'It's about the smoke, not the smoker': Messages that motivate rural communities to support smoke-free policies

Health Education Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 58-71

  Kostygina, Ganna ^a   Hahn, Ellen J ^b   Rayens, Mary Kay ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PASSIVE SMOKING;

ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PASSIVE SMOKING; RISK FACTOR; RURAL POPULATION; SMOKING; SMOKING BAN; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL MARKETING; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; CULTURE; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; KENTUCKY; MALE; MASS MEDIA; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; RISK FACTORS; RURAL POPULATION; SMOKE-FREE POLICY; SMOKING; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL MARKETING; TOBACCO SMOKE POLLUTION;

EID: 84892699229     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyt087     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. ALA. Cutting Tobacco Rural Roots: Tobacco Use in Rural Communities. Disparities in Lung Health. New York, NY: American Lung Association, 2012.
2. USDHHS. How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 2010. xv, 704 p.
3. IOM(ed). Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Cardiovascular Effects: Making Sense of the Evidence. Overview of key studies of the effects of smoking bans on acute coronary events, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009, 125-162.
4. HamiltonWL,Biener L, BrennanRT.Do local tobacco regulations influence perceived smoking norms? Evidence from adult and youth surveys in Massachusetts. Health Educ Res 2008; 23: 709-22.
5. Alamar B, Glantz SA. Effect of increased social unacceptability of cigarette smoking on reduction in cigarette consumption. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 1359-63.
6. Chaloupka F, Hahn E, Emery S. Policy levers for the control of tobacco consumption. KY Law J 2002; 90: 1009-42.
7. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. The Toll of Tobacco in Kentucky. 2013. Available at: http://www.tobaccofreekids. org/facts-issues/toll-us/kentucky. Accessed: 3 August 2013.
8. Satterlund TD, Cassady D, Treiber J et al. Barriers to adopting and implementing local-level tobacco control policies. J Community Health 2011; 36: 616-23.
9. Cruz TB, Schuster D, Andreeva-Cook V. In: California Department of Public Health, California Tobacco Control Program (eds). The Evolution of Tobacco Industry-sponsored Adult-only Facilities in California: A Case Study AOFs at public events. Alhambra: University of Southern California, 2009, 16-20.
10. OtanezMG, Glantz SA. Trafficking in tobacco farm culture: tobacco companies use of video imagery to undermine health policy. Vis Anthropol Rev 2009; 25: 1-24.
11. USDHHS. Preventing TobaccoUse among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2012. xiv, 899 p.
12. CrawfordMA, Balch GI, Mermelstein R et al. Responses to tobacco control policies among youth. Tob Control 2002; 11: 14-9.
13. FTC. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2007 and 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Federal Trade Commission, 2011.
14. Kosir M, Gutierrez K. Lessons Learned Globally from Secondhand Smoke Mass Media Campaigns: Global Dialogue for Effective Stop Smoking Campaigns. MN: Global Dialogue for Effective Stop Smoking Campaigns, 2009.
15. Dillard JP, Shen LJ, Vail RG. Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Hum Commun Res 2007; 33: 467-88.
16. Quick BL, Bates B, Romina S. Examining antecedents of clean indoor air policy support: implications for campaigns promoting clean indoor air. Health Commun 2009; 24: 50-9.
17. Siahpush M, Wakefield M, Spittal M et al. Antismoking television advertising and socioeconomic variations in calls to Quitline. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007; 61: 298-301.
18. Worden JK, Flynn BS, Secker-Walker RH. Antismoking advertising campaigns for youth. JAMA 1998; 280: 323.
19. Witter L, Chen L. The She Spot:Why Women Are theMarket for Changing the World and How to Reach Them. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc., 2008.
20. Puntenney D, Grumm C, Katz-Kishawi E.Women's biggest contribution: a view of social change. In: Clift E (ed). Women, Philanthropy, and Social Change: Visions for A Just Society. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England, 2005, 139-157.
21. Park E, Scherer CW, Glynn CJ. Community involvement and risk perception at personal and societal levels. Health Risk Soc 2001; 3: 281-92.
22. Rayens MK, Hahn EJ, Langley RE et al. Public support for smoke-free laws in rural communities. Am J Prev Med 2008; 34: 519-22.
23. Rice RE, Atkin CK. Public Communication Campaigns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2001.
24. Biener L, Harris JE, Hamilton W. Impact of the Massachusetts tobacco control programme: population based trend analysis. Br Med J 2000; 321: 351-4.
25. FreimuthVS, Hammond SL, Edgar T et al. Reaching those at risk-a content-analytic study of aids PSAs. Commun Res 1990; 17: 775-91.
26. Goldman LK, Glantz SA. Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. JAMA 1998; 279: 772-7.
27. Beaudoin CE. Exploring antismoking ads: appeals, themes, and consequences. J Health Commun 2002; 7: 123-37.
28. Pechmann C, Reibling ET. Antismoking advertisements for youths: an independent evaluation of health, counter-industry, and industry approaches. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 906-13.
29. Goldman LK, Glantz SA. Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. JAMA 1998; 279: 772-7.
30. Biener L, Ji M, Gilpin EA et al. The impact of emotional tone, message, and broadcast parameters in youth anti-smoking advertisements. J Health Commun 2004; 9: 259-74.
31. Terry-McElrath Y, Wakefield M, Ruel E et al. The effect of antismoking advertisement executional characteristics on youth comprehension, appraisal, recall, and engagement. J Health Commun 2005; 10: 127-43.
32. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981; 211: 453-8.
33. Otsuka R,Watanabe H, Hirata K et al. Acute effects of passive smoking on the coronary circulation in healthy young adults. JAMA 2001; 286: 436-41.
34. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979; 47: 263-91.
35. Meyerowitz BE, Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987; 52: 500-10.
36. Stephenson MT, Witte K. Fear, threat, and perceptions of efficacy from frightening skin cancer messages. Public Health Rev 1998; 26: 147-74.
37. Rothman AJ, Bartels RD,Wlaschin J et al. The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: how theory can informpractice. J Commun 2006; 56: S202-20.
38. Ganzach Y, Karsahi N.Message framing and buying behavior- a field experiment. J Bus Res 1995; 32: 11-7.
39. Kanouse DE. Explaining negativity biases in evaluation and choice behavior-theory and research. Adv Consum Res 1984; 11: 703-8.
40. Rozin P, Royzman EB. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2001; 5: 296-320.
41. Leshner G, Cheng IH. The effects of frame, appeal, and outcome extremity of antismoking messages on cognitive processing. Health Commun 2009; 24: 219-27.
42. Biener L, Wakefield M, Shiner CM et al. How broadcast volume and emotional content affect youth recall of antitobacco advertising. Am J Prev Med 2008; 35: 14-9.
43. Hahn EJ, Rayens MK, York N. Readiness for smoke-free policy and overall strength of tobacco control in rural tobacco-growing communities. Health Promot Pract 2013; 14: 238-46.
44. York NL, Hahn EJ, Rayens MK et al. Community readiness for local smoke-free policy change. Am J Health Promot 2008; 23: 112-20.
45. Stillman FA, Hartman AM, Graubard BI et al. Evaluation of the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST): a report of outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 1681-91.
46. Ramirez AG, Velez LF, Chalela P et al. Tobacco control policy advocacy attitudes and self-efficacy among ethnically diverse high school students. Health Educ Behav 2006; 33: 502-14.
47. Lindlof TR, Taylor BC. Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
48. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 2000; 23: 334-40.
49. Slovic P. The risk game. J Hazard Mater 2001; 86: 17-24.
50. Eberhardt MS, Ingram DD, Makuc DM. Urban and Rural Health Chartbook. Health, United States. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2001.
51. Lam TH, Ho LM, Hedley AJ et al. Secondhand smoke and respiratory ill health in current smokers. Tob Control 2005; 14: 307-14.
52. Butler KM, Hedgecock S, Record RA et al. An evidencebased cessation strategy using rural smokers' experiences with tobacco. Nurs Clin North Am 2012; 47: 31-43.