Emerging rules for effective antimicrobial coatings

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 82-90

  Salwiczek, Mario ^a,b   Qu, Yue ^b   Gardiner, James ^a   Strugnell, Richard A ^c   Lithgow, Trevor ^b   McLean, Keith M ^a   Thissen, Helmut ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Anti infective coatings; Antimicrobial peptides; Biofilms; Implant infections; Low fouling polymers

Indexed keywords

ANTI-MICROBIAL PROPERTIES; ANTIMICROBIAL COATINGS; ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDE; BIOFILM FORMATION; IMPLANT INFECTIONS; IMPLANTABLE DEVICES; RECENT RESEARCHES; SELECTIVE PRESSURE;

ANTIBIOTICS; BACTERIA; BIOFILMS; BIOLOGY; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

COATINGS;

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; MACROGOL; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; POLYPEPTIDE ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYER;

ATOM TRANSFER RADICAL POLYMERIZATION; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BINDING SITE; BIOFILM; BIOFOULING; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DRUG COATING; NONHUMAN; OLIGOMERIZATION; PLASMA HALF LIFE; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; QUORUM SENSING; REVIEW; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; STATIC ELECTRICITY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

FUNGI;

ANTI-INFECTIVE COATINGS; ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDES; BIOFILMS; IMPLANT INFECTIONS; LOW-FOULING POLYMERS;

ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS; BACTERIA; CROSS INFECTION; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; FUNGI; INFECTION CONTROL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84892862068     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.09.008     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Lynch A.S., Robertson G.T. Bacterial and fungal biofilm infections. Annu. Rev. Med. 2008, 59:415-428.
2. Busscher H.J., et al. Biomaterial-associated infection: locating the finish line in the race for the surface. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4:153rv110.
3. Beaglehole R., et al. World Health Report 2004: Changing History 2004, World Health Organization.
4. Boucher H.W., et al. Bad bugs, no drugs: No ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 48:1-12.
5. Martinez L.R., Casadevall A. Cryptococcus neoformans biofilm formation depends on surface support and carbon source and reduces fungal cell susceptibility to heat, cold, and UV light. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73:4592-4601.
6. Shingu-Vazquez M., Traven A. Mitochondria and fungal pathogenesis: drug tolerance, virulence, and potential for antifungal therapy. Eukaryot. Cell 2011, 10:1376-1383.
7. Finkel J.S., Mitchell A.P. Genetic control of Candida albicans biofilm development. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9:109-118.
8. Singh B., et al. Human pathogens utilize host extracellular matrix proteins laminin and collagen for adhesion and invasion of the host. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36:1122-1180.
9. Darouiche R.O. Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350:1422-1429.
10. Falagas M.E., et al. Mesh-related infections after pelvic organ prolapse repair surgery. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2007, 134:147-156.
11. Zetrenne E., et al. Prosthetic vascular graft infection: a multi-center review of surgical management. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2007, 80:113-121.
12. Geipel U. Pathogenic organisms in hip joint infections. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2009, 6:234-240.
13. Pye A.D., et al. A review of dental implants and infection. J. Hosp. Infect. 2009, 72:104-110.
14. Baddour L.M., et al. Infections of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367:842-849.
15. Ciorba A., et al. Postoperative complications in cochlear implants: a retrospective analysis of 438 consecutive cases. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2012, 269:1599-1603.
16. Nandakumar V., et al. Characteristics of bacterial biofilm associated with implant material in clinical practice. Polym. J. 2013, 45:137-152.
17. Edmiston C.E., et al. Microbiology of explanted suture segments from infected and noninfected surgical patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51:417-421.
18. Muench P.J. Infections versus penile implants: the war on bugs. J. Urol. 2013, 189:1631-1637.
19. Scott R.D. The Direct Medical Costs of Healthcare-associated Infections in U.S. Hospitals and the Benefits of Prevention 2009, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
20. Senaratne W., et al. Self-assembled monolayers and polymer brushes in biotechnology: Current applications and future perspectives. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6:2427-2448.
21. Raynor J.E., et al. Polymer brushes and self-assembled monolayers: versatile platforms to control cell adhesion to biomaterials (Review). Biointerphases 2009, 4:FA3-FA16.
22. Hucknall A., et al. In pursuit of zero: polymer brushes that resist the adsorption of proteins. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21:2441-2446.
23. Epstein A.K., et al. Liquid-infused structured surfaces with exceptional anti-biofouling performance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:13182-13187.
24. Kingshott P., et al. Effects of cloud-point grafting, chain length, and density of PEG layers on competitive adsorption of ocular proteins. Biomaterials 2002, 23:2043-2056.
25. Yu Q., et al. Anti-fouling bioactive surfaces. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7:1550-1557.
26. Li W., et al. Fouling control in a submerged membrane-bioreactor by the membrane surface modification. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115:2302-2309.
27. McArthur S.L., et al. Effect of polysaccharide structure on protein adsorption. Colloid. Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2000, 17:37-48.
28. Feng W., et al. Methacrylate polymer layers bearing poly(ethylene oxide) and phosphorylcholine side chains as non-fouling surfaces: in vitro interactions with plasma proteins and platelets. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7:3692-3699.
29. Smith R.S., et al. Vascular catheters with a nonleaching poly-sulfobetaine surface modification reduce thrombus formation and microbial attachment. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4:153ra132.
30. Rodriguez-Emmenegger C., et al. Polymer brushes showing non-fouling in blood plasma challenge the currently accepted design of protein resistant surfaces. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2011, 32:952-957.
31. Thissen H., et al. Clinical observations of biofouling on PEO coated silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Biomaterials 2010, 31:5510-5519.
32. Groll J., et al. Biofunctionalized, ultrathin coatings of cross-linked star-shaped poly(ethylene oxide) allow reversible folding of immobilized proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126:4234-4239.
33. Ameringer T., et al. Polymer coatings that display specific biological signals while preventing nonspecific interactions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2012, 100A:370-379.
34. Meyers S.R., Grinstaff M.W. Biocompatible and bioactive surface modifications for prolonged in vivo efficacy. Chem. Rev. 2011, 112:1615-1632.
35. Zhang L., et al. Zwitterionic hydrogels implanted in mice resist the foreign-body reaction. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31:553-556.
36. Worthington R.J., et al. Small molecule control of bacterial biofilms. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10:7457-7474.
37. Kaplan J.B. Biofilm dispersal: mechanisms, clinical implications, and potential therapeutic uses. J. Dent. Res. 2010, 89:205-218.
38. Bazaka K., et al. Efficient surface modification of biomaterial to prevent biofilm formation and the attachment of microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 95:299-311.
39. Green J-B.D., et al. A review of immobilized antimicrobial agents and methods for testing. Biointerphases 2011, 6:MR13-MR28.
40. Pasupuleti M., et al. Antimicrobial peptides: key components of the innate immune system. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2012, 32:143-171.
41. Bechinger B., Salnikov E.S. The membrane interactions of antimicrobial peptides revealed by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2012, 165:282-301.
42. Melo M.N., et al. Antimicrobial peptides: linking partition, activity and high membrane-bound concentrations. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7:245-250.
43. Afacan N.J., et al. Therapeutic potential of host defense peptides in antibiotic-resistant infections. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2012, 18:807-819.
44. Gee M.L., et al. Imaging the action of antimicrobial peptides on living bacterial cells. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3:1557.
45. Anaya-López J.L., et al. Bacterial resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 39:180-195.
46. Perez Espitia P.J., et al. Bioactive peptides: synthesis, properties, and applications in the packaging and preservation of food. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2012, 11:187-204.
47. Costa F., et al. Covalent immobilization of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) onto biomaterial surfaces. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7:1431-1440.
48. Onaizi S.A., Leong S.S.J. Tethering antimicrobial peptides: Current status and potential challenges. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29:67-74.
49. Zou P., et al. It takes walls and knights to defend a castle - synthesis of surface coatings from antimicrobial and antibiofouling polymers. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22:19579-19589.
50. Hasan J., et al. Antibacterial surfaces: the quest for a new generation of biomaterials. Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31:295-304.
51. Graham M.V., et al. Development of antifouling surfaces to reduce bacterial attachment. Soft Matter 2013, 9:6235-6244.
52. Joo H-S., Otto M. Molecular basis of in vivo biofilm formation by bacterial pathogens. Chem. Biol. 2012, 19:1503-1513.
53. Gabriel M., et al. Preparation of LL-37-grafted titanium surfaces with bactericidal activity. Bioconjug. Chem. 2006, 17:548-550.
54. 2 surface: tests of antifouling and antibacterial activities. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116:13839-13847.
55. Glinel K., et al. Antibacterial and antifouling polymer brushes incorporating antimicrobial peptide. Bioconjug. Chem. 2009, 20:71-77.
56. Laloyaux X., et al. Temperature-responsive polymer brushes switching from bactericidal to cell-repellent. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22:5024-5028.
57. Blin T., et al. Bactericidal microparticles decorated by an antimicrobial peptide for the easy disinfection of sensitive aqueous solutions. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:1259-1264.
58. Gao G., et al. The biocompatibility and biofilm resistance of implant coatings based on hydrophilic polymer brushes conjugated with antimicrobial peptides. Biomaterials 2011, 32:3899-3909.
59. Hilpert K., et al. High-throughput generation of small antibacterial peptides with improved activity. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23:1008-1012.
60. Hilpert K., et al. Screening and characterization of surface-tethered cationic peptides for antimicrobial activity. Chem. Biol. 2009, 16:58-69.
61. Gao G., et al. Antibacterial surfaces based on polymer brushes: investigation on the influence of brush properties on antimicrobial peptide immobilization and antimicrobial activity. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:3715-3727.
62. Lim K., et al. Immobilization studies of an engineered arginine-tryptophan rich peptide on a silicone surface with antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5:6412-6422.
63. Gribova V., et al. Polyelectrolyte multilayer assemblies on materials surfaces: from cell adhesion to tissue engineering. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24:854-869.
64. Caruso F. Nanoengineering of particle surfaces. Adv. Mater. 2001, 13:11-22.
65. Wang Q., et al. Self-assembled poly(ethylene glycol)-co-acrylic acid microgels to inhibit bacterial colonization of synthetic surfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4:2498-2506.
66. Vreuls C., et al. Biomolecules in multilayer film for antimicrobial and easy-cleaning stainless steel surface applications. Biofouling 2010, 26:645-656.
67. Gristina A. Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science 1987, 237:1588-1595.
68. Storz-Pfennig P., et al. Trials are needed before new devices are used in routine practice in Europe. Br. Med. J. 2013, 346:f1646.
69. Peters G., et al. Adherence and growth of coagulase-negative staphylococci on surfaces of intravenous catheters. J. Infect. Dis. 1982, 146:479-482.
70. Donlan R.M. Biofilm formation: a clinically relevant microbiological process. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 33:1387-1392.
71. von Eiff C., et al. Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulasenegative staphylococci. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2002, 2:677-685.
72. Peters G. Pathogenesis of S. epidermidis foreign body infections. Br. J. Clin. Pract. Suppl. 1988, 57:62-65.
73. Gottenbos B., et al. Pathogenesis and prevention of biomaterial centered infections. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2002, 13:717-722.
74. Herrmann M., et al. Fibronectin, fibrinogen, and laminin act as mediators of adherence of clinical staphylococcal isolates to foreign material. J. Infect. Dis. 1988, 158:693-701.
75. Espersen F., et al. Attachment of staphylococci to silicone catheters in vitro. APMIS 1990, 98:471-478.
76. Otto M. Staphylococcus epidermidis - the 'accidental' pathogen. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7:555-567.
77. Sauer K., et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184:1140-1154.
78. Tormo M.Á., et al. SarA is an assential positive regulator of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm development. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187:2348-2356.
79. Xu L., et al. Role of the luxS quorum-sensing system in biofilm formation and virulence of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74:488-496.
80. Tao J-H., et al. Depression of biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance by sarA disruption in Staphylococcus epidermidis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 12:4009-4013.
81. Goller C.C., Romeo T. Environmental influences on biofilm development. Bacterial Biofilms 2008, 37-66. Springer. T. Romeo (Ed.).
82. B in persistence of Staphylococcus epidermidis foreign body infection. Microbiology 2008, 154:2827-2836.
83. Rupp C.J., et al. Viscoelasticity of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in response to fluid shear allows resistance to detachment and facilitates rolling migration. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71:2175-2178.
84. Otto M. Staphylococcal biofilms. Bacterial Biofilms 2008, 207-228. Springer. T. Romeo (Ed.).
85. Lee J-H., et al. Microfluidic devices for studying growth and detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Biomed. Microdevices 2008, 10:489-498.
86. Stoodley P., et al. Molecular and imaging techniques for bacterial biofilms in joint arthroplasty infections. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005, 437:31-40.
87. Bester E., et al. Planktonic-cell yield of a pseudomonad biofilm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71:7792-7798.