The relevance of local participatory scenario planning for ecosystem management policies in the Basque Country, northern Spain

Ecology and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Palacios Agundez, Igone ^a   Casado Arzuaga, Izaskun ^a   Madariaga, Iosu ^a,b   Onaindia, Miren ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^b Department of Environment   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biscay subglobal assessment (EEMBiscay); Ecosystem service; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment; Multiscale scenarios; Policy impact; Scenario planning; Stakeholder participation

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PLANNING PROCESS; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; STAKEHOLDER;

BASQUE COUNTRY; BIZKAIA; SPAIN;

EID: 84884917658     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-05619-180307     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Alcamo, J. A., D. P. van Vuuren, and W. Cramer. 2006. Changes in provisioning and regulating ecosystem goods and services and their drivers across the scenarios. Pages 297-374 in Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: findings of the Scenarios Working Group. Island, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.unep.org/maweb/documents/document.333.aspx.pdf
2. Amezaga, I., and M. Onaindia. 1997. The effect of evergreen and deciduous coniferous plantations on the field layer and seed bank of native woodlands. Ecography 20:308-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1997.tb00375.x
3. Andersen, I.-E., and B. Jaeger. 1999. Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: towards more democratic decisionmaking. Science and Public Policy 26(5):331-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782301
4. Basque Government. 2005. Forest inventory of the CAE 2005 in 1:10000 scale. [online] URL: http://www.geo.euskadi.net/s69geodir/en/contenidos/informacion/recursoagricultura2009/en_20/agricultura.html
5. Bennett, E. M., G. D. Peterson, and L. J. Gordon. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 12:1394-1404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
6. Berkes, F., and I. J. Davidson-Hunt. 2006. Biodiversity,traditional management systems, and cultural landscapes: examples from the boreal forest of Canada. International Social Science Journal 58:35-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2006.00605.x
7. Biggs, R., E. Bohensky, P. V. Desanker, C. Fabricius, T. Lynam, A. A. Misslehorn, C. Musvoto, M. Mutale, B. Reyers, R. J. Scholes, S. Shikongo, and A. S. van Jaarsveld. 2004.Nature supporting people: the Southern African millennium ecosystem assessment. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, South Africa. [online] URL: http://www.unep.org/maweb/documents_sga/safma_integrated_report.pdf
8. Biggs, R., C. Raudsepp Hearne, C. Atkinson-Palombo, E. Bohensky, E. Boyd, G. Cundill, H. Fox, S. Ingram, K. Kok, S. Spehat, M. Tengö, D. Timmer, and M. Zurek. 2007. Linking futures across scales: a dialogue on multiscale scenarios. Ecology and Society 12(1): 17. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art17/
9. Bohensky, E. L., B. Reyers, and A. S. van Jaarsveld. 2006.Future ecosystem services in a Southern African river basin: a scenario planning approach to uncertainty. Conservation Biology 20:1051-1061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00475.x
10. Booth, H., L. Simpson, M. Ling, O. Mohammed, C. Brown, K. Garcia, and M. Walpole. 2012. Lessons learned from carrying out ecosystem assessments: experiences from members of the Sub-Global Assessment Network. United Nations Environment Programme/World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK. [online] URL: http://www.ecosystemassessments.net/news/96-new-lessons-learnedreport.html
11. Brown, J., and D. Isaacs. 2005. The World Café: shaping our futures through conversations that matter. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, California, USA.
12. Brunckhorst, D., P. Coop, and I. Reve. 2006. 'Eco-civic'optimisation: a nested framework for planning and managinglandscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 75:265-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.04.001
13. Butler, C. D., R. Chambers, K. Chopra, P. Dasgupta, A. Duraiappah, P. Kumar, A. J. McMichael, and N. Wen-Yuan. 2003. Ecosystems and human well-being. Pages 71-84 in Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island, Washington,D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.unep.org/maweb/documents/document.301.aspx.pdf
14. Carlsson-Kanyama, A., K. H. Dreborg, H. C. Moll, and D. Padovan. 2008. Participative backcasting: a tool for involving stakeholders in local sustainability planning. Futures 40 (1):34-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.06.001
15. Carpenter, S. R., and C. Folke. 2006. Ecology for transformation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21 (6):309-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.007
16. Carvalho-Ribeiro, S. M., A. Lovett, and T. O'Riordan. 2010.Multifunctional forest management in northern Portugal: moving from scenarios to governance for sustainable development. Land use policy 27(4):1111-1122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.02.008
17. Casado-Arzuaga, I., I. Madariaga, and M. Onaindia. 2013. Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. Journal of Environmental Management 129:33-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.059
18. Cork, S., G. Peterson, G. Petschel-Held, J. Alcamo, J. Alder, E. M. Bennett, E. R. Carr, D. Deane, G. C. Nelson, T. Ribeiro, C. Butler, E. M. Mendiondo, W. Olouch-Kosura, and M. Zurek. 2005. Four scenarios. Pages 223-294 in Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). Ecosystems and human wellbeing: findings of the Scenarios Working Group. Island, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.maweb.org/en/Scenarios.aspx
19. County Council of Biscay (BFA/DFB). 2012. Approval of the updated Biscay 21 program: a County Council of Biscay strategy for sustainability 2011-2016. Official Bulletin of Biscay (BOB) 130:July 6, 2012. [online] URL: http://www.euskadi.net/contenidos/informacion/ura_gardena_gr_concesiones/es_def/adjuntos/BOB130.pdf
20. Eustat: Basque Statistics Office. 2011. Gross added value by province and sector (base 2005) (%) 2008. Eustat, San Sebastián, Spain. [online] URL: http://en.eustat.es/ci_ci/elementos/ele0000500/ti_Gross_added_value_by_province_-and_sector_base_2005_2008/tbl0000543_i.html#axzz1oXSu2tkC
21. Eustat: Basque Statistics Office. 2013. Population of theBasque Country classified by year of birth, according to historic territory and sex on 11/1/2011. Eustat, San Sebastián,Spain. [online] URL: http://en.eustat.es/elementos/ele0008400/ti_Population_of_the_Basque_Country_classified_by_year_-of_birth_according_to_Historic_Territory_an_sex_on_XI12011/tbl0008457_i.html#axzz2ZrEgnzHJ
22. Groome, H. J. 1990. Historia de la política forestal en el estado español. Agencia de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, Spain. Gunderson, L. H., C. S. Holling, and S. S. Light, editors. 1995. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
23. Haines-Young, R., J. Paterson, M. Potschin, A. Wilson, and G. Kass. 2011. The UK NEA scenarios: development of storylines and analysis of outcomes. Pages 1195-1264 in The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, United Nations Environment Programme/World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge,UK. [online] URL: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/cem/pdf/NEA_Ch25_Scenarios_Haines-Young_et%20al%20_2011.pdf
24. Heemskerk, M. 2003. Scenarios in anthropology: reflections on possible futures of the Suriname Maroons. Futures 35:931-949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00050-8
25. Henrich, T., M. Zurek, B. Eickhout, K. Kok, C. Raudsepp-Hearne, T. Ribeiro, D. van Vuuren, and A. Volkery. 2010. Scenario development and analysis for forward-looking ecosystem assessments. Pages 151-220 in N. Ash, H. Blanco, C. Brown, K. Garcia, T. Henrichs, N. Lucas, C. Raudsepp-Hearne, R. D. Simpson, R. Scholes, T. Tomich, B. Vira, andM. Zurek, editors. Ecosystems and human well-being: amanual for assessment practitioners. Island, Washington, D.C., USA.
26. Hjortsø, C. N. 2004. Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using Soft OR-an application ofstrategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning. European Journal of Operational Research 152:667-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00065-1
27. Hulme, M., and S. Dessai. 2008. Predicting, deciding, learning: can one evaluate the 'success' of national climate scenarios? Environmental Research Letters 3:045013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045013
28. Huss, W. R. 1988. A move toward scenario analysis. International Journal of Forecasting 4:377-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(88)90105-7
29. Jessel, B., and J. Jacobs. 2005. Land use scenario development and stakeholder involvement as tools for watershed management within the Havel river basin. Limnologica 35:220-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2005.06.006
30. Kok, K., R. Biggs, and M. Zurek. 2007. Methods for developing multiscale participatory scenarios: insights from southern Africa and Europe. Ecology and Society 12(1): 8. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art8/
31. Kok, K., M. Patel, D. S. Rothman, and G. Quaranta. 2006a. Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective. Part II. Participatory local scenario development. Futures 38:285-311.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.07.006
32. Kok, K., D. S. Rothman, and M. Patel. 2006b. Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective. Part I. European and Mediterranean scenario development. Futures 38:261-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.07.001
33. Kok, K., M. van Vliet, I. Bärlund, A. Dubel, and J. Sendzimir. 2011. Combining participative backcasting and exploratory scenario development: experiences from the SCENES project. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78:835-851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.004
34. Lebel, L., P. Thongbai, K. Kok, J. B. R. Agard, E. Bennett, R. Biggs, M. Ferreira, C. Filer, Y. Gokhale, W. Mala, C. Rumsey, S. J. Velarde, M. Zurek, H. Blanco, T. Lynam, and Y. Tianxiang. 2005. Subglobal scenarios. Pages 227-258 in D. Capistrano, C. K. Samper, M. J. Lee, and C. Raudsepp-Hearne,editors. Ecosystems and human well-being volume 4:multiscale assessments. Findings of the Sub-globalAssessments Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island, Washington, D.C., USA.
35. Leslie, A. D., M. Mencuccini, and M. Perks. 2012. The potential for eucalyptus as a wood fuel in the UK. AppliedEnergy 89:176-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.07.037
36. Lynam T., W. de Jong, D. Sheil, T. Kusumanto, and K. Evans. 2007. A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecology and Society 12(1): 5. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art5/
37. Madariaga, I., X. Arana, I. Casado-Arzuaga, and I. Palacios-Agúndez. 2010. Evaluación de los ecosistemas del milenio en Bizkaia: conocimiento compartido entre la comunidad científica, política, gestora y la sociedad civil. Pages 47-52 in N. Viota and M. Maraña editors. Servicios de los ecosistemas y bienestar humano. La contribuciún de la evaluaciún de losecosistemas del milenio. UNESCO Etxea, Bilbao, Spain. [online] URL: http://www.unescoetxea.org/dokumentuak/Ecosistemas_bienestar.pdf
38. Madariaga I., X. Arana, I. Casado-Arzuaga, and I. Palacios-Agúndez. 2011. Servicios de los ecosistemas del paisaje cultural de Bizkaia. Perspectiva histórica de la actividad forestal y minera. Revista Forum de Sostenibilidad 4:33-46. [online] URL: http://www.ehu.es/cdsea/web/revista/numero_4/Servicios_ecosistemas_paisaje_cultural_Bizkaia.pdf
39. Merino, A., A. Fernández-Lúpez, F. Solla-Gullón, and J. M. Edeso. 2004. Soil changes and tree growth in intensively managed Pinus radiata in northern Spain. Forest Ecology and Management 196:393-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.04.002
40. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2003. Ecosystemsand human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.maweb.org
41. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2005a. Ecosystemsand human well-being: synthesis. Island, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.unep.org/maweb/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf
42. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2005b. Ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios: findings of the Scenarios Working Group. Island, Washington, D.C., USA. [online]URL: http://www.maweb.org/en/Scenarios.aspx
43. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment in Biscay (EEMBiscay).2010. The ecological footprint of Biscay. EEMBiscay project didactic sheets. no 3, UNESCO, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain. [online] URL: http://www.ehu.es/cdsea/web/ecosistema/
44. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment in Biscay (EEMBiscay). 2012. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment in Biscay. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment in Biscay, Bilbao, BasqueCountry, Spain.
45. Narayan, D., R. Chambers, M. K. Shah, and P. Petesch. 1999. Global synthesis: consultations with the poor. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.fes.de/cotonou/DocumentsEN/ThematicFocus/Poverty%20Reduction/GobalSynthesis_ConsultationsWithThePoor.pdf
46. Nelson G. C., E. Bennett, A. A. Berhe, K. G. Cassman, R. DeFries, T. Dietz, A. Dobson, A. Dobermann, A. Janetos, M. Levy, D. Marco, N. Nakicenovic, B. O'Neill, R. Norgaard, G. Petschel-Held, D. Ojima, P. Pingali, R. Watson, and M. Zurek. 2005. Drivers of change in ecosystem condition and services. Pages 173-222 in Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). Ecosystems and human well-being: findings of the Scenarios Working Group. Island, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.unep.org/maweb/documents/document.331.aspx.pdf
47. Nicholson, E., G. M. Mace, P. R. Armsworth, G. Atkinson, S. Buckle, T. Clements, R. M. Ewers, J. E. Fa, T. A. Gardner, J. Gibbons, R. Grenyer, R. Metcalfe, S. Mourato, M. Muûls, D. Osborn, D. C. Reuman, C. Watson, and E. J. Milner-Gulland. 2009. Priority research areas for ecosystem services in a changing world. Journal of Applied Ecology 46(6):1139-1144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01716.x
48. Olarieta, J. R., G. Besga, R. Rodríguez, A. Usón, M. Pinto, and S. Virgel. 1999. Sediment enrichment ratios after mechanical site preparation for Pinus radiata plantations in the Basque Country. Geoderma 93:255-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(99)00063-4
49. Palacios I., I. Casado, Arzuaga. X. Arana, and I. Madariaga. 2012. Millennium ecosystem assessment from the Basque Country. Pages 19-33 in I. Ayestarán and M. Onaindia, editors. Sustainable development, ecological complexity, and environmental values. Current Research Series 10, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA.
50. Palomo, I., B. Martín-López, C. López-Santiago, and C. Montes. 2011. Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: the Doñana social-ecological system in southwestern Spain. Ecology and Society 16(1): 23. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art23/
51. Patel, M., K. Kok, and D. S. Rothman. 2007. Participatory planning in land use analysis: an insight into the experiences and opportunities created by stakeholder involvement in scenario construction in the northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 24:546-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.02.005
52. Pereira, H. M., T. Domingos, C. Marta-Pedroso, V. Proençal, P. Rodrigues, M. Ferreira, R. Teixeira, R. Mota, and A. Nogal.2009. Uma avaliação dos serviços dos ecossistemas em Portugal: cenários. Pages 709-711 in H. M. Pereira, T.Domingos, L. Vicente, and V. Proença1, editors. Ecossistemase bem-estar humano: resultados da avaliação para Portugaldo millennium ecosystem assessment. Escolar Editora, Lisboa,Portugal. [online] URL: http://ecossistemas.org/pt/relatorios.htm
53. Pereira, H. M., T. Domingos, and L. Vicente. 2006. Assessing ecosystem services at different scales in the Portugal millennium ecosystem assessment. Pages 59-80 in W. V. Reid, F. Berkes, T. Wilbanks, and D. Capistrano, editors. Bridging scales and knowledge systems: concepts and applications in ecosystem assessment. Island, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Bridging.html
54. Pereira, E., C. Queiroz, H. M. Pereira, and L. Vicente. 2005. Ecosystem services and human well-being: a participatory study in a mountain community in Portugal. Ecology and Society 10(2): 14. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art14/
55. Perrings, C., A. Duraiappah, A. Larigauderie, and H. Mooney. 2011. The biodiversity and ecosystem services science-policy interface. Science 331:1139-1140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1202400
56. Peterson, G. D., G. S. Cumming, and S. R. Carpenter. 2003. Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology 17:358-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01491.x
57. Pretty, J. 2003. Social capital and the collective managementof resources. Science 302:1912-1914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1090847
58. Quist, J. 2007. Backcasting for a sustainable future: the impact after ten years. Dissertation. Delft Technical University, Delft, Netherlands. [online] URL: http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid%3Abd642b6a-17c7-4284-8be7-10be10dc336c/
59. Quist, J., and P. Vergragt. 2006. Past and future of backcasting: the shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures 38:1027-1045. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.010
60. Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141:2417-2431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
61. Ribot, J. C. 2002. Democratic decentralization of natural resources: institutionalizing popular participation. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://pdf.wri.org/ddnr_full_revised.pdf
62. Robinson, J. 2003. Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures 35:839-856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00039-9
63. Rodríguez, J. P., T. D. Beard, Jr., E. M. Bennett, G. S. Cumming, S. Cork, J. Agard, A. P. Dobson, and G. D. Peterson. 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 11(1): 28. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28/
64. Sala, O. E., D. P. van Vuuren, H. M. Pereira, D. Lodge, J. Alder, G. Cumming, A. Dobson, V. Wolters, M. A. Xenopoulos, A. S. Zaitsev, M. G. Polo, I. Gomes, C. Queiroz, and J. A. Rusak. 2006. Biodiversity across scenarios. Pages 375-408 in Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: findings of the Scenarios Working Group. Island, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://ww.unep.org/maweb/documents/document.334.aspx.pdf
65. Santos, T., J. L. Telleria, M. Díaz, and R. Carbonell. 2006. Evaluating the benefits of CAP reforms: can afforestations restore bird diversity in Mediterranean Spain? Basic and Applied Ecology 7:483-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2005.11.001
66. Scholes, R. J., and R. Biggs. 2004. Ecosystem services in southern Africa: a regional assessment. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Pretoria, South Africa.
67. Schultz, L., C. Folke, and P. Olsson. 2007. Enhancing ecosystem management through social-ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environmental Conservation 34:140-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892907003876
68. Shearer, A. W. 2005. Approaching scenario-based studies: three perceptions about the future and considerations for landscape planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32:67-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b3116
69. Shuman, S. P. 1996. The role of facilitation in collaborative groups. Pages 126-140 in C. Huxham, editor. Creating collaborative advantage. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
70. Stringer, L. C., A. J. Dougill, E. Fraser, K. Hubacek, C. Prell, and M. S. Reed. 2006. Unpacking "participation" in the adaptive management of social-ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society 11(2): 39. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art39/
71. Sub-Global Assessment Network (SGA Network). 2011. Sub-Global Assessment Network 3rd Annual Meeting Report. United Nations Environment Programme/World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK. [online] URL: http://www.ecosystemassessments.net/news/87-3rd-sga-network-annualmeeting-report.html
72. Termorshuizen, J. W., and P. Opdam. 2009. Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology 24:1037-1052. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8
73. The World Café. 2012. About the World Café and The World Café Community Foundation. The World Café. [online] URL: http://www.theworldcafe.com/about.html
74. van Asselt, M. B. A., and N. Rijkens-Klomp. 2002. A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environmental Change 12:167-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00012-2
75. Van Berkel, D. B., S. Carvalho-Ribeiro, P. H. Verburg, and A. Lovett. 2011. Identifying assets and constraints for rural development with qualitative scenarios: a case study of Castro Laboreiro, Portugal. Landscape and Urban Planning 102 (2):127-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.016
76. Vergragt, P. J., and J. Quist. 2011. Backcasting for sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78:747-755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.010
77. Weighell, T. 2011. UK dependence on non-UK ecosystem services. Pages 1045-1065 in UK national ecosystem assessment. The UK national ecosystem assessment technical report. United Nations Environment Programme/World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK.
78. Whitfield, S., H. J. Geist, and A. A. R. Ioris. 2011. Deliberative assessment in complex socioecological systems: recommendations for environmental assessment in drylands. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 183:465-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-1933-x
79. Wollenberg, E., D. Edmunds, and L. Buck. 2000. Usingscenarios to make decisions about the future: anticipatory learning for the adaptive co-management of communityforests. Landscape and Urban Planning 47:65-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00071-7
80. Zurek, M. B., and T. Henrichs. 2007. Linking scenarios across geographical scales in international environmental assessments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74:1282-1295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.11.005