005) Ecosystems and human wellbeing: a synthesis report. Island Press, Washington, DC
27. 2 por los bosques españoles. Ed. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) y Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Madrid
28. Mooney H, Cropper A, Reid W (2005) Confronting the human dilemma. Nature 434:561–562
29. Musacchio LR (2009) The scientific basis for the design of landscape sustainability: a conceptual framework for translational landscape research and practice of designed landscapes and the six Es of landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecol 24:993–1013
30. Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecol 23:633–644
31. Neiker-Ihobe (2004) Estudio sobre la potencialidad de los suelos y la biomasa de zonas agrícolas, pascícolas y forestales de la CAPV como sumideros de carbono. Informe
32. Onaindia M, Mitxelena A (2009) Potential use of pine plantations to restore native forests in a highly fragmented river basin. Ann For Sci 66:13–37
33. Onaindia M, Fernández de Manuel B, Madariaga I, Rodríguez-Loinaz G (2013a) Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, the carbon storage and water flow regulations. For Ecol Manag 289:1–9
34. Onaindia M, Ametzaga-Arregi I, San Sebastián M, Mitxelena A, Rodríguez-Loinaz G, Peña L, Alday JG (2013b) Can understorey native woodland plant species regenerate under exotic pine plantations using natural succession? For Ecol Manag 308:136–144
35. Opdam P, Pouwels R, van Rooij S, Steingröver E, Vos CC (2008) Setting biodiversity targets in participatory regional planning: introducing ecoprofiles. Ecol Soc 13(1):20. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art20/ (Accessed Dec 2013)
36. Otte A, Simmering D, Wolters V (2007) Biodiversity at the landscape level: recent concepts and perspectives for multifunctional land use. Landscape Ecol 22:639–642
37. Palacios-Agundez I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Madariaga I, Onaindia M (2013) The relevance of local participatory scenario planning for ecosystem management policies in the Basque Country, northern Spain. Ecol Soc 18(3):7. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss3/art7/ (Accessed Dec 2013)
38. Palomo I, Martín-López B, López-Santiago C, Montes C (2011) Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: the Doñana social–ecological system in southwestern Spain. Ecol Soc 16(1):23. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art23/ (Accessed Dec 2013)
39. Patel M, Kok K, Rothman DS (2007) Participatory planning in land use analysis: an insight into the experiences and opportunities created by stakeholder involvement in scenario construction in the northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 24:546–561
40. Pereira E, Queiroz C, Pereira H, Vicente L (2005) Ecosystem services and human well-being: a participatory study in a mountain community in Portugal. Ecol Soc 10(2):14. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art14 (Accessed Dec 2013)
41. Potschin M, Haines-Young R (2013) Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol 28:1053–1065
42. Quist J, Vergragt P (2006) Past and future of backcasting: the shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures 38:1027–1045
43. R Core Team (2012). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/ (Accessed Dec 2013)
44. Reyers B, O’Farrell PJ, Nel JL, Wilson K (2012) Expanding the conservation toolbox: conservation planning of multifunctional landscapes. Landscape Ecol 27(8):1121–1134
45. Rodríguez-Loinaz G, Amezaga I, Onaindia M (2011) Efficacy of management policies on protection and recovery of natural ecosystems in the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve. Nat Areas J 31(4):358–367
46. Rodríguez-Loinaz G, Amezaga I, Onaindia M (2013) Use of native species to improve carbon sequestration and contribute towards solving the environmental problems of the timberlands in Biscay, northern Spain. J Environ Manag 120:18–26
47. Schouten M, Opdam P, Polman N, Westerhof E (2013) Resilience-based governance in rural landscapes: experiments with agri-environment schemes using a spatially explicit agent-based model. Land Use Policy 30:934–943
48. Schultz L, Folke C, Olsson P (2007) Enhancing ecosystem management through social–ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environ Conserv 34:140–152
49. Thompson MC, Baruah M, Carr ER (2011) Seeing REDD+ as a project of environmental governance. Environ Sci Policy 14(2):100–110
50. van Asselt MBA, Rijkens-Klomp N (2002) A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective. Glob Environ Chang 12:167–184