Genome size in anthurium evaluated in the context of karyotypes and phenotypes

AoB PLANTS

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Bliss, Barbara J ^a   Suzuki, Jon Y ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893048183     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20412851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/pls006     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Adams KL, Wendel JF. 2005. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8: 135-141.
2. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 796-815.
3. Arumuganathan K, Earle E. 1991. Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by cell-flow cytometry. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 9: 229-233.
4. Balao F, Casimiro-Soriguer R, Talavera M, Herrera J, Talavera S. 2009. Distribution and diversity of cytotypes in Dianthus broteri as evidenced by genome size variations. Annals of Botany 104: 965-973.
5. Baranyi M, Greilhuber J. 1996. Flow cytometric and Feulgen densitometric analysis of genome size variation in Pisum. TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92: 297-307.
6. Beaulieu JM, Moles AT, Leitch IJ, Bennett MD, Dickie JB, Knight CA. 2007. Correlated evolution of genome size and seed mass. New Phytologist 173: 422-437.
7. Beaulieu JM, Leitch IJ, Patel S, Pendharkar A, Knight CA. 2008. Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms. New Phytologist 179: 975-986.
8. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: progress, problems and prospects. Annals of Botany 95: 45-90.
9. Bennett MD, Smith JB. 1976. Nuclear-DNA amounts in angiosperms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 274: 227-274.
10. Bennetzen JL, Ma J, Devos KM. 2005. Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants. Annals of Botany 95: 127-132.
11. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. 2004. Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. The Plant Cell Online 16: 1667-1678.
12. Boyce PC, Croat TB. 2012. The Überlist of Araceae: Totals for published and estimated number of species in aroid genera. http:// www.aroid.org/genera/120110uberlist.pdf (12 January 2012).
13. Cabrera LI, Salazar GA, Chase MW, Mayo SJ, Bogner J, Dávila P. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships of aroids and duckweeds (Araceae) inferred from coding and noncoding plastid DNA. American Journal of Botany 95: 1153-1165.
14. Carlsen M. 2011. Understanding the origin and rapid diversification of the genus Anthurium Schott (Araceae), integrating molecular phylogenetics, morphology and fossils. PhD Dissertation, University of Missouri, St Louis, MO, USA.
15. Carlsen MM, Croat TB. 2007. Taxonomic revision of Anthurium section Semaeophyllium Schott (Araceae). Harvard Papers in Botany 12: 173-234.
16. Chopra S, Brendel V, Zhang J, Axtell JD, Peterson T. 1999. Molecular characterization of a mutable pigmentation phenotype and isolation of the first active transposable element from Sorghum bicolor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96: 15330-15335.
17. Coen ES, Carpenter R. 1986. Transposable elements in Antirrhinum majus: generators of genetic diversity. Trends in Genetics 2: 292-296.
18. Cotias-de-Oliveira ALP, Guedes MLS, Barreto EC. 1999. Chromosome numbers for Anthurium and Philodendron spp. (Araceae) occurring in Bahia, Brazil. Genetics and Molecular Biology 22: 237-242.
19. Croat TB. 1983. A revision of the genus Anthurium (Araceae) of Mexico and Central America. Part I. Mexico and Middle America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 70: 211-420.
20. Croat TB. 1988. Ecology and life forms of Araceae. Aroideana 11: 4-56.
21. Croat TB. 1989. Ecology and life forms of Araceae: a follow-up. Aroideana 12: 6-8.
22. Croat TB. 1991. A revision of Anthurium section Pachyneurium (Araceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 78: 539-855.
23. Croat TB, Sheffer RD. 1983. The sectional groupings of Anthurium (Araceae). Aroideana 6: 85-123.
24. Cui L, Wall PK, Leebens-Mack JH, Lindsay BG, Soltis DE, Doyle JJ, Soltis PS, Carlson JE, Arumuganathan K, Barakat A, Albert VA, Ma H, dePamphilis CW. 2006. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Research 16: 738-749.
25. Cusimano N, Bogner J, Mayo SJ, Boyce PC, Wong SY, Hesse M, Hetterscheid WLA, Keating RC, French JC. 2011. Relationships within the Araceae: comparison of morphological patterns with molecular phylogenies. American Journal of Botany 98: 654-668.
26. Devos KM, Brown JKM, Bennetzen JL. 2002. Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis. Genome Research 12: 1075-1079.
27. Doležel J, Greilhuber J. 2010. Nuclear genome size: are we getting closer? Cytometry Part A 77A: 635-642.
28. Doyle JJ, Egan AN. 2009. Dating the origins of polyploidy events. New Phytologist 186: 73-85.
29. Fawcett JA, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. 2009. Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106: 5737-5742.
30. Galbraith D, Harkins K, Maddox J, Ayres N, Sharma D, Firoozabady E. 1983. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220: 1049-1051.
31. Geber G. 1989. Zur Karyosystematik der Lemnaceae. PhD Dissertation, University of Vienna, Vienna.
32. Ghosh P, Mukherjee S, Sharma A. 2001. Cytophotometric estimation of in situ DNA content in several species of Araceae. Cytobios 105: 177-183.
33. Gorbunova V, Levy AA. 1999. How plants make ends meet: DNA double-strand break repair. Trends in Plant Science 4: 263-269.
34. Govaerts R, Bogner J, Boos J, Boyce P, Cosgriff B, Croat T, Gonçalves E, Grayum M, Hay A, Hetterscheid W, Ittenbach S, Landolt E, Mayo S, Murata J, Nguyen VD, Sakuragui CM, Singh Y, Thompson S, Zhu G. 2011. World checklist of Araceae. http://www.kew.org/wcsp/ (16 September 2011).
35. Greilhuber J. 1998. Intraspecific variation in genome size: a critical reassessment. Annals of Botany 82: 27-35.
36. Greilhuber J. 2005. Intraspecific variation in genome size in angiosperms: identifying its existence. Annals of Botany 95: 91-98.
37. Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysák MA, Bennett MD. 2005. The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value' to describe nuclear DNA contents. Annals of Botany 95: 255-260.
38. Hawkins JS, Kim H, Nason JD, Wing RA, Wendel JF. 2006. Differential lineage-specific amplification of transposable elements is responsible for genome size variation in Gossypium. Genome Research 16: 1252-1261.
39. Hirochika H, Sugimoto K, Otsuki Y, Tsugawa H, Kanda M. 1996. Retrotransposons of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93: 7783-7788.
40. Hodgson JG, Sharafi M, Jalili A, Díaz S, Montserrat-Martí G, Palmer C, Cerabolini B, Pierce S, Hamzehee B, Asri Y, Jamzad Z, Wilson P, Raven JA, Band SR, Basconcelo S, Bogard A, Carter G, Charles M, Castro-Díez P, Cornelissen JHC, Funes G, Jones G, Khoshnevis M, Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Pérez-Rontomé MC, Shirvany FA, Vendramini F, Yazdani S, Abbas-Azimi R, Boustani S, Dehghan M, Guerrero-Campo J, Hynd A, Kowsary E, Kazemi-Saeed F, Siavash B, Villar-Salvador P, Craigie R, Naqinezhad A, Romo-Díez A, de Torres Espuny L, Simmons E. 2010. Stomatal vs. genome size in angiosperms: the somatic tail wagging the genomic dog? Annals of Botany 105: 573-584.
41. Hoshino A, Inagaki Y, Iida S. 1995. Structural analysis of Tpn1, a transposable element isolated from Japanese morning glory bearing variegated flowers. Molecular and General Genetics 247: 114-117.
42. Jones N, Houben A. 2003. B chromosomes in plants: escapees from the A chromosome genome? Trends in Plant Science 8: 417-423.
43. Jones RN, Rees H. 1982. B chromosomes. London: Academic Press.
44. Kalendar R, Tanskanen J, Immonen S, Nevo E, Schulman AH. 2000. Genome evolution of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) by BARE-1 retrotransposon dynamics in response to sharp microclimatic divergence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97: 6603-6607.
45. Kamemoto H, Kuehnle AR. 1996. Breeding Anthuriums in Hawai'i. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
46. Kirik A, Salomon S, Puchta H. 2000. Species-specific double-strand break repair and genome evolution in plants. EMBO J 19: 5562-5566.
47. Knight CA, Molinari NA, Petrov DA. 2005. The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology and phenotype. Annals of Botany 95: 177-190.
48. Kuehnle AR, Amore TD, Kamemoto H, Kunisaki JT, Lichty JS, Uchida JY. 2004. New plants for Hawai'i anthurium cultivar release: 'Princess Aiko' ('Imperial') and 'Regina', two novelty anthuriums. Research Extension Series 152, Publication NPH-A-7. 2 pp.
49. Lagercrantz U. 1998. Comparative mapping between Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica nigra indicates that Brassica genomes have evolved through extensive genome replication accompanied by chromosome fusions and frequent rearrangements. Genetics 150: 1217-1228.
50. Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. 2004. Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 651-663.
51. Leitch IJ, Chase MW, Bennett MD. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Annals of Botany 82: 85-94.
52. Leitch IJ, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Bennett MD. 2005. Evolution of DNA amounts across land plants (Embryophyta). Annals of Botany 95: 207-217.
53. Leitch IJ, Beaulieu JM, Cheung K, Hanson L, Lysak MA, Fay MF. 2007. Punctuated genome size evolution in Liliaceae. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 2296-2308.
54. Leitch IJ, Hanson L, Lim KY, Kovarik A, Chase MW, Clarkson JJ, Leitch AR. 2008. The ups and downs of genome size evolution in polyploid species of Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Annals of Botany 101: 805-814.
55. Leitch IJ, Beaulieu JM, Chase MW, Leitch AR, Fay MF. 2010. Genome size dynamics and evolution in monocots. Journal of Botany 2010. Availableat http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/862516.
56. Leong-ŠkorničkováJ, Šída O, JarolímováV, Sabu M, Fér T, Trávníček P, Suda J. 2007. Chromosome numbers and genome size variation in Indian species of Curcuma (Zingiberaceae). Annals of Botany 100: 505-526.
57. Marutani M, Sheffer RD, Kamemoto H. 1993. Cytological analysis of Anthurium andraeanum (Araceae), its related taxa and their hybrids. American Journal of Botany 80: 93-103.
58. Mayo SJ, Bogner J, Boyce P, Catherine E, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. 1997. The genera of Araceae. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
59. McClintock B. 1965-1966. Regulation of pattern of gene expression by controlling elements in maize. Washington, DC: Yearbook of The Carnegie Institution of Washington.
60. Mookerjea A. 1955. Cytology of different species of aroids with a view to trace the basis of their evolution. Caryologia 7: 221-291.
61. Ohno S, Hosokawa M, Hoshino A, Kitamura Y, Morita Y, Park K-I, Nakashima A, Deguchi A, Tatsuzawa F, Doi M, Iida S, Yazawa S. 2011. A bHLH transcription factor, DvIVS, is involved in regulation of anthocyanin synthesis in dahlia (Dahlia variabilis). Journal of Experimental Botany 62: 5105-5116.
62. Ohri D. 1998. Genome size variation and plant systematics. Annals of Botany 82: 75-83.
63. Peschke VM, Phillips RL. 1991. Activation of the maize transposable element Suppressor-mutator (Spm) in tissue culture. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 81: 90-97.
64. Petersen G. 1989. Cytology and systematics of Araceae. Nordic Journal of Botany 9: 119-166.
65. Praça-Fontes M, Carvalho C, Clarindo W, Cruz C. 2011. Revisiting the DNA C-values of the genome size-standards used in plant flow cytometry to choose the 'best primary standards'. Plant Cell Reports 30: 1183-1191.
66. Rabinowicz PD, Bennetzen JL. 2006. The maize genome as a model for efficient sequence analysis of large plant genomes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9: 149-56.
67. SanMiguel P, Tikhonov A, Jin Y-K, Motchoulskaia N, Zakharov D, Melake-Berhan A, Springer PS, Edwards KJ, Lee M, Avramova Z, Bennetzen JL. 1996. Nested retrotransposons in the intergenic regions of the maize genome. Science 274: 765-768.
68. Sharma AK, Bhattacharyya UC. 1961. Structure and behavior of chromosomes in species of Anthurium with special reference to the accessory chromosomes. Proceedings of the National Institute of India, Part B, Biological Science 27: 317-328.
69. Sheffer RD, Croat TB. 1983. Chromosome numbers in the genus Anthurium (Araceae) II. American Journal of Botany 70: 858-871.
70. Sheffer RD, Kamemoto H. 1976. Chromosome numbers in genus Anthurium. American Journal of Botany 63: 74-81.
71. Shirasu K, Schulman AH, Lahaye T, Schulze-Lefert P. 2000. A contiguous 66-kb barley DNA sequence provides evidence for reversible genome expansion. Genome Research 10: 908-915.
72. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2003. Evolution of genome size in the angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 90: 1596-1603.
73. Suda J, Leitch IJ. 2010. The quest for suitable reference standards in genome size research. Cytometry Part A 77A: 717-720.
74. Teoh SB, Rees H. 1976. Nuclear DNA amounts in populations of Picea and Pinus species. Heredity 36: 123-137.
75. Vicient CM, Kalendar R, Anamthawat-Jonsson K, Schulman AH. 1999. Structure, functionality, and evolution of the BARE-1 retrotransposon of barley. Genetica 107: 53-63.
76. Vision TJ, Brown DG, Tanksley SD. 2000. The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science 290: 2114-7.
77. Wang X, Shi X, Hao B, Ge S, Luo J. 2005. Duplication and DNA segmental loss in the rice genome: implications for diploidization. New Phytologist 165: 937-946.
78. Wendel JF. 2000. Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Molecular Biology 42: 225-249.
79. Yogeeswaran K, Frary A, York TL, Amenta A, Lesser AH, Nasrallah JB, Tanksley SD, Nasrallah ME. 2005. Comparative genome analyses of Arabidopsis spp.: inferring chromosomal rearrangement events in the evolutionary history of A. thaliana. Genome Research 15: 505-515.
80. Zonneveld BJM. 2010. New record holders for maximum genome size in eudicots and monocots. Journal of Botany 2010. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/527357.