Meiotic Cohesin SMC1β Provides Prophase I Centromeric Cohesion and Is Required for Multiple Synapsis-Associated Functions

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 9, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Biswas, Uddipta ^a   Wetzker, Cornelia ^a   Lange, Julian ^b   Christodoulou, Eleni G ^a   Seifert, Michael ^a   Beyer, Andreas ^a,c   Jessberger, Rolf ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR REGENERATIVE THERAPIES DRESDEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; COHESIN; PROTEIN GAMMA H2AX; PROTEIN SMC1 ALPHA; PROTEIN SMC1 BETA; SPO11 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOSOME; CELL ADHESION; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; DOWN REGULATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LOCATION; GENE SILENCING; MALE; MEIOTIC PROPHASE I; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SEX LINKAGE; SISTER CHROMATID; SISTER CHROMATID COHESION; SPERMATOCYTE; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX; TELOMERE; UPREGULATION;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; ENDODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; MALE; MEIOSIS; MEIOTIC PROPHASE I; MICE; SPERMATOCYTES; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX; TELOMERE;

EID: 84892763549     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003985     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Kleckner N, (2006) Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma 115: 175-194.
2. Costa Y, Cooke H, (2007) Dissecting the mammalian synaptonemal complex using targeted mutations. Chromosome Research 15: 579.
3. Handel MA, Schimenti JC, (2010) Genetics of mammalian meiosis: regulation, dynamics and impact on fertility. Nat Rev Genet 11: 124-136.
4. Lichten M, de Massy B, (2011) The impressionistic landscape of meiotic recombination. Cell 147: 267-270.
5. Youds JL, Boulton SJ, (2011) The choice in meiosis- defining the factors that influence crossover or non-crossover formation. J Cell Sci 124: 501-513.
6. Sasaki M, Lange J, Keeney S, (2010) Genome destabilization by homologous recombination in the germ line. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 182-195.
7. Keeney S, (2008) Spo11 and the Formation of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Meiosis. Genome Dyn Stab 2: 81-123.
8. Yanowitz J, (2010) Meiosis: making a break for it. Curr Opin Cell Biol 22: 744-751.
9. Burgoyne PS, Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM, (2009) The consequences of asynapsis for mammalian meiosis. Nat Rev Genet 10: 207-216.
10. Fukuda T, Daniel K, Wojtasz L, Toth A, Hoog C, (2010) A novel mammalian HORMA domain-containing protein, HORMAD1, preferentially associates with unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes. Exp Cell Res 316: 158-171.
11. Wojtasz L, Daniel K, Roig I, Bolcun-Filas E, Xu H, et al. (2009) Mouse HORMAD1 and HORMAD2, two conserved meiotic chromosomal proteins, are depleted from synapsed chromosome axes with the help of TRIP13 AAA-ATPase. PLoS Genet 5: e1000702.
12. Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD, (2000) The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol Cell 6: 975-987.
13. Baudat F, Manova K, Yuen JP, Jasin M, Keeney S, (2000) Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol Cell 6: 989-998.
14. Ellis N, Goodfellow PN, (1989) The mammalian pseudoautosomal region. Trends Genet 5: 406-410.
15. Perry J, Palmer S, Gabriel A, Ashworth A, (2001) A short pseudoautosomal region in laboratory mice. Genome Res 11: 1826-1832.
16. Anderson LK, Reeves A, Webb LM, Ashley T, (1999) Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics 151: 1569-1579.
17. Kauppi L, Barchi M, Baudat F, Romanienko PJ, Keeney S, et al. (2011) Distinct properties of the XY pseudoautosomal region crucial for male meiosis. Science 331: 916-920.
18. Inagaki A, Schoenmakers S, Baarends WM, (2010) DNA double strand break repair, chromosome synapsis and transcriptional silencing in meiosis. Epigenetics 5: 255-266.
19. Yan W, McCarrey JR, (2009) Sex chromosome inactivation in the male. Epigenetics 4: 452-456.
20. Handel MA, (2004) The XY body: a specialized meiotic chromatin domain. Exp Cell Res 296: 57-63.
21. Fernandez-Capetillo O, Mahadevaiah SK, Celeste A, Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD, et al. (2003) H2AX is required for chromatin remodeling and inactivation of sex chromosomes in male mouse meiosis. Dev Cell 4: 497-508.
22. Page J, de la Fuente R, Manterola M, Parra MT, Viera A, et al. (2012) Inactivation or non-reactivation: what accounts better for the silence of sex chromosomes during mammalian male meiosis? Chromosoma 121: 307-326.
23. Turner JM, Mahadevaiah SK, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Nussenzweig A, Xu X, et al. (2005) Silencing of unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes in the mouse. Nat Genet 37: 41-47.
24. Mahadevaiah SK, Bourc'his D, de Rooij DG, Bestor TH, Turner JM, et al. (2008) Extensive meiotic asynapsis in mice antagonises meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and consequently disrupts meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. J Cell Biol 182: 263-276.
25. Turner JM, (2007) Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Development 134: 1823-1831.
26. Royo H, Polikiewicz G, Mahadevaiah SK, Prosser H, Mitchell M, et al. (2010) Evidence that meiotic sex chromosome inactivation is essential for male fertility. Curr Biol 20: 2117-2123.
27. Nasmyth K, Haering CH, (2009) Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet 43: 525-558.
28. Shintomi K, Hirano T, (2010) Sister chromatid resolution: a cohesin releasing network and beyond. Chromosoma 119: 459-467.
29. Onn I, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Guacci V, Unal E, Koshland DE, (2008) Sister chromatid cohesion: a simple concept with a complex reality. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 24: 105-129.
30. Wood AJ, Severson AF, Meyer BJ, (2010) Condensin and cohesin complexity: the expanding repertoire of functions. Nat Rev Genet 11: 391-404.
31. Nasmyth K, (2011) Cohesin: a catenase with separate entry and exit gates? Nat Cell Biol 13: 1170-1177.
32. Haering CH, Jessberger R, (2012) Cohesin in determining chromosome architecture. Exp Cell Res 318: 1386-1393.
33. Uhlmann F, (2011) Cohesin subunit Rad21L, the new kid on the block has new ideas. EMBO Rep 12: 183-184.
34. Jessberger R, (2011) Cohesin complexes get more complex: the novel kleisin RAD21L. Cell Cycle 10: 2053-2054.
35. Revenkova E, Eijpe M, Heyting C, Gross B, Jessberger R, (2001) Novel meiosis-specific isoform of mammalian SMC1. Mol Cell Biol 21: 6984-6998.
36. Revenkova E, Eijpe M, Heyting C, Hodges CA, Hunt PA, et al. (2004) Cohesin SMC1 beta is required for meiotic chromosome dynamics, sister chromatid cohesion and DNA recombination. Nat Cell Biol 6: 555-562.
37. Hodges CA, Revenkova E, Jessberger R, Hassold TJ, Hunt PA, (2005) SMC1beta-deficient female mice provide evidence that cohesins are a missing link in age-related nondisjunction. Nat Genet 37: 1351-1355.
38. Strom L, Sjogren C, (2007) Chromosome segregation and double-strand break repair- a complex connection. Curr Opin Cell Biol 19: 344-349.
39. Watrin E, Peters JM, (2006) Cohesin and DNA damage repair. Exp Cell Res 312: 2687-2693.
40. Feeney KM, Wasson CW, Parish JL, (2010) Cohesin: a regulator of genome integrity and gene expression. Biochem J 428: 147-161.
41. Cortes-Ledesma F, de Piccoli G, Haber JE, Aragon L, Aguilera A, (2007) SMC proteins, new players in the maintenance of genomic stability. Cell Cycle 6: 914-918.
42. Wendt KS, Peters JM, (2009) How cohesin and CTCF cooperate in regulating gene expression. Chromosome Res 17: 201-214.
43. Merkenschlager M, (2010) Cohesin: a global player in chromosome biology with local ties to gene regulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 20: 555-561.
44. Dorsett D, (2011) Cohesin: genomic insights into controlling gene transcription and development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 21: 199-206.
45. Bose T, Gerton JL, (2010) Cohesinopathies, gene expression, and chromatin organization. J Cell Biol 189: 201-210.
46. Adelfalk C, Janschek J, Revenkova E, Blei C, Liebe B, et al. (2009) Cohesin SMC1beta protects telomeres in meiocytes. J Cell Biol 187: 185-199.
47. Scherthan H, Jerratsch M, Li B, Smith S, Hulten M, et al. (2000) Mammalian meiotic telomeres: protein composition and redistribution in relation to nuclear pores. Mol Biol Cell 11: 4189-4203.
48. Peters AH, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P, (1997) A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chromosome Res 5: 66-68.
49. Lee J, Hirano T, (2011) RAD21L, a novel cohesin subunit implicated in linking homologous chromosomes in mammalian meiosis. J Cell Biol 192: 263-276.
50. Eijpe M, Heyting C, Gross B, Jessberger R, (2000) Association of mammalian SMC1 and SMC3 proteins with meiotic chromosomes and synaptonemal complexes. J Cell Sci 113 (Pt 4):: 673-682.
51. Takada Y, Naruse C, Costa Y, Shirakawa T, Tachibana M, et al. (2011) HP1gamma links histone methylation marks to meiotic synapsis in mice. Development 138: 4207-4217.
52. Baumann C, Daly CM, McDonnell SM, Viveiros MM, De La Fuente R, (2011) Chromatin configuration and epigenetic landscape at the sex chromosome bivalent during equine spermatogenesis. Chromosoma 120: 227-244.
53. Lange J, Pan J, Cole F, Thelen MP, Jasin M, et al. (2011) ATM controls meiotic double-strand-break formation. Nature 479: 237-240.
54. Rozen S, Skaletsky H, (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 132: 365-386.
55. Wilcoxon F, (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin 1: 80-83.
56. Seifert M, Strickert M, Schliep A, Grosse I, (2011) Exploiting prior knowledge and gene distances in the analysis of tumor expression profiles with extended Hidden Markov Models. Bioinformatics 27: 1645-1652.
57. Novak I, Wang H, Revenkova E, Jessberger R, Scherthan H, et al. (2008) Cohesin Smc1beta determines meiotic chromatin axis loop organization. J Cell Biol 180: 83-90.
58. de Carvalho CE, Colaiacovo MP, (2006) SUMO-mediated regulation of synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis. Genes Dev 20: 1986-1992.
59. Rogers RS, Inselman A, Handel MA, Matunis MJ, (2004) SUMO modified proteins localize to the XY body of pachytene spermatocytes. Chromosoma 113: 233-243.
60. Vigodner M, Morris PL, (2005) Testicular expression of small ubiquitin-related modifier-1 (SUMO-1) supports multiple roles in spermatogenesis: silencing of sex chromosomes in spermatocytes, spermatid microtubule nucleation, and nuclear reshaping. Dev Biol 282: 480-492.
61. Fukuda T, Pratto F, Schimenti JC, Turner JM, Camerini-Otero RD, et al. (2012) Phosphorylation of Chromosome Core Components May Serve as Axis Marks for the Status of Chromosomal Events during Mammalian Meiosis. PLoS Genet 8: e1002485.
62. Yazdi PT, Wang Y, Zhao S, Patel N, Lee EY, et al. (2002) SMC1 is a downstream effector in the ATM/NBS1 branch of the human S-phase checkpoint. Genes Dev 16: 571-582.
63. Kim ST, Xu B, Kastan MB, (2002) Involvement of the cohesin protein, Smc1, in Atm-dependent and independent responses to DNA damage. Genes Dev 16: 560-570.
64. Liefshitz B, Kupiec M, (2011) Roles of RSC, Rad59, and cohesin in double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 31: 3921-3923.
65. Heidinger-Pauli JM, Unal E, Guacci V, Koshland D, (2008) The kleisin subunit of cohesin dictates damage-induced cohesion. Mol Cell 31: 47-56.
66. James RD, Schmiesing JA, Peters AH, Yokomori K, Disteche CM, (2002) Differential association of SMC1alpha and SMC3 proteins with meiotic chromosomes in wild-type and SPO11-deficient male mice. Chromosome Res 10: 549-560.
67. Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S, (2005) Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436: 1053-1057.
68. Bellani MA, Boateng KA, McLeod D, Camerini-Otero RD, (2010) The expression profile of the major mouse SPO11 isoforms indicates that SPO11beta introduces double strand breaks and suggests that SPO11alpha has an additional role in prophase in both spermatocytes and oocytes. Mol Cell Biol 30: 4391-4403.
69. Cole F, Kauppi L, Lange J, Roig I, Wang R, et al. (2012) Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis. Nat Cell Biol 14: 424-430.
70. Murdoch B, Owen N, Stevense M, Smith H, Nagaoka S, et al. (2013) Altered cohesin gene dosage affects Mammalian meiotic chromosome structure and behavior. PLoS Genet 9: e1003241.
71. Eijpe M, Offenberg H, Jessberger R, Revenkova E, Heyting C, (2003) Meiotic cohesin REC8 marks the axial elements of rat synaptonemal complexes before cohesins SMC1beta and SMC3. J Cell Biol 160: 657-670.
72. Toth A, Jessberger R, (2010) Male meiosis: Y keep it silenced? Curr Biol 20: R1022-1024.
73. Bellani MA, Romanienko PJ, Cairatti DA, Camerini-Otero RD, (2005) SPO11 is required for sex-body formation, and Spo11 heterozygosity rescues the prophase arrest of Atm-/- spermatocytes. J Cell Sci 118: 3233-3245.
74. Barchi M, Roig I, Di Giacomo M, de Rooij DG, Keeney S, et al. (2008) ATM promotes the obligate XY crossover and both crossover control and chromosome axis integrity on autosomes. PLoS Genet 4: e1000076.
75. Almstrup K, Nielsen JE, Hansen MA, Tanaka M, Skakkebaek NE, et al. (2004) Analysis of cell-type-specific gene expression during mouse spermatogenesis. Biol Reprod 70: 1751-1761.
76. Rossi P, Dolci S, Sette C, Capolunghi F, Pellegrini M, et al. (2004) Analysis of the gene expression profile of mouse male meiotic germ cells. Gene Expr Patterns 4: 267-281.
77. Chalmel F, Rolland AD, Niederhauser-Wiederkehr C, Chung SS, Demougin P, et al. (2007) The conserved transcriptome in human and rodent male gametogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 8346-8351.
78. Pang AL, Johnson W, Ravindranath N, Dym M, Rennert OM, et al. (2006) Expression profiling of purified male germ cells: stage-specific expression patterns related to meiosis and postmeiotic development. Physiol Genomics 24: 75-85.
79. Smirnova NA, Romanienko PJ, Khil PP, Camerini-Otero RD, (2006) Gene expression profiles of Spo11-/- mouse testes with spermatocytes arrested in meiotic prophase I. Reproduction 132: 67-77.
80. Bastos H, Lassalle B, Chicheportiche A, Riou L, Testart J, et al. (2005) Flow cytometric characterization of viable meiotic and postmeiotic cells by Hoechst 33342 in mouse spermatogenesis. Cytometry A 65: 40-49.